Searching for semi-strong form inefficiency in the UK racetrack betting market

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493614.007

6 - Searching for semi-strong form inefficiency in the UK racetrack betting market

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 July 2009

Ming-Chien Sung ,

Johnnie E. V. Johnson and

Alistair C. Bruce

Edited by

Leighton Vaughan Williams

Show author details

Ming-Chien Sung: Affiliation:
PhD student in the Centre for Risk Research School of Management at the University of Southampton
Johnnie E. V. Johnson: Affiliation:
Professor of Decision and Risk Analysis and Director of the Centre for Risk Research School of Management at the University of Southampton
Alistair C. Bruce: Affiliation:
Director of Nottingham University Business School
Leighton Vaughan Williams: Affiliation:
Nottingham Trent University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

While there is a large body of literature devoted to the study of various aspects of the efficiency of betting markets, and especially horse-race betting markets, there are contexts for and forms of analysis that remain significantly underrepresented. Hence, studies which seek to identify weak form inefficiency are relatively common compared with those which investigate the presence of semi-strong or strong form inefficiency. Equally, the dominant means of analysis has been to explore opportunities for pockets of abnormal returns associated with a single variable or a closely related set of variables, rather than a wider set of factors. This study seeks to redress these imbalances in the body of empirical work by focusing on semi-strong form efficiency of horse-race betting markets, using a multi-variable approach seen previously in only a limited number of studies.

Furthermore, while the overwhelmingly dominant setting for betting market analysis has been the US parimutuel market, this contribution focuses instead on the UK bookmaker market. The appeal of investigating the UK context is based on a number of institutional factors which discriminate it markedly from the US setting and which, prima facie, might give grounds for expecting differences in efficiency characteristics.

The following section offers a brief review of the literature relating to betting market efficiency and charts those characteristics of the UK horse-race betting market context which render it distinctive from other settings for empirical enquiry.

Type: Chapter
Information: Information Efficiency in Financial and Betting Markets , pp. 179 - 192

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493614.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benter, W. (1994) ‘Computer Based Horse Race Handicapping and Wagering Systems: A Report’, in Hausch, Donald B., Lo, Victor S. Y. and Ziemba, William T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, New York: Academic Press, pp. 183–98

Betton, S. (1994) ‘Post Position Bias: An Econometric Analysis of the 1987 Season at Exhibition Park’, in Hausch, Donald B., Lo, Victor S. Y. and Ziemba, William T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, New York: Academic Press, pp. 511–26

Bird, R. and McCrae, M. (1987) ‘Tests of the Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Using Bookmaker Odds’, Management Science, 33, pp. 1552–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolton, R. N. and Chapman, R. G. (1986) ‘Searching for Positive Returns at the Track: A Multinomial Logit Model for Handicapping Horse Races’, Management Science, 32, pp. 1040–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruce, A. C. and Johnson, J. E. V. (2001) ‘Efficiency Characteristics of a Market for State Contingent Claims’, Applied Economics, 33, pp. 1751–4CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruce, A. C., Johnson, J. E. V. and Tang, L. L. (2004) ‘The Value of Trading Volume Information in a Market for State-Contingent Claims’, Unpublished paper

Busche, K. and Walls, W. D. (2000) ‘Decision Costs and Betting Market Efficiency’, Rationality and Society, 12(4), pp. 477–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Cain, M., Law, D. and Peel, D. A. (2001) ‘The Incidence of Insider Trading in Betting Markets and the Gabriel and Marsden Anomaly’, The Manchester School, 69, pp. 197–207CrossRef Google Scholar

Canfield, B. R., Fauman, B. C. and Ziemba, W. T. (1987) ‘Efficient Market Adjustment of Odds Prices to Reflect Track Biases’, Management Science, 33, pp. 1428–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Chapman, R. G. (1994) ‘Still Searching for Positive Returns at the Track: Empirical Results from 2,000 Hong Kong Races’, in Hausch, Donald B., Lo, Victor S. Y. and Ziemba, William T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, New York: Academic Press, pp. 173–81

Chapman, R. G. and Staelin, R. (1982) ‘Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data Within the Stochastic Utility Model’, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 288–301CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, D. (2003) ‘Adapting Support Vector Machine Methods for Horse-race Odds Prediction’, Conference Paper for the 12th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Vancouver BC, June

Figlewski, S. (1979) ‘Subjective Information and Market Efficiency in a Betting Market’, Journal of Political Economy, 87(1), pp. 75–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Gabriel, P. E. and Marsden, J. R. (1990). ‘An Examination of Market Efficiency in British Racetrack Betting’, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), pp. 874–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Gabriel, P. E. and Marsden, J. R.(1991) ‘An Examination of Efficiency in British Racetrack Betting: Errata and Corrections’, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), pp. 657–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Gu, M. G., Huang, C. and Benter, W. (2003) ‘Multinomial Probit Mock for Competitive Horse Racing’, Working Paper of the Chinese University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar

Hausch, D. B. and Ziemba, W. T. (1990) ‘Arbitrage Strategies for Cross-Track Betting on Major Horse Races’, Journal of Business, 63, pp. 61–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, J. L. (1956) ‘A New Interpretation of Information Rate’, Bell System Technical Journal, 35, pp. 917–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Leong, S. M. and Lim, K. G. (1994), ‘Cross-Track Betting: Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side?’, in Hausch, Donald B., Lo, Victor S. Y. and Ziemba, William T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, New York: Academic Press, pp. 617–29

Losey, R. L. and Talbott, J. C. (1980) ‘Back on the Track with the Efficient Markets Hypothesis’, Journal of Finance, 35, pp. 1039–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Peirson, J. and Blackburn, P. (2003) ‘Betting at British Racecourses – A Comparison of the Efficiency of Betting with Bookmakers and at the Tote’, in Williams, L. Vaughan (ed.), The Economics of Gambling, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, pp. 30–42Google Scholar

Smith, M. A. (2003) ‘The Impact of Tipster Information on Bookmakers’ Prices in OK Horse-Race Markets’, in Vaughan Williams (ed.), L., The Economics of Gambling, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, pp. 67–79Google Scholar

Snyder, W. W. (1978a) ‘Horse Racing: Testing the Efficient Markets Model’, Journal of Finance, 33, pp. 1109–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Vaughan Williams, Leighton (2000) ‘Can Forecasters Forecast Successfully? Evidence from UK Betting Markets’, Journal of Forecasting, 19, pp. 505–133.0.CO;2-2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Walls, W. D. and Busche, K. (2003) ‘Breakage, Turnover and Betting Market Efficiency – New Evidence from Japanese Horse Tracks’, in Williams, L. Vaughan (ed.), The Economics of Gambling, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, pp. 43–66Google Scholar

Watson, P. L. and Westin, R. B. (1975) ‘Transferability of Disaggregated Mode Choice Models’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 5, pp. 227–49CrossRef Google Scholar

White, E. M., Dattero, R. and Flores, B. (1992) ‘Combining Vector Forecasts to Predict Thoroughbred Horse Race Outcomes’, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, pp. 595–611CrossRef Google Scholar