Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:40:43.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Interdependence, Timing, and Expectations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Edited by
Laura V. Machia ,
Christopher R. Agnew  and
Ximena B. Arriaga
Laura V. Machia
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Christopher R. Agnew
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Ximena B. Arriaga
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Interdependence, Interaction, and Close Relationships , pp. 267 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agnew, C. R. (2000). Cognitive interdependence and the experience of relationship loss. In Harvey, J. H. & Miller, E. D. (Eds.), Loss and Trauma: General and Close Relationship Perspectives (pp. 385–398). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (2014a). Relationship Receptivity: Commitment in a Changing World. Invited keynote address presented at the 2014 International Association of Relationship Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (Ed.) (2014b). Social Influences on Romantic Relationships: Beyond the Dyad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Arriaga, X. B., & Wilson, J. E. (2008). Committed to what? Using the Bases of Relational Commitment Model to understand continuity and changes in social relationships. In Forgas, J. P. & Fitness, J. (Eds.), Social Relationships: Cognitive, Affective and Motivational Processes (pp. 147–164). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Hadden, B. W., & Tan, K. (2019). It’s about time: Readiness, commitment and stability in close relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 1046–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal Relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R. & VanderDrift, L. E. (2018). Commitment processes in personal relationship. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (2nd ed., pp. 437–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allendorf, K. & Pandian, R. K. (2016). The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review, 42, 435–464.Google Scholar
Apatow, J. (Producer) & Showalter, M. (Director). (2017). The Big Sick [Motion Picture]. United States: Apatow Productions.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Dutton, D. G., Aron, E. N., & Iverson, A. (1989). Experiences of falling in love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 243–257.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 39–65). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Reed, J., Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 700–721.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Barbara, A. M. & Dion, K. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do, especially for strongly “preoccupied” lovers. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 5, 315–342.Google Scholar
Barber, L. L. & Cooper, M. L. (2014). Rebound sex: Sexual motives and behaviors following a relationship breakup. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar
Besikci, E., Agnew, C. R., & Yildirim, A. (2016). It’s my partner, deal with it: Rejection sensitivity, normative beliefs, and commitment. Personal Relationships, 23, 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Reception strategies in concept attainment. In Bruner, J. S. & Anglin, J. M. (Eds.), Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Schmidt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In Zanna, M. P., Olsen, J. M., & Herman, C. P (Eds.), Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y., (Eds.) (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Clark, C. L., Shaver, P. R., & Abrahams, M. F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2012). First marriages in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Report, 49, 1–21.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T. & Windle, M. (2000). Middle adolescents’ dating pathways and psychosocial adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 90–118.Google Scholar
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2003). Physical, emotional, and behavioral reactions to breaking up: The roles of gender, age, environmental involvement, and attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 971–884.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 88–114). New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Keneski, E., Morgan, T. A., McDonald, M. A. & Huang, S. A. (2018). What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 5, 747–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, L. F. & Le, B. (2014). Imagining the white picket fence: Social class, future plans, and romantic relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 653–661.Google Scholar
Emmons, R. A. (1996). Striving and feeling: Personal goals and subjective well-being. In Gollwitzer, P. M. & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation and Behavior (pp. 313–337). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E. & Agnew, C. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409–428.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 933–940.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B. & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual process theories. In Carlston, D. E. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 282–312). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, W. & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graziano, W. G. & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In Leary, M. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hadden, B. W., Agnew, C. R.., & Tan, K. (2018). Commitment readiness and relationship formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1242–1257.Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W. & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 239–244.Google Scholar
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.Google Scholar
Joel, S., Teper, R., & MacDonald, G. (2014). People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for others. Psychological Science, 25, 2233–2240.Google Scholar
Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, P. S., Fletcher, G. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2014). The mating sociometer and attractive others: a double-edged sword in romantic relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 126–141.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. & Griskevicius, V. (2015). Life history, fundamental motives, and sexual competition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 40–44.Google Scholar
Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370.Google Scholar
Knee, C. R. & Reis, H. T. (Eds.). (2016). Positive Approaches to Optimal Relationship Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kumashiro, M., Rusbult, C. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Navigating personal and relational concerns: The quest for equilibrium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 94–110.Google Scholar
