Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-08T04:00:19.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - God, matter, and information: towards a Stoicizing Logos Christology

from Part IV - Philosophy and Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Edited by
Paul Davies  and
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Paul Davies
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Up to modernity, the majority of Christian thinkers presupposed the world of creation to be composed of two parts: the material and the spiritual, existing alongside one another as independent yet interacting realms. In the traditional exegesis of Genesis 1, for example, the creation of light in Genesis 1:3 (“Let there be light”) was interpreted as a spiritual light for spiritual beings in a spiritual world (kosmos noētos), preceding the creation of the corporeal light of the sun in the empirical world (kosmos aisthētikos) in Genesis 1:14.

This two-stock universe lost its plausibility with the advent of classical physics in the seventeenth century, when nature came to be seen as a seamless unity. The scientific intuition of the oneness of the universe, however, was initially combined with a narrow interpretation of the nature of the material. As Isaac Newton (1642–1727) argued in his Opticks, matter is basically atomic: “solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles”. According to Newton, these particles, formed in the beginning by God and held together by the mechanical laws of nature, serve the divine purpose of the universe while at the same time being embraced by God, who is ubiquitously at work ordering, shaping, and reshaping the universe. For Newton, mechanism and theism were two sides of the same coin. How else to explain the orderliness of the otherwise arraying particles?

Type
Chapter
Information
Information and the Nature of Reality
From Physics to Metaphysics
 , pp. 319 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, C. K. (1972). The Gospel According to St. John. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Brown, R. E. (1966). The Gospel According to John (i–xii). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Buch-Hansen, G. (2007). It is the Spirit that Makes Alive (6:63). A Stoic Understanding of pneuma in John. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. K. (1971). The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. (1962). An Essay on the Unity of Stoic Philosophy. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Davies, P., and Gribbin, J. (1992). The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries that Challenge our Understanding of Physical Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2003). The hierarchic logic of emergence: Untangling the interdependence of evolution and self-organization. In Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, eds. Weber, B. H. and Depew, D. J.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 273–308.Google Scholar
Mettrie, J. O. (1748). Machine Man and Other Writings, ed. Thomson, Ann (1996). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A., and Infeld, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Emmeche, C. (1999). The Sarkar challenge to biosemiotics: Is there any information in the cell?Semiotica, 127(1/4): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2000). Paul and the Stoics. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Flores, F. (2005). The Equivalence of Mass and Energy, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, originally accessed 2 August 2006; substantive revision 2007 (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equivME).
Gregersen, N. H. (1998). The idea of creation and theory of autopoietic processes. Zygon: Journal of Science & Religion, 33(3): 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, N. H. (1999). I begyndelsen var mønsteret. Kritisk Forum for Praktisk Teologi, 75: 34–47.Google Scholar
Gregersen, N. H. (2001). The cross of Christ in an evolutionary world. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 40(3): 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, N. H. (2007). Reduction and emergence in artificial life: A theological appropriation. In Emergence from Physics to Theology, eds. Murphy, N. and Stoeger, W.. New York: Oxford University Press, 284–314.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1962). The dematerialization of matter. Philosophy of Science, 73(1): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton and London: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. S. (1813). The System of the World, vols 1–2, trans. Pond, J. (2007). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the Universe. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. R. (1842). Bemerkungen über die Kräfte der unbelebten Natur. Philosophisches Magazin, 24: 371–377.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. R. (1980). Remarks on the forces of inorganic nature. In Darwin to Einstein: Primary Sources on Science & Belief, eds. Coley, N. G. and V. Hall, M. D.. Harlow, UK: Longman, 68–73.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1952). Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, 4th ed (1730). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Peacocke, A. (2007). All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the 21st Century, ed. Clayton, P.. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Puddefoot, J. C. (1996). Information theory, biology, and christology. In Religion and Science: History, Method, Dialogue, eds. Richardson, M. and Wildman, W. J.. New York: Routledge, 301–320.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary and Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1961). Introduction to A History of Materialism, by Lange, F. A. (1925). In The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell 1903–1959, eds. R. Egner and L. E. Denonn (1961). New York: Simon & Schuster, 237–245.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, R. (1979). Das Johannesevangelium. Einleitung Kommentar Teil 1. Freiburg: Herder Verlag.Google Scholar
Stubenberg, L. (2005). Neutral monism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, originally accessed 31 July 2006; substantive revision 2010 (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neutral-monism).
Chardin, Teilhard (1978). The Heart of Matter. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Tertullianus, (c. 200). Adversus Praxeas. In Patrologia Latina, vol. 2, ed. Migne, J. P. (1857). Turnhout: Brepols, 160.Google Scholar
Antioch, Theophilus of (c. 190) Ad Autolycum. In Patrologia Graeca, vol. 6, ed. Migne, J. P. (1866), Turnhout: Brepols, 1064.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. (1980). On the dynamic theory of heat. In Darwin to Einstein, eds. Coley, N. G. and Hall, V.. Harlow, UK: Longman, 84–86.Google Scholar
Harnack, A. (1892). Über das Verhältniss des Prologs des vierten Evangeliums zum ganzen Werk. Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche, 2(3): 189–231.Google Scholar
Weaver, W. (1949). Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. In The Mathematical Theory of Communication, eds. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W.. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 94–117.Google Scholar
Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.Google Scholar
Zemann, J. (1990). Energie. In Europäische Enzyklopädie zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften, ed. Sandkühler, H. J. et al. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 694–696.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×