Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:06:00.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Sausages and the law: Juror decisions in the much larger justice system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Reid Hastie
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

My personal experience as a consulting statistician in legal hearings and trials and my exposure to research from a variety of intersections of social justice and the law have led me to view juror decision making as a small part of our legal institutions. When viewed from this broader perspective it is not clear that research on juror decision making should have the highest priority in our agenda of studies of legal decision making or of decision making in general.

First, I am impressed that juror decision making as an institution is designed to be opaque to the scrutiny of social scientists, the citizenry, and even legal authorities. It is not an accident that the instructions to jurors are sometimes vague, incomplete, and difficult to understand. In fact, there is a cliche that jurors frequently set aside these instructions and decide the case on its merits according to the dictates of their consciences and not according to written statutory law. I'm also impressed by the resistance of legal authorities to opening courthouses to exploration of social scientists. Again, I think it is no accident that we have federal laws forbidding social scientists and other reporters from penetrating into the mysteries of the jury room for a direct look on how the decisions are made. I'm reminded of the old aphorism admonishing us that people who love sausages (and the law) should never watch their being made. Contrary to the rampant curiosity of most social scientists, I wonder if those who love the institution of jury decision making should not also avoid watching it being done.

Type
Chapter
Information
Inside the Juror
The Psychology of Juror Decision Making
, pp. 229 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×