Le, B. & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.Google Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J. & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemay, E. P. Jr. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 34–52.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. & Wolf, N. R. (2016). Projection of romantic and sexual desire in opposite-sex friendships: How wishful thinking creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 864–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, A. & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.Google Scholar
Norcross, J. C., Krebs, P. M., and Prochaska, J. O. (2011). Stages of change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 143–154.Google Scholar
Orehek, E., Forest, A. L., & Wingrove, S. (2018). People as means to multiple goals: Implications for interpersonal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1487–1501.Google Scholar
Owen, K., Rhoades, G., Shuck, B., Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S., Markman, H., & Knopp, K. (2014). Commitment uncertainty: A theoretical overview. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 207–219.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G. & Haselton, M. G. (2005). The evolution of coupling. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 98–104.Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (2005). The transtheoretical approach. In Norcross, J. C. & Goldfried, M. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration (2nd ed., pp. 147–171). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (2007). Readiness theory and the Northern Ireland conflict. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1520–1541.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rhoades, G. K., Kamp Dush, C. M., Atkins, D. C., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riela, S., Rodriguez, G., Aron, A., Xu, X., & Acevado, B. P. (2010). Experiences of falling in love: Investigating culture, ethnicity, gender, and speed. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 473–493.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Bissonnette, V. I., Arriaga, X. B., & Cox, C. L. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. In Bradbury, T. N. (Ed.), The Developmental Course of Marital Dysfunction (pp. 74–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close Relationships: Maintenance and Enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar
Saffrey, C. & Ehrenberg, M. (2007). When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and postrelationship adjustment. Personal Relationships, 14, 351–368.Google Scholar
Sbarra, D. A. & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12, 213–232.Google Scholar
Schiff, A. (2013). On success in peace processes: Readiness theory and the Aceh peace process. Peace and Conflict Studies, 20(1), Article 2.Google Scholar
Schwarz, B. Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirksy, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Collins, W. A., & Salvatore, J. E. (2011). The impact of early interpersonal experience on adult romantic relationship functioning: Recent findings from the Minnesota longitudinal study of risk and adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 355–359.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. C., Hood, K. B., & Wright, B. L. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect: Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147–160.Google Scholar
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2017). The crowded life is a slow life: Population density and life history strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 736–754.Google Scholar
Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Maxwell, J. A., Joel, S., Peragine, D., Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2013). Settling for less out of fear of being single. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1049–1073.Google Scholar
Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., & Wilson, A. E. (2009). On the rebound: Focusing on someone new helps anxiously attached individuals let go of ex-partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1382–1394.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.Google Scholar
Tan, K. & Agnew, C. R. (2016). Ease of retrieval effects on relationship commitment: The role of future plans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, K., Agnew, C. R., & Hadden, B. W. (2020). Seeking and ensuring interdependence: Desiring commitment and the strategic initiation and maintenance of close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 36–50.Google Scholar
Tan, K., Agnew, C. R., VanderDrift, L. E., & Harvey, S. M. (2015). Committed to us: Predicting relationship closeness following nonmarital romantic relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 456–471.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. (1999) [1913]. Education Psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. (1932). The Fundamentals of Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.Google Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E. & Agnew, C. R. (2014). Relational consequences of personal goal pursuits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 927–940.Google Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., & Wilson, J. E. (2009). Nonmarital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: The mediating role of dissolution consideration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1220–1232.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67.Google Scholar
Wright, B. L. & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of friend and parent opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships, 19, 743–758.Google Scholar

References

Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1356–1372.Google Scholar
Alarcon, G. M., Bowling, N. A., & Khazon, S. (2013). Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 821–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). Amos (Version 24.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., & Lewandowski, G. (2002). Shared participation in self-expanding activities: Positive effects on experienced martial quality. In Noller, P., Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Feeney, J. A. (Eds.), Understanding Marriage: Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction (pp. 177–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly-formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., Cobb, R. A., McNulty, J. K., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Remaining in a situationally aggressive relationship: The role of relationship self-efficacy. Personal Relationships, 23, 591–604.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Shyness and marriage: Does shyness shape even established relationships? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 665–676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., Overall, N. C., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). How do relationship maintenance behaviors affect individual well-being?: A contextual perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 282–289.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J.K., & VanderDrift, L.E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 700–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.Google Scholar
Biehle, S. N. & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 36–45.Google Scholar
Bradbury, T. N. (1989). Cognition, emotion, and interaction in distressed and nondistressed marriages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Brase, G. L. & Guy, E. C. (2004). The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 471–484.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Phillips, C. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17–32.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). How often does currently felt emotion predict social behavior and judgment? A meta-analytic test of two theories. Emotion Review, 8, 136–143.Google Scholar
Dion, K. K. & Dion, K. L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, B. D., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 608–614.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G. & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In Feather, N. T. (Ed.), Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C. & Collins, N. L. (2014). A theoretical perspective on the importance of social connections for thriving. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of Social Connection: From Brain to Group (pp. 291–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A. & Karantzas, G. C. (2017). Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J. & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Relationship science, 2015. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 5–9.Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 117–124.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, W. & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kirsner, B. R., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75, 131–148.Google Scholar
Laner, M. R. & Russell, J. N. (1995). Marital expectations and level of premarital involvement: Does marriage education make a difference? Teaching Sociology, 23, 28–34.Google Scholar
Lawrence, E., Nylen, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2007). Prenatal expectations and marital satisfaction over the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 155–164.Google Scholar
Le, B. & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 34–52.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Lin, J. L., & Muir, H. J. (2015). Daily affective and behavioral forecasts in romantic relationships: Seeing tomorrow through the lens of today. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1005–1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, K. C., McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484–498.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity’s enhancement of desirability: The role of naive economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 67–78.Google Scholar
Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 357–364.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and interpersonal negativity: The independent contributions of perceptions and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1439–1450.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Fisher, T. D. (2008). Gender differences in response to sexual expectancies and changes in sexual frequency: A short-term longitudinal study of sexual satisfaction in newlywed married couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 229–240.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Integrating specific and global evaluations of a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 943–955.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2002). Expectancy confirmation in appraisals of marital interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 764–775.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Karney, B. R. (2004). Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: Should couples expect the best or brace for the worst? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729–743.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff” but it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Jones, R. E., & Acosta, L. M. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28, 1031–1040.Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A. & Broady, E. F. (2011). Stress resilience in early marriage: Can practice make perfect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1050–1067.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A. & Geers, A. L. (2013). Optimistic expectations in early marriage: A resource or vulnerability for adaptive relationship functioning? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 38–60.Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglan- ski, A. W. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.Google Scholar
Poortman, A. & Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 357–376.Google Scholar
Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. Science, 339, 96–98.Google Scholar
Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461, 263–266.Google Scholar
Rosato, A. (2016). Selling substitute goods to loss-averse consumers: Limited availability, bargains, and rip-offs. RAND Journal of Economics, 47, 709–733.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Satisfaction and commitment in friendships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11, 96–105.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. H. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close Romantic Relationships: Maintenance and Enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 119–141.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 133–161.Google Scholar
Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.Google Scholar
Silliman, B. & Schumm, W. R. (1999). Improving practice in marriage preparation. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 25, 23–43.Google Scholar
Silverman, I. W. (1967). Incidence of guilt reactions in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 338–340.Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53–67.Google Scholar
Tran, P., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2019). Commitment in relationships: An updated meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 26, 158–180.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. L., Wester, S. R., Wei, M., & Boysen, G. A. (2005). The role of outcome expectations and attitudes on decisions to seek professional help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 459–470.Google Scholar
