The Justification of Punishment in the International Context

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511642265.011

10 - The Justification of Punishment in the International Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2010

Deirdre Golash

Edited by

Larry May and

Zachary Hoskins

Show author details

Larry May: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Zachary Hoskins: Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Since the Nuremberg trials, the United Nations (UN) has taken steps to bring criminal violators of international law to trial in various forums. Special tribunals were established for the conflicts in former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the UN has also exerted pressure on national governments to try these violators, as in East Timor. In 1998, a permanent court, the International Criminal Court (ICC), was established by a treaty signed by 105 nations. The crimes that fall under the ICC's jurisdiction are genocide, crimes against humanity (specific acts such as torture performed in the context of systematic or widespread attacks on a civilian group), war crimes, and the crime of aggression. The ICC's jurisdiction is complementary; that is, it steps in only where the domestic government is unable or unwilling to prosecute. The court has so far opened investigations in Uganda, Congo, Darfur, and Central African Republic.

There are reasons for thinking that the justification for punishing offenders convicted by the ICC is especially strong. The crimes of which these offenders are convicted are in general qualitatively more serious than their domestic counterparts. Such crimes are vastly more serious than ordinary crimes; they directly affect many more individuals, and their effects on the communities in which they occur are far deeper and more lasting.

Just as we might think that the justification for punishing first-degree homicide is stronger than that for punishing shoplifting, we are likely to think that the justification for punishing mass homicide for purposes of ethnic cleansing is stronger than that for punishing garden variety homicide.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Criminal Law and Philosophy , pp. 201 - 223

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642265.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law (New York: NYU Press, 2005)

Bardgett, Suzanne, “Remembering Srebrenica,” 57(11) History Today (2007), 52Google Scholar

Burns, John F., “Standoff for Muslim Enclave in Bosnia,” The New York Times, April 23, 1993Google Scholar

Doder, Dusko and Branson, Louise, Milošević: Portrait of a Tyrant (New York: Free Press, 1999), 7–9Google Scholar

Moshman, David, “Theories of Self and Theories as Selves,” in Lightfoot, Cynthia, LaLonde, Christopher A., and Chandler, Michael J. (eds.), Changing Conceptions of Psychological Life (New York: Routledge, 2004), 183–206Google Scholar

Kuperman, Alan J., “Rwanda in Retrospect,” 79 Foreign Affairs (January, 2000), 94–118CrossRef Google Scholar

Hintjens, Helen M., “Explaining the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda,” 37(2) Journal of Modern African Studies (1999), 268CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alusala, Nelson, “The Arming of Rwanda and the Genocide,” 13(2) African Security Review (2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Magnarella, Paul J., “The Hutu-Tutsi Conflict in Rwanda,” Chapter 4, in Saha, Santosh C. (ed.), Perspectives on Contemporary Ethnic Conflict (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006)Google Scholar

Bhavnani, Ravi, “Ethnic Norms and Interethnic Violence: Accounting for Mass Participation in the Rwandan Genocide,” 43(6) Journal of Peace Research (2006), 651–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Ponte, Del, La Caccia: Io e i criminali di Guerra (Milan: Fetrinelli, 2008)Google Scholar

Haile, Dadimos, Rwanda's Experiment in People's Courts (Gacaca) and the Tragedy of Unexamined Humanitarianism (Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp: January 2008)Google Scholar

Tiemessen, Alana E., “After Arusha: Gacaca Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda,” 8(1) African Studies Quarterly (Fall 2004), 70Google Scholar

Mutibwa, Phares, Uganda Since Independence: A Story of Unfulfilled Hopes (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1992), 159Google Scholar

Kasaija, Philip Apuuli, “Taking Stock of the First Arrest Warrants of the International Criminal Court,” 7(1) African Journal of Conflict Resolution (2007), 43–61, 45–6Google Scholar

Pham, Phuong N., Vinck, Patrick and Stover, Eric, “The Lord's Resistance Army and Forced Conscription in Northern Uganda,” 20(2) Human Rights Quarterly, (May 2008), 404–11CrossRef Google Scholar

Branch, Adam, “Uganda's Civil War and the Politics of ICC Intervention,” 21(2) Ethics & International Affairs (2007), 188CrossRef Google Scholar

Ogwang, Joel, “Uganda: Kony Fears That Museveni Will Arrest Him,” New Vision (Kampala) (April 17, 2008)Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 32CrossRef Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (New York: Perennial Classics, 2004), 104–5Google Scholar

Waller, James, Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 181–2Google Scholar

Staub, Ervin, The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Kelman, Herbert and Hamilton, V. Lee, Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Zimbardo, Philip, “A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil,” in Miller, Arthur G., The Social Psychology of Good and Evil (New York: Guilford Press, 2004), 32Google Scholar

Kasaija, Philip Apuuli, “Taking Stock of the First Arrest Warrants of the International Criminal Court,” 7(1) African Journal of Conflict Resolution (2007), 43–61, 45–6Google Scholar

Peck, M. Scott, People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil (New York: Touchstone, 1983)Google Scholar

Darley, and Latané, , “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility,” 8(4) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1968), 379CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duffield, Mark, “Globalization, Transborder Trade, and War Economies,” in Berdal, Mats R. and Malone, David M. (eds.), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000)Google Scholar

O'Shaughnessy, Hugh, Pinochet: The Politics of Torture (New York: New York University Press, 2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Osiel, Mark, “Why Prosecute? Critics of Criminal Punishment for Mass Atrocity,” 118(22) Human Rights Quarterly (2000), 118–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Duff, R. A., Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

“A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment,” 18 American Philosophical Quarterly (1981), 263–71

Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophy of Right, Knox, T.M., trans. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), 66Google Scholar