,ABA Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law. 1998. Study Finds Employers Win Most ADA Title I Judicial and Administrative Complaints. Mental and Physical Disabilities Law Reporter 22:403–7.Google Scholar

Abrams, K. 1989. Gender Discrimination and the Transformation of Workplace Norms. Vanderbilt Law Review 42:1183–248.Google Scholar

Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender and Society 4:139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Administrative Office of the United States Courts. 1995. Judicial Business of the United States Courts: 1995 Report of the Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, D.C.

Albiston, C. 2007. Institutional Perspectives on Law, Work, and Family. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:397–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albiston, CR. 2005. Anti-Essentialism and the Work/Family Dilemma. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 20:30–49.Google Scholar

Albiston, CRNielsen, LB. 2007. The Procedural Attack on Civil Rights: The Empirical Reality of Buckhannon for the Private Attorney General. UCLA Law Review 54:1087–134.Google Scholar

Allen, TD, Russell, JEA. 1999. Parental Leave of Absence: Some Not So Family-Friendly Implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29:166–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, DJ, Binder, M, Krause, K. 2003. The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work-Schedule Flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56:273–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armenia, A, Gerstel, N. 2006. Family Leaves, the FMLA and Gender Neutrality: The Intersection of Race and Gender. Social Science Research 35:871–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagenstos, SR. 2006. The Structural Turn and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Law. California Law Review 94:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baum, CL. 2003. The Effect of State Maternity Leave Legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on Employment and Wages. Labor Economics 10:573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, M. 1985. The Age of Manufacturers. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar

Berger, PL, Luckman, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L, Walker, N. 1967. Law and Moral Judgments. Sociometry 30:410–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. 1973. The Mobilization of Law. The Journal of Legal Studies 2:125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair-Loy, M, Wharton, AS. 2002. Employees' Use of Work-Family Policies and the Workplace Social Context. Social Forces 80:813–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, JT, Galinsky, E, Lord, M, Staines, GL, Brown, KR. 1991. Beyond the Parental Leave Debate: The Impact of Laws in Four States, Families and Work Institute, New York.

Boris, E. 1993. The Power of Motherhood: Black and White Activist Women Redefine the “Political.” In Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of the Welfare State, ed. Koven, S, Michel, S. New York: Routledge, pp. 213–45.Google Scholar

Borsay, A. 1998. Returning Patients to the Community: Disability, Medicine and Economic Rationality before the Industrial Revolution. Disability and Society 13:645–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boydston, J. 1990. Home and Work: Housework, Wages, and the Ideology of Labor in the Early Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Budig, MJ, England, P. 2001. The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. American Sociological Review 66:204–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bumiller, K. 1987. Victims in the Shadow of the Law: A Critique of the Model of Legal Protection. Signs 12:421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bumiller, K. 1988. The Civil Rights Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 161 pp.Google Scholar

Affairs, Bureau of National. 1998. DOL Summary of Outreach, Compliance Activity under the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act. Daily Labor Report:E-1.

Bureau, of the Census. 2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

,Bureau of Labor Statistics 2007. Employment Characteristics of Families in 2006, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.

Burke, TF. 2002. Lawyers, Lawsuits and Legal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burstein, P. 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 96:1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, P, Monaghan, K. 1986. Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilization of Law. Law and Society Review 20:355–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantor, D, Waldfogel, J, Kerwin, J, Wright, MM, Levin, K, et al. 2001. Balancing the Needs of Families and Employers: The Family and Medical Leave Surveys, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.

Chayes, A. 1976. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review 89:1281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, JC. 1983. Rescuing the Private Attorney General: Why the Model of the Lawyer as Bounty Hunter Is Not Working. Maryland Law Review 42:215.Google Scholar

Cohen, PN, Bianchi, SM. 1999. Marriage, Children, and Women's Employment: What Do We Know?Monthly Labor Review 112:22–31.Google Scholar

Colker, R. 1999. The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Windfall for Defendants. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 34:99–162.Google Scholar

Collins, PH. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

,Commerce US Dept of. 1997. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, D.C.

,Commission on Leave. 1996. A Workable Balance: Report to Congress on Family and Medical Leave Policies, Commission on Family and Medical Leave, Washington D.C.

Cooter, R, Kornhauser, L. 1980. Can Litigation Improve the Law Without the Help of Judges?Journal of Legal Studies 9:139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooter, RD. 1996. Decentralized Law for a Complex Economy: The Structural Approach to Adjudicating the New Law Merchant. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144:1643–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correll, SJ, Benard, S, Paik, I. 2007. Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?American Journal of Sociology 112:1297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cott, NF. 1977. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cuddy, AJC, Fiske, ST, Glick, P. 2004. When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice. Journal of Social Issues 60:701–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, AE, Kalleberg, AL. 2006. Family-Friendly Organizations? Work and Family Programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations 33:191–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deacon, D. 1985. Political Arithmetic: The Nineteenth-Century Australian Census and the Construction of the Dependent Woman. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11:27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Digeser, P. 1992. The Fourth Face of Power. The Journal of Politics 54:977–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, PJ, Powell, WW. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, WW, DiMaggio, PJ, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Donohue, JJ, Siegelman, P. 1991. The Changing Nature of Employment Discrimination. Stanford Law Review 43:983.Google Scholar

Dowd, NE. 1989. Work and Family: The Gender Paradox and the Limitations of Discrimination Analysis in Restructuring the Workplace. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 24:79–172.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, HL, Rabinow, P. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 271 pp.Google Scholar

Drimmer, JC. 1993. Cripples, Overcomers, and Civil Rights: Tracing the Evolution of Federal Legislation and Social Policy for People with Disabilities. UCLA Law Review 40:1341–410.Google Scholar

Edelman, LB. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology 97:1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, LB. 1999. When the “Haves” Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law. Law and Society Review 22:941–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, LB, Erlanger, HS, Lande, J. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law and Society Review 27:497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar

Ellickson, RC. 1986. Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review 38:623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, RC. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Engel, D, Munger, F. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Story of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, DM. 1993. Law in the Domains of Everyday Life: The Construction of Community and Difference. In Law and Everyday Life, ed. Sarat, A, Kearns, TR, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 123–70.Google Scholar

Engel, DM, Munger, FW. 1996. Rights, Remembrance, and the Reconciliation of Difference. Law and Society Review 30:7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, CF, Kalleberg, AL, eds. 2004. Fighting for Time: Shifting Boundaries and Work and Social Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Epstein, CF, Seron, C, Oglensky, B, Saute, R. 1998. The Part-Time Paradox: Time Norms, Professional Life, Family and Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Erlanger, HS, Chambliss, E, Melli, MS. 1987. Participation and Flexibility in Informal Processes: Cautions from the Divorce Context. Law and Society Review 21:585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewick, P, Silbey, S. 1992. Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review 26:731–49.Google Scholar

Ewick, P, Silbey, S. 2003. Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority. American Journal of Sociology 108:1328–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewick, P, Silbey, SS. 1995. Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law and Society Review 29:197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewick, P, Silbey, SS. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Felstiner, WLF, Abel, RL, Sarat, A. 1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …Law and Society Review 15:631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferber, MA, Waldfogel, J. May 1998. The long-term consequences of nontraditional employment. Monthly Labor Review 121(5): 3–12.Google Scholar

Ferree, MM. 2003. Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology 109:304–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferree, MM, Hess, BB. 1994. Controversy & Coalition: The New Feminist Movement across Three Decades of Change. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar

Fields, J, Casper, LM. 2001. America's Families and Living Arrangements: Population Characteristics. Rep. P20–537, U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. 1994. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge, 239 pp.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, V. 1980. Attitudes and Disabled People. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund, Inc.Google Scholar

Finley, LM. 1986. Transcending Equality Theory: A Way Out of the Maternity and the Workplace Debate. Columbia Law Review 86: 1118–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiss, OM. 1984. Against Settlement. Yale Law Journal 93:1073–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flaherty, K, Heller, E. 1998. Workers Face Tough Odds in Disability Suits, ABA Study Finds. Fulton County Daily Report (June 30).

Folbre, N. 1991. The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought. Signs 16:463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Frank, M, Lipner, R. 1988. History of Maternity Leave in Europe and the United States. In The Parental Leave Crisis: Toward a National Policy, ed. Zigler, EF, Frank, M. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

Fraser, N, Gordon, L. 1994. A Genealogy ofDependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State. Signs 19:309–36.Google Scholar

Freeman, A. 1998. Antidiscrimination Law from 1954 to 1989: Uncertainty, Contradiction, Rationalization, Denial. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, ed. Kairys, D. New York: Basic Books, pp. 285–311.Google Scholar

Freeman, AD. 1982. Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review. In The Politics of Law, ed. Kairys, D. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar

Fried, M. 1998. Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, LM. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Fuegen, K, Biernat, M, Haines, E, Deaux, K. 2004. Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgments of Job-Related Competence. Journal of Social Issues 60:737–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fullerton, HNJ. 1999. Labor Force Participation: 75 Years of Change, 1950–98 and 1998–2025. Monthly Labor Review 122(12): 3–12.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. 1974. Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, M. 1975. Afterword: Explaining Litigation. Law and Society Review 9:347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, M. 1983. The radiating effects of courts. In Empirical Theories About Courts, ed. Boyum, K., Mather, L., New York: Longman, pp. 117–42.Google Scholar

Gerstel, N, McGonagle, K. 1999. Job Leaves and the Limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The Effects of Gender, Race and Family. Work and Occupations 26:510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gilles, ME. 2000. Reinventing Structural Reform Litigation: Deputizing Private Citizens in the Enforcement of Civil Rights. Columbia Law Review 100:1384–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, J. 2004. Blessing or Curse? Work-Family Policies and Mothers' Wage Growth over Time. Work and Occupations 31:367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, J, Fujimoto, T. 1995. Employer Characteristics and the Provision of Family Responsive Policies. Work and Occupations 22:380–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleeson, BJ. 1997. Disability Studies: A Historical Materialist View. Disability & Society 12:179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodstein, JD. 1994. Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues. Academy of Management Journal 37:350–82.Google Scholar

Gordon, DM, Edwards, R, Reich, M. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, L. 1990. The New Feminist Scholarship on the Welfare State. In Women, the State, and Welfare, ed. Gordon, L, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar

Gornick, JC, Meyers, MK. 2003. Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Green, T. 2003. Discrimination in Workplace Dynamics: Toward a Structural Account of Disparate Treatment Theory. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 38:91–157.Google Scholar

Gross, SR, Syverud, KD. 1991. Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial. Michigan Law Review 90:319–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, D, Roth, LM. 1999. The State, Courts, and Maternity Policies in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms. American Sociological Review 64:41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gwartney-Gibbs, PA. 1994. Gender and Workplace Dispute Resolution: A Conceptual and Theoretical Model. Law and Society Review 28:265–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, L, Hwang, P. 1995. Company Culture and Men's Usage of Family Leave Benefits in Sweden. Family Relations 44:28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadfield, GK. 1992. Bias in the Evolution of Legal Rules. Georgetown Law Journal 80:583–616.Google Scholar

Hahn, H. 1997. Advertising the Acceptably Employable Image. In The Disability Studies Reader, ed. Davis, LJ. New York: Routledge, pp. 172–86Google Scholar

Hale, TW, Hayghe, HV, McNeil, JM. 1998. Persons with Disabilities: Labor Market Activity, 1994. Monthly Labor Review (9):3–12.Google Scholar

Han, W-j, Waldfogel, J. 2003. Parental Leave: The Impact of Recent Legislation on Parents' Leave Taking. Demography 40:101–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Handler, JF. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Handler, JF, Hollingsworth, EJ, Erlanger, HS. 1978. Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hareven, TK. 1982. Family Time and Industrial Time: The Relationship between the Family and Work in a New England Industrial Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harlan, SL, Robert, PM. 1998. The Social Construction of Disability in Organizations. Work and Occupations 25:397–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayghe, HV. 1990. Family Members in the Workforce. Monthly Labor Review (3):14–46.Google Scholar

Hayghe, HV. 1997. Developments in Women's Labor Force Participation. Monthly Labor Review (9):41–46.Google Scholar

Heimer, CA. 1999. Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care. Law and Society Review 33:17–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiley, DR, Bohman, JF, Schusterman, R, eds. 1991. The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Hirschman, AO. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar

Horwitz, MJ. 1977. The Transformation of American Law 1780–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hunnicutt, BK. 1988. Work Without End: Abandoning Shorter Hours for the Right to Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Hunnicutt, BK. 1996. Kellogg's Six-Hour Day. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, JA, Gerson, K. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, JP, Levin, LM. 1995. Effects of intermittent labor force attachment on women's earnings. Monthly Labor Review 118(9):14–19.

Jacoby, SM. 1985. Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jepperson, RL. 1991. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, WW, DiMaggio, PL, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar

Jolls, C. 2001. Antidiscrimination and Accommodation. Harvard Law Review 115:642–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judiesch, MK, Lyness, KS. 1999. Left behind? The Impact of Leaves of Absence on Managers' Career Success. Academy of Management Journal 42:641–51.Google Scholar

Kalev, A, Kelly, E, Dobbin, F. 2006. Best Practices or Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action. American Sociological Review 71:589–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalleberg, AL. 1995. Part-Time Work and Workers in the United States: Correlates and Policy Issues. Washington and Lee Law Review 52:771–98.Google Scholar

Kalleberg, AL, Reskin, BF, Hudson, K. 2000. Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United States. American Sociological Review 65:256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamerman, SB, Kahn, AJ, Kingston, P. 1983. Maternity Policies and Working Women. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, EL. 2005. Discrimination Against Caregivers? Gendered Family Responsibilities, Employer Practices, and Work Rewards. In Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities, ed. Nielsen, LB, Nelson, R, New York: Springer, pp. 353–374.Google Scholar

Kelly, EL, Kalev, A. 2006. Managing Flexible Work Arrangements in U.S. Organizations: Formalized Discretion or “a Right to Ask.”Socio-Economic Review 4:379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessler-Harris, A. 1982. Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kessler-Harris, A. 2001. In Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men and the Quest for Economic Citizenship in 20th-Century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kittay, EF. 1995. Taking Dependency Seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act Considered in Light of the Social Organization of Dependency Work and Gender Equality. Hypatia 10:8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluger, R. 1976. Simple Justice. New York: Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, J, Ensminger, J. 1998. Conflict over Changing Social Norms: Bargaining, Ideology, and Enforcement. In The New Institutionalism in Sociology, ed. Brinton, MC, Nee, V, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 105–26.Google Scholar

Krieger, L. 2000. Afterword: Socio-Legal Backlash. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 21:475–519.Google Scholar

Krieger, LJ, Cooney, PN. 1983. The Miller-Wohl Controversy: Equal Treatment, Positive Action and the Meaning of Women's Equality. Gold Gate University Law Review 13:513.Google Scholar

Kritzer, H, Silbey, S, eds. 2003. In Litigation: Do the Haves Still Come Out Ahead?Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kritzer, HM. 1986. Adjudication to Settlement: Shading in the Gray. Judicature 70:161–5.Google Scholar

Kudlick, CJ. 2003. Disability History: Why We Need Another “Other.”American Historical Review 108:763–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landes, WM, Posner, RA. 1979. Adjudication as a Private Good. Journal of Legal Studies 8:235–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, S. 1983. Women, Work, Welfare and the Preservation of Patriarchy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 131:1249–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, C. 1987. The Id, The Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism. Stanford Law Review 39:317.Google Scholar

Lempert, R. 1998. A Resource Theory of the Criminal Law: Exploring When it Matters. In How Does Law Matter, ed. Garth, BG, Sarat, A, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 227–47.Google Scholar

Lerner, G, ed. 1972. Black Women in White America: A Documentary History. New York: Vintage Books.

Lipschultz, S. 1989. Social Feminism and Legal Discourse: 1908–1923. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 2:131–60.Google Scholar

Lipset, SM. 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Liu, G. 1999. Social Security and the Treatment of Marriage: Spousal Benefits, Earnings Sharing, and the Challenge of Reform. Wisconsin Law Review 1999:1–64.Google Scholar

Lopez, IFH. 1999–2000. Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a New Theory of Racial Discrimination. Yale Law Journal 109:1717–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Louis and Associates, I. 1986. The ICD Survey of Disabled Americans: Bringing Disabled Americans Into the Mainstream, Conducted for the ICD-International Center for the Disabled, New York.

Macaulay, S. 1963. Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study. American Sociological Review 28:55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maccoby, E, Mnookin, R. 1990. Dividing the Child. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, C. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, CA. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Maine, HS. 1986. Ancient Law. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Malin, MH. 1993–94. Fathers and Parental Leave. Texas Law Review 72:1047–95.Google Scholar

Marshall, A-M. 1998. Closing the Gaps: Plaintiffs in Pivotal Sexual Harassment Cases. Law and Social Inquiry 23:761–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, A-M. 2003. Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment. Law and Social Inquiry 28:659–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, A-M. 2005. Idle Rights: Employees' Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies. Law and Society Review 39:83–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, TH. 1965. Class, Citizenship and Social Development. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

May, M. 1987. The Historical Problem of the Family Wage: The Ford Motor Company and the Five Dollar Day. In Families and Work, ed. Gerstel, N, Gross, HE, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar

McCann, M. 1986. Taking Reform Seriously. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McCann, M. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCann, M. 2006. On Legal Rights Consciousness: A Challenging Analytical Tradition. In The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Approach, ed. Fleury-Steiner, B, Nielsen, LB, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press, pp. ix–xxx.Google Scholar

McNeil, JM. August 1997. Americans with Disabilities: 1994–95, Current Population Reports P70–61, U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration.

Mettler, S. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, JW, Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, RE, Sarat, A. 1981. Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture. Law and Society Review 15:525–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, HHG, Wright, C. ed. 1946. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.

Minow, M. 1987. Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover. Yale Law Journal 96:1860–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mnookin, R, Kornhauser, L. 1979. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. Yale Law Journal 88:950–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, D. 1976. Workers' Control of Machine Production in the Nineteenth Century. Labor History 17:485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, D. 1987. The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, The State and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, PA. 1999. Risking Relationships: Understanding the Litigation Choices of Sexually Harassed Women. Law and Society Review 33:67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, B. 1990. The Origins of the Two-Channel Welfare State: Workmen's Compensation and Mother's Aid. In Women, the State, and Welfare, ed. Gordon, L. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 123–151.Google Scholar

Nelson, R, Bridges, WP. 1999. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, LB. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review 34:1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, LB. 2004. License to Harass. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

North, DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions)Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okin, SM. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar

Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, PE, Johnston, H. 2000. What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research. Mobilization 4:37–54.Google Scholar

Olson, SM. 1992. Studying Federal District Courts Through Published Cases: A Research Note. Justice System Journal 15:782–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, A. 2002. Explaining U.S. Welfare Reform: Power, Gender, Race and the U.S. Policy Legacy. Critical Social Policy 22:96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orren, K. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Osterman, P. 1995. Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94:251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pleck, JH. 1993. Are “Family-Supportive” Employer Policies Relevant to Men? In Men, Work, and Family, ed. Hood, JC, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 217–37.Google Scholar

Powell, WW. 2007. The New Institutionalism. In The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Volume 3, pp. 975–78.Google Scholar

Powell, WW, DiMaggio, PJ, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Presser, HB. 2003. Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Priest, GL, Klein, B. 1984. The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Journal of Legal Studies 13:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purcell, D. 1997. The Public Right to Precedent: A Theory and Rejection of Vacatur. California Law Review 85:867–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quadagno, JS. 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quindlen, A. 1992. Public & Private: A (Rest) Room of One's Own. The New York Times:A25.Google Scholar

Quinn, BA. 2000. The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor, and Harassment in the Everyday Work World. Law and Social Inquiry 25:1151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, CA. 1964. The New Property. Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reskin, B, Padavic, I. 1994. Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Robert, P. 2003. Disability Oppression in the Contemporary U.S. Capitalist Workplace. Science & Society 67:136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roediger, D, Foner, P. 1989. Our Own Time: A History of American Labor and the Working Day. New York: Westport.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. 1993. Hollow Hopes and Other Aspirations: A Reply to Feely and McCann. Law and Social Inquiry 17:761–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, GN. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rothman, DJ. 1971. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, WB. 2004. On What a “Private Attorney General” Is – and Why It Matters. Vanderbilt Law Review 57:2129–2173.Google Scholar

Rubin, E, Feeley, M. 1996. Creating Legal Doctrine. Southern California Law Review 69:1989–2037.Google Scholar

Ruggie, M. 1984. The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruhm, CJ. 1997. Policy Watch: The Family and Medical Leave Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruhm, CJ. 1998. The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, M. 1998. Beyond Ramps: Disability at the End of the Social Contract. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar

Russell, M. 2001. Disablement, Oppression, and the Political Economy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 12:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, M. 2002. What Disability Civil Rights Cannot Do: Employment and Political Economy. Disability & Society 17:117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherglen, G. 1987. Disparate Impact Under Title VII: An Objective Theory of Discrimination. Virginia Law Review 73:1297–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A, Kearns, TS. 1993. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Sarat, A, Kearns, TR. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 21–61.Google Scholar

Scheingold, SA. 1974. The Politics of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press, 224 pp.Google Scholar

Scheppele, KL. 1994. Legal Theory and Social Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 20:383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiberg, M, Soule, SA. 2005. Institutionalization as a Contested Multilevel Process. In Social Movements and Organization Theory, ed. Davis, C. et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–160.Google Scholar

Scotch, RK. 1984. From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, WR. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Sellers, C. 1992. The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815–1846. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. 1969. Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Sewell, WH. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, JP. 1993. No Mercy: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar

Siegel, R. 1985. Employment Equality under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. Yale Law Journal 94:929–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, R. 2000. Discrimination in the Eyes of the Law: How “Color Blindness” Discourse Disrupts and Rationalizes Social Stratification. California Law Review 88:77–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, RB. 1994. Home As Work: The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850–1880. Yale Law Journal 103:1073–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegelman, P, Donohue, JJ. 1990. Studying the Iceberg From Its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases. Law and Society Review 24:1133–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silbey, S, Sarat, A. 1989. Dispute Processing in Law and Legal Scholarship: From Institutional Critique to the Reconstruction of the Juridical Subject. Denver University Law Review 66:437–98.Google Scholar

Skocpol, T. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Slavitt, H. 1995. Selling the Integrity of the System of Precedent: Selective Publication, Depublication, and Vacatur. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 30:109–42.Google Scholar

Smith-Rosenberg, C. 1985. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Smith, DE. 1987. Women's Inequality and the Family. In Families and Work, ed. Gerstel, N, Gross, He, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 23–54.Google Scholar

Snow, DA, Burke Rochford J, E., Worden, SK, Benford, RD. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51:464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Songer, DR, Smith, D, Sheehan, RS. 1989. Nonpublication in the Eleventh Circuit: An Empirical Analysis. Florida State University Law Review 16:963–84.Google Scholar

Steinfeld, RJ. 1991. The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350–1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Stone, DA. 1984. The Disabled State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, DA. 1989. Discriminatory Intent and the Taming of Brown. University of Chicago Law Review 56:935–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturm, S. 2001. Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach. Columbia Law Review 101:458–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, M. 1997. On Beyond Interest: Rational, Normative and Cognitive Perspectives in the Social Scientific Study of Law. Wisconsin Law Review 1997:475–501.Google Scholar

Suchman, MC, Edelman, LB. 1996. Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law and Social Inquiry 21:903–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, CR. 1996. On the Expressive Function of Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144:2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51:273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taub, N, Williams, WW. 1985. Will Equality Require More Than Assimilation, Accommodation, or Separation from the Existing Social Structure?Rutgers Law Review 37:825–844.Google Scholar

Thomas, C. 2002. Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers. In Disability Studies Today, ed. Barnes, MO Colin, Barton, Len. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 38–57.Google Scholar

Thompson, BH. 2000. The Continuing Innovation of Citizen Enforcement. University of Illinois Law Review 2000:185–236.Google Scholar

Thompson, EP. 1967. Time, Work-discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Past and Present 38:56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomlins, CL. 1993. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trubek, DM, Sarat, A, Felstiner, WLF, Kritzer, HM, Grossman, JB. 1983. The Costs of Ordinary Litigation. UCLA Law Review 31:72–127.Google Scholar

Trzcinski, E, Alpert, WT. 1990. Leave Policies in Small Business: Findings from the U.S. Small Business Administration Employee Leave Survey, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, Washington, D.C.

Tucker, J. 1993. Everyday Forms of Employee Resistance. Sociological Forum 8:25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, M. 1984. An Essay on Rights. Texas Law Review 62:1363–403.Google Scholar

Tushnet, MV. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thrugood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

,United States Commission on Civil Rights. September 1983. Accommodating the Spectrum of Individual Abilities: Clearinghouse Publication 81.Google Scholar

Valenze, D. 1995. The First Industrial Woman. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waldfogel, J. 1997. The Effect of Children on Women's Wages. American Sociological Review 62:209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldfogel, J. 1999a. Family leave coverage in the 1990s. Monthly Labor Review 122(10):13–21.Google Scholar

Waldfogel, J. 1999b. The Impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18:281–302.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldfogel, J. 2001. Family and medical leave: evidence from the 2000 surveys. Monthly Labor Review 124(9):17–23.Google Scholar

Waldrop, J, Stern, SM. 2003. Disability Status: 2000. Rep. C2KBR-17, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Walsh, DJ. 1997. On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations: Evidence from State Wrongful Discharge Precedent Cases. Law and Society Review 31:337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wanner, C. 1975. The Public Ordering of Private Relations Part Two: Winning Civil Court Cases. Law and Society Review Winter 1975:293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wayne, JH, Cordeiro, BL. 2003. Who is a Good Organizational Citizen? Social Perception of Male and Female Employees Who Use Family Leave. Sex Roles 49:233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin Hyman, 292 pp.Google Scholar

Welter, B. 1966. The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820–1860. American Quarterly 18:151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whaples, R. 1990. Winning the Eight-Hour Day, 1909–1919. Journal of Economic History 50:393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, S, Cartwright, B, Kagan, RA, Friedman, LM. 1987. Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970. Law and Society Review 21:403–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whipp, R. 1987. “A Time to Every Purpose”: An Essay on Time and Work. In The Historical Meanings of Work, ed. Joyce, P, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–36.Google Scholar

Williams, J. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Families and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, JC, Segal, N. 2003. Beyond the Maternal Wall: Relief for Family Caregivers Who Are Discriminated Against on the Job. Harvard Women's Law Journal 26:77–162.Google Scholar

Williams, P. 1991. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Yngvesson, B. 1988. Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town. Law and Society Review 22:409–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zemans, F. 1984. Fee Shifting and the Implementation of Public Policy. Law and Contemporary Problems 1984:187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zemans, FK. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77:690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zucker, LG. 1991. Institutionalization and Cultural Persistence. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, WW, DiMaggio, PJ. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar