Book contents
- Interpreting Adam Smith
- Interpreting Adam Smith
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations of Works by Adam Smith
- Introduction
- 1 Smith Scholarship
- 2 The Wealth of Nations as a Work of Social Science
- 3 Adam Smith’s “Industrial Organization” of Religion
- 4 Talking to My Butcher
- 5 What Did Adam Smith Mean? The Semantics of the Opening Key Principles in the Wealth of Nations
- 6 Adam Smith and Virtuous Business
- 7 Adam Smith and the Morality of Political Economy
- 8 A Moral Philosophy for Commercial Society?
- 9 Adam Smith, Sufficientarian
- 10 Narrowing the Scope of Resentment in Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments
- 11 Adam Smith
- 12 “Much Better Instructors”
- 13 Sophie de Grouchy as an Activist Interpreter of Adam Smith
- 14 Adam Smith and the Limits of Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2023
Edited by
Book contents
- Interpreting Adam Smith
- Interpreting Adam Smith
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations of Works by Adam Smith
- Introduction
- 1 Smith Scholarship
- 2 The Wealth of Nations as a Work of Social Science
- 3 Adam Smith’s “Industrial Organization” of Religion
- 4 Talking to My Butcher
- 5 What Did Adam Smith Mean? The Semantics of the Opening Key Principles in the Wealth of Nations
- 6 Adam Smith and Virtuous Business
- 7 Adam Smith and the Morality of Political Economy
- 8 A Moral Philosophy for Commercial Society?
- 9 Adam Smith, Sufficientarian
- 10 Narrowing the Scope of Resentment in Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments
- 11 Adam Smith
- 12 “Much Better Instructors”
- 13 Sophie de Grouchy as an Activist Interpreter of Adam Smith
- 14 Adam Smith and the Limits of Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpreting Adam SmithCritical Essays, pp. 245 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abramson, K. (2007) “Hume’s Distinction between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting,” Philosophy Compass, 2(5), pp. 680–698. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00096.x.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2006) “Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective,” American Political Science Review, 100(1), pp. 115–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062046.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Adair, D. (1957) “‘That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science’: David Hume, James Madison, and the Tenth Federalist,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 20(4), pp. 343–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3816276.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2016) “Adam Smith on Inequality,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 152–172.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2017) Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. M. (1988) “Mr. Smith and the Preachers: The Economics of Religion in the Wealth of Nations,” Journal of Political Economy, 96(5), pp. 1066–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1984) “Politics,” in Barnes, J. (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1986–2129.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. (2005) How Novels Think: The Limits of Individualism from 1719–1900. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F. and Loewenstein, G. (2005) “Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), pp. 131–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357897.Google Scholar
Aspromourgos, T. (2009) The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bachaumont, L. P. de P. de M. M. F. and Mouffle d’Angerville, B.-F.-J. (1788) Mémoires secrets pour servir à l’histoire de la République des Lettres en France, depuis MDCCLXII, ou Journal d’un observateur, contenant les analyses des pièces de théâtre qui ont paru durant cet intervalle, les relations des assemblée littéraires. London: John Adamson.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1853) The Physical and Metaphysical Works of Lord Bacon. Edited by Devey, J.. London: Bohn Library.Google Scholar
Badinter, E. (2010) “‘Esquisse d’un portrait’,” in Bernier, M. A. and Dawson, D. (eds.) Les Lettres sur la sympathie (1798) de Sophie de Grouchy, philosophie morale et réforme sociale. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
Barber, W. J. (1993) Breaking the Academic Mould: Economists and Higher Learning in the Nineteenth Century. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. and McCleary, R. M. (2003) “Religion and Economic Growth across Countries,” American Sociological Review, 68(5), pp. 760–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R. H. (2001) Prosperity & Violence: The Political Economy of Development. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Bator, P. G. (1996) “The Entrance of the Novel into the Scottish Universities,” in Crawford, R. (ed.) The Scottish Invention of English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and Willig, R. D. (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar
Baysinger, Barry, Ekelund, Robert B., Jr., and Tollison, Robert D.. 2008. “Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society,” in Hillman Congleton, Roger and Konrad Kai, Arye (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2. Applications: Rent Seeking in Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Becker, J. F. (1961) “Adam Smith’s Theory of Social Science,” Southern Economic Journal, 28(1), pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2014) “What Is Liberalism?,” Political Theory, 42(6), pp. 682–715. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591714535103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. (1948) Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by Harrison, W.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2015) “Sophie de Grouchy on the Cost of Domination in the Letters on Sympathy and Two Anonymous Articles in Le Republicain,” The Monist, 98(1), pp. 102–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onu011.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2019) “Revolution and Republicanism: Women Political Philosophers of Late Eighteenth-Century France and Why They Matter,” Australasian Philosophical Review, 3(4), pp. 351–370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2020.1840647.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. and Schliesser, E. (2019) “Introduction” in Berges, S. and Schliesser, E. (eds.) Letters on Sympathy: A Critical Engagement with Adam Smith’s the Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Berns, L. (1994) “Aristotle and Adam Smith on Justice: Cooperation between the Ancients and Moderns?” The Review of Metaphysics, 49(1), pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (1997) The Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2006) “Smith and Science,” in Haakonssen, Knud (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–135.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2013) The Idea of Commercial Society in the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2018a) “Adam Smith’s ‘Science of Human Nature,’” in Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 364–384.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2018b) “Smith and Science,” in Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 303–325.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2020a) “O Problema da Coesão na Sociedada Comercial,” Discurso: Revista da Filosofia, 50(1), pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (2020b) “Out of the Coffee House, or How Political Economy Pretended to Be a Science from Montchrétien to Steuart,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 37(1), pp. 10–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052520000023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T. and Persson, T. (2011) Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bittermann, H. J. (1940) “Adam Smith’s Empiricism and the Law of Nature,” Journal of Political Economy, 48(5), pp. 487–520. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/255612.Google Scholar
Biziou, M. (2013) “Traductions et retraductions françaises de la Théorie des sentiments moraux d’Adam Smith. L’insoutenable légèreté de (re)traduire,” Noesis, 21, pp. 229–263.Google Scholar
