Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T13:11:19.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The concept of information in biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
John Maynard Smith
Edited by
Paul Davies  and
Niels Henrik Gregersen
John Maynard Smith
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Paul Davies
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

The use of informational terms is widespread in molecular and developmental biology. The usage dates back to Weismann. In both protein synthesis and in later development, genes are symbols, in that there is no necessary connection between their form (sequence) and their effects. The sequence of a gene has been determined by past natural selection, because of the effects it produces. In biology, the use of informational terms implies intentionality, in that both the form of the signal, and the response to it, have evolved by selection. Where an engineer sees design, a biologist sees natural selection.

A central idea in contemporary biology is that of information. Developmental biology can be seen as the study of how information in the genome is translated into adult structure, and evolutionary biology of how the information came to be there in the first place. Our excuse for writing a chapter concerning topics as diverse as the origins of genes, of cells, and of language is that all are concerned with the storage and transmission of information.

(Szathmáry and Maynard Smith, 1995)

Let us begin with the notions involved in classical information theory…These concepts do not apply to DNA because they presuppose a genuine information system, which is composed of a coder, a transmitter, a receiver, a decoder, and an information channel in between. No such components are apparent in a chemical system (Apter and Wolpert, 1965). To describe chemical processes with the help of linguistic metaphors such as “transcription” and “translation” does not alter the chemical nature of these processes. After all, a chemical process is not a signal that carries a message. Furthermore, even if there were such a thing as information transmission between molecules, transmission would be nearly noiseless (that is, substantially nonrandom), so that the concept of probability, central to the theory of information, does not apply to this kind of alleged information transfer.

(Mahner and Bunge, 1997)

It is clear from these quotations that there is something to talk about. I shall be concerned only with the use of information concepts in genetics, evolution, and development, and not in neurobiology, which I am not competent to discuss.

Type
Chapter
Information
Information and the Nature of Reality
From Physics to Metaphysics
 , pp. 157 - 185
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apter, M. J., and Wolpert, L. (1965). Cybernetics and development I. Information theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 8: 244–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, F. H. C., Griffith, J. S., and Orgel, L. E. (1957). Codes without commas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 43: 416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, F. H. C., Barnett, L., Brenner, S., and Watts-Tobin, R. J. (1961). General nature of the genetic code. Nature, 192: 1227–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gatlin, L. L. (1972). Information Theory and the Living System. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000). On the theoretical role of “genetic coding.”Philosophy of Science, 67: 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 55: 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halder, G., Callaerts, P., and Gehring, W. J. (1995). Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science, 267: 1758–1791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, F., and Monod, J. (1961). On the regulation of gene activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 26: 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. (1961). Natural selection as a process of accumulating genetic information in adaptive evolution. Genetical Research, Cambridge, 2: 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahner, M., and Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1999). Too good to be true. Nature, 400: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., and Harper, D. G. C. (1995). Animal signals: Models and terminology. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 177: 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological information: A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology, ed. Sarkar, S.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 157–231.CrossRef
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 279–423, 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K., and Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Szathmáry, E., and Maynard Smith, J. (1995). The major evolutionary transitions. Nature, 374: 227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weismann, A. (1904). The Evolution Theory, trans. J. A. and M. R. Thomson. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×