Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T00:01:15.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - The Engines of Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Jana von Stein
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Compliance with international law (IL) has long puzzled scholars and policy-makers. For decades, debates centered around the question of whether IL was even law at all, given its lack of an overarching enforcer (Morgenthau 1948; Hart 1961). Later, international relations (IR) scholars showed that international cooperation was not only possible and sustainable, but also common (Axelrod 1984; Axelrod and Keohane 1986). Around the same time, Henkin (1979: 47) famously stated, “it is probably the case that almost all nations observe almost all principles of international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time” (italics in original). But, by and large, most scholars agreed that it was puzzling – even surprising – that states ever abided by their international legal commitments (Keohane 1984: 99; Franck 1988: 705).

Why do – and don't – states comply with international rules? If we do observe compliance, what does this tell us about laws' usefulness as a tool for effecting real changes in how governments treat their citizens, whether they defend their partners when war breaks out, how they apply antidumping measures, and whether they curb pollution? International law scholars have long been interested in compliance. Political scientists have considered compliance with international law puzzling for decades, if not longer, but even ten years ago these questions rarely received in-depth attention in the literature. This has changed dramatically. Across both fields, scholars are interested in how governments use laws to structure their relations with one another, and why, if at all, governments abide by those rules.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 477 - 501
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2000). “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O. (1986). “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” in Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 226–54.Google Scholar
Barrett, Scott (2007). Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (2013). “Legitimacy: Concepts and Conceptions/Normative and Descriptive,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., Hofmann, Tobias, and Panke, Diana (2012). “Caving In or Sitting It Out? Longitudinal Patterns of Non-compliance in the European Union,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 454–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. (2003). “International Delegations, the Structural Constitution, and Non-Self-Execution,” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 1557–96.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel (2009). “Unpacking the State's Reputation,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 231–69.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel (2013). “Reputation in International Relations and International Law Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 524–43.Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, Edith, and Jacobson, Harold K. (1998) (eds.). Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2010). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia (1991). “Compliance without Enforcement: State Behavior under Regulatory Treaties,” Negotiation Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia (1993). “On Compliance,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Courtenay (forthcoming). “Divergent Incentives for Dictators: Domestic Institutions and (International Promises Not to) Torture,” Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Conrad, Courtenay, and Hencken Ritter, Emily (2012). “Treaties, Tenure, and Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law.” Available at .
Dai, Xinyuan (2006). “The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 690–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony (1985). “Is International Law Really ‘Law’?,” Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 79, No. 5 & 6, pp. 1293–314.Google Scholar
Danish, Kyle (1997). “Management vs. enforcement: The new debate on promoting treaty compliance,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 789–819.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. (2006). “The WTO: Looking Forward,” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., and Jones, Michael A. (2002). “Reputation, Compliance, and International Law,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, Part 2, pp. S95–S114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M. (1995). Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N. (1996). “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?,” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, Ratner, Steven R., and Wippman, David (2010). International Law: Norms, Actors, Process: A Problem-Oriented Approach, 3rd ed. (New York: Aspen Publishers).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Roger (1981). Improving Compliance with International Law (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. (1988). “Legitimacy in the International System,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 705–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. (1995). Fairness in International Law and Institutions (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Skrede Gleditsch, Kristian (2004). “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 775–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. (2008). “The Costs of Reneging: Reputation and Alliance Formation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 426–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. (2005). The Limits of International Law (New York:Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek (2004). “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 621–703.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M., Gelpi, Christopher F., and Camber Warren, T. (2009). “When Preferences and Commitments Collide: The Effect of Relative Partisan Shifts on International Treaty Compliance,” International Organization, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. (1989). “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control,” International Organization, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. (2002). “UN Conferences and Constructivist Governance of the Environment,” Global Governance, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2005). “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trading Agreements Influence Government Repression,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2009). Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru (2005). “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 110, No. 5, pp. 1373–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. (2002). “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111, No. 8, pp. 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. (2007). “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 588–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2005). “Exiting Treaties,” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 7, pp. 1579–648.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2013). “Flexibility in International Agreements,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Pollack, Mark A (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis (1979). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Hill, Daniel (2010). “Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior,”Journal of Politics, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 1161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti (2010). “Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters,” Global Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter J. (1996). “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain (2001). “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). Activists beyond Borders. Transnational Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith (2007). “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 573–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1997). “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 487–502.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict (1998). “The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 345–72.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju (1997). “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 106, No. 8, pp. 2599–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju (1998). “Bringing International Law Home,” Houston Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 623–81.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Gerard Ruggie, John (1986). “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik (2009). “The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leebron, David W. (2002). “Linkages,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley (2003). “Alliance Reliability in Times of War: Explaining State Decisions to Violate Treaties,” International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 801–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Peter Rosendorff, B. (2000). “Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith (2010). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2009: Dataset Users’ Manual (Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace).