Blair, H. (2005) Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Edited by Halloran, S. M. and Ferreira-Buckley, L.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnet, J.-C. (2016) “Preface,” in Bonnet, J.-C. (ed.) Lettres sur la sympathie. Paris: Payot & Rivages, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
Boucoyannis, D. (2013) “The Equalizing Hand: Why Adam Smith Thought the Market Should Produce Wealth without Steep Inequality,” Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), pp. 1051–1070. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271300282X.Google Scholar
Bourne, E. G. (1894) “Alexander Hamilton and Adam Smith,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8(3), pp. 328–344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883458.Google Scholar
Bray, J. (2003) The Epistolary Novel: Representations of Consciousness. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bréban, L. and Delamotte, J. (2016) From One Form of Sympathy to Another: Sophie de Grouchy’s Translation of and Commentary on Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01435828 (accessed: July 28, 2022).Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (2006) “Sympathy and the impartial spectator,” in Haakonnsen, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–188.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. (2020) “Nonintrinsic Egalitarianism, from Hobbes to Rousseau,” Journal of Politics, 82(4), pp. 1406–1417. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/708502.Google Scholar
Brown, V. (2016) “The Impartial Spectator and Moral Judgment,” Econ Journal Watch, 13(2), pp. 232–248.Google Scholar
Buchan, J. (2016) “The Biography of Adam Smith,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1978) “The Justice of Natural Liberty,” in Glahe, F. R. (ed.) Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations: Bicentrnnial Essays 1776–1976. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1990) “The Domain of Constitutional Economics,” Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393031.Google Scholar
Buck, P. (1977) “Seventeenth-Century Political Arithmetic: Civil Strife and Vital Statistics,” Isis, 68(1), pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgin, A. (2012) The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Great Depression. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Business Roundtable (2019) Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2017) Fifteen Sermons and Other Writings on Ethics. Edited by McNaughton, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantillon, R. (2001) Essai sur la nature du Commerce en général. Edited by Couvreur, S.. Paris: Coppet.Google Scholar
Casal, P. (2007) “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics, 117(2), pp. 296–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/510692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, S. (2017) Character in the Age of Adam Smith. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, R. (2021) “Adam Smith, Allyn Young, Amartya Sen and the Role of the State,” History of Economics Review, 78(1), pp. 17–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2020.1863005.Google Scholar
Cheney, P. (2022) “István Hont, the Cosmopolitan Theory of Commercial Globalization, and Twenty-First-Century Capitalism,” Modern Intellectual History, 19(3), pp. 883–911. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S147924432100007X.Google Scholar
Cicero (1961) De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Edited by Rackham, H.. London: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Cicero (1988) De Re Publica and De Legibus. Edited by Keyes, C. W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero (1990) De Officiis. Edited by Miller, W.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. H. (2000) “Adam Smith, Stoicism and Religion in the 18th Century,” History of the Human Sciences, 13(4), pp. 49–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/09526950022120863.Google Scholar
Collini, S. (1991) Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de (1947) Oeuvres Complètes, 3 vols. Edited by le Roy, G.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Condorcet (1798a) “Avertissement,” in Condorcet, S. (ed.) Théorie des sentiments moraux […] [septième édition]. Paris: Buisson.Google Scholar
Condorcet (1798b) “Lettres sur la sympathie,” in Condorcet, S. (ed.) Théorie des sentiments moraux […] [septième édition]. Paris: Buisson.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (1786) Réflexions d’un citoyen non gradué sur un procès très connu. London [Brussels].Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (1787a) “‘Announcing marriage to Grouchy,’” [Letter] Held at: Státní oblastní archiv v Plzni. RAW, no. 1562, f. 17.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (1787b) “‘Letter to Malesherbes,’” [Letter] Held at: Bibliothèque de l’Institut. Ms 854, F. 419.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (1795) Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain. Paris: chez Agasse.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (1904) “‘Essai sur quelques changemens à faire dans les loix criminelles de France,’” in Cahen, L. (ed.) Condorcet et la Révolution française. Paris: Germer Baillière, pp. 549–559.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (no date a) “‘Rapport sur un concours (sur le meilleur livre de morale à l’usage des enfants),’” [Manuscript] Held at: Bibliothèque de l’Institut. Ms 884, F. 153–154.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. C. de (no date b) “‘Fragment d’une lettre sur l’opinion,’” [Manuscript] Held at: Bibliothèque de l’Institut. Ms 884, F. 150–153.Google Scholar
Condorcet O’Connor, E. (1893) “‘Note biographique sur Mme de Condorcet,’” in Condorcet: Sa Vie, Son Oeuvre (1743–1794). Paris: Librairies-Imprimeries réunies, pp. 369–371.Google Scholar
Condorcet O’Connor, E. (no date) “‘Note biographique,’” [Manuscript] Held at: Bibliothèque de l’Institut. Ms 848, F. 26.Google Scholar
Conkin, P. K. (1980) Prophets of Prosperity: America’s First Political Economist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Conn, S. (2018) “Business Schools Have No Business in the University,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 February.Google Scholar
D’Alembert, J. le R. (2011) Discours Préliminaire à l’Encyclopédie [1752]. Paris: Les Échoes de Maquis.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (1999) “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28(2), pp. 139–164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1999.00139.x.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2004) “Equal Dignity in Adam Smith,” The Adam Smith Review, 1, pp. 129–134.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2006) The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1991) “Is Sympathy so Surprising? Adam Smith and the French Fictions of Sympathy,” Eighteenth Century Life, 15, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Debes, R. (2016) “Adam Smith and the Sympathetic Imagination,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 192–207.Google Scholar
Debes, R. and Stueber, K (eds.) (2017) Ethical Sentimentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Degooyer, S. (2018) “‘The Eyes of Other People’: Adam Smith’s Triangular Sympathy and the Sentimental Novel,” ELH - English Literary History, 85(3), pp. 669–690. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2018.0024.Google Scholar
DeMartino, G. F. (2011) The Economist’s Oath: On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (1751) Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc. Paris.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. (1925) Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited by Hicks, R. D.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Douglass, R. (2017) “Morality and Sociability in Commercial Society: Smith, Rousseau-And Mandeville,” Review of Politics, 79(4), pp. 597–620. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670517000584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, R. (2018) “Theorising Commercial Society: Rousseau, Smith and Hont,” European Journal of Political Theory, 4(17)pp. 501–511. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118782390.Google Scholar
Dumouchel, D. (2010) “Une éducation sentimentale: sympathie et construction de la morale dans les Lettres sur la sympathie de Sophie de Grouchy,” in Bernier, M. A. and Dawson, D. (eds) Les Lettres sur la sympathie (1798) de Sophie de Grouchy, philosophie morale et réforme sociale. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
