Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:30:30.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Victimology

Services and Rights for Victims of Domestic and International Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Jan van Dijk
Affiliation:
University of Tilburg/Intervict, Netherlands
Jo-Anne Wemmers
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal, Canada
Mangai Natarajan
Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In modern times there was in Western countries almost no place for the victims of crime in criminal justice. The victim had become the forgotten third party of the criminal trial. Likewise criminologists exclusively focused their studies on offenders and largely ignored the role and problems of victims. The first publications on victims dealt with the role of victims in the causation of crimes. The focus of these studies was on the degree of guilt of the victims for the crime committed against them (e.g., provocative behavior). This early interest in the culpability of victims has later been critiqued as manifestations of “victim blaming.” The inclination to blame victims of serious crimes for their misfortune has itself been the subject of social psychological studies. Experiments by Lerner and others have revealed that victims of serious crimes often elicit negative responses from their environment because their situation poses an acute threat to the fundamental belief in a just world. By assuming that the victim bears some responsibility for his or her victimization through irresponsible behavior, others can reassure themselves that they have nothing to fear for themselves.

Around 1970 grassroots organizations discovered the needs of victims of domestic and sexual violence and began to provide services for them such as shelter homes and rape crisis centers. Around the same time some criminologists took up an interest in the situation of crime victims as a special research topic. Victimization surveys revealed not only that many victimizations were never reported to the police (the dark numbers of crime) but also that many reporting victims were dissatisfied with the way their cases were handled by the authorities. A sizeable minority of reporting victims even complained that they had been retraumatized by their treatment by the police and the criminal justice system (secondary victimization). Soon an international movement came into being, lobbying for improved services for victims and for the introduction of victims’ rights in criminal procedure (Walklate, 2007; Wemmers, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogaerts, S. (2010), Spiegelingen tussen Daders en Slachtoffers, inaugural lecture, INTERVICT, 23 January.
Erez, E. (2000). Integrating a Victim Perspective in Criminal Justice through Victim Impact Statements. In Crawford, A. & Goodey, J. (Eds.), Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 165–85.Google Scholar
Farrell, G. & Pease, K. (2001). Repeat Victimization. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 12. NY: Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., & Turner, H. A. (2009). Lifetime Assessment of Poly-Victimization in a National Sample of Children & Youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, J. (2004). Victims and Victimology; Research, Policy and Practice, Harlow: Pearson.
Groenhuijsen, M. & Letschert, R. (2008). Compilation of International Victims’ Rights Instruments. Intervict/Wolf legal Publishers (www.universitytilburg.nl/intervict).Google Scholar
Hall, M. (2009). Victims of Crime: Policy and Practice in Criminal Justice. Devon, UK:, Willan Publishers.
International Criminal Court Web site: (www.icc-cpi.int)
Kilpatrick, D. G. et al. (1987). Criminal Victimization: Lifetime Prevalence, Reporting to Police, and Psychological Impact. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 479–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, G. F. (1994). Victimology – History and Basic Concepts. In Kirchhoff, G. F., Kosovski, E. & Schneider, H. J. (Eds.). International Debates of Victimology. Mönchengladbach: WSV Publishing, pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
Lamet, W. & Wittebrood, K.. (2009). Nooit meer Dezelfde, Gevolgen van Misdrijven voor Slachtoffers. Den Haag Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
NICE (2005). Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Management of PTSD in Adults and Children in Primary and Secondary Care, by Gaskell and the BPS, online: www.nice.org.uk
Tobolowski, P. (2001). Crime Victim Rights and Remedies. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. J. M. (2009). Free the Victim: A Critique of the Western Conception of Victimhood. International Review of Victimology, 16, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walklate, S. (2007). Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Deon, UK: Willan Publishers.Google Scholar
Wemmers, J. (2003). Introduction à la victimologie. Montréal : Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmers, J. (2010). Where Do They Belong? Giving Victims a Place in the Criminal Justice Process. Criminal Law Forum.
Wemmers, J. & de Brouwer, A. M. (2010). Globalisation and Victims’ Rights at the International Criminal Court. In van Dijk, J. J. M. & Letschert, R. (Eds.), Globalisation, Human Security and Victims. Springer.Google Scholar
Winkel, F. W. (2007). Post Traumatic Anger: Missing Link in the Wheel of Misfortune, Inaugural Lecture. University of Tilburg/Intervict (www.universitytilburg.nl/intervict).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Victimology
  • Edited by Mangai Natarajan, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: International Crime and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762116.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Victimology
  • Edited by Mangai Natarajan, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: International Crime and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762116.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Victimology
  • Edited by Mangai Natarajan, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: International Crime and Justice
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762116.009
Available formats
×