Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2mk96 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T00:48:54.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Reviewing Two Decades of IL/IR Scholarship

What We've Learned, What's Next

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

After two decades, and twenty-five chapters, of international law and international relations (IL/IR) scholarship, where do we stand? More specifically, what are the value-added insights of IL/IR relative to the extant scholarship in IL and IR taken separately, what are the weaknesses or lacunae in the literature, and what productive research agenda lies ahead? In this concluding chapter, we begin to outline preliminary answers to these questions.

The chapter is organized in five parts. Following this introduction, the first three sections address the volume's core thematic issues, asking what IL/IR has taught us about the making, interpretation of, and compliance with international law. In each area, we demonstrate that IL/IR scholarship has generated substantial theoretical insight and empirical knowledge about international law. However, in each case, this same scholarship has exhibited blind spots and gaps that can, and should, be addressed in a new generation of IL/IR scholarship that draws in a more balanced way on insights and methods from both disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 626 - 662
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. (1989). “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 335–411.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2000). “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2009). “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards, Institutions and the Shadow of the State,” in Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 44–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2013). “Law, Legalization and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IL/IR Scholars,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Allee, Todd L. (2004). “Legal Incentives and Domestic Rewards: The Selection of Trade Disputes for GATT/WTO Dispute Resolution,” unpublished paper.
Allee, Todd L., and Huth, Paul K. (2006). “Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Adjudication as Domestic Political Cover,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (New York:Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. (2008). “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. (2013). “The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 345–70.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Helfer, Laurence R. (2010). “Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice,” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 563–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie (2009). “The Politics of International Regime Complexity,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E. (2011). “The Return of the State,” Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 223–64.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond (2005) (eds.). Power in Global Governance (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff (2007). “Global Legal Pluralism,” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 6, pp. 1155–238.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (2013). “Legitimacy: Concepts and Conceptions/Normative and Descriptive,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel (2013). “Reputation in International Relations and International Law Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 524–43.Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, Edith (1987). “Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Preliminary Inquiry,” in Damrosch, Lori (ed.), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers).Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2010). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2013). “Constructivism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 119–45.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter (1993). “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of European Integration,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. (2000). “Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric (2002). “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Kennedy, Daniel M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert Hudec (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric (2003). “Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Trade, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 719–35.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford, Gabel, Mathew, and Hankla, Charles (2008). “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram (1974). The Cuban Missile Crisis: International Crises and the Role of Law (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia (1993). “On Compliance,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa (2002). Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa (2013). “Whose Agents? The Interpretation of International Law in National Courts,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 394–420.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L., and Blodgett Bermeo, Sarah (2009). “Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George, Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter (1996). “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?,” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, John S. (2003). “The Limits of ‘Rational Design,’” International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 411–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (1998). “The Misguided Debate over NGO Participation at the WTO,” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (1999). “The Death of the Trade Regime,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 733–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (2006). “Lotus Eaters: Reflections on the Varietals Dispute, the SPS Agreement and WTO Dispute Resolution,” in Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros(eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 153–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (2012). “A New Approach to Regime Interaction,” in Young, Margaret (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 136–74.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (2012). “What Can International Relations Learn from International Law?” (April 9, 2012). Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-14. Available at SSRN: or .
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollard, Mark A. (2013). “International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–32.
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Trachtman, Joel P. (1999). “Economic Analysis of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, and Ehring, Lothar (2005). “Decision-Making in the World Trade Organization,” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred, and Pollack, Mark A. (forthcoming). “Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: Nomination and Appointment of Judicial Candidates in the WTO Appellate Body,” European Journal of International Relations.
Fearon, James D., and Wendt, Alexander (2002). “Rationalism and Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” in Carlsnaes Thomas Risse, Walter, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations Theory (London: Sage Publications), pp. 52--72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (2000). “Are Legal Norms Distinctive?,” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 699–705.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Toope, Stephen J. (2001). “Alternatives to ‘Legalization’: Richer Views of Law and Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. (1990). The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. (2005). The Limits of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Martin, Lisa L. (2000). “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Constituents: A Cautionary Note,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 603–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek (2003). “Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek (2004). “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 621–703.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M., Gelpi, Christopher F., and Camber Warren, T. (2009). “When Preferences and Commitments Collide: The Effect of Relative Partisan Shifts on International Treaty Compliance,” International Organization, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A. (2005). “Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in World Trade Organization Disputes,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 557–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2005). “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Victor, David G., and Lupu, Yonatan (2012). “Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No. 1, p. 47–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker (1997). Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona (2002). “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111, No. 8, pp. 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona (2003). “Testing Conventional Wisdom,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2002). “International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 1832–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2004). “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–83.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2006). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Theory of Constrained Independence,” in Voight, Stefan, Albert, Max, and Schmidtchen, Dieter (eds.), International Conflict Resolution (Tuebingen: Mohn Siebeck), pp. 255–76.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2013). “Flexibility in International Agreements,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1997). “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 273–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2005). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo,” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 899–956.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis (1979). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Hix, Simon (2008). What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2007). “International Trade: Dispute Settlement,” in Guzman, Andrew T. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 177–210.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti (2010). “Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters,” Global Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. (1999). “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (2006). “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law,” UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.