Duncan, I. (1998) “Adam Smith, Samuel Johnson and the Institutions of English,” in Crawford, R. (ed.) The Scottish Invention of English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Dupaty, C.-M.-J.-B.M. (1786a) Mémoire justificatif pour trois hommes condamnés à la roue. Paris: Philippe-Denys Pierres.Google Scholar
Dupaty, C.-M.-J.-B.M. (1786b) Moyens de droit pour Bradier, Simare, Lardoise, condamnés à la roue. Paris: Philippe-Denys Pierres.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2021) “Progress by Consent: Adam Smith as Development Economist,” Review of Austrian Economics, 34(2), pp. 179–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-019-00478-5.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B. Jr., et al. (1996) Sacred Trust: The Medieval Church as an Economic Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., Jr. and Hébert, R. F. (2007) A History of Economic Theory and Method, 5th edition. Long Grove: Waveland Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., Jr., Hébert, R. F. and Tollison, R. D. (2006) The Marketplace of Christianity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2004) “Two for One? Reciprocity in Seneca and Adam Smith,” Adam Smith Review, 6, pp. 152–171.Google Scholar
Endres, A. M. (1991) “Adam Smith’s Rhetoric of Economics,” Journal of Scottish Political Economy, 38(1), pp. 76–95.Google Scholar
Epictetus, (1989) The Discourses as Reported by Arrian, the Manual and Fragments. Edited by Oldfather, W. A.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evensky, J. (2005a) Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evensky, J. (2005b) “‘Chicago Smith‘ versus ‘Kirkaldy Smith,’” History of Political Economy, 37(2), pp. 197–203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-2-197.Google Scholar
Faccarello, G. and Steiner, P. (2002) “The Diffusion of the Work of Adam Smith in the French Language: An Outline History,” in Tribe, K. (ed.) A Critical Bibliography of Adam Smith. London: Pickering and Chatto, pp. 61–119.Google Scholar
Farrant, A. and Paganelli, M. P. (2016) “Romance or No Romance? Adam Smith and David Hume in James Buchanan’s ‘Politics without Romance,’” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 34A, pp. 357–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542016000034A013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, E. (2014) Liberalism: The Life of an Idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Festa, L. M. (2006) Sentimental Figures of Empire in Eighteenth-Century Britain and France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fiori, S. (2012) “Adam Smith on Method: Newtonianism, History, Institutions, and the ‘Invisible Hand,’” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34(3), pp. 411–435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837212000405.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (1999) A Third Concept of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2002) “Adam Smith’s Reception among the American Founders, 1776–1790,” William and Mary Quarterly, 59(4), pp. 897–924. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3491575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2004a) A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2004b) On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2013) “Adam Smith on Equality,” in Berry, C. J., Maria, P. P., and Smith, C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 485–501.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2016) “Adam Smith and the Left,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 478–493.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2019b) “The Impact on America,” in Broadie, A. and Smith, C. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–333.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. (1975) “Sceptical Whiggism, Commerce and Liberty,” in Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (eds) Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
Force, P. (2003) Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forget, E. L. (2001) “Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet’s Letters on Sympathy,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(3), pp. 319–337. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710120073609.Google Scholar
Forman-Barzilai, F. (2010) Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, K. (2019) In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1987) “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics, 98(1), pp. 21–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/292913.Google Scholar
Frecer, R. (2015) Stoicism in Practice: The Cosmopolitanism of Cicero and the Development of Roman Citizenship. Prague: Charles University in Prague.Google Scholar
Fricke, C. (2013) “Adam Smith: The Sympathetic Process and the Origin and Function of Conscience,” in Berry, C. J., Smith, C., and Paganelli, M. P. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1977). “The Invisible Hand”, in The Collected Works of Milton Friedman, Hoover Institution Archives. Available at http://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/objects/57602 (accessed: March 8, 2022).Google Scholar
Galiani, F. (1975a) “Della Moneta,” in Diaz, F. and Guerci, L. (eds) Opere di Ferdinando Galiani. Milan: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. (1975b) “Dialogues sur le commerce des bleds,” in Diaz, F. and Guerci, L. (eds) Opere di Ferdinando Galiani. Milan: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. and Hanley, R. P. (2015) “Adam Smith: History and Impartiality,” in Harris, J. and Garrett, A. (eds) Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–282.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. and Heydt, C. (2015) “Moral Philosophy: Practical and Speculative,” in Garrett, A. and Harris, J. (eds) Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–130.Google Scholar
Gill, M. B. (2014) “Moral Pluralism in Smith and His Contemporaries,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 269(3), pp. 275–306.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (2014) Words and Meanings. Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (2016) “It’s mine!’ Re-thinking the Conceptual Semantics of ‘Possession’ through NSM,” Language Sciences, 56, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (2019) “Cognitive Semantics, Linguistic Typology and Grammatical Polysemy: ‘Possession’ and the English Genitive,” Cognitive Semantics, 5(2), pp. 224–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00502003.Google Scholar
Gorski, P. (2003) The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R. R. and Tahmasebian, K. (2020) “Introduction: Translation and Activism in the Time of the Now,” in Gould, R. R. and Tahmasebian, K. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Activism. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Graham, Gordon. (2007) “The Ambition of Scottish Philosophy,” The Monist, 90, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
Greiner, R. (2010) “The Art of Knowing Your Own Nothingness,” ELH - English Literary History, 77(4), pp. 893–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, R. (2012) Sympathetic Realism in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (1991) “Rhetoric and Ethics: Adam Smith on Theorizing about the Moral Sentiments,” Philosophy and Rhetoric , 24(3), pp. 213–237.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (1999) Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (2010) “Smith and Rousseau in Dialogue: Sympathy, pitié, Spectatorship and Narrative,” The Adam Smith Review, 5, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (2018) Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith: A Philosophical Encounter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (2005) The Rights of War and Peace. Edited by Tuck, R.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grouchy, S. de (1792) “Sending Manuscript of Lettres,” [Letter] Held at: Bibliothèque de Genève. Ms Dumont 74, f. 174.Google Scholar
Guillois, A. (1894) Le salon de Madame Helvétius: Cabanis et les idéologues. Paris: Calmann Lévy.Google Scholar