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In Wenzel, K. R., Wigfield, A., Wenzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 55–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Afifi, T. D., Joseph, A., & Aldeis, D. (2012). The “standards for openness hypothesis”: Why women find (conflict) avoidance more dissatisfying than men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 102–125. doi:10.1177/0265407511420193Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 173–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Allen, W. D. & Olson, D. H. (2001). Five types of African‐American marriages. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 301–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb00326.xGoogle Scholar
Amato, P. R. & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Do attitudes toward divorce affect marital quality? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 69–86. doi:10.1177/019251399020001004Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Capezza, N. M., Goodfriend, W., & Allsop, K. E. (2018). The invisible harm of downplaying a romantic partner’s aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 275–280. doi:10.1177/0963721417754198Google Scholar
Badr, H., Acitelli, L. K., & Taylor, C. L. C. (2008). Does talking about their relationship affect couples’ marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2, 53–64. doi:10.1007/s11764-008-0044-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 700–721. doi:10.1037/xge0000299Google Scholar
Barr, A. B. & Simons, R. L. (2012). Marriage expectations among African American couples in early adulthood: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 726–742. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00985.xGoogle Scholar
Barros-Gomes, P. & Baptist, J. (2014). Black women’s ambivalence about marriage: A voice-centered relational approach. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 13, 284–311. doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.929064Google Scholar
Bell, R. A. & Buerkel‐Rothfuss, N. L. (1990). S(he) loves me, s(he) loves me not: Predictors of relational information‐seeking in courtship and beyond. Communication Quarterly, 38, 64–82. doi:10.1080/01463379009369742Google Scholar
Berger, C. R. & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112.Google Scholar
Birnie, C., Joy McClure, M., Lydon, J. E., & Holmberg, D. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 16, 79–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01211.xGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, T. N. & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3Google Scholar
Cate, R. M., Huston, T. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1986). Premarital relationships: Toward the identification of alternative pathways to marriage. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 3–22. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.1.3Google Scholar
Chaney, C. (2014). “No matter what, good or bad, love is still there”: Motivations for romantic commitment among Black cohabiting couples. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 216–245. doi:10.1080/01494929.2013.851056Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.xGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. L. & Perry, A. R. (2015). Black men’s perspectives on the role of the black church in healthy relationship promotion and family stability. Social Work and Christianity, 42, 430–448. doi:10.1177/000312240406900603Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (2004). The world historical transformation of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 974–979. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00067.xGoogle Scholar
Dainton, M. (2000). Maintenance behaviors, expectations for maintenance, and satisfaction: Linking comparison levels to relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 827–842. doi:10.1177/0265407500176007Google Scholar
Dilworth-Anderson, P., Burton, L., & Turner, W. (1993). The importance of values in the study of culturally diverse families. Family Relations, 42, 238–242. doi:10.2307/585551Google Scholar
Fehr, B. (1999). Laypeople’s conceptions of commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 90–103. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.90Google Scholar
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 1259–1287. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0039Google Scholar
Few‐Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 169–183. doi:10.1111/jftr.12039Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. (2014). I say a little prayer for you: Praying for partner increases commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 587–593. doi:10.1037/a0034999Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723Google Scholar
Finkenauer, C. & Hazam, H. (2000). Disclosure and secrecy in marriage: Do both contribute to marital satisfaction? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 245–263. doi:10.1177/0265407500172005Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O. & Thomas, G. (1996). Close relationship lay theories: Their structure and function. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fitness, J. (Eds.), Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Fincham, F. D., Cramer, L., & Heron, N. (1987). The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 481–489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.481Google Scholar
Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., & Young-DeMarco, L. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. In Clogg, C. C. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (Vol. 18, pp. 37–68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, R. W., Flannagan, D., & Matamoros, M. (2009). Behavior expectations in cross-sex friendships, same-sex friendships, and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 16, 575–595. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01240.xGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. (2009). If Moynihan had only known: Race, class, and family change in the late twentieth century. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 94–110. doi:10.1177/0002716208324866Google Scholar
Gager, C. T. & Sanchez, L. (2003). Two as one? Couples’ perceptions of time spent together, marital quality, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 21–50. doi:10.1177/0192513X02238519Google Scholar
Gibson‐Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low‐income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00218.xGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, G. P. (1988). Rules, scripts and prototypes in personal relationships. In Duck, S., Hay, D. F., Hobfoll, S. E., Ickes, W., & Montgomery, B. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions (pp. 23–39). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 179–205. doi:10.1177/0192513X08323694Google Scholar
Hampel, A. D. & Vangelisti, A. L. (2008). Commitment expectations in romantic relationships: Application of a prototype interaction-pattern model. Personal Relationships, 15, 81–102. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00186.xGoogle Scholar
Harknett, K. & McLanahan, S. S. (2004). Racial and ethnic differences in marriage after the birth of a child. American Sociological Review, 69, 790–811. doi:10.1177/000312240406900603Google Scholar
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511Google Scholar
Holmberg, D. & MacKenzie, S. (2002). So far, so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 777–796. doi:10.1177/0265407502196003Google Scholar
Holmberg, D. & Veroff, J. (1996). Rewriting relationship memories: The effects of courtship and wedding scripts. In Fletcher, G. J. P. & Fitness, J. (Eds.), Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach (pp. 345–368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (2000). The social ecology of marriage and other intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 298–320. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00298.xGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. L. & Melz, H. (2004). The case for (promoting) marriage: The devil is in the details. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 943–958. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00064.xGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237Google Scholar
Huston, T. L., Surra, C., Fitzgerald, N., & Cate, R. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. & Gilmour, R. (Eds.), Personal Relationships: Vol. 2. Developing Personal Relationships (pp. 53–88). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1999). Personal, moral, and structural commitment to relationships. In Jones, W. H. & Adams, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability (pp. 73–87). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J., & Huston, T. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 160–177. doi:10.2307/353891Google Scholar
Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3Google Scholar
Kelley, H. & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Knee, C. R. & Petty, K. N. (2013). Implicit theories of relationships: Destiny and growth beliefs. In Simpson, J. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 183–199). New York: Oxford University Press: doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0009Google Scholar
Knobloch, L. K. & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243–257. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00806.xGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, L. K. & Theiss, J. A. (2011). Relational uncertainty and relationship talk within courtship: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model. Communication Monographs, 78, 3–26. doi:10.1037/a0024063Google Scholar
Lannutti, P. J. (2007). The influence of same-sex marriage on the understanding of same-sex relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 135–151. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01697.xGoogle Scholar
Lauer, S. & Yodanis, C. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 58–72. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.xGoogle Scholar
Mongeau, P. A., Carey, C. M., & Williams, M. L. M. (1998). First date initiation and enactment: An expectancy violation approach. In Canary, D. J. & Dindia, K. (Eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Critical Investigations of Sex and Gender in Interaction (pp. 413–426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Monk, J. K. & Ogolsky, B. G. (2019). Contextual relational uncertainty model: Understanding ambiguity in a changing sociopolitical context of marriage. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 11, 243–261. doi: 10.1111/jftr.12325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Lamarche, V. M., Gomillion, S., Seery, M. D., & Kondrak, C. (2017). In defense of commitment: The curative power of violated expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 697–729. doi:10.1037/pspi0000102Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., & Oswald, R. F. (2018). As the states turned: Implications of the changing legal context of same-sex marriage on well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3219–3238. doi:10.1177/0265407518816883Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., & Oswald, R. F. (2019). Personal well-being across the transition to marriage equality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 33, 422–432. doi:10.1037/fam0000504.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 275–306. doi:10.1111/jftr.12205Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Surra, C. A., & Monk, J. K. (2016). Pathways of commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 293–310. doi:10.1111/jomf.12260Google Scholar
Osborn, J. L. (2012). When TV and marriage meet: A social exchange analysis of the impact of television viewing on marital satisfaction and commitment. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 739–757. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.618900Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2014). Record share of Americans have never married as values, economics and gender patterns change. Retrieved from www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/09/24/record-share-of-americans-have-never-married/#will-todays-never-married-adults-eventually-marryGoogle Scholar
Pulice-Farrow, L., Brown, T. D., & Galupo, M. P. (2017). Transgender microaggressions in the context of romantic relationships. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4, 362–373. doi:10.1037/sgd0000238Google Scholar
Riggio, H. R. & Weiser, D. A. (2008). Attitudes toward marriage: Embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Personal Relationships, 15, 123–140. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00188.xGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. & Arriaga, X. (1997). Interdependence theory. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships (2nd ed., pp. 221–250). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101Google Scholar
Segrin, C. & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247–263. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02543.xGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. (2017). “Stress that I don’t need”: Gender expectations and relationship struggles among the poor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 657–674. doi:10.1111/jomf.12387Google Scholar
Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Lei, M. K., & Landor, A. M. (2012). Relational schemas, hostile romantic relationships, and beliefs about marriage among young African American adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 77–101. doi:10.1177/0265407511406897Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Schmeeckle, M., & Shu, X. (2006). No breakup occurs on an island: Social networks and relationship dissolution. In Fine, M. A. & Harvey, J. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357–375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.357Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. (1987). Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship type. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 17–33. doi: 10.1177/0265407587041002Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. (1995). Reasons coding manual IV. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A., Arizzi, P., & Asmussen, L. A. (1988). The association between reasons for commitment and the development and outcome of marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 47–63. doi:10.1177/0265407588051003Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. & Gray, C. E. (2000). A typology of processes of commitment to marriage: Why do partners commit to problematic relationships? In Waite, L. J., Backrach, C., Hindin, M., Thomson, E., & Thornton, A. (Eds.), The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation (pp. 253–280). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. & Hughes, D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5–21. doi:10.2307/353658Google Scholar
Surra, C. A., Hughes, D. K., & Jacquet, S. E. (1999). The development of commitment to marriage: A phenomenological approach. In Adams, J. M. & Jones, W. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability (pp. 125–148). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. & Bartell, D. S. (2001) Attributions, communication, and the development of a marital identity, in Manusov, V. & Harvey, J. H. (Eds.), Attribution, Communication Behavior, and Close Relationships (pp. 93–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Towner, S. L., Dolcini, M. M., & Harper, G. W. (2015). Romantic relationship dynamics of urban African American adolescents: Patterns of monogamy, commitment, and trust. Youth & Society, 47, 343–373. doi:10.1177/0044118X12462591Google Scholar
Vannier, S. A. & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2017a). Great expectations: Examining unmet romantic expectations and dating relationship outcomes using an investment model framework. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1045–1066. doi:10.1177/0265407517703492Google Scholar
Vannier, S. A. & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2017b). Passion, connection, and destiny: How romantic expectations help predict satisfaction and commitment in young adults’ dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 235–257. doi:10.1177/0265407516631156Google Scholar
Vaterlaus, J. M., Skogrand, L., Chaney, C., & Gahagan, K. (2017). Marital expectations in strong African American marriages. Family Process, 56, 883–899. doi:10.1111/famp.12263Google Scholar

References

Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., Le, B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (pp. 103–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792.Google Scholar
Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1431–1444.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L. & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.Google Scholar
Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Relationship Initiation (pp. 153–174). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. D. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 712–727.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W. & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Speed-dating: A powerful and flexible paradigm for studying romantic relationship initiation. In Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Relationship Initiation (pp. 217–234). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994). Assessing adult attachment. In Sperling, M. & Berman, W. (Eds.), Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives (pp. 128–152). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fraley, B. & Aron, A. (2004). The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships, 11, 61–78.Google Scholar
Gorman, G. & Jordan, C. H. (2015). “I know you’re kidding”: Relationship closeness enhances positive perceptions of teasing. Personal Relationships, 22, 173–187.Google Scholar
Hill, C. T. & Stull, D. E. (1982). Disclosure reciprocity: Conceptual and measurement issues. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 238–244.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. (2005). Cellphones in public: Social interactions in a wireless era. New Media & Society, 7, 810–833.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (2009). Strangers in a Strange Lab: How Personality Shapes Our Initial Encounters with Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., & Stinson, L. L. (1990). Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. In Hendrick, C. & Clark, M. S. (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 11. Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 16–44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jourard, S. M. (1971). The Transparent Self (rev. ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B. & Wenzel, A. (2005). A transactional approach to social anxiety and the genesis of interpersonal closeness: Self, partner, and social context. Behavior Therapy, 36, 335–346.Google Scholar
Kelley, H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Huston, T., Levinger, G., … Peterson, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley, H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Huston, T., Levinger, G., … Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close Relationships (pp. 20–67). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Ketay, S. & Beck, L. A. (2017). Attachment predicts cortisol response and closeness in dyadic social interaction. Psychoneurendcrinology, 80, 114–121.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, G. W. & Aron, A. P. (2004). Distinguishing arousal from novelty and challenge in initial romantic attraction between strangers. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 361–372.Google Scholar
Lundy, B. L. & Drouin, M. (2016). From social anxiety to interpersonal connectedness: Relationship building within face-to-face, phone and instant messaging mediums. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 271–277.Google Scholar
MacInnis, C. C. & Hodson, G. (2015). The development of online cross-group relationships among university students: Benefits of earlier (vs. later) disclosure of stigmatized group membership. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 788–809.Google Scholar
Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversations: An examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 155–163.Google Scholar
Mattick, R. P. & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, R. & Page-Gould, E. (2008). Can cross-group friendships influence minority students’ well-being at historically white universities? Psychological Science, 19, 933–939.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2013). The role of attachment security in adolescent and adult close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 66–89). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2018). Attachment theory as a framework for studying relationship dynamics and functioning. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 175–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48, 275–298.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B. & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
Nikolova, H., Lamberton, C., & Coleman, N. V. (2017). Stranger danger: When and why consumer dyads behave less ethically than individuals. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 90–108.Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 97–105.Google Scholar
Oztop, P., Katsikopoulos, K., & Gummerum, M. (2018). Creativity through connectedness: The role of closeness and perspective taking n group creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 266–275.Google Scholar
Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.Google Scholar
Philipp-Muller, A. & MacDonald, G. (2017). Avoidant individuals may have muted responses to social warmth after all: An attempted replication of MacDonald and Borsook (2010). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 272–280.Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R. & Beck, L. A. (2015). Attachment processes in adult romantic relationships. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal Relations (pp. 33–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246.Google Scholar
Rainie, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Operating System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A. & Burgoon, J. K. (2004). The effect of interactivity on initial interactions: The influence of information valence and modality and information richness on computer-mediated interaction. Communication Monographs, 71, 422–447.Google Scholar
Ray, D. G., Gomillion, S., Pintea, A. I., & Hamlin, I. (2018). On being forgotten: Memory and forgetting serve as signals of interpersonal importance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 259–276.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 557–570.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., O’Keefe, S. D., & Lane, R. D. (2017). Fun is more fun when others are involved. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 547–557.Google Scholar
Robinson, H., Ravikulan, A., Nater, U. M., Skoluda, N., Jarrett, P., & Broadbent, E. (2017). The role of social closeness during tape stripping to facilitate skin barrier recovery: Preliminary findings. Health Psychology, 36, 619.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Coolsen, M. K., & Kirchner, J. L. (2004). Interdependence, closeness, and relationships. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (pp. 137–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378–386.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.Google Scholar
Slatcher, R. B. (2010). When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane: Creating closeness between couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 279–297.Google Scholar
Sommer, K. L. & Bernieri, F. (2015). Minimizing the pain and probability of rejection: Evidence for relational distancing and proximity seeking within face-to-face interactions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 131–139.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2014a). Effects of actual (manipulated) and perceived similarity on liking in get-acquainted interactions: The role of communication. Communication Monographs, 81, 4–27.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2014b). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 190–197.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. & Hampton, A. J. (2017). Liking and other reactions after a get-acquainted interaction: A comparison of continuous face-to-face interaction versus interaction that progresses from text messages to face-to-face. Communication Quarterly, 65, 333–353.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Hampton, A. J., Heinzel, H. J., & Felmlee, D. (2016). Can I connect with both you and my social network? Access to network-salient communication technology and get-acquainted interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 423–432.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. & Treger, S. (2015). The benefits of turn-taking reciprocal self-disclosure in get-acquainted interactions. Personal Relationships, 22, 460–475.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Wondra, J. D. (2012). Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 497–514.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 860–866.Google Scholar
Sunnafrank, M. (1983). Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction in communication processes: In pursuit of an ephemeral influence. Communications Monographs, 50, 273–284.Google Scholar
Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed‐dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215.Google Scholar
Treger, S., Sprecher, S., & Erber, R. (2013). Laughing and liking: Exploring the interpersonal effects of humor use in initial social interactions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 532–543.Google Scholar
Tu, Y., Shaw, A., & Fishbach, A. (2015). The friendly taking effect: How interpersonal closeness leads to seemingly selfish yet jointly maximizing choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 669–687.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Vacharkulksemsuk, T. & Fredrickson, B. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 399–402.Google Scholar
Vittengl, J. R. & Holt, C. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 53–66.Google Scholar
Welker, K. M., Slatcher, R. B., Baker, L., & Aron, A. (2014). Creating positive out-group attitudes through intergroup couple friendships and implications for compassionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 706–725.Google Scholar
Worthy, M., Gary, A. L., & Kahn, G. M. (1969). Self-disclosure as an exchange process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 59–63.Google Scholar
Wright, B. L. & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of friend and parent opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships, 19, 743–758.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73.Google Scholar
Yang, C. C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2014). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16, 5–23.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×