Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword by HE Judge Sang-Hyun Song
- Foreword by Patricia O’Brien
- Foreword by Silvia A. Fernandez de Gurmendi
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: bridge over troubled waters?
- PART I General reflections
- PART II Origin and genesis of complementarity
- PART III Analytical dimensions of complementarity
- PART IV Interpretation and application
- PART IV (Continued) Interpretation and application
- PART V Complementarity in perspective
- PART VI Complementarity in practice
- 31 Making complementarity work: maximizing the limited role of the Prosecutor
- 32 Positive complementarity in action
- 33 Complementarity and the construction of national ability
- 34 The Colombian peace process (Law 975 of 2005) and the ICC’s principle of complementarity
- 35 Darfur: complementarity as the drafters intended?
- 36 Complementarity in Uganda: domestic diversity or international imposition?
- 37 Courts, conflict and complementarity in Uganda
- 38 Chasing cases: the ICC and the politics of state referral in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda
- 39 A problem, not a solution: complementarity in the Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo
- 40 Complementarity and the impact of the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court in Kenya
- Index
- References
33 - Complementarity and the construction of national ability
from PART VI - Complementarity in practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword by HE Judge Sang-Hyun Song
- Foreword by Patricia O’Brien
- Foreword by Silvia A. Fernandez de Gurmendi
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: bridge over troubled waters?
- PART I General reflections
- PART II Origin and genesis of complementarity
- PART III Analytical dimensions of complementarity
- PART IV Interpretation and application
- PART IV (Continued) Interpretation and application
- PART V Complementarity in perspective
- PART VI Complementarity in practice
- 31 Making complementarity work: maximizing the limited role of the Prosecutor
- 32 Positive complementarity in action
- 33 Complementarity and the construction of national ability
- 34 The Colombian peace process (Law 975 of 2005) and the ICC’s principle of complementarity
- 35 Darfur: complementarity as the drafters intended?
- 36 Complementarity in Uganda: domestic diversity or international imposition?
- 37 Courts, conflict and complementarity in Uganda
- 38 Chasing cases: the ICC and the politics of state referral in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda
- 39 A problem, not a solution: complementarity in the Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo
- 40 Complementarity and the impact of the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court in Kenya
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter considers the emphasis of the Rome Statute on the capacity of national institutions to investigate and prosecute international crimes, and its significance under the International Criminal Court (‘ICC's’) complementarity regime. In light of the importance placed on national ability under the Rome Statute, the chapter highlights difficulties national institutions may face in investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating core international crimes. The chapter goes on to introduce the Legal Tools platform which criminal justice institutions may draw on in the processing of international crimes. The ICC's Legal Tools, it concludes, make an effective infrastructure contribution to the construction of national ability and, by that, help states to fulfil their role under the ICC's complementarity regime.
Introduction
The ability of national institutions to seek justice for the commission of core international crimes is central to the regime created by the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’) that aims to put an end to impunity for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The institutional design of the ICC confirms that states have priority in the investigation and prosecution of international crimes. It is grounded in the idea that states will share the burden of establishing accountability for cases arising from the commission of mass atrocities. However, the complex nature of the process of criminal justice for atrocities, the resources and expertise required for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes and the relative incapacity of national justice institutions may prevent states from fulfilling the role they have pursuant to the Rome Statute.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Criminal Court and ComplementarityFrom Theory to Practice, pp. 1052 - 1070Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
- 3
- Cited by