Guillois, A. (1897) La marquise de Condorcet: sa famille, son salon, ses amis, 1764–1822. Paris: P. Ollendorff.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (1981) The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (1996) Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, L. M. (1957) Alexander Hamilton and the American Tradition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haeffele, S. and Storr, V. H. (2019) “Adam Smith and the Study of Ethics in a Commercial Society,” in White, M. D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–33.Google Scholar
Halikias, D. I. (2020) “Adam Smith on the Scottish Highlands and the Origins of Commercial Society,” History of Political Thought, 41(4), pp. 622–647.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander (1963). “Second Report on the Further Provision Necessary for Establishing Public Credit” in The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 7, September 1790–January 1791. Edited by Syrett, H. C.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 236–256.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2006) “From Geneva to Glasgow: Rousseau and Adam Smith on the Theater and Commercial Society,” Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture, 35, pp. 177–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/sec.2010.0051.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2008) “Commerce and Corruption: Rousseau’s Diagnosis and Adam Smith’s Cure,” European Journal of Political Theory, 7(2), pp. 137–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107086445.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2009) Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2014) “The Wisdom of the State: Adam Smith on China and Tartary,” American Political Science Review, 108(2), pp. 371–382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000057.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2018) “On the Place of Politics in Commercial Society,” in Paganelli, M. P., Rasmussen, D. C., and Smith, C. (eds) Adam Smith and Rousseau: Ethics, Politics, Economics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. P. (2021) “Review of Craig Smith, ‘Adam Smith,’” History of Political Economy, 53(4), pp. 793–795. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-9309009Google Scholar
Heath, E. (2013) “Adam Smith and Self-Interest,” in Berry, C. J., Paganelli, M. P., and Smith, C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–264.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2020) The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heckscher, Eli Filip. (1994). “Mercantilism as a conception of society,” in Mercantilism, vol. II: 5. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2011) “Higher and Lower Virtues in Commercial Society: Adam Smith and Motivation Crowding Out,” Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 10(4), pp. 370–395. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10386564.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2013) Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2014) “Adam Smith on Markets and Justice,” Philosophy Compass, 9(12), pp. 864–875. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12183.Google Scholar
Hetherington, N. S. (1983) “Isaac Newton’s Influence on Adam Smith’s Natural Laws in Economics,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(3), pp. 497–505.Google Scholar
Heydt, C. (2012) “‘A Delicate and an Accurate Pencil’: Adam Smith, Description, and Philosophy as Moral Pedagogy,” in Robison, W. L. and Suits, D. B. (eds) New Essays on Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Rochester: RIT Press, pp. 212–227.Google Scholar
Hill, L. (2001) “The Hidden Theology of Adam Smith,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8(1), pp. 1–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/713765225.Google Scholar
Hill, L. (2011) “Social Distance and the New Strangership in Adam Smith,” Adam Smith Review, 6, pp. 166–183.Google Scholar
Hill, L. (2017) “‘The Poor Man’s Son’ and the Corruption of Our Moral Sentiments: Commerce, Virtue and Happiness in Adam Smith,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 15(1), pp. 9–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2017.0149.Google Scholar
Hill, L. (2020) Adam Smith’s Pragmatic Liberalism, Adam Smith’s Pragmatic Liberalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hill, L. and Blazejak, E. (2021) Stoicism and the Western Political Tradition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hill, L. and McCarthy, P. (1999) “Hume, Smith and Ferguson: Friendship in Commercial Society,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2(4), pp. 33–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698239908403290.Google Scholar
Hill, M. and Montag, W. (2014) The Other Adam Smith. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1991) Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. (1973) The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. (1977) “Adam Smith and the Self-Interest Axiom,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 20(1), pp. 133–152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/466895.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2021) Recognition: A Chapter in the History of European Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2005) Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2015) Politics in Commercial Society. Edited by Sonenscher, M. and Kaposy, B.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (1983a) “Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nation,” in Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (eds) Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (eds) (1983b) Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Nidditch, P. and Selby-Bigge, L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1987) Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Edited by Miller, E. F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2001) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Beauchamp, T. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, J. (2005) “Pity, Sympathy and Self-Interest: Review of Pierre Force’s Self-Interest before Adam Smith,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12(4), pp. 713–721. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560500370409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, F. (1725) An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. London: J. Darby.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, L. R. (1990) “Religious Participation: A Human Capital Approach,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), pp. 297–314.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, L. R. (1991) “The Consequences of Religious Market Structure: Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion,” Rationality and Society, 3(2), pp. 156–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannacone, L. R. (1997) “Rational Choice: Framework for the Scientific Study of Religion,” in Young, L. A. (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment. New York: Routledge, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, L. R. and Bainbridge, W. S. (2009) “Economics of Religion,” in Hinnells, J. (ed.) Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, 2nd Edition. Florence: Routledge, pp. 475–489.Google Scholar
Ince, O. U. (2021) “Adam Smith, Settler Colonialism, and Limits of Liberal Anti-imperialism,” Journal of Politics, 83(3), pp. 1080–1096. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/711321.Google Scholar
