Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:16:44.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - On the Philosophical and Scientific Relationship between Ernst Mach and William James

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

By
Alexander Klein
Edited by
John Preston
John Preston
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

Ernst Mach and William James were personal friends and intellectual allies. Might there have been an American pragmatist influence on Logical Positivism via James’s influence on Mach? I explore the relationship between these two friends, arguing that, if anything, Mach’s instrumentalism about science actually influenced James more than James’s pragmatism influenced Mach. What is more, empirical and not philosophical issues dominated their intellectual exchanges, and I examine the three topics about which they most frequently engaged one another: the role of the semicircular canals in the perception of bodily orientation, the question of whether there is a distinctive 'feeling of effort' (Innervationsgefühl), and the nature of visual spatial perception. The debate over the Innervationsgefühl is particularly interesting because James apparently convinced Mach to reverse his position on the matter. In short, we remember Mach as a master experimentalist and James as a philosophical populariser, so it is a surprise to learn that the main philosophical influence apparently flowed from Mach to James, while the main influence when it comes to matters of empirical interest actually flowed the other way.

Keywords

Ernst MachPragmatismLogical PositivismWilliam JamesInnervationsgefühlVolition
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Mach
Critical Essays
 , pp. 103 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikin, Scott F., and Talisse, Robert B. 2017. Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Nature of Philosophy Routledge.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2003. Ernst Mach’s World Elements: A Study in Natural Philosophy. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2004. ‘The Philosophical Roots of Ernst Mach’s Economy of Thought’, Synthese 139: 23–53.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2014. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, John T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life, and Influence. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, John T. and Hentschel, Klaus (eds.) 1985. Ernst Mach als Aussenseiter. W. Braumüller.Google Scholar
Brenner, Anastasios 2005. ‘Réconcilier les Sciences et les Lettres: Le Rôle de L’Histoire des Sciences selon Paul Tannery, Gaston Milhaud et Abel Rey’, Revue D’Histoire des Sciences 58: 433–454.Google Scholar
Chimisso, Cristina 2008. Writing the History of the Mind: Philosophy and Science in France, 1900 to 1960s. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert 1963/1981. ‘The Power of Positivistic Thinking: An Essay on the Quandaries of Transcendence’, in Cohen, R. S. (ed.), Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings, 1929–1974. D. Reidel, pp. 38–56.Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert 1969/1981. ‘The Wiener Kreis in America’, in Cohen, R. S. (ed.), Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings, 1929–1974. D. Reidel, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo 2017. ‘William James and the Vienna Circle’, in Pihlström, Sami, Stadler, Friedrich, and Weidtmann, Niels (eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism. Springer, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
Haller, Rudolf 1991. ‘The First Vienna Circle’, in Uebel, T. (ed.), Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle. Springer Netherlands, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary C. 2002. ‘Sense-Data and the Philosophy of Mind: Russell, James, and Mach’, Principia: Revista Internacional de Epistemologia 6: 203–230.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von 1856–1867/2005. Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols. Trans. James Powell Cooke Southall. Dover.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von 1867 Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physik. Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Henn, V. and Young, L. R. 1975. ‘Ernst Mach on the Vestibular Organ 100 Years Ago’, Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialties 37: 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, Erwin N. 1976. ‘Introductionʼ, in Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. Trans. Thomas J. McCormack from the 5th German edn. D. Reidel, 1926/1976, pp. xi–xxx.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald 1992. ‘Ernst Mach and the Fortunes of Positivism in America’, Isis 83: 27–60.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald 1993a. ‘From the Vienna Circle to Harvard Square: The Americanization of a European World Conception’, in Stadler, F. (ed.), Scientific Philosophy – Origins and Developments. Kluwer, pp. 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gerald 1993b. Science and Anti-Science. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1879. ‘The Sentiment of Rationality’, Mind 4: 317–346.Google Scholar
James, William 1880. ‘The Feeling of Effort’, Anniversary Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History (Boston, MA).Google Scholar
James, William 1882. ‘The Sense of Dizziness in Deaf–Mutes’, American Journal of Otology 4: 239–254.Google Scholar
James, William 1890/1981. ‘The Principles of Psychology’, in Burkhardt, F. H., Bowers, F., and Skrupskelis, I. K. (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1898. ‘Philosophical Conceptions and Practical Results’, The University Chronicle (University of California) 1: 287–310.Google Scholar
James, William 1904. ‘Does “Consciousness” Exist?’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 1: 477–491.Google Scholar
James, William 1907/1975. Pragmatism, in Bowers, F. and Skrupskelis, I. K. (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1912/1976. Essays in Radical Empiricism, in Bowers, F. and Skrupskelis, I. K. (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1983. Essays in Psychology, in Burkhardt, F. H., Bowers, F., and Skrupskelis, I. K. (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1987. Essays, Comments and Reviews. in F. H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, and I. K. Skrupskelis (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1988. Manuscript Lectures, in F. H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, and I. K. Skrupskelis (eds.), The Works of William James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1992–2004. The Correspondence of William James, 12 vols. Edited by Skrupskelis, I. K. and Berkeley, E. M.. University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Klein, Alexander 2007. The Rise of Empiricism: William James, Thomas Hill Green, and the Struggle over Psychology. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Klein, Alexander 2008. ‘Divide Et Impera! William James’s Pragmatist Tradition in the Philosophy of Science’, Philosophical Topics 36: 129–166.Google Scholar
