Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
4 - Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
By
Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter is a text-based study of the enactment of interpersonal meaning in Mandarin, with particular focus on the MOOD system and structure, part of interpersonal grammar that is involved in the realisation of the discourse-semantic system of NEGOTIATION. The data considered is taken from the genres of criminal case courtroom discourse, realised interpersonally by a tenor of unequal social status and lack of reciprocity of linguistic choices among the speakers. The study adopts an axis-oriented trinocular perspective, foregrounding paradigmatic relations as the fundamental principle of linguistic organisation and reasoning about system-structure relations from above, round about and below. The analysis shows that MOOD in Mandarin is not only responsible for negotiating knowledge and action exchanges between moves in dialogue, but also closely interacts with MODALITY and POLARITY systems that are associated with the subsystem ENGAGEMENT of the discourse semantic system APPRAISAL. Therefore a complementary description of Mandarin MOOD is presented with a perspective oriented toward both NEGOTIATION and ENGAGEMENT.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpersonal GrammarSystemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description, pp. 96 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Berry, M. (1981). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 120–45.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ding, L. (1999). 从问句系统看“是不是”问句 [Cong wenju xitong kan ‘shi bu shi’ wenju, A Study of ‘Shi Bu Shi’ Questions from the Perspective of Question System]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 6, 415–20.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic-Functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R. P., Halliday, M. A. K., Lamb, S. M. and Makkai, A., eds., Language as Social Semiotic. Vol I. of The Semiotics of Language and Culture. London: Pinter, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). Systemic Grammar and the Concept of a ‘Science of Language’. Waiguoyu (Journal of Foreign Languages), 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). On Grammar and Grammatics. In Hasan, R., Cloran, C. and Butt, D., eds., Functional Descriptions: Language Form and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday‘s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Chinese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 305–96.Google Scholar
Hu, Y. (2011). 现代汉语 [Xiandai Hanyu, Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, B. (1984). 陈述句，疑问句，祈使句，感叹句 [Chenshu Ju, Yiwen Ju, Qishi Ju, Gantan Ju, Declaratives, Interrogatives, Imperatives, Exclamatives]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Huang, B. & Liao, X. (2002). 现代汉语 [Xiandai Hanyu, Modern Chinese] II. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Li, E. S. (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese: A Text-based Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2002). Meaning Beyond the Clause: SFL Perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 52–74.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Tagalog. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2014). Evolving Systemic Functional Linguistics: Beyond the Clause. Functional Linguistics, 1 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2015). Meaning beyond the Clause: Co-Textual Relations. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11 (2–3), 203–35.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018). Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Quiroz, B. (2020). Functional Language Typology: A Discourse Semantic Perspective. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 189–237.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London/Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. (2016). Rites of Passion: Remorse, Apology and Forgiveness in Youth Justice Conferencing. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 12 (2–3),101–21.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Descriptive Motifs and Generalisations. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 537–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K. & Wu, C. (2008). Multilingual Studies as Multi-Dimensional Space of Interconnected Language Studies. In Webster, J., ed., Meaning in Context: Implementing Intelligent Applications. London/New York: Continuum, pp. 146–220.Google Scholar
McDonald, E. (1998). Clause and Verbal Group Systems in Chinese: A Text-based Functional Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2008). Towards a Systemic Profile of the Spanish mood. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(1), 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meaning: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, E. & Teich, E. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of German. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–84.Google Scholar
Tao, L. (1998). “是不是”问句说略 [‘Shi bu shi’ wenju shuolue, A Brief Account of ‘Shi Bu Shi’ Questions]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 105–7.Google Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T. H., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U. H., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of mood: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional View. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: Functional Perspective, vol. II. London: Equinox, pp. 859–920.Google Scholar
Thai, M. D. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Vietnamese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 397–431.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 73–101.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (circa 1936). A Linguistic Consideration of Thinking in Primitive Communities. In Whorf, B. L. (1956), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. (Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B. ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1937). Grammatical Categories. In Whorf, B. L. (1956), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. (Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B. ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B.. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. (1997). 疑问句功能琐议 [Yiwenju gongneng suoyi, Trivial Comments on the Functions of Questions]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 104–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D. (2009). 汉语语气系统的特点 [Hanyu yuqi xitong de tedian, Some Characteristics of Chinese mood System]. 外国语文 [Waiguo Yuwen, Foreign Language and Literature], 25 (5), 1–7.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. (1982). 语法讲义 [Yufa Jiangyi, Lectures on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by