Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
7 - Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
Book contents
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Interpersonal Grammar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages
- 2 Interpersonal Grammar in Spanish
- 3 Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian
- 4 Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin
- 5 Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems
- 6 Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara
- 7 Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese
- 8 Interpersonal Grammar in British Sign Language
- 9 Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, we take paradigmatic reasoning as point of departure and describe axial relations for interpersonal clause systems in Brazilian Portuguese. We reason axially about MOOD types first in relation to discourse-semantic systems and then by agnating clause structures. Our description is text-based and privileges the view from above as it investigates how exchanges are enacted in language through the discourse-semantic systems of NEGOTIATION, SPEECH FUNCTION and ENGAGEMENT – which in turn are realised by MOOD and ASSESSMENT in the grammar. A corpus based on a range of text types forms the basis of the study. The core of interpersonal grammar comprises the functions of Predicator, Finite and Subject realising MOOD – responsible for dialogic interaction and negotiation. Positioner is the function realising ASSESSMENT – the grammatical system responsible for assessing the roles of speaker and listener, thus managing their voices in the negotiation of moves.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpersonal GrammarSystemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description, pp. 191 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagliari, L. C. (1981). Elementos de Fonética do Português Brasileiro [Elements of Phonetics in Brazilian Portuguese]. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Institute of Language Studies. State University of Campinas.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. P. (1988). What Makes a ‘Good’ System Network Good? In Benson, J. D. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Systemic Perspectives on Discourse. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2011). Introdução ao Perfil Metafuncional do Português Brasileiro: Contribuições para os Estudos Multilíngues [Introduction to the Metafunctional Profile of Brazilian Portuguese: Contributions to Multilingual Studies]. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2014). Uma metodologia de perfilação gramatical sistêmica baseada em corpus [A Corpus-Based Methodolody for Systemic Grammar Profiling]. Letras & Letras, 30(2), 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2015). A Systemic Functional Description of Modal Particles in Brazilian Portuguese: The System of assessment. Alfa, 59(2), 275–302.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1965). Linguistics and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the Theory of Grammar, Word, 17(3),241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Text as a Semantic Choice in Social Contexts. In van Dijk, T. A. and Petöfi, J. S., eds., Grammars and Descriptions. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 176–225.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). The Construction of Knowledge and Value in the Grammar of Scientific Discourse, with Reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In Coulthard, M., ed., Advances in Written Text Analysis. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 136–56.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). On Grammar and Grammatics. In Webster, J., ed., (2002), On Grammar, Vol. 1, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum, pp. 384–417.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: a Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J. (2020). Analysing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018). Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 2–19.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2018). Interpersonal Grammar of Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 54–96.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Quiroz, B. (2020). Functional Language Typology:A Discourse Semantic Perspective. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 189–237.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2013). The Interpersonal and Experiential Grammar of Chilean Spanish: Towards a Principled Systemic-Functional Description Based on Axial Argumentation. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2015). La cláusula como movimiento interactivo: una perspectiva semántico-discursiva de la gramática interpersonal del español [The Clause as an Interactive Movement: A Discourse-Semantic Perspective to Spanish Interpersonal Grammar]. Documentação de Estudios em Linguística Teorica e Aplicada – DELTA, 31(1), 261–301. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-445023762456121953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meanings: Reasoning about MOOD. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17013.qui.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2005). Narrative and the Origins of Discourse: Construing Experience in Stories around the World. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (Series S19), 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Anderson, T., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C., Petersen, U., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of MOOD: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional view. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Vol. 2. London: Equinox, pp. 859–920.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 73–101.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2020). Axial Argumentation below the Clause: The Verbal Group in Khorchin Mongolian. In Martin, J.R., Doran, Y. J. and Figueredo, Giacomo, eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 35–72.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by