Klein, Alexander 2016. ‘Was James Psychologistic?’, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4: 1–21.Google Scholar
Klein, Alexander 2018. ‘In Defense of Wishful Thinking: James, Quine, Emotions, and the Web of Belief’, in Baghramian, M. and Marchetti, S. (eds.), Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology before the Great Divide. Routledge, pp. 228–250.Google Scholar
Koch, Carl Henrik 1991. ‘The Correspondence of Ernst Mach with a Young Danish Philosopher’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 26: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1863. ‘Zur Theorie des Gehörorgansʼ, Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe 48: 283–300.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1865. ‘Untersuchungen über den Zeitsinn des Ohresʼ, Sitzungsberichte 51: 133–150.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1872. Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit. J.G. Calve’sche.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1872/1911. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Transl. by Jourdain, Philip E. B.. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1875/2001. Fundamentals of the Theory of Movement Perception. Transl. by Young, Laurence R., Henn, Volker, and Scherberger, Hansjörg. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1883. Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung: Historisch-kritisch dargestellt. F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1883/1893. The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development. Transl. by McCormack, Thomas J. from the 2nd (1888) edn. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1886. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1886/1897. Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations. Transl. by Williams, C. M. from the 1st edn. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1886/1914. The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. Transl. by Williams, C. M. and Waterlow, S.. From the 5th German edn. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1895. Popular Scientific Lectures. Transl. by McCormack, Thomas J. from the 1st (1896 [sic]) edn. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1926/1976. Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. Transl. by McCormack, Thomas J. from the 5th German edn. D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Menand, Louis 2001. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl J. 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl J. 2015. ‘James on Religious Experience’, presented at Conference on Issues in Modern Philosophy: God, New York University, 7 November 2015.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl J. 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Johannes 1837. Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen, 2 vols. Verlag von J. Hölscher.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1877. ‘The Fixation of Belief’, Popular Science Monthly 12: 1–15.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1878. ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’, Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton 1935. The Thought and Character of William James, 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami, Stadler, Friedrich, and Weidtmann, Niels (eds.) 2017. Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism. Springer.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 1997. ‘Toward a History of Scientific Philosophy’, Perspectives on Science 5: 418–451.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 2003. ‘Logical Empiricism, American Pragmatism, and the Fate of Scientific Philosophy in North America’, in Hardcastle, G. L. and Richardson, A. W. (eds.), Logical Empiricism in North America. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Scheerer, Eckart 1989. ‘On the Will: An Historical Perspective’, in Hershberger, W. A. (ed.), Volitional Action: Conation and Control. North-Holland, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 1992. ‘The “Verein Ernst Mach”: What Was It Really?’, in Blackmore, J. T. (ed.), Ernst Mach – A Deeper Look: Documents and New Perspectives. Kluwer, pp. 363–378.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 2015. The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism. Springer.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 2017. ‘Ernst Mach and Pragmatism – the Case of Mach’s Popular Scientific Lectures (1895)’, in Pihlström, Sami, Stadler, Friedrich, and Weidtmann, Niels (eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism. Springer, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Joachim 1966. ‘William James und Ernst Machʼ, Philosophia Naturalis 9: 298–310.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas 2014. ‘European Pragmatism? Further Thoughts on the German and Austrian Reception of American Pragmatism’, in Galavotti, M. C. et al. (eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, pp. 627–643.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas 2015. ‘American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years’, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, Thomas 2017. ‘American Pragmatism, Central-European Pragmatism and the First Vienna Circle’, in Pihlström, Sami, Stadler, Friedrich, and Weidtmann, Niels (eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism. Springer, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
Visser, Henk 2001. ‘Wittgenstein’s Machist Sources’, in Blackmore, J. T., Itagaki, R. and Tanaka, S. (eds.), Ernst Mach’s Vienna, 1895–1930, or, Phenomenalism as Philosophy of Science. Kluwer, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Carlton Berenda 1937. Mach’s Empirio-Pragmatism in Physical Science. Albee Press.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm Max 1863. Vorlesungen über die Menschen- und Tier-Seele, 2 vols. Leopold Voss.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×