Innes, J. (2009) Inferior Politics: Social Problems and Social Policies in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1961) "Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Mann Randolph, Jr., 30 May 1790," in Boyd, J. P. (ed.) The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 16, 30 November 1789–4 July 1790. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 448–450.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, F. (1844) Contributions to the Edinburgh Review, 3 vols. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2000) “The Rambler no. 4 [‘The New Realistic Novel’],” in Greene, D. (ed.) The Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–9.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. (2014) Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2017) Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830–1914: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jubb, R. (2015) “The Real Value of Equality,” Journal of Politics, 77(3), pp. 679–691. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/681262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kames, H. H. L. (2005) Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion. Edited by Haakonssen, K.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. L. (1976) Bread, Politics and Political Economy in the Reign of Louis XV. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. (2006) “Rousseau’s ‘peut-etre’: Reflections on the Status of the State of Nature,” Modern Intellectual History, 3(1), pp. 75–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244305000697.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (2013) “Adam Smith and The Limits of Sympathy,” in Berry, C. J., Paganelli, M. P and Smith, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–218.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (2008) Adam Smith: A Moral Philosopher and His Political Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klein, D. (1985) “Deductive Economic Methodology in the French Enlightenment: Condillac and Destutt de Tracy,” History of Political Economy, 17(1), pp. 51–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-1-51.Google Scholar
Klein, D. and Humphries, A. G. (2019) “Foreword and Supplement to ‘Adam Smith’s Library: General Checklist and Index,” Econ Journal Watch, 16(2), pp. 374–474.Google Scholar
Klein, D. B. (2018) “Dissing The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Twenty-Six Critics, from 1765 to 1949,” Econ Journal Watch, 15(2), pp. 201–254.Google Scholar
Kopajtic, L. (2020) “Smith’s Sentimentalist Conception of Self-Command,” Adam Smith Review, 12, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Kopajtic, L. (2022) “Learning to Read: A Problem for Adam Smith and a Solution from Jane Austen,” in Hagberg, G. (ed.) Philosophical Reflection in Fictional Worlds. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. (1974) “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” The American Economic Review, 64(3), pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Lai, C.-C. (2000) Adam Smith across Nations: Translations and Receptions of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Larrère, C. (1992) “L’Arithémetiques des physiocrates,” Histoire et Mesure, 7(1–2), pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Larrère, C. (2002) “Adam Smith et Jean-Jacques Rousseau: sympathie et pitié,” Kairos: revue de la Faculté de philosophie de l’Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 20, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Leddy, N. (2009) “Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy in the Context of Eighteenth Century French Fiction,” Adam Smith Review, 4, pp. 158–180.Google Scholar
Levy, J. T. (2015) Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, R. J. (1973) The Social Philosophy of Adam Smith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2021) “Relational Sufficientarianism and Frankfurt’s Objections to Equality,” Journal of Ethics, 25(1), pp. 81–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09344-0.Google Scholar
List, G. F. (1827) Outlines of American Political Economy. Philadelphia: Samuel Parker.Google Scholar
Liu, G. M. (2018) “‘The Apostle of Free Trade:’ Adam Smith and the Nineteenth-Century American Trade Debates,” History of European Ideas, 44(2), pp. 210–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2018.1429709.Google Scholar
Liu, G. M. (2020) “Rethinking the Chicago Smith Problem: Adam Smith and the Chicago School, 1929–1980,” Modern Intellectual History, 4(17), pp. 1041–1068. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S147924431900009X.Google Scholar
Liu, G. M. (2022) Adam Smith’s America: How A Scottish Philosopher Became an Icon of American Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2008) “The Concept of the Cosmopolitan in Greek & Roman Thought,” Daedalus, 137(3), pp. 50–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.3.50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, D. (2012) “Adam Smith on Vanity, Domination, and History,” Modern Intellectual History, 2(9)pp. 275–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244312000042.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. S. (1998) The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K. (2019) “Did British Sociology Begin with the Scottish Enlightenment?” in Panayatova, P. (ed.) The History of Sociology in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–69.Google Scholar
Machovec, F. (2012) “Adam Smith: Early Public-Choice Theorist,” Journal of Political Economy, 120(4), p. 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/668966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, H. (1987) The Man of Feeling. Edited by Vickers, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James (1979). “Import Tonnage and Duties, 9 April 1789,” in Rachal, M. E., Rutland, R. A. and Sisson, J. K. (eds) The Papers of James Madison, vol. 12. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. (1994). Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. (1988) The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits, in two volumes. Edited by Kaye, F. B.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Manent, P. and Seigel, J. E. (1996) An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Translated by R. Balinski. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus Aurelius (1987) The Meditations. Edited by Haines, C. R.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marivaux, P. (1965) The Virtuous Orphan, or, The Life of Marianne, Countess of *****: An Eighteenth-Century English Translation by Mrs. Mary Mitchell Collyer of Marivaux’s La vie de Marianne. Edited by McBurney, W. H. and Shugrue, M. F.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. (1986) The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1927) “Achille du Chastellet et le premier mouvement républicain en France d’après les lettres inédites (1791–1792),” La Révolution française, 80, pp. 104–132.Google Scholar
Maurer, C. (2016) “Stoicism and the Scottish Enlightenment,” in Sellars, J. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. New York: Routledge, pp. 254–269.Google Scholar
Maurer, C. (2019) Self-Love, Egoism and the Selfish Hypothesis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, C. (2018) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maza, S. (1993) Private Lives and Public Affairs: the causes célèbres of prerevolutionary France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McBurney, W. H. and Shugrue, M. F. (1965) “Introduction,” in McBurney, W. H. and Shugrue, M. F. (eds) The Virtuous Orphan, or, The Life of Marianne, Countess of *****: An Eighteenth-Century English Translation by Mrs. Mary Mitchell Collyer of Marivaux’s La vie de Marianne. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. xi–xliv.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (1998) “The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: A Comment on Zerbe and Medema,” in Medeman, S. G. (ed.) Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 239–248.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (2016) “Adam Smith Did Humanomics: So Should We,” Eastern Economic Journal, 42(4), pp. 503–513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-016-0007-8.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. and DeMartino, G. F. (eds) (2016) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCrudden, K. (2021) Fraternité, Liberté, Égalité: Sophie de Grouchy, Moral Republicanism, and the History of Liberalism, 1785–1815. PhD Dissertation. Yale University.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. (1889) Preface to Adam Smith Wealth of Nations [1828]. Edinburgh: A & C. Black.Google Scholar
McHugh, J. (2021) Adam Smith’s ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’ A Critical Commentary. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McLean, I. (2006) Adam Smith, Radical and Egalitarian: An Interpretation for the 21st Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. (2010) “Adam Smith and the Chicago School,” in Emmet, R. B. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
Mercier de la Rivière (1910) L’ordre natural et essentiel des sociétés politiques. Edited by Depitre, E.. Paris: Librairie Paul Guethner.Google Scholar
Mercure Français (1798) “Announcement of publication of Lettres sur la sympathie,” Mercure Français, p. 38.Google Scholar
Minowitz, P. (1993) Profits, Priests and Princes: Adam Smith’s Emancipation of Economics from Politics and Religion. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, (1769) “Suite de la Seizième Lettre de M. B.A M***,” in Éphémérides du Citoyen. Paris.Google Scholar
Mizuta, H. (1976) “Towards a Definition of the Scottish Enlightenment,” Studies in Voltaire, 154, pp. 1459–1464.Google Scholar
Mizuta, H. and Sugiyama, C. (1993) Adam Smith: International Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Montes, L. (2003) “Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), pp. 63–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000058325.Google Scholar
Montes, L. (2004) Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Montes, L. (2013) “Newtonianism and Adam Smith,” in Berry, C. J., Paganelli, M. P., and Smith, C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–53.Google Scholar
Mullan, J. (1988) Sentiment and Sensibility: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, J. (1996a) “Feelings and Novels,” in Porter, R. (ed.) Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Middle Ages to the Present. London: Routledge, pp. 119–131.Google Scholar
Mullan, J. (1996b) “Sentimental Novels,” in Richetti, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–254.Google Scholar
Muller, J. Z. (1993) Adam Smith in His Time and Ours. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Musonius, Rufus C. (2011) Musonius Rufus, Lectures and Sayings. Edited by King, C. and Irvine, W. B.. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.Google Scholar
Muthu, S. (2008) “Adam Smith’s Critique of International Trading Companies: Theorizing ‘Globalization’ in the Age of Enlightenment,” Political Theory, 36(2), pp. 185–212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707312430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neem, J. N. (2019) “Abolish the Business Major! Anti-Intellectual Degree Programs Have No Business in Colleges,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 August.Google Scholar
North American Review (1823). “Review: Considerations sur l’Industrie et la Législation sous le Rapport de leur Influence sur la Richesse des Etats, et Examen Critique des Principaux Ouvrages, Qui ont para sur l’Economie Politique by Louis Say”, 17(41), pp. 424–436.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1992) Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance. Economic Inquiry, 25(3), pp. 419–428. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1987.tb00750.x (accessed: February 8, 2022).Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. and Weingast, B. R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2019) The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, M. J. L. (1944) Origins of Academic Economics in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second Printing with a New Preface and Appendix. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oncken, A. (1897) “The Consistency of Adam Smith,” The Economic Journal, 7(27), pp. 443–450. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2957137.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M. (2008) “What Should Egalitarians Believe?,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36(2), pp. 119–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00130.x.Google Scholar
Oprea, A. (2022) “Adam Smith on Political Judgment: Revisiting the Political Theory of the Wealth of Nations,” Journal of Politics, 84(1), pp. 18–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/715249.Google Scholar
Otteson, J. R. (2016) “Adam Smith and the Right,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 494–511.Google Scholar
Pack, S. J. (1991) Capitalism as a Moral System: Adam Smith’s Critique of the Free Market Economy. Aldershott: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2008) “The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in the Wealth of Nations and the Theory of Moral Sentiments,” History of Political Economy, 40(2), pp. 365–382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2008-006.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2010) “The Moralizing Role of Distance in Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments as Possible Praise of Commerce,” History of Political Economy, 42(3), pp. 425–441. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2010-019.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2017) “240 Years of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations,” Nova Economia, 27(2), pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2020) The Routledge Guidebook to Smith’s Wealth of Nations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2021) “Adam Smith and Dying Peacefully,” in Dolgoy, E. A., Hurd Hale, K., and Peabody, B. (eds) Political Theory on Death and Dying. London: Routledge, pp. 292–298.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. and Schumacher, R. (2019) “Do Not Take Peace for Granted: Adam Smith’s Warning on the Relation between Commerce and War,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(3), pp. 785–797. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey040.Google Scholar
Paganelli, M. P., Smith, C. and Rasmussen, D. C. (2018) “Introduction,” in Paganelli, M. P., Smith, C., and Rasmussen, D. C. (eds) Adam Smith and Rousseau: Ethics, Politics, Economics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Palen, M. W. (2016) The “Conspiracy” of Free Trade: The Anglo-American Struggle over Empire and Economic Globalisation, 1846–1896. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peart, S. and Levy, D. (2005) The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics. Ann Arbour: Michigan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, J.-C. (1992) Une Histoire Intellectuelle de l’Économie Politique. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Social.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1899) Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, 2 Vols. Edited by Hull, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillipson, N. (1983) “Adam Smith as Civic Moralist,” in Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (eds) Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
Pignol, C. and Walraevens, B. (2017) “Smith and Rousseau on Envy in Commercial Societies,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24(6), pp. 1214–1246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2017.1378693.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. (2005). A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, (1992) The Republic. Edited by Reeve, C. D. C. and Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1983) “Cambridge Paradigms and Scotch Philosophers,” in Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (eds) Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1985) Virtue, Commerce, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, B. and Zwolinski, M. (2012) “The Ethical and Economic Case against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment,” Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4)pp. 449–472. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1058-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnay, F. (1764) Philosophie rurale ou économie générale et politique de l’agriculture, 3 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. (1767b) “Lettre de M. Alpha,” in Éphémérides du Citoyen, 1st edition. Paris.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1973) “Hume and Adam Smith on Justice and Utility,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 73(1), pp. 87–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.87.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (2007) The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (1976) “Introduction,” in Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (eds) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Rashid, S. (1982) “Adam Smith’s Rise to Fame: A Reexamination of the Evidence,” The Eighteenth Century, 23(1), pp. 64–85.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. C. (2006) “Does ‘Bettering Our Condition’ Really Make Us Better Off? Adam Smith on Progress and Happiness,” American Political Science Review, 100(3), pp. 309–318. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062204.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. C. (2008) The Problems and Promise of Commercial Society. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. C. (2016) “Adam Smith on What Is Wrong with Economic Inequality,” American Political Science Review, 110(2), pp. 342–352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recktenwald, H. C. (1978) “An Adam Smith Renaissance anno 1976? The Bicentenary Output: A Reappraisal of His Scholarship,” Journal of Economic Literature, 16(1), pp. 56–83.Google Scholar