Martin, Lisa L. (2000). Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. (2013). “Against Compliance,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 591–610.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona, and Smith, Alastair (2000). “Trust and Cooperation through Agent-Specific Punishments,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 809–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (1994–95). “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. (1997). Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. (1994). “Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance,” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Hensel, Paul R. (2007). “International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 721–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, David H. (2003). “A Signaling Theory of Human Rights Compliance,” Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 879–910.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. (2002). “The Laws of War, Common Conjectures, and Legal Systems in International Politics” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 31, No. S1, pp. S41–S60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. (2007). “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric (2005). “Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 925–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nzelibe, Jide (2011). “Strategic Globalization: International Law as an Extension of Domestic Political Conflict,” Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 635–88.Google Scholar
Poast, Paul (2012). “Can Issue Linkage Improve Treaty Credibility? Buffer State Alliances as a ‘Hard Case,’” Forthcoming, Journal of Conflict Resolution. Available at .
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Staton, Jeffrey K. (2009). “Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2002). “International Law, International Relations, and Compliance,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), pp. 538–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G. (1998). “Conclusions,” in Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 659–708.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1999). “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction,” in Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar (1991). International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Press).Google Scholar
Setear, John K. (2002). “The President's Rational Choice of a Treaty's Preratification Pathway: Article II, Congressional-Executive Agreement, or Executive Agreement?” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. S5–S31.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. (1998). “Compliance with International Agreements,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 1, pp. 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. (2000). “International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 819–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. (2010). “Treaty Compliance and Violation,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 13, pp. 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Hopkins, Daniel J. (2005). “The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 623–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1995). “International Law in a World of Liberal States,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 503–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Heather (2012). Insincere Commitments: Human Rights Treaties, Abusive States, and Citizen Activism (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph, and Weiss, Andrew (1989). “Sorting Out the Differences between Screening and Signalling Models,” in Dempster, Michael (ed.), Papers in Commemoration of the Economic Theory Seminar at Oxford University (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas (2002). “Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, Fernando R. (1992). “The Kantian Theory of International Law,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 53–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. (2001). The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Thompson, Alexander (2009). “The Rational Enforcement of International Law: Solving the Sanctioners’ Dilemma,” International Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander (2013). “Coercive Enforcement in International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 502–23.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael (2008). “Reputation and the Effect of International Law on Preferences and Beliefs,” Working Paper (Stanford, CA: Stanford University). Available at .
Tomz, Michael (2011). “Reputation Spillovers in International Relations,” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Trachtman, Joel P. (2010). “International Law and Domestic Political Coalitions: The Grand Theory of Compliance with International Law,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1998) (eds.) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
von Stein, Jana (2005). “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stein, Jana (2012). “Making Promises, Keeping Promises: Democracy, Ratification, and Compliance in International Human Rights Law,” Working Paper (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Dept. of Political Science & Center for Political Studies). Available at .
Young, Oran R. (1979). Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. (1994). International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Medellin v. Texas, 52 US 491 (2008)
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 US 692 (2004)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×