Joerges, Christian (2001). “Deliberative Supranationalism – a Defence,” European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 5, No. 8, available at , accessed on April 2, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian (2011). The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics and Organization (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Ian (2013). “Lawmaking by International Organizations: Perspectives from IL/IR Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 266–92.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, and Snidal, Duncan (2006). “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives, Strategies” (unpublished manuscript).
Kahler, Miles (2000). “Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 661–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Sil, Rudra (2008). “Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations,” in Smit, Christian Reus and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 109–30.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith (2007). “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 573–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1998). “When Does International Law Come Home?” Houston Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 699–713.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2000). “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S., Jr. (1974). “Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations,” World Politics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B. (2005). “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 68, Nos. 3 & 4, pp. 15–61.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju (1997). “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 106, No. 8, pp. 2599–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju (1998). “Bringing International Law Home,” Houston Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 623–81.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2007). “If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provisions, Which Half Needs Explaining?,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2013). “Institutionalism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, and Betz, Timm (2013). “The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 371–93.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (2001). “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (1990). “The Politics of International Law,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Paivi (2002). “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties,” Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1982). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1991). “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 336–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., and Gerard Ruggie, John (1986). “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. (2011). “Why ‘isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew, and Scott, Joanne (2009). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch (1933). The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles (1991). “Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 495–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. (2013). “Against Compliance,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 591–610.Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S. (1955). “The Hydrogen Bomb Tests and the International Law of the Sea,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 356–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Timothy L. (2012). “Codifying Custom,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, No. 4, pp. 995–1069.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2002). “In Defense of the Democratic Deficit: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2013). “Liberal Theories of International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. (2007). “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Henry R. (2011). “No Alternative to ‘isms,’” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 487–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric (2007). “Qualified Ratification: Explaining Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Abraham, and Zaring, David (2013). “Regulatory Networks: Power, Legitimacy, and Compliance,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York:Cambridge University Press), pp. 244–65.Google Scholar
Norman, George, and Trachtman, Joel P. (2005). “The Customary International Law Game,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 541–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2003). Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, and Elsig, Manfred (2013). “The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 445–73.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. (2003). The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the EU (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and de Figueiredo, Miguel (2005). “Is the International Court of Justice Biased?,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Yoo, John C. (2005). “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals,” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. (2013). “Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 568–90.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1999). “Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 291–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2013). “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 293–320.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2001). “International Law, International Relations and Compliance,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage Publications), pp. 538–58.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G. (2004). “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael (1990). “Necessary and Proper: Executive Competence to Interpret Treaties,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 316–30.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael (2003). “Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, Wiessner, Siegfried, and Willard, Andrew R. (2007). “The New Haven School: A Brief Introduction,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 575–82.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2004). The Politics of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea (2013). “Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, No. 1.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R. (2011). “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 241–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C. (2003). Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation (Washington, DC: Brookings).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo (2010) (eds.). Dispute Settlement at the WTO: The Developing Country Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A. (2010). “Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance,” Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 706–99.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A. (2013). “Hard Law and Soft Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 197–222.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah (2000)(ed.). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Hopkins, Daniel J. (2005). “The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methodology,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 623–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Adriana (2010). International Relations Theory and International Law: A Critical Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie (1993). “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 205–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2000). “A Liberal Theory of International Law,” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 94, pp. 240–48.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2013). “International Law and International Relations Theory: Twenty Years Later,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 613–25.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve (1992). “The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations,” Millennium, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Peter J. (2000). “The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Prophets,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Peter J. (2013). “Nongovernmental Organizations in International Relations (Theory),” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 223–43.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2002). “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2013). “Wanted – Dead or Alive: Realist Approaches to International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 146–72.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall (2011). Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Brunell, Thomas (1998). “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Brunell, Thomas (2012). “The European Court of Justice, State Noncompliance, and the Politics of Override,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, Edward T. (2002). “Rational Custom,” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 559–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas (2002). “Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management and the European Union,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander (2010). “Rational Design in Motion: Uncertainty and Flexibility in the Global Climate Regime,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander (2013). “Coercive Enforcement in International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 502–23.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P. (2013). “Open Economy Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 544–67.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, and Croco, Sarah (2006). “Covenants without the Sword: International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War,” World Politics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 339–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2008). “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 417–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2013). “International Judicial Independence,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 421–44.Google Scholar
von Stein, Jana (2005). “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stein, Jana (2013). “The Engines of Compliance,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 477–501.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1994). “A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×