Redman, D. A. (1993a) “Adam Smith and Isaac Newton,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 40(2), pp. 210–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1993.tb00651.x.Google Scholar
Redman, D. A. (1993b) The Rise of Political Economy as Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. (1985) Clarissa, or The History of a Young Lady. Edited by Ross, A.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. (2011) Pamela: Or, Virtue Rewarded. Edited by Rivero, A. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2005) The Case for The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roederer, P.-L. (1798) “Des Lettres de la Citoyenne Condorcet sur la Sympathie,” Journal de Paris.Google Scholar
Roederer, P.-L. (1859) “Cours d’organisation sociale,” in Roederer, A.-M. (ed.) Oeuvres du Comte Pierre Louis Roederer. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères, pp. 129–304.Google Scholar
Rose, D. C. (2011) The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. (2019) The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, I. S. (2010) The Life of Adam Smith, Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (1992) “Adam Smith and Conservative Economics,” The Economic History Review, 45(1), pp. 74–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1992.tb01292.x.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (2002) Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1992) Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse), Polemics, and Political Economy. Edited by Masters, R. D. and Kelly, C.. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997) The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Edited by Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. (2012) The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saad, M. (2015) “Sentiment, Sensation and Sensibility: Adam Smith, Pierre Jean Georges Cabanis and Wilhelm von Humboldt,” History of European Ideas, 41(2), pp. 205–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.921474.Google Scholar
Sagar, P. (2018a) “Smith and Rousseau, after Hume and Mandeville,” Political Theory, 46(1), pp. 29–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716656459.Google Scholar
Sagar, P. (2018b) The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sagar, P. (2021a) “Adam Smith and the Conspiracy of the Merchants,” Global Intellectual History, 6(4), pp. 463–483.Google Scholar
Sagar, P. (2021b) “On the Liberty of the English: Adam Smith’s Reply to Montesquieu and Hume,” Political Theory, 50(3), pp. 381–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917211039763.Google Scholar
Sagar, P. (2022) Adam Smith Reconsidered: History, Liberty and the Foundations of Modern Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schabas, M. and Wennerlind, C. (2020) A Philosopher’s Economist: David Hume and the Rise of Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2006) “Adam Smith’s Benevolent and Self-Interested Conception of Philosophy,” in Montes, L. and Schliesser, E. (eds) New Voices on Adam Smith. London: Routledge, pp. 328–357.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2017) Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2019) “Sophie de Grouchy, Adam Smith, and the Politics of Sympathy,” in O’Neill, E. and Lascano, M. P. (eds) Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2021) “Adam Smith on Political Leadership,” in Mills, R. J. W. and Smith, C. (eds) The Scottish Enlightenment: Human Nature, Social Theory and Moral Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Christopher J. Berry. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, E. and Bergé, S. (2019) Sophie de Grouchy’s Letters on Sympathy: A Critical Engagement with Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. (2021) Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schwarze, M. (2020) Recognizing Resentment: Sympathy, Injustice and Liberal Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarze, M. A. and Scott, J. T. (2015) “Spontaneous Disorder in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments: Resentment, Injustice, and the Appeal to Providence,” Journal of Politics, 77(2), pp. 463–476. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/679750.Google Scholar
Schwarze, M. A. and Scott, J. T. (2019) “Mutual Sympathy and the Moral Economy: Adam Smith Reviews Rousseau,” Journal of Politics, 81(1), pp. 66–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/700003.Google Scholar
Scurr, R. (2009) “Inequality and Political Stability from Ancien Régime to Revolution: The Reception of Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments in France,” History of European Ideas, 35(2), pp. 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastiani, S. (2013) The Scottish Enlightenment; Race, Gender, and the Limits of Progress. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1986) “Adam Smith’s Prudence,” in Lall, S. and Stewart, F. (eds) Theory and Reality in Development. London: Macmillan, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2013) “The Contemporary Relevance of Adam Smith,” in Berry, C. J., Paganelli, M. P., and Smith, C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 581–592.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2016) “Adam Smith and Economic Development,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
Seneca, (1917) Epistles, in Three Volumes. Edited by Gummere, R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, (2003) Moral Essays, in Three Volumes. Edited by Basore, J. W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seth, C. (2010) “Un double service rendu à la postérité: la Théorie des sentiments moraux par Adam Smith, suivie des Lettres sur la sympathie,” in Bernier, M. A. and Dawson, D. (eds) Les ‘Lettres sur la sympathie’ (1798) de Sophie de Grouchy, marquise de Condorcet. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 127–137.Google Scholar
Sher, R. B. (1985) Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, R. B. (1990) “‘Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century,’” in Stewart, M. A. (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–126.Google Scholar
Sher, R. B. (2010) The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland, and America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, L. (2020) “Sufficientarianism,” Philosophy Compass, 15(11), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12704.Google Scholar
Silver, A. (1997) “‘Two Different Sorts of Commerce’: Friendship and Strangership in Civil Society,” in Kumar, K. and Weintraub, J. (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–74.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. F. (1975) “Adam Smith: An Economic Interpretation of History,” in Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (eds) Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 154–178.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. F. (1996) A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slack, P. (2015) The Invention of Improvement: Information and Material Progress in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, A. K. (2011) Citoyennes: Women and the Ideal of Citizenship in Eighteenth-Century France. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1983) The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith: Volume IV – Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres [LRBL]. Edited by Bryce, J. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (2013a) “Adam Smith and the New Right,” in Berry, C. J., Paganelli, M. P., and Smith, C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 539–558.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2013b) “Adam Smith: Left or Right?,” Political Studies, 61(4), pp. 784–798. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00985.x.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2015) “Adam Smith: Moral Judgment versus Moral Theory,” in Sison, A. G., Beabout, G. R., and Ferrero, I. (eds) The Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 143–150.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2018) “Adam Smith on Philosophy and Religion,” Ruch Filozoficzny, 73(3), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2022) “Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson and the Reconceptualization of Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland,” History of Political Economy, 54(5), pp. 921–934.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. and Wilson, B. J. (2019) Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Somos, M. (2011) “‘A Price Would Be Set Not Only upon Our Friendship, but upon Our Neutrality’: Alexander Hamilton’s Political Economy and Early American State-Building,” Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, 10, pp. 184–211.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. (2007) Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. (2015) “Sociability, Perfectibility and the Intellectual Legacy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” History of European Ideas, 41(5), pp. 683–698. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.987563.Google Scholar
Spacks, P. M. (2006) Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, A. and Davis, M. (eds) (2001) Conflict of Interest in the Professions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W. S. (1989) A Theory of Religion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. (2005) An End to Poverty?: A Historical Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, P. (1998) La ‘Science Nouvelle’ de l’Économie Politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sterne, L. (2009) The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. Edited by Ross, I. C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1975) “Smith’s Travels on the Ship of State,” in Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (eds) Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 232–248.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1976) “The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith,” Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), pp. 1199–1213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/260508.Google Scholar
Stimson, S. C. (2015) “The General Will after Rousseau: Smith and Rousseau on Sociability and Inequality,” in Farr, J. and Lay Williams, D. (eds) The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 350–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegos, S. (2013) “Sympathie morale et tragédie sociale: Sophie de Grouchy lectrice d’Adam Smith,” Noesis, 21, pp. 265–292.Google Scholar
Tegos, S. (2014) “Friendship in Commercial Society Revisited,” in Hardwick, David F. and Marsh, L. (eds) Propriety and Prosperity: New Studies on the Philosophy of Adam Smith. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
Teichgraeber, R. F. (1987) “‘Less Abused Than I Had Reason to Expect’: The Reception of the Wealth of Nations in Britain, 1776–90,” The Historical Journal, 30(2), pp. 337–366. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00021476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, H. (ed.) (1953) Newton’s Philosophy of Nature: Selections from His Writing. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Thomson, H. F. (1965) “Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79(2), pp. 212–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1880627.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. (1995) Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, K. (2008) “‘Das Adam Smith Problem‘ and the Origins of Modern Smith Scholarship,” History of European Ideas, 34(4), pp. 514–525. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2008.02.001.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. (2021) “The ‘System of Natural Liberty’: Natural Order in the Wealth of Nations,” History of European Ideas, 47(4), pp. 573–583. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2020.1793516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, G. (1967) “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft,” Economic Inquiry, 5(3), pp. 224–232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01923.x.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1975) “The Transitional Gains Trap,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 6(2), pp. 671–678. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3003249.Google Scholar
Valihora, K. (2016) “Adam Smith’s Narrative Line,” in Hanley, R. P. (ed.) Adam Smith: His Life, Thought, and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 405–421.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1993) “Liberal Rights: Two Sides of the Coin,” in Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2008) “Basic Equality,” SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1311816.Google Scholar
Waszek, N. (1984) “Two Concepts of Morality: A Distinction of Adam Smith’s Ethics and Its Stoic Origin,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 45(4), pp. 591–606. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709375.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. (2002) “Economics as Theology: Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations,” Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), pp. 907–921. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1061499.Google Scholar
Watt, I. (1957) The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (2017) “Adam Smith’s Theory of Violence and the Political Economics of Development,” in Wallis, J. J. and Lamoreaux, N. (eds) Organizations, Civil Society, and the Roots of Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (2022) “Adam Smith’s Theory of the Persistence of Slavery and Its Abolition in Western Europe. Stanford. Available at: www.researchgate.net/publication/315450839_Adam_Smith%27s_Theory_of_the_Persistence_of_Slavery_and_its_Abolition_in_Western_Europe (accessed: August 2, 2022).Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. R. (2013) Adam Smith’s Pluralism: Rationality, Education, and the Moral Sentiments. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1991) Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, E. G. (1990) Adam Smith and Modern Economics: From Market Behavior to Public Choice. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Whatmore, R. (2002) “Adam Smith’s Role in the French Revolution,” Past & Present, 175(1), pp. 65–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/past/175.1.65.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1992) Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996) Semantic Primes and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, J. B. (2002) “The Rise of Adam Smith: Articles and Citations, 1970–1997,” History of Political Economy, 34(1), pp. 55–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-1-55.Google Scholar
Williams, O. F. (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Business in Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Willis, K. (1979) “The Role in Parliament of the Economic Ideas of Adam Smith, 1776–1800,” History of Political Economy, 11(4), pp. 505–544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-11-4-505.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. (2015) “Humankind in Civilization’s Extended Order: A Tragedy, The First Part,” Supreme Court Economic Review, 23(1), pp. 35–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/686471.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. (2020) The Property Species: Mine, Yours, and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, D. (1978) Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. (1992) “Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist,” The Historical Journal, 35(1), pp. 91–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00025620.Google Scholar
Winch, D. (1996) Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wooton, D. (2018) Power, Pleasure, and Profit: Insatiable Appetites from Machiavelli to Madison. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1999) “Combination and Monopoly,” in Mehrling, P. M. and Sandilands, R. (eds) Money and Growth: Selected Papers of Allyn Abbott Young. London: Routledge, pp. 244–251.Google Scholar
Young, J. T. and Gordon, B. (1996) “Distributive Justice as a Normative Criterion in Adam Smith’s Political Economy,” History of Political Economy, 28(1), pp. 1–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182 702-28-1-1.Google Scholar