Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-7l9ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T08:04:17.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Imaging the Male Reproductive System

from Section 2 - Clinical Evaluation of the Infertile Male

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2023

By
Roger K. Khouri  and
Tolulope Bakare
Edited by
Larry I. Lipshultz ,
Stuart S. Howards ,
Craig S. Niederberger  and
Dolores J. Lamb
Larry I. Lipshultz
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Stuart S. Howards
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Craig S. Niederberger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Dolores J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Get access

Summary

Infertility occurs in 10–15 percent of couples of reproductive age [1]. Male factor contributes to approximately 50 percent of couples with infertility, with the male being the sole contributor in 20 percent of the time and a combination between male and female in 30–40 percent of the time [1, 2]. Infertility in the male can result from several factors, which may be congenital or acquired. Historically, infertility workup and treatment have overemphasized the female factor. Fortunately, there is increased awareness of the factors that can affect fertility in the male. Evaluation of the infertile male should achieve certain goals. These include: (1) identifying reversible causes that can improve fertility status; (2) identifying irreversible causes which may lead to treatment by assisted reproductive technology (ART); (3) identifying irreversible causes not amenable to ART; (4) identifying medically significant pathologies underlying infertility; and (5) identifying genetic causes that may have implications for the patient and their offspring.

Type
Chapter
Information
Infertility in the Male , pp. 165 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Further Reading

Huang, I-S, Wren, J, Bennett, NE, Brannigan, RE. Clinical consultation guide on imaging in male infertility and sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol Focus 2018;4:338–47.Google Scholar
Jurewicz, M, Gilbert, BR. Imaging and angiography in male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1432–42.Google Scholar
Mittal, PK, Little, B, Harri, PA, et al. Role of imaging in the evaluation of male infertility. Radiographics 2017;37:837–54.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;110:1239–45.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019;111:873–80.Google Scholar

References

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015;103:e18–25.Google Scholar
Huang, I-S, Wren, J, Bennett, NE, Brannigan, RE. Clinical consultation guide on imaging in male infertility and sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol Focus 2018;4:338–47.Google Scholar
Abdulwahed, SR, Mohamed, E-EM, Taha, EA, Saleh, MA, Abdelsalam, YM, ElGanainy, EO. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in predicting etiology of azoospermia. Urology 2013;81:967–71.Google Scholar
Stamou, MI, Georgopoulos, NA. Kallmann syndrome: phenotype and genotype of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Metabolism 2018;86:124–34.Google Scholar
Mulhall, JP, Trost, LW, Brannigan, RE, et al. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA Guideline. J Urol 2018;200:423–32.Google Scholar
Boehm, U, Bouloux, P-M, Dattani, MT, et al. Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism – pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015;11:547–64.Google Scholar
Colao, A, Di Sarno, A, Cappabianca, P, et al. Gender differences in the prevalence, clinical features and response to cabergoline in hyperprolactinemia. Eur J Endocrinol 2003;148:325–331.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, M, Tanaka, H, Arita, H, et al. Pituitary-targeted dynamic contrast-enhanced multisection CT for detecting MR Imaging-occult functional pituitary microadenoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:904–8.Google Scholar
Pedersen, MR, Osther, PJS, Rafaelsen, SR. Ultrasound evaluation of testicular volume in patients with testicular microlithiasis. Ultrasound Int Open 2018;4:E99–103.Google Scholar
Gianfrilli, D, Ferlin, A, Isidori, AM, et al. Risk behaviours and alcohol in adolescence are negatively associated with testicular volume: results from the Amico-Andrologo survey. Andrology 2019;7:769–77.Google Scholar
Bernstein, AP, Fram, EB, North, A, Casale, A, Drzewiecki, BA. Does total testicular volume predict testicular volume difference in adolescent males with varicocele? Int Braz J Urol 44:981–6.Google Scholar
Wein, AJ, Kavoussi, LR, Partin, AW, Peters, CA (eds). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
Nieschlag, E, Behre, HM, Nieschlag, S (eds). Andrology: Male Reproductive Health and Dysfunction. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Moon, MH, Kim, SH, Cho, JY, Seo, JT, Chun, YK. Scrotal US for evaluation of infertile men with azoospermia. Radiology 2006;239:168–73.Google Scholar
Biagiotti, G, Cavallini, G, Modenini, F, Vitali, G, Gianaroli, L. Spermatogenesis and spectral echo-colour Doppler traces from the main testicular artery. BJU Int 2002;90:903–8.Google Scholar
Li, M, Du, J, Wang, Z, Li, F. The value of sonoelastography scores and the strain ratio in differential diagnosis of azoospermia. J Urol 2012;188:1861–6.Google Scholar
Clarke, BG. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA 1966;198:1121–2.Google Scholar
Fretz, PC, Sandlow, JI. Varicocele: current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:921–37.Google Scholar
Silay, MS, Hoen, L, Quadackaers, J, et al. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2019;75:448–61.Google Scholar
Nork, JJ, Berger, JH, Crain, DS, Christman, MS. Youth varicocele and varicocele treatment: a meta-analysis of semen outcomes. Fertil Steril 2014;102:381–7.e6.Google Scholar
Zhou, T, Zhang, W, Chen, Q, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on testis volume and semen parameters in adolescents: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 17:1012–16.Google Scholar
Hayden, RP, Tanrikut, C. Testosterone and varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 2016;43:223–32.Google Scholar
Pilatz, A, Altinkilic, B, Köhler, E, Marconi, M, Weidner, W. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele? World J Urol 2011;29:645–50.Google Scholar
Chiou, RK, Anderson, JC, Wobig, RK, et al. Color Doppler ultrasound criteria to diagnose varicoceles: correlation of a new scoring system with physical examination. Urology 1997;50:953–6.Google Scholar
Tsili, AC, Sofikitis, N, Xiropotamou, O, Astrakas, LG, Ntorkou, A, Argyropoulou, MI. Diffusion tensor imaging as an adjunct tool for the diagnosis of varicocele. Andrologia 2019;51:e13210.Google Scholar
Cornud, F, Belin, X, Amar, E, Delafontaine, D, Hélénon, O, Moreau, JF. Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol 1999;9:536–45.Google Scholar
Diamond, DA, Roth, JA, Cilento, BG, Barnewolt, CE. Intratesticular varicocele in adolescents: a reversible anechoic lesion of the testis. J Urol 2004;171:381–3.Google Scholar
Bucci, S, Liguori, G, Amodeo, A, Salamè, L, Trombetta, C, Belgrano, E. Intratesticular varicocele: evaluation using grey scale and color Doppler ultrasound. World J Urol 2008;26:87–9.Google Scholar
Mittal, PK, Little, B, Harri, PA, et al. Role of imaging in the evaluation of male infertility. Radiographics 2017;37:837–54.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, LS, Nees, SN, Fast, AM, Glassberg, KI. Intratesticular varicoceles: are they significant? J Pediatr Urol 2013;9(6 Pt A):851–5.Google Scholar
Masson, P, Brannigan, RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:129–44.Google Scholar
Bachir, BG, Jarvi, K. Infectious, inflammatory, and immunologic conditions resulting in male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:67–81.Google Scholar
Dohle, GR. Inflammatory-associated obstructions of the male reproductive tract. Andrologia 2003;35:321–4.Google Scholar
Raza, SA, Jhaveri, KS. Imaging in male infertility. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:1183–200.Google Scholar
Lee, PA, O’Leary, LA, Songer, NJ, Coughlin, MT, Bellinger, MF, LaPorte, RE. Paternity after unilateral cryptorchidism: a controlled study. Pediatrics 1996;98(4 Pt 1):676–9.Google Scholar
Lee, PA, O’Leary, LA, Songer, NJ, Coughlin, MT, Bellinger, MF, LaPorte, RE. Paternity after bilateral cryptorchidism. A controlled study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:260–3.Google Scholar
Radmayr, C. Management of undescended testes: European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology guidelines. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:550.Google Scholar
Kolon, TF, Herndon, CDA, Baker, LA, et al. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014;192:337–45.Google Scholar
Tasian, GE, Copp, HL. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in nonpalpable cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2011;127:119–28.Google Scholar
Tasian, GE, Copp, HL, Baskin, LS. Diagnostic imaging in cryptorchidism: utility, indications, and effectiveness. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:2406–13.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, S, Fonnesbeck, C, Penson, D, McPheeters, ML. Magnetic resonance imaging for locating nonpalpable undescended testicles: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1908–16.Google Scholar
Hotaling, JM, Walsh, TJ. Male infertility: a risk factor for testicular cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2009;6:550–6.Google Scholar
Doria-Rose, VP, Biggs, ML, Weiss, NS. Subfertility and the risk of testicular germ cell tumors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2005;16:651–6.Google Scholar
Walsh, TJ, Croughan, MS, Schembri, M, Chan, JM, Turek, PJ. Increased risk of testicular germ cell cancer among infertile men. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:351–6.Google Scholar
Raman, JD, Nobert, CF, Goldstein, M. Increased incidence of testicular cancer in men presenting with infertility and abnormal semen analysis. J Urol 2005;174:1819–22; discussion 1822.Google Scholar
de Bruin, D, de Jong, IJ, Arts, EGJM, et al. Semen quality in men with disseminated testicular cancer: relation with human chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit and pituitary gonadal hormones. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2481–6.Google Scholar
Paoli, D, Gilio, B, Piroli, E, et al. Testicular tumors as a possible cause of antisperm autoimmune response. Fertil Steril 2009;91:414–19.Google Scholar
Rocher, L, Ramchandani, P, Belfield, J, et al. Incidentally detected non-palpable testicular tumours in adults at scrotal ultrasound: impact of radiological findings on management radiologic review and recommendations of the ESUR scrotal imaging subcommittee. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2268–78.Google Scholar
Lagabrielle, S, Durand, X, Droupy, S, et al. Testicular tumours discovered during infertility workup are predominantly benign and could initially be managed by sparing surgery. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:630–5.Google Scholar
Bieniek, JM, Juvet, T, Margolis, M, Grober, ED, Lo, KC, Jarvi, KA. Prevalence and management of incidental small testicular masses discovered on ultrasonographic evaluation of male infertility. J Urol 2018;199:481–6.Google Scholar
Aigner, F, De Zordo, T, Pallwein-Prettner, L, et al. Real-time sonoelastography for the evaluation of testicular lesions. Radiology 2012;263:584–9.Google Scholar
Mohrs, OK, Thoms, H, Egner, T, et al. MRI of patients with suspected scrotal or testicular lesions: diagnostic value in daily practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:609–15.Google Scholar
Carrasquillo, R, Sávio, LF, Venkatramani, V, Parekh, D, Ramasamy, R. Using microscope for onco-testicular sperm extraction for bilateral testis tumors. Fertil Steril 2018;109:745.Google Scholar
Xu, C, Liu, M, Zhang, F, et al. The association between testicular microlithiasis and semen parameters in Chinese adult men with fertility intention: experience of 226 cases. Urology 2014;84:815–20.Google Scholar
Xu, C, Zhang, F-F, Yang, H-L, et al. The influence of testicular microlithiasis on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation in a Chinese Han population. Andrologia 2017;49(8).Google Scholar
Nishimura, Y, Moriya, K, Nakamura, M, et al. Prevalence and chronological changes of testicular microlithiasis in isolated congenital undescended testes operated on at less than 3 years of age. Urology 2017;109:159–64.Google Scholar
Goede, J, Hack, WWM, van der Voort-Doedens, LM, Pierik, FH, Looijenga, LHJ, Sijstermans, K. Testicular microlithiasis in boys and young men with congenital or acquired undescended (ascending) testis. J Urol 2010;183:1539–43.Google Scholar
Kim, B, Winter, TC, Ryu, J. Testicular microlithiasis: clinical significance and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2567–76.Google Scholar
Costabile, RA. How worrisome is testicular microlithiasis? Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:419–23.Google Scholar
Rashid, HH, Cos, LR, Weinberg, E, Messing, EM. Testicular microlithiasis: a review and its association with testicular cancer. Urol Oncol 22:285–9.Google Scholar
Leblanc, L, Lagrange, F, Lecoanet, P, Marçon, B, Eschwege, P, Hubert, J. Testicular microlithiasis and testicular tumor: a review of the literature. Basic Clin Androl 2018;28:8.Google Scholar
Pedersen, MR, Rafaelsen, SR, Møller, H, Vedsted, P, Osther, PJ. Testicular microlