Abrantes-Metz, R. M., Bajari, P. and Murphy, J., ‘Enhancing Compliance Programs Through Antitrust Screening’, The Antitrust Counselor, 45 (2010), 4Google Scholar

AFEP-MEDEF, ‘Code of Corporate Governance of Listed Corporations’Google Scholar

AFG, ‘Recommandations sur le Gouvernement D’entreprise’ (2018), 19, available at: www.afg.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Recommandations_sur_le_gouvernement_d_entreprise_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Aghion, P. and Schankerman, M., ‘On the Welfare Effects and Political Economy of Competition-Enhancing Policies’, The Economic Journal,114 (2007), 800Google Scholar

Aguzzoni, L., Langus, G. and Motta, M., ‘The Effect of EU Antitrust Investigations and Fines on a Firm’s Valuation’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 61 (2013), 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akaman, P., ‘A Competitive Assessment of Platform Most-Favoured-Customer Clauses’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 12(4) (2016), 781Google Scholar

Akman, P. and Kassim, H., ‘Myths and Myth-Making in the European Union: The Institutionalization and Interpretation of EU Competition Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48 (2010), 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, G., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (1970), 488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H., ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, 62 (1972), 777Google Scholar

Alexander, C. R. and Cohen, M. A., ‘Why Do Corporations Become Criminals? Ownership, Hidden Actions, and Crime as an Agency Cost’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 5 (1999), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allemand, I., Brullebaut, B., Prinz, E. and Thépot, F., ‘Structure et évolution des réseaux d’administrateurs’ Conférence internationale de gouvernance, 15–16 May 2017, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Allen, F. and Gale, D., ‘Corporate Governance and Competition’ in Vives, X. (ed.), Corporate Governance, Theoretical and Empirical (Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 23Google Scholar

Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, ‘Introduction to D&O Insurance, Risk Briefing’, 2010, available at: www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/risk%20insights/AGCS-DO-infopaper.pdfGoogle Scholar

American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Compliance: Perspectives and Resources for Corporate Counselors, 2nd edn (ABA Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar

American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Interlocking Directorates: Handbook on Section 8 of the Clayton Act (ABA Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

Andreangeli, A., ‘Between Economic Freedom and Effective Competition Enforcement: the Impact of the Antitrust Remedies Provided by the Modernisation Regulation on Investigated Parties’ Freedom to Contract and to Enjoy Property’, Competition Law Review, 6 (2010), 225Google Scholar

Angelucci, C. and Han, M. A., ‘Monitoring Managers Through Corporate Compliance Programs’, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics, Working Paper No 2010–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Areeda, P. E. and Hovenkamp, H., Antitrust Law, An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, 3rd edn (Aspen, 2006)Google Scholar

Arlen, J., ‘The Failure of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines’, University of Miami Law Review, 66 (2012), 321Google Scholar

Arlen, J., ‘The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (1994), 833Google Scholar

Arlen, J. and Kraakman, R., ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’, New York University Law Review, 72 (1997), 687Google Scholar

Aubert, C., ‘Managerial Effort Incentives and Market Collusion’, Toulouse School of Economics, Working Paper No 09–127 (2009)Google Scholar

Aubert, C., Rey, P. and Kovacic, W. E., ‘The Impact of Leniency and Whistleblowing Programs on Cartels’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24 (2006), 1241Google Scholar

Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J., Responsive Regulation (Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Azar, J., Raina, S. and Schmalz, M., ‘Ultimate Ownership and Bank Competition’ (2016), available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2710252Google Scholar

Azar, J., Schmalz, M. and Tecu, I., ‘Anti-Competitive Effects of Common Ownership’, Journal of Finance, 73(4), (2018), 1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagley, C. E., Winning Legally: How to Use the Law to Create Value, Marshal Resources, and Manage Risk (Harvard Business School Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Bagley, C. E., ‘Winning Legally: The Value of Legal Astuteness’, Academy of Management Review, 33 (2008), 378Google Scholar

Baily, M. and Gersbach, H., ‘Efficiency in Manufacturing and the Need for Global Competition’ in Baily, M. (ed.), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (Brookings, 1995)Google Scholar

Baker, J., ‘Overlapping Financial Investor Ownership, Market Power, and Antitrust Enforcement: My Qualified Agreement with Professor Elhauge’, Harvard Law Review Forum, 129 (2016), 212Google Scholar

Baker, J. B., ‘My Summer Vacation at the Commission’, The Antitrust Source (2005)Google Scholar

Baker McKenzie, ‘Conducting an Effective Global Antitrust/Competition Risk Assessment’ (2013)Google Scholar

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M., Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Barboza, D., ‘Tearing Down the Facade of “Vitamins Inc.”’, New York Times (1999)Google Scholar

Bardong, A., ‘The “German Experience” in Merger Control and Minority Shareholdings: Time for a Change?’, Revue Concurrences, 3 (2011), 14Google Scholar

Beal, K., ‘The Sins of the Son or Daughter’, Competition Bulletin (2013), available at: https://competitionbulletin.com/2013/05/19/the-sins-of-the-son-or-daughter/Google Scholar

Becker, G. S., ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy, (1968), 76Google Scholar

Benham, A. and Benham, L., ‘The Costs of Exchange’ in Klein, P. G. and M. Sykuta, E. (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010), 367Google Scholar

Bennett, G. and Domineck, B., ‘Hungary’, The European Antitrust Review (2013)Google Scholar

Bennett, M., ‘Online Platforms: Retailers, Genuine Agents or None of the Above?’ Competition Policy International (2013)Google Scholar

Bergman, H. and Sokol, D. D., ‘The Air Cargo Cartel: Lessons for Compliance’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran (eds.), C., Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar

Berle, A. A., ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’, Columbia Law Review, 47(3) (1947), 343Google Scholar

Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, 2nd edn, (Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967)Google Scholar

Bernard, E., ‘L’“activité économique”, un critère d’applicabilité du droit de la concurrence rebelle à la conceptualisation’, Revue Internationale de Droit économique [2009] 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best in Procurement, Das Magazin für Manager, im Einkauf und Logistik, ‘Kartell Prävention im Einkauf’ (2013)Google Scholar

Bishop, J., ‘Sitting Ducks and Decoy Ducks: New Trends in the Indemnification of Corporate Directors and Officers’, Yale Law Journal, 77 (1968), 1Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘Limited Liability in Corporate Groups’, Journal of Corporation Law, 11 (1985–86), 574Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups’, Connecticut Law Review, 37 (2005), 605Google Scholar

Bork, F. A., Koktvedgaard, O. and Zinck, S., Cartel Regulation (Getting the Deal Through) (online) (2017)Google Scholar

Bouton, E., ‘The Single Economic Unit Doctrine Under EU Competition Law: Application and Consequences for the Scope and Enforcement of the Substantive Rules of Competition Law’, unpublished LLM dissertation, University of Glasgow (2016)Google Scholar

Brandeis, L. D., Other People’s Money and How Bankers Use It (Seven Treasures Publications, 1914)Google Scholar

Brander, J. A. and Lewis, T. R., ‘Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect’, American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 956Google Scholar

Bronckers, M. and Vallery, A., ‘No Longer Presumed Guilty? The Impact of Fundamental Rights on Certain Dogmas of EU Competition Law’, World Competition, 34 (2011), 535Google Scholar

Bryant, P. G. and Eckard, E. W., ‘Price Fixing: The Probability of Getting Caught’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73 (1991), 531Google Scholar

Buccirossi, P., and Spagnolo, G., ‘Corporate Governance and Collusive Behavior’, in Collins, W. D. (eds.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy 1 (American Bar Association, 2008)Google Scholar

Buch-Hansen, H., ‘Interlocking Directorates and Collusion: An Empirical Analysis’, International Sociology, 29 (2014), 253Google Scholar

Buhart, J. and Lesur, L., ‘Minority Shareholders and Competition: Is a European Reform Necessary?’, Revue Concurrences, 4 (2013), 1Google Scholar

Burden, S. and Townsend, J., ‘Whose Fault Is It Anyway? Undertakings and the Imputation of Liability’, Competition Law Journal, 3 (2013), 294Google Scholar

Burnside, A. J., ‘Minority Shareholdings Minority Shareholdings: An Overview of EU and National Case Law’, e-Competitions N° 56676 (2013)Google Scholar

Burt, R. S., Corporate Profits and Cooptation (Academic, 1983)Google Scholar

Calderón Cuadrado, R. and Alvarez Arce, J. L., ‘The Complexity of Corruption: Nature and Ethical Suggestions’, Working Paper 05/06, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de NavarraGoogle Scholar

Caronna, F., ‘Article 81 as a Tool for Controlling Minority Cross Shareholdings Between Competitors’, European Law Review, 29 (2004) 485Google Scholar

Cauffman, C., ‘The Interaction of Leniency Programmes and Actions for Damages’, Competition Law Review, 7 (2011), 181Google Scholar

Cheng, T. K., ‘The Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the US Corporate Veil Doctrines’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 34 (2011), 329Google Scholar

Cherry, T. L., ‘Financial Penalties as an Alternative Criminal Sanction: Evidence from Panel Data’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 29 (2001), 450Google Scholar

Chu, C. Y. and Yingyi, Q., ‘Vicarious Liability under a Negligence Rule’, International Review of Law and Economics, 15 (1995), 305Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4 (1937), 386Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1960), 1Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘New Myths and Old Realities: The American Law Institute Faces the Derivative Action’, Business Lawyer, 48 (1993), 1407Google Scholar

Coglianese, C. and Lazer, D., ‘Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals’, Law & Society Review, 37 (2003), 691Google Scholar

Combe, E., Monnier, C. and Legal, R., ‘Cartels: The Probability of Getting Caught in the European Union’, Bruges European Economic Research Papers (2008), 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comment, ‘Combinations in Restraint of Trade: A New Approach to Section 1 of the Sherman Act’, Utah Law Review (1966), 75Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, Press Release, ‘CMA Secures Director Disqualification for Competition Law Breach’ (2016)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, Press Release, ‘Director Sentenced to 6 months for Criminal Cartel’ (14 September 2015)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, Press Release, ‘Estate Agent Cartel Directors Disqualified’ (2018)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, Press Release, ‘Supply of Precast Concrete Drainage Products: Criminal Investigation’ (15 September 2017)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, ‘Rewards for Information About Cartels’, available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/cartels-informant-rewards-policyGoogle Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, ‘Stop Unfair Cartels’, available at: https://stopcartels.campaign.gov.uk/?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=press-release&utm_campaign=Cartels_2018&utm_content=CMA-releaseGoogle Scholar

Competition Commission of Pakistan, ‘Revised Guidelines on “Reward Payment to Informants Scheme”’, cl3, available at: www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/guidlines/reward_paymentannexure_ii.pdfGoogle Scholar

Connor, J. M., ‘Cartel Detection and Duration Worldwide’, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 2 (2011), 2Google Scholar

Connor, J. M., Global Price Fixing (Studies in Industrial Organization), 2nd edn (Springer, 2008)Google Scholar

Connor, J. M., ‘Private International Cartels Full Data’, 2012–4-13 2012–1 edn, Purdue University Research Repository (2012), available at: https://purr.purdue.edu/publications/2732/1Google Scholar

Connor, J. M., ‘Recidivism Revealed: Private International Cartels 1990–2009’, Competition Policy International, 6 (2012) 101Google Scholar

Connor, J. M. and Helmers, G., ‘Statistics on Modern Private International Cartels’, Working Paper 07–01: American Antitrust Institute (2007)Google Scholar

Conyon, M. J. and Mallin, C. A., ‘Directors’ Share Options, Performance Criteria and Disclosure: Compliance with the Greenbury Report’, ICAEW research monograph (1997) in Mallin, C. A., Corporate Governance, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Cooter, R. D. and Siegel, N. S., ‘Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8’, Stanford Law Review, 63 (2010), 115Google Scholar

Corradi, M. C. and Tzanaki, A., ‘Active and Passive Institutional Investors and New Antitrust Challenges: Is EU Competition Law Ready?’, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 3(1) (2017)Google Scholar

Cosset, J. C., Somé, H. Y. and Valéry, P., ‘Does Competition Matter for Corporate Governance? The Role of Country Characteristics’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51 (2016), 1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, D. A., ‘Why Leniency Does Not Undermine Compensation’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), p. 263Google Scholar

Crotty, J., Capitalism, Macroeconomics and Reality: Understanding Globalization, Financialization, Competition and Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar

Cseres, K. J., Schinkel, M. P. and Vogelaar, F. O. W. (eds.), Remedies and Sanctions in Competition Policy: Economic and Legal Implications of the Tendency to Criminalize Antitrust Enforcement in the EU Member States (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar

Dahlman, C. J., ‘The Problem of Externality’, Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1979), 141Google Scholar

Davis, M. L., ‘The Impact of Rules Allocating Legal Responsibilities Between Principals and Agents’, Managerial and Decision Economics, (1996) 17, 413Google Scholar

De Geest, G., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Edward Elgar, 2000)Google Scholar

Demsetz, H., ‘The Theory of the Firm Revisited’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 4 (1988), 141Google Scholar

Deutsche Bahn, ‘Code of Conduct’, available at: www.deutschebahn.com/en/group/compliance/geschaeftspartner/verhaltenskodex-1212586Google Scholar

Deutsche Welle, ‘ThyssenKrupp to face fiery shareholders’ meeting’ (17 January 2013)Google Scholar

DG Competition, ‘Anonymous Whistleblower Tool’, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/whistleblower/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Department of Justice, Press Release ‘Former Chairmen of Sotheby’s and Christie’s Auction Houses Indicted in International Price-Fixing Conspiracy’ (2001)Google Scholar

Department of Justice, ‘The False Claims Act: A Primer’ (2011), available at: www.justice.gov/civil/docs_forms/C-FRAUDS_FCA_Primer.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Justice, ‘Tullett Prebon and ICAP Restructure Transaction after Justice Department Expresses Concerns About Interlocking Directorates’ (2016), available at: www.justice.gov/opa/pr/tullett-prebon-and-icap-restructure-transaction-after-justice-department-expresses-concernsGoogle Scholar

Department of Justice Antitrust Division, ‘Criminal Enforcement Trend Charts’ (2017), available at: www.justice.gov/atr/criminal-enforcement-fine-and-jail-chartsGoogle Scholar

Douma, S. and Schreuder, H., Economic Approaches to Organizations, 6th edn (Pearson Education, 2017)Google Scholar

Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R. and Santella, P., ‘Corporate Governance Reforms, Interlocking Directorship Networks and Company Value in Italy (1998–2007)’, CESIfo Working Paper (2011)Google Scholar

Driguez, L., Droit Social et Droit de la Concurrence (Bruylant, 2006)Google Scholar

Dubrow, J. B., ‘Challenging the Economic Incentives Analysis of Competitive Effects in Acquisitions of Passive Minority Equity Interests’, Antitrust Law Journal, 69 (2001), 131Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H., ‘The Limits of Antitrust’, Texas Law Review, 63 (1984), 1Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’, University of Chicago Law Review, 52 (1985), 89Google Scholar

Eichenwald, K., ‘U.S. Wins a Round against Cartel’, New York Times (30 January 1997)Google Scholar

Elhauge, E., ‘Essay: Horizontal Shareholding’, Harvard Law Review, 129 (2016), 1267Google Scholar

Enriques, L. and Volpin, P., ‘Corporate Governance Reforms in Continental Europe’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (2007), 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

EU Commission, ‘Authorities in EU Member States Which Operate a Leniency Programme’, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/ecn/leniency_programme_nca.pdfGoogle Scholar

EU Commission, ‘Cartel Statistics’ (2017), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/statistics/statistics.pdfGoogle Scholar

EU Commission, ‘Statistics on Fines Imposed by the Commission Between 1990 and 2017’ (2017), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/statistics/statistics.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ezrachi, A. and Gilo, D., ‘EC Competition Law and Regulation of Passive Investments Among Competitors’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), 327Google Scholar

Ezrachi, A. and Stucke, M., Virtual Competition (Harvard University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Falce, V., ‘Interlocking Directorates: An Italian Antitrust Dilemma’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 9 (2013), 457Google Scholar

Fama, E., ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 88 (1980), 288Google Scholar

Fama, E. and Jensen, M. C., ‘Agency Problems and Residual Claims’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1983), 327Google Scholar

Faulkner, R. R., Cheney, E. R., Fisher, G. A. and Baker, W. E., ‘Crime by Committee: Conspirators and Company Men in the Illegal Electrical Industry Cartel, 1954–1959’, Criminology, 41 (2003), 511Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission, ‘Red Ventures Holds and Bankrate’, N°1710196 (2018), available at: www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/file-no-1710196/red-ventures-holdco-bankrateGoogle Scholar

Federal Trade Commission, ‘Statement of FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz Regarding the Announcement that Arthur D. Levinson Has Resigned from Google’s Board’ (2009), available at: www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2009/10/statement-ftc-chairman-jon-leibowitz-regarding-announcementGoogle Scholar

Federal Trade Commission, ‘Third Point Funds Agree to Settle FTC Charges that They Violated U.S. Pre-merger Notification Requirements’ (2015), available at https://perma.cc/F9HZ-S8YPGoogle Scholar

Ferraro, F., Schnyder, G., Heemskerk, E. M., Corrado, R. and Del Vecchio, N., ‘Structural Breaks and Governance Networks in Western Europe’ in Kogut, B. (ed.), The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance (MIT Press, 2012), p. 151Google Scholar

Fich, E. M. and White, L. J., ‘CEO Compensation and Turnover: The Effects of Mutually Interlocked Boards’, Wake Forest Law Review, 38 (2003), 935Google Scholar

Fich, E. M. and White, L. J., ‘Why Do CEOs Reciprocally Sit on Each Other’s Boards?’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11 (2005) 175Google Scholar

Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. and Garcia-Bernardo, J., ‘Hidden Power of the Big Three? Passive Index Funds, Re-concentration of Corporate Ownership, and New Financial Risk’, Business and Politics, 19(2) (2017), 298Google Scholar

Financial Times, ‘BA Sales Chief on Price-Fixing Charge to Join Board’ (28 November 2008)Google Scholar

Fisse, B., ‘Reconditioning Corporate Leniency: The Possibility of Making Compliance Programmes a Condition of Immunity’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), ch.10Google Scholar

Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J., Corporations, Crime and Accountability (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Flochel, L., ‘The Competitive Effects of Acquiring Minority Shareholdings’, Revue Concurrences, 1–2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Fox, E. M., ‘Monopolization and Abuse of Dominance: Why Europe Is Different’, Antitrust Bulletin 59 (2014), 129Google Scholar

Freedman, C. E., ‘Cartels and the Law in France Before 1914’, French Historical Studies, 15 (1988), 462Google Scholar

Furubotn, E. G. and Richter, R. (eds.), Institutions & Economic Theory, The Contribution of New Institutional Economics, 2nd edn (University of Michigan Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galloway, J., ‘Securing the Legitimacy of Individual Sanctions in UK Competition Law’, World Competition, 40(1) (2016), 121Google Scholar

Garner, J., ‘Ethics and Law’ in Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics (Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar

Gavil, A. I., ‘Copperweld 2000: The Vanishing Gap Between Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act’, Antitrust Law Journal, 68 (2000), 87Google Scholar

Gavil, A. I., Kovacic, W. E. and Baker, J. B., Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Policy, 2nd edn (Thomson West, 2008)Google Scholar

Geis, G., White-Collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions (Alberton Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Geradin, D., ‘Antitrust Compliance Programmes & Optimal Antitrust Enforcement: A Reply to Wouter Wils’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1 (2013), 325Google Scholar

Gerber, B. M., ‘Enabling Interlock Benefits While Preventing Anticompetitive Harm: Toward an Optimal Definition of Competitors Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 24 (2007), 107Google Scholar

Gertner, M., ‘Why Do Shareholder Derivative Suits Remain Rare in Continental Europe?’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 37 (2013), 843Google Scholar

Ghezzi, F., ‘Interlocking Directorates in the Financial Sector: The Italian Job (Art. 36 Law 214/2011) – An Antitrust Perspective’, Università Bocconi (2012)Google Scholar

Gilo, D., ‘The Anticompetitive Effect of Passive Investment’, Michigan Law Review, 99 (2000), 1Google Scholar

Gilo, D., Moshe, Y. and Spiegel, Y., ‘Partial Cross Ownership and Tacit Collusion’, RAND Journal of Economics, 37 (2006), 81Google Scholar

Ginsburg, D. H., ‘Are Administrative Fines the Best Way to Deter Infringements?’, Deterring EU Competition Law Infringements: Are We Using the Right Sanctions?, Conference by TILEC and the Liege Competition & Innovation, 3 December 2012, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, D. H. and Wright, J. D., ‘Antitrust Sanctions’, Competition Policy International, 6 (2010), 3Google Scholar

Goffinet, P. and Puel, F., ‘Vertical Relationships: The Impact of the Internet on the Qualification of Agency Agreements’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 6(4) (2015), 242Google Scholar

González, T. A. and Schmid, M. ‘Corporate Governance and Antitrust Behavior’, Swiss Institute of Banking and Finance, University of St. Gallen Working Paper 5 (2012)Google Scholar

González, T. A., Schmid, M. and Yermack, D., ‘Does Price Fixing Benefit Corporate Managers?’, NYU Working Paper No FIN-13–002 (2017)Google Scholar

Götz, G. Herold, D. and Paha, J., ‘Germany, Austria and Switzerland on How to Prevent Violations of Competition Laws’ in Paha, J. (ed.), Competition Law Compliance Programmes – An Interdisciplinary Approach (Springer, 2016), p. 37Google Scholar

Graafland, J. J., ‘Collusion, Reputation Damage and Interest in Code of Conduct: The Case of a Dutch Construction Company’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 2 (2004), 127Google Scholar

Grechenic, K. and Sekyra, M. ‘No Derivative Shareholder Suits in Europe – A Model of Percentage Limits and Collusion’, International Review of Law and Economics, 31 (2011), 16Google Scholar

Griffin, J. M., Department of Justice, ‘An Inside Look at a Cartel at Work: Common Characteristics of International Cartels’, ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 48th Annual Spring Meeting (2000)Google Scholar

Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D., ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1986), 691Google Scholar

Grow, N., ‘American Needle and the Future of the Single Entity Defense Under Section One of the Sherman Act’, American Business Law Journal, 48 (2011), 449Google Scholar

Guttuso, L., ‘Leniency and the Two Faces of Janus: Where Public and Private Enforcement Merge and Converge’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), p. 273Google Scholar

Hammond, S. D., ‘Cornerstones of an Effective Leniency Program’, speech delivered to ICN Workshop on Leniency Programs, Sydney (22–23 November 2004)Google Scholar

Han, M. A., Vertical Relations in Cartel Theory (Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics, 2011)Google Scholar

Harding, C., ‘The Anti-Cartel Enforcement Industry: Criminological Perspectives on Cartel Criminalisation’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Ezrachi, A. (eds.), Criminalising Cartels: A Critical Interdisciplinary Study of an International Regulatory Movement (Hart Publishing, 2011), ch. 16Google Scholar

Harding, C., Beaton Wells, C. and Edwards, J., ‘Leniency and Criminal Sanctions in Anti-Cartel Enforcement: Happily Married or Uneasy Bedfellows?’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), ch. 12Google Scholar

Harringon, J. E., ‘How Do Cartels Operate?’, Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 2 (2006), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, J. E., ‘Optimal Deterrence of Competition Law Infringement’, Deterring EU Competition Law Infringements: Are We Using the Right Sanctions?, Conference by TILEC and the Liege Competition & Innovation, 3 December 2012, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Harrison, J. L., ‘Dr Miles Orphans: Vertical Conspiracy and Consignment in the Wake of Leegin’, Wake Forest Law Review, 45 (2010), 1125Google Scholar

Hart, O., ‘An Economist’s Perspective on the Theory of the Firm’ in Buckley, P. J. and Michie, J. (eds.), Firms, Organizations and Contracts: A Reader in Industrial Organization (Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 199Google Scholar

Hart, O., Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Hart, O., ‘Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (1988), 119Google Scholar

Hart, O., ‘The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme’, Bell Journal of Economics, 2 (1983), 366Google Scholar

Hart, O. and Holmström, B., ‘The Theory of Contracts’ in Bewley, T. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 71Google Scholar

Hart, O. and Moore, J., ‘Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation’, Econometrica, 56 (1988), 755Google Scholar

Hawk, B. E. and Huser, H. L., ‘“Controlling” the Shifting Sands: Minority Shareholdings Under EEC Competition Law’, Fordham International Law Journal, 17 (1993), 321Google Scholar

Hayek, F., ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35(1945), 519Google Scholar

He, J. and Huang, J., ‘Product Market Competition in a World of Cross-Ownership: Evidence from Institutional Blockholdings’, Review of Financial Studies, 30(8) (2017), 2674Google Scholar

Heimler, A. and Mehta, K. ‘Violations of Antitrust Provisions: The Optimal Level of Fines for Achieving Deterrence’, World Competition, 35 (2012), 103Google Scholar

Hein, E., Detzer, D. and Dodig, N. (eds.), Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: Country Studies (Edward Elgar, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hernstein, R. J. and Wilson, J. Q., Crime and Human Nature (Simon and Schuster, 1985)Google Scholar

Herold, D., ‘Compliance and Incentive Contracts’ in Paha, J. (ed.), Competition Law Compliance Programmes – An Interdisciplinary Approach (Springer, 2016)Google Scholar

Herold, D., ‘The Impact of Incentive Pay on Corporate Crime’, MAGKS Discussion Paper No 52–2017 (2017)Google Scholar

Holmström, B., ‘Moral Hazard in Teams’, Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (1982), 324Google Scholar

Holmström, B. and Tirole, J., ‘The Theory of the Firm’ in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North Holland, 1989), p. 61Google Scholar

Horn, H., Lang, H. and Lundgren, S., ‘Competition, Long Run Contracts and Internal Inefficiencies in Firms’, European Economic Review, 38 (1994), 213Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H., ‘American Needle: The Sherman Act, Conspiracy and Exclusion’, Competition Policy International Antitrust Journal (2010), 1Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H., Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937 (Harvard University Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H., Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and its Practice, 5th edn (Thomson West, 2016)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H., ‘Resale Price Maintenance: Consignment Agreements, Copyrighted or Patented Products and the First Sale Doctrine’, University of Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper [2010]Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H. and Leslie, C. R., ‘The Firm as Cartel Manager’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 64 (2011), 813Google Scholar

Hubert, P. and Schallenberg, K., ‘Moving in the Right Direction, France is Taking Antitrust Compliance very Seriously’, Competition Law Insight (2012), 18Google Scholar

Hughes, P., ‘Competition Law Enforcement and Corporate Group Liability – Adjusting the Veil’, European Competition Law Review, 35 (2014), 68Google Scholar

Hughes, P., ‘Directors’ Personal Liability for Cartel Activity under UK and EC Law – A Tangled Web’, European Competition Law Review, 29 (2008), 632Google Scholar

Hughes, P. and Rodger, B., ‘EU Competition Law and Private International Law: A Developing Relationship’ in Lianos, I. and Geradin, D. (eds.), Handbook on European Competition Law: Enforcement and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Ignjatovic, B. and Ridyard, D., ‘Minority Shareholdings, Material Effects?’, Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle (2012) 7Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce, ‘Promoting Antitrust Compliance: The various approaches of national antitrust’ (2011)Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce, ‘The ICC Antitrust Compliance Toolkit, Practical Antitrust Compliance Tools for SMEs and Larger Companies’ (2013)Google Scholar

International Comparative Legal Guides, ‘Cartels and Leniency’ (2018)Google Scholar

International Competition Network, Anti-Cartel Enforcement Manual (2011)Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization, New Work Item Proposal – Compliance Programs (2012)Google Scholar

Januszewski, S., Koke, J. and Winter, J. K., ‘Product Market Competition, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis for Germany’, Research in Economics, 56 (2002), 299Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C., ‘Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers’, American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C., ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14 (2010), 8Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305Google Scholar

Jones, A., ‘The Boundaries of an Undertaking in EU Competition Law’, European Competition Journal, 8 (2012), 301Google Scholar

Jones, A. and Sufrin, B., EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 6th edn (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Jones, K. and Harrison, F., ‘Criminal Sanctions: An Overview of EU and National Case Law’, e-Competitions N° 64713 [2014]Google Scholar

Jones, T. M. and Keevil, A. A. C., ‘“Agents without Principals” Revisited: Theorizing the Effects of Increased Shareholder Participation in Corporate Governance’ in Goranova, M. and Ryan, L. V. (eds.), Shareholder Empowerment (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 103Google Scholar

Joshua, J., Botteman, Y. and Atlee, L., ‘“You Can’t Beat the Percentage” – The Parental Liability Presumption in EU Cartel Enforcement’, European Antitrust Review (2012), 3Google Scholar

Kalbfleisch, P., ‘Minority Shareholdings in Competing Companies’, ‘Merger Control and Minority Shareholdings: Time for a Change?’, Revue Concurrences, 39–2011 (2011), 14Google Scholar

Kallifatides, M., Nachemson-Ekwall, S. and Sjoestrand, S. E., Corporate Governance in Modern Financial Capitalism: Old Mutual’s Hostile Takeover of Skandia (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar

Kalss, S., ‘Shareholder Suits: Common Problems, Different Solutions and First Steps Towards a Possible Harmonization by Means of a European Model Code’, European Company and Financial Law Review, 2 (2009), 324Google Scholar

Karr, N., ‘The OFT’s Revised Director Disqualification Guidance: Deterring Directors or Competition Law Breaches?’, Linklaters (2010)Google Scholar

Kass, C., ‘Holding Parents Liable For Antitrust Violations – Differences in US And EU Corporate Governance’, The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel (2010), 38Google Scholar

Katz, M. L., ‘Vertical Contractual Relations’ in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. 1 (North Holland, 1989), p. 655Google Scholar

Kennelly, B., ‘Antitrust Forum-Shopping in England: Is Provimi Ltd v Aventis Correct?’, CPI Antitrust Journal, 2 (2010) 1Google Scholar

Kershaw, D., Company Law in Context: Text and Materials, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Kishoiyian, B. ‘The Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy Doctrine in International Business: The Case for the Extraterritorial application of Antitrust Law’, Touro International Law Review, 6 (1995) 191Google Scholar

Klahold, C., ‘Importance and Challenges of Antitrust Compliance for Large Corporations’, Deterring EU Competition Law Infringements: Are We Using the Right Sanctions?, Conference by TILEC and the Liege Competition & Innovation, 3 December 2012, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Klein, B., ‘Single Entity Analysis of Joint Ventures After American Needle: An Economic Perspective’, Antitrust Law Journal, 78 (2013), 669Google Scholar

Klein, B. and Lerner, A. V., ‘The Firm in Economics and Antitrust Law’ in Collins, W. D. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, vol. 1 (American Bar Association, 2008)Google Scholar

Klein, B., Crawford, R. G. and Alchian, A. A., ‘Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process’, Journal of Law and Economics, 21 (1978), 297Google Scholar

Klein, P. G., ‘New Institutional Economics’ in Bouckaert, B. and De Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Edward Elgar, 2000)Google Scholar

Koenig, C., ‘An Economic Analysis of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine in the EU Competition Law’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 13 (2017), 281Google Scholar

Kogut, B. and Walker, G., ‘The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks’, American Sociological Review, 66 (2001), 317Google Scholar

Korea Federal Trade Commission, Annual Report (2017), available at: https://bit.ly/2wm2MZQGoogle Scholar

Kornhauser, L., ‘An Economic Analysis of the Choice Between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents’, California Law Review, 70 (1982), 1345Google Scholar

Kovacic, W. E., ‘Competition Policy in the European Union and the United States: Convergence or Divergence in the Future Treatment of Dominant Firms?’, Competition Law International, 4 (2008), 8Google Scholar

Kovacic, W. E., Mavroidis, P. C., and Neven, D. J., ‘Merger Control Procedures and Institutions: A Comparison of the EU and US Practice’, Antitrust Bulletin, 59 (2014), 55Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., ‘Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (1984), 857Google Scholar

Krauss, J. G. and Cronheim, C. T., ‘Partial Acquisitions After Dairy Farmers: Got Answers?’, Antitrust magazine, ABA Section of Antitrust Law [2006], 49Google Scholar

Kühn, K. U., ‘Fighting Collusion by Regulating Communication Between Firms’, Economic Policy, 16 (2001), 167Google Scholar

Kühn, K. U. and Vives, X., Information Exchanges Among Firms and their Impact on Competition (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1995)Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanez, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. ‘Law and Finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanez, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’, Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1131Google Scholar

LaCroix, K., ‘Professional Liability Insurance: The Antitrust Exclusion Isn’t Just About Antitrust Claims’, The D&O Diary (2012)Google Scholar

Land, R. H. and Davis, J. P., ‘Comparative Deterrence from Private Enforcement and Criminal Enforcement of the U.S. Antitrust Laws’, Brigham Young University Law Review (2011), 315.Google Scholar

Leslie, C. R., ‘Antitrust Amnesty, Game Theory, and Cartel Stability’, Journal of Corporation Law, 31 (2006) 453Google Scholar

Leslie, C. R., ‘Cartels, Agency Costs, and Finding Virtue in Faithless Agents’, William & Mary Law Review, 49 (2008), 1621Google Scholar

Leslie, C. R., ‘Trust, Distrust, and Antitrust’, Texas Law Review, 82 (2004), 515Google Scholar

Letwin, W., ‘Congress and the Sherman Antitrust Law: 1887–1890’, University of Chicago Law Review, 23 (1956), 222Google Scholar

Leupold, B., ‘Effective Enforcement of EU Competition Law Gone Too Far? Recent Case Law on the Presumption of Parental Liability’, European Competition Law Review, 34 (2013), 570Google Scholar

Levenstein, M. C. and Suslow, V. Y., ‘What Determines Cartel Success?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (2006), 43Google Scholar

Lianos, I., ‘Commercial Agency Agreements, Vertical Restraints, and the Limits of Article 81(1) EC: Between Hierarchies and Networks’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 3 (2007), 625Google Scholar

Lianos, I., ‘Competition Law Remedies in Europe’ in Lianos, I. and Geradin, D. (eds.), Handbook on European Competition Law: Enforcement and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2013), p. 362Google Scholar

Lianos, I., ‘Cross-border Damages Actions in the EU: Managing Inter-Jurisdictional Competition in the EU Mixed Enforcement System’, CLES Research Paper series/2014 (2014)Google Scholar

Lianos, I., ‘La Transformation du Droit de la Concurrence par le Recours à l’Analyse Economique’ (Bruylant/Sakkoulas, 2007)Google Scholar

Lianos, I., Davis, P. and Nebbia, P., ‘Cross-Border Damages Actions in the EU: Managing Inter-Jurisdictional Competition in the EU Mixed Enforcement System’ in Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law (Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Longo, L. and Moretti, A., ‘Chapter 10: Italy’ in Holmes, M. and Davey, L. (eds.), A Practical Guide to National Competition Rules Across Europe (Kluwer Law International, 2007)Google Scholar

Macey, J. R., ‘Agency Theory and the Criminal Liability of Organizations’, Boston University Law Review, 71 (1991), 315Google Scholar

Macey, J. R. and Mitts, J., ‘Finding Order in the Morass: The Three Real. Justifications for Piercing the Corporate Veil’, Cornell Law Review, 100 (2014), 99Google Scholar

Machlup, F., ‘Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial’, American Economic Review, 57 (1967), 1Google Scholar

Malecki, C., Corporate Social Responsibility, Perspectives for Sustainable Corporate Governance (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar

Mallin, C. A., Corporate Governance, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Malueg, D. A., ‘Collusive Behavior and Partial Ownership of Rivals’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10 (1992), 27Google Scholar

Manne, H. G., ‘Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control’, Journal of Political Economy, 73 (1965), 110Google Scholar

Marshall, R. C. and Marx, L. M., The Economics of Collusion (MIT Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Martin, S., ‘Endogenous Firm Efficiency in a Cournot Principal-Agent Model’, Journal of Economic Theory, 59 (1993), 445Google Scholar

Marvao, C. and Spagnolo, G., ‘What Do We Know About the Effectiveness of Leniency Policies? A Survey of the Empirical and Experimental Evidence’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), p. 57Google Scholar

Mason, C., The Art of the Steal (GP Putnam & Sons, 2004)Google Scholar

Massey, P., ‘Criminalization and Leniency: Will the Combination Favourably Affect Cartel Stability?’ in Cseres, K. J., Schinkel, M. P. and Vogelaar, F. O. W. (eds.), Remedies and Sanctions in Competition Policy: Economic and Legal Implications of the Tendency to Criminalize Antitrust Enforcement in the EU Member States (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar

Matheson, J. H., ‘The Modern Law of Corporate Groups: An Empirical Study of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Parent-Subsidiary Context’, North Carolina Law Review, 87 (2009), 1091Google Scholar

McCahery, J., Sautner, Z. and Starks, L., ‘Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors’, Journal of Finance, 71(6) (2016), 2905Google Scholar

Menard, C., ‘The Economics of Hybrid Organizations’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160 (2004), 347Google Scholar

Menell, N. G., ‘The Copperweld Question: Drawing the Line Between Corporate Family and Cartel’, Cornell Law Review, 101 (2016), 467Google Scholar

Merlino, P., ‘Edison: A Glimpse of Hope for Parent Companies Seeking to Rebut the Parental Liability Presumption?’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice (2014), 2Google Scholar

Meyers, R. P., ‘Ownership of Subsidiaries, Unity of Purpose, and Antitrust Liability’, University of Chicago Law Review, 68 (2001), 1401Google Scholar

Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J., Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice Hall, 1992)Google Scholar

Miller, S. R., Raven, M. E. and Went, D., ‘Ownership Interest Acquisitions: New Developments in the European Union and United States’, Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle [2012], 1Google Scholar

Mitić, A. and Rogl, M., ‘The European Antitrust Review 2014: Slovenia’, Global Competition Review (2014)Google Scholar

Mizruchi, M. S., ‘What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates’, Annual Review of Sociology, 22 (1996), 273Google Scholar

Moore, M. T., ‘Private Ordering and Public Policy: The Paradoxical Foundations of Corporate Contractarianism’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(4) (2014), 693Google Scholar

Moore, M. T. and Walker-Arnott, E., ‘A Fresh Look at Stock Market Short-Termism’, Journal of Law and Society, 41 (2014), 416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morfey, A. and Patton, C., ‘Safeway Stores Ltd v Twigger: The Buck Stops Here’, Competition Law (2011), 57Google Scholar

Motta, M., Competition Policy, Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Motta, M. and Langus, G., ‘On the Effect of EU Cartel Investigations and Fines On the Infringing Firms’ Market Value’ in Ehlermann, C. D. and Atanasiu, I. (eds.), European Competition Law Annual 2006: Enforcement of Prohibition of Cartels (Hart Publishing, 2006)Google Scholar

Motta, M. and Polo, M., ‘Leniency Programs and Cartel Prosecution’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (2003), 347Google Scholar

Mullin, W. P. and Snyder, M., ‘Should Firms be Allowed to Indemnify Their Employees for Sanctions?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26 (2010), 30Google Scholar

Murphy, J. E., ‘A Compliance & Ethics Program on a Dollar a Day: How Small Companies Can Have Effective Programs’ (2010), available at: www.hcca-info.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Resources/ResourceOverview/CEProgramDollarADay-Murphy.pdfGoogle Scholar

Murphy, J. E., ‘Making The Sentencing Guidelines Message Complete’ Letter to the Department of Justice: Proposed Revision to the Sentencing Guidelines (2014), available at: http://antitrustconnect.com/2014/07/28/making-the-sentencing-guidelines-message-complete/Google Scholar

Murphy, J. E., ‘The FTC and Antitrust Compliance Programs’, Compliance & Ethics Professional (2012)Google Scholar

Murphy, J. E., ‘Policies in Conflict: Undermining Corporate Self-Policing’ Rutgers University Law Review, 69 (2017) 421Google Scholar

Murphy, J. E. and Boehme, D., ‘Fear No Evil: A Compliance and Ethics Professionals’ Response to Dr. Stephan’ (2011), available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1965733Google Scholar

Nalebuff, B. J. and Stiglitz, J. E. ‘Information, Competition, and Markets’, American Economic Review, 73 (1983), 278Google Scholar

Nalebuff, B. J. and Stiglitz, J. E., ‘Prices and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition’, Bell Journal of Economics, 14 (1983), 21Google Scholar

Nelson, B., Law and Ethics in Global Business: How to Integrate Law and Ethics into Corporate Governance Around the World (Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar

Newbigging, E., ‘Hoffmann-La Roche v Stanley Adams – Corporate and Individual Ethics’, Cranfield University Working Paper (1986)Google Scholar

Newman, H. A. and Wright, D. W., ‘Strict Liability in a Principal–Agent Model’, International Review of Law and Economics, 10 (1990), 219Google Scholar

Nickell, S. J., ‘Competition and Corporate Performance’, Journal of Political Economy, (1996) 104–724Google Scholar

Nickell, S. J., Nickolitsas, D. and Dryden, N., ‘What Makes Firms Perform Well?’, European Economic Review, 41 (1997), 783Google Scholar

Nili, Y., ‘The Corporate Governance of Sovereign Wealth Funds’, available at: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2014/08/07/the-corporate-governance-of-sovereign-wealth-funds/Google Scholar

Norton Rose Fulbright, ‘Important Changes in Polish Competition Law’ (2015)Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. and Waehrer, K., ‘The Competitive Effects of Common Ownership: We Know Less than We Think’, Antitrust Law Journal, 81(3) (2017) 729Google Scholar

Odudu, O., ‘The Meaning of Undertaking Within 81 EC’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 7 (2005), 211Google Scholar

Okeoghene, O., ‘Collective Dominance Clarified?’, Cambridge Law Journal, 63(1) (2004), 44Google Scholar

Ono, H., ‘Lifetime Employment in Japan: Concepts and Measurements’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 24 (2010), 1Google Scholar

Orbach, B. Y., ‘The Antitrust Curse of Bigness’, Southern California Law Review, 85 (2012), 605Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age’ (2017)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in Brazil’, DAF/COMP (2010)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Cartel Sanctions Against Individuals’ (2003)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Common Ownership by Institutional Investors and its Impact on Competition’, DAF/COMP/WD (2017), 10Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Competition and Corporate Governance’ (2010)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Competition Committee, ‘The Concept of Merger Transaction’ (2013)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Competition Committee, Working Party No. 3, Public Prosecutors Program (2005)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics, and Compliance’ (2010)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Phase 3 Report on implementing the OECD Anti-bribery Convention in the Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Policy Roundtable, Minority Shareholdings (2008)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Policy Roundtable, Promoting Compliance with Competition Law (2011)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Principles of Corporate Governance’ (2004)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions, Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions’ (2009)Google Scholar

Ortiz Blanco, L., Givaja Sanz, A. and Lamadrid De Pablo, A., ‘Fine Arts in Brussels: Punishment and Settlement of Cartel Cases under EC Competition Law’ in Hirita, H., Raffaelli, E. and Adriano, E. (eds.), Antitrust Between EC Law and National Law (Bruyland Emile Etablissements, 2009)Google Scholar

Orts, E. W., Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Orts, E. W., ‘Shirking and Sharking: A Legal Theory of the Firm’, Yale Law & Policy, 16(2) (1997), 265Google Scholar

Pace, L. F. and Seidel, K., ‘The Drafting and the Role of Regulation 17, a Hard-Fought Compromise’ in Patel, K. K. and Schweitzer, H. (eds.), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Paha, J., ‘Antitrust Compliance: Managerial Incentives and Collusive Behavior’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 38(7) (2017), 992Google Scholar

Parker, C., The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Patel, M. S., ‘Common Ownership, Institutional Investors, and Antitrust’, Antitrust Law Journal (2018)Google Scholar

Pauer, N. I., The Single Economic Unit Doctrine and Corporate Group Responsibility in European Antitrust Law (Kluwer Law International, 2014)Google Scholar

Pennings, J. M., Interlocking Directorates: Origins and Consequences of Connections Among Organizations’ Board of Directors (Jossey-Bass Inc Pub, 1980)Google Scholar

Perrot, A., ‘Minority Shareholdings: Is there a Need for Reform?’, Law & Economics Workshop, Institute of Competition Law (15 October 2013)Google Scholar

Petersen, V., ‘Interlocking Directorates in the European Union: An Argument for Their Restriction’, European Business Law Review, 27(6) (2016), 821Google Scholar

Petersone, A., ‘Managerial Compensation and Cartel Behavior’ (2010), available at: http://dare.uva.nl/cgi/arno/show.cgi?fid=222247Google Scholar

Phillips, N. J.,‘Taking Stock: Assessing Common Ownership’ (1 June 2018), Remarks to the Global Antitrust Economics ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L., Microeconomics, 9th edn (Pearson, 2017)Google Scholar

Pini, G. D., ‘Passive–Aggressive Investments: Minority Shareholdings and Competition Law’, European Business Law Review, 23 (2012), 575Google Scholar

Pinotti, V., Sforza, M. and di Castelnuovo, N., ‘Italy Chapter – Cartels’ in Parr, N. and Hammon, C. (eds.), Cartels, Enforcement, Appeals & Damages Actions (Global Legal Group, 2012)Google Scholar

Platis, I., ‘Competition Law Implications of Minority Shareholdings: The EU and US Perspectives’, Hellenic Review of European Law [2013], 181Google Scholar

Polinsky, A., Mitchell, A. and Shavell, S., ‘Economic Analysis of Law’, 2nd edn, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Harvard University, 2008)Google Scholar

Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S., ‘Should Employees Be Subject to Fines and Imprisonment Given the Existence of Corporate Liability?’, International Review of Law and Economics, 13 (1993), 239Google Scholar

Posner, E., Scott Morton, F. and Weyl, E. G., ‘A Proposal to Limit the Anti-Competitive Power of Institutional Investors’, Antitrust Law Journal, 81(3) (2017), 669Google Scholar

Posner, R. A., Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective (University of Chicago Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Prinz, E., Les effets des liens personnels interconseils sur la performance de l’entreprise: une analyse comparée entre France et Allemagne (Peter Lang, 2011)Google Scholar

Privileggi, F., Marchese, C. and Cassone, A., ‘Agent’s Liability Versus Principal’s Liability When Attitudes Toward Risk Differ’, International Review of Law and Economics, 21 (2001), 181Google Scholar

Rahl, J. A., ‘Conspiracy and the Antitrust Laws’, Illinois Law Review, 44 (1950), 743Google Scholar

Raith, M., ‘Competition, Risk and Managerial Incentives’, American Economic Review, 93 (2003), 1425Google Scholar

Ramirez Pérez, S. M. and van de Scheur, S., ‘The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC [Articles 101 and 102 TFEU], Ordoliberalism and its Keynesian Challenge’ in Patel, K. K. and Schweitzer, H. (eds.), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Reisberg, A., Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance Theory and Operation (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Rhee, R. J., ‘Corporate Short-Termism and Intertemporal Choice’, Washington University Law Review, 96 (2018), 2Google Scholar

Riley, A. and Bloom, M., ‘Antitrust Compliance Programmes – Can Companies and Antitrust Agencies do More?’, Competition Law Journal [2011], 21Google Scholar

Riley, A. and Sokol, D., ‘Rethinking Compliance’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 3(1) (2015), 31Google Scholar

Roberts, J., The Modern Firm, Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Rock, E. B., ‘Antitrust and the Market for Corporate Control’, California Law Review, 77 (1989), 1365Google Scholar

Rock, E. B., ‘Corporate Law Through an Antitrust Lens’, Columbia Law Review, 92 (1992), 497Google Scholar

Rock, E. B. and Rubinfield, D., ‘Antitrust for Institutional Investors’, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No 17–23Google Scholar

Romano, R., ‘Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance: What Went Wrong?’, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 37 (1988), 76Google Scholar

Romano, R., ‘The Shareholder Suit: Litigation without Foundation?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7 (1991), 55Google Scholar

Rosch, J. T., ‘Terra Incognita: Vertical and Conglomerate Merger and Interlocking Directorate Law Enforcement in the United States’, Remarks of Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission, before the University of Hong Kong (2009)Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S., Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Ross, S. A., ‘The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem’, American Review, 63 (1983), 134Google Scholar

Salop, S. C. and O’ Brien, D. P., ‘Competitive Effects of Partial Ownership: Financial Interest and Corporate Control’, Antitrust Law Journal, 67 (2000), 268Google Scholar

Santella, P., Drago, C., Polo, A., and Gagliardi, E., ‘A Comparison of the Director Networks of the Main Listed Companies in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States’, Working Paper (2008)Google Scholar

Scharfstein, D. S., ‘Product-Market Competition and Managerial Slack’, RAND Journal of Economics, 19 (1988), 147Google Scholar

Schmidt, J., ‘The Case for a European Competition Disqualification Order’, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht, 8 (2010), 391Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. P., ‘Germany: Merger Control Analysis of Minority Shareholdings – A Model for the EU?’, Revue Concurrences, 2–2013 (2013), 207Google Scholar

Schmidt, K. M., ‘Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition’, Review of Economic Studies, 64 (1997), 191Google Scholar

Schmidt, V. A., ‘Privatization in France: The Transformation of French Capitalism’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, (1999) 17, 445Google Scholar

Schroeder, D. and Heinz, S., ‘Requests for Leniency in the EU: Experience and Legal Puzzle’ in Cseres, K. J., Schinkel, M. P., Vogelaar, F. O. W. (eds.), Remedies and Sanctions in Competition Policy: Economic and Legal Implications of the Tendency to Criminalize Antitrust Enforcement in the EU Member States (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar

Scott, P., ‘Competition Law Briefing: Safeway v Twigger – Safeway’s Claim Against Former Directors Reaches End of Shelf Life’, Norton Rose Case Brief (2011)Google Scholar

Sergakis, K., ‘EU Corporate Governance: The Ongoing Challenges of the “Institutional Investor Activism” Conundrum’, European Journal of Law Reform, 4 (2014), 726Google Scholar

Shavell, S., ‘Law Versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct’, American Law and Economics Review, 4 (2002), 227Google Scholar

Shavell, S., ‘The Judgment Proof Problem’, International Review of Law and Economics, 6 (1986), 45Google Scholar

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance’, Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 737Google Scholar

Sidak, G. and Teece, D. J., ‘Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 5 (2009), 581Google Scholar

Sidhu, K., ‘Anti-Corruption Compliance Standards in the Aftermath of the Siemens Scandal’, German Law Journal, 10 (2009), 1343Google Scholar

Siemens, Statement of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Investigation and Summary of Findings with respect to the Proceedings in Munich and the USGoogle Scholar

Simon, H., ‘A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship’, Econometrica, 19 (1951), 293Google Scholar

Simpson, S. S., Leeper Piquero, N. and Paternoster, R., ‘Rationality and Corporate Offending Decisions’ in Piquero, A. and Tibbetts, S. G. (eds.), Rational Choice and Criminal Behavior: Recent Research and Future Challenges (Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar

Simpson, S. S., Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Simpson, S. S., ‘Making Sense of White Collar Crime: Theory and Research’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 8 (2011), 481Google Scholar

Simpson, S. S. and Koper, C. S., ‘Deterring Corporate Crime’, Criminology, 30(3) (1992), 347Google Scholar

Slotboom, M., ‘Individual Liability for Cartel Infringements in the EU: An Increasingly Dangerous Minefield’, Kluwer Competition Law Blog (2013)Google Scholar

Smith, A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (University of Chicago Press, 1776)Google Scholar

Sokol, D. D., ‘Cartels, Corporate Compliance, and What Practitioners Really Think About Enforcement’, Antitrust Law Journal, 78 (2012), 201Google Scholar

Sokol, D. D., ‘Policing the Firm’, Notre Dame Law Review, 89 (2014), 785Google Scholar

Sonnenfeld, J. and Lawrence, P. R., ‘Why Do Companies Succumb to Price Fixing?’, Harvard Business Review (1978), 145Google Scholar

Spagnolo, G., ‘Criminalization of Cartels and their Internal Organization’ in Cseres, K. J., Schinkel, M. P., Vogelaar, F. O. W. (eds.), Remedies and Sanctions in Competition Policy: Economic and Legal Implications of the Tendency to Criminalize Antitrust Enforcement in the EU Member States (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar

Spagnolo, G., ‘Debt as a (Credible) Collusive Device, or: “Everybody Happy but the Consumer”’, Working paper of the Stockholm School of Economics, No 349 (2000)Google Scholar

Spagnolo, G., ‘Divide et Impera: Optimal Leniency Programs’, CEPR Working Paper No 4840 (2004)Google Scholar

Spagnolo, G., ‘Managerial Incentives and Collusive Behavior’, European Economic Review, 49 (2005), 150Google Scholar

Spark Legal Network and Queen Mary University of London, ‘Support Study for Impact Assessment Concerning the Review of Merger Regulation Regarding Minority Shareholdings’ (2016)Google Scholar

Spector, D., ‘Some Economics of Minority Shareholdings’, Revue Concurrences, 3–2011 (2011), 14Google Scholar

Staahl Gabrielsen, T., Hjelmeng, E. and Sorgard, L., ‘Rethinking minority Share Ownership and Interlocking Directorships – The Scope for Competition Law Intervention’, European Law Review, 36 (2011), 839Google Scholar

Stanevicius, M., ‘Portielje: Bar Remains High for Rebutting Parental Liability Presumption’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5 (2014), 24Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘An Empirical Assessment of the European Leniency Notice’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5 (2008), 537Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘Cartel Laws Undermined: Corruption, Social Norms, and Collectivist Business Cultures’, Journal of Law and Society, 37 (2010), 345Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘Disqualification Orders for Directors Involved in Cartels’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2 (2011), 529Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘European Commission Launches New Anonymous Whistleblower Tool, but Who Would Use It?’, Compettion Policy Blog (2017)Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘Four Key Challenges to the Successful Criminalization of Cartel Laws’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2 (2014), 333Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘How Dishonesty Killed the Cartel Offence’, Criminal Law Review, 6 (2011), 446Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘Is the Korean Innovation of Individual Informant Rewards a Viable Cartel Detection Tool?’ in Cheng, T., Ong, B. and Marco Colino, S. (eds.), Cartels in Asia (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014)Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘See No Evil: Cartels and the Limits of Antitrust Compliance Programs’, The Company Lawyer, 31 (2010), 231Google Scholar

Stephan, A., ‘Should Individual Sanctions Be Part of Deterrence Efforts?’ Deterring EU Competition Law Infringements: Are We Using the Right Sanctions? Conference by TILEC and the Liege Competition & Innovation, 3 December 2012, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Stephan, A. and Nikpay, A., ‘Leniency Decision-Making from a Corporate Perspective: Complex Realities’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), ch. 8Google Scholar

Stigler, J., ‘The Economies of Scale’, Journal of Law and Economics, 1 (1958), 54Google Scholar

Stokman, F. N., Ziegler, R. and Scott, J. (eds.), Networks of Corporate Power (Polity Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Stone, C, ‘The Place of Enterprise Liability in the Control of Corporate Conduct’, Yale Law Journal, 90 (1980), 1Google Scholar

StrategicRISK, ‘Guide to Directors’ & Officers’ Liability Insurance’ (2012)Google Scholar

Stucke, M., ‘Leniency, Whistle-Blowing and the Individual: Should We Create Another Race to the Competition Agency?’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C. (eds.), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: The Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing, 2015), ch. 11Google Scholar

Sykes, A., ‘The Economics of Vicarious Liability’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (1984), 1231Google Scholar

Temple Lang, J., ‘How Can the Problem of the Liability of a Parent Company for Price Fixing by a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Be Resolved?’, Fordham International Law Journal, 37(5) (2014), 1481Google Scholar

Thépot, F., ‘Antitrust v. Anti-Corruption Policy Approaches to Compliance: Why Such a Gap?’, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 6(2) (2015)Google Scholar

Thépot, F., ‘Leniency and Individual Liability: Opening the Black Box of the Cartel’, Competition Law Review, 7 (2011), 221Google Scholar

Thépot, F., Hugon, F. and Luinaud, M., ‘Cumul de Mandats D’Administrateur et Risques Anticoncurrentiels: Un Vide Juridique en Europe?’, Revue Concurrences, 1–2016 (2016), 1Google Scholar

Thépot, F. and Thépot, J., ‘Collusion, Managerial Incentives and Antitrust Fines’, Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center, 2017–06 (2017)Google Scholar

Thomas, S., ‘Guilty of a Fault that One Has Not Committed: The Limits of the Group-Based Sanction Policy Carried out by the Commission and the European Courts in EU-Antitrust Law’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 3 (2012), 11Google Scholar

Thompson, R. B., ‘Unpacking Limited Liability: Direct and Vicarious Liability of Corporate Participants for Torts of the Enterprise’, Vanderbilt Law Rewiew, 47 (1994), 2Google Scholar

Thompson, S. and Thomas, R. S., ‘The Public and Private Faces of Derivative Lawsuits’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57 (2004), 1747Google Scholar

ThyssenKrupp, Audit Report, available at: www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/company/compliance/audit-reports/Google Scholar

ThyssenKrupp, Remarks By Dr Heinrich Hiesinger Chairman of the Executive Board of ThyssenKrupp AG at the 14th Annual General Meeting on 18 January 2013Google Scholar

Travers, A. H., ‘Interlocks in Corporate Management and the Antitrust Laws’, Texas Law Review, 46 (1968), 819Google Scholar

Tricker, B., Corporate Governance, Principles, Policies and Practices, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Tzanaki, A., ‘The Legal Treatment of Minority Shareholdings Under EU Competition Law: Present and Future’ in Essays in Honour of Professor Panayiotis I. Kanellopoulos (Sakkoulas, 2015)Google Scholar

Umit Kucuk, S. and Timmermans, H. J. P., ‘Resale Price Maintenance (RPM): The US and EU perspectives’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19 (2012), 537Google Scholar

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Note by the UNCTAD secretariat, ‘The Use of Leniency Programmes as a Tool for the Enforcement of Competition Law Against Hardcore Cartels in Developing Countries’ (2010)Google Scholar

Van den Broek, S., Kemp, R. G. M., Verschoor, W. F. C. and de Vries, A. C., ‘Reputational Penalties to Firms in Antitrust Investigations’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 8 (2012), 231Google Scholar

Van Veen, K. and Kratzer, J., ‘National and International Interlocking Directorates Within Europe: Corporate Networks Within and Among Fifteen European Countries’, Economy and Society, 40 (2011), 1Google Scholar

Venit, J. S. and Foster, A. L., ‘Competition Compliance: Fines and Complementary Incentives’ in Lowe, P. and Marquis, M. (eds.), European Competition Law Annual 2011: Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law – Implications for Courts and Agencies (Hart Publishing, 2014)Google Scholar

Vestager, M., ‘Competition in Changing Times’, FIW Symposium, Innsbruck (16 February 2018)Google Scholar

Vestager, M., ‘Refining the EU merger Control System’, speech, Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht, Brussels (10 March 2016)Google Scholar

Vives, X., Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools (MIT Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Volkov, M., ‘Antitrust Compliance and Credit for an Effective Compliance Program’, available at: http://corruptioncrimecompliance.com/2013/09/antitrust-compliance-and-credit-for-an-effective-compliance-program/Google Scholar

Voss, K., ‘Preventing the Cure: Corporate Compliance Programmes in EU Competition Law Enforcement’, Europarättslig Tidskrift, 16 (2013), 28Google Scholar

Wagner, S. and Dittmar, L., ‘The Unexpected Benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley’, Harvard Business Review, 84 (2006), 133Google Scholar

Wagner von-Papp, F., ‘Compliance and Individual Sanctions for Competition Law Infringements’ in Paha, J. (ed.), Competition Law Compliance Programmes – An Interdisciplinary Approach (Springer, 2016), p. 135Google Scholar

Wagner-Von Papp, F., ‘What if all Bid Riggers Went to Prison and Nobody Noticed? Criminal Antitrust Law Enforcement in Germany’ in Beaton-Wells, C. and Ezrachi, A. (eds.), Criminalising Cartels, Critical Studies of an International Regulatory Movement (Hart Publishing, 2011), p. 157Google Scholar

Wagner-von Papp, F., Stephan, A., Kovacic, W., Zimmer, D. and Viros, D. ‘Individual Sanctions for Competition Law Infringements: Pros, Cons and Challenges’, Revue Concurrences, 2–2016 (2016), 14Google Scholar

Waldron, J., The Right to Private Property (Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Wall Street Journal, ‘ThyssenKrupp Chairman Gerhard Cromme to Step Down March 31’ (8 March 2013)Google Scholar

Wardhaugh, B., ‘Cartel Leniency and Effective Compensation in Europe: The Aftermath of Pfleiderer’, Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 19(3) (2013)Google Scholar

Wardhaugh, B., Cartels, Markets and Crime: A Normative Justification for Criminalisation of Economic Collusion (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Wardhaugh, B., ‘Punishing Parents for the Sins of Their Child: Extending EU Competition Liability in Groups and to Subcontractors’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 5(1) (2017), 22Google Scholar

Warner, J. B., Watts, R. L. and Wruck, K. H., ‘Stock Prices and Top Management Changes’, Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 461Google Scholar

Weber Waller, S., ‘Corporate Governance and Competition Policy’, George Mason Law Review, 18 (2011), 833Google Scholar

Weisbach, M. S., ‘Outside Directors and CEO Turnover’, Journal of Financial Economics (1988) 431Google Scholar

Werden, G. J., Hammond, S. D. and Barnett, B. A., ‘Deterrence and Detection of Cartels: Using all the Tools and Sanctions’ (2012)Google Scholar

Werden, G. J., Hammond, S. D., and Barnett, B. A., ‘Recidivism Eliminated: Cartel Enforcement in the United States Since 1999’, Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle (2011), 10Google Scholar

Whelan, P. M., The Criminalization of European Antitrust Enforcement: Theoretical, Legal, and Practical Challenges (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Whish, R. and Bailey, D., Competition Law, 8th edn (Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Williamson, D. V., ‘Organization, Control, and the Single Entity Defense in Antitrust’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5 (2009), 723Google Scholar

Williamson, O., ‘Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1991), 269Google Scholar

Williamson, O., Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, 1975)Google Scholar

Williamson, O., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Williamson, O., ‘The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 87 (1981), 548Google Scholar

Williamson, O., The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Williamson, O., ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, American Economic Review, 61 (1971), 112Google Scholar

Williamson, O., ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1979), 233Google Scholar

Williamson, O. and Winter, S. G. (eds.), The Nature of the Firm, Origins, Evolution and Development (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Willig, R. D., ‘Corporate Governance and Market Structure’ in Razin, A. and Sadka, E. (eds.), Economic Policy in Theory and Practice (Macmillan, 1987), p. 481Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., ‘Antitrust Compliance Programmes & Optimal Antitrust Enforcement’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1 (2013), 52Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., ‘Is Criminalization of EU Competition Law the Answer?’, World Competition: Law and Economics Review, 28 (2005), 117Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., ‘Is Criminalization of EU Competition Law the Answer?’ in Cseres, K. J., Schinkel, M. P., Vogelaar, F. O. W. (eds.), Remedies and Sanctions in Competition Policy: Economic and Legal Implications of the Tendency to Criminalize Antitrust Enforcement in the EU Member States (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., ‘Private Enforcement of EU Antitrust Law and Its Relationship with Public Enforcement: Past, Present and Future’, World Competition, 40(1) (2017), 3Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., The Optimal Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law (Kluwer Law International, 2002)Google Scholar

Wils, W. P. J., ‘The Undertaking as Subject of EC Competition Law and the Imputation of Infringements to Natural or Legal Persons’, European Law Review, (2000), 99Google Scholar

Windolf, P. and Beyer, J., ‘Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain’, British Journal of Sociology, 47 (1996), 2Google Scholar

Winterstein, A., ‘Nailing the Jellyfish: Social Security and Competition Law’, European Competition Law Review, 20 (1999), 324Google Scholar

World Bank Institute, ‘Fighting Corruption Through Collective Action’, presentation, available at: www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/fighting_corruption_through_collective_action.pdfGoogle Scholar

Wright, S. K., ‘All in the Family: When Will Internal Discussion Be Labeled Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy?’, Duquesne Law Review, 14 (1975), 63Google Scholar

Yeo, H. J., Pochet, C. and Alcouffe, A., ‘CEO Reciprocal Interlocks in French Corporations’, Journal of Management and Governance, 7 (2003), 87Google Scholar

Zajac, E. J. and Westphal, J. D., ‘Director Reputation, Power, and CEO-Board the Dynamics of Board Interlocks’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1996), 507Google Scholar

Zhang, A., ‘Toward an Economic Approach to Agency Agreements’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 9 (2013), 553Google Scholar

Zingales, N., ‘European and American Leniency Programmes: Two Models Towards Convergence?’, Competition Law Review, 5 (2008) 5Google Scholar