Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:15:33.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Conclusions: interest groups and representative democracy in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Get access

Summary

In this concluding chapter, I will first compare French interest-group politics in the Fourth and Fifth Republics and in the Gaullist/Giscardian era and the Socialist period of the Fifth Republic. These comparisons over time have two objectives: first, to see if there are indications of trends in changing patterns of government/interest-group interaction, and second, to identify probable causes of these changes. Finally, we will look at the consequences of interest-group/government relations for French representative democracy.

Change and continuity in French interest-group politics

The flirtation of many in political science with group theory during the 1950s produced a number of excellent analyses of the overall pattern of French interest groups during the Fourth Republic. We have already had occasion to refer often to these studies because many of the perceptions of Ehrmann, Lavau, Brown, and Meynaud remain valuable 30 years later. But the changes from this period to the present probably outweigh the elements of continuity, especially in the crucial issue of government/group interaction. This study represents the first major effort to analyze the overall system of interest-group politics during the Fifth Republic. Since the study also extends over the transfer of power in the Fifth Republic from the Right to the Left, it is also possible to look for change in interest-group politics as this major political shift occurred. Here the evidence suggests much more continuity during the Fifth Republic than change.

From the Fourth to the Fifth Republic: a new system of group politics

Under the Third Republic (1872–1940) and the Fourth Republic (1946–58), interest groups grew out of the weakness of other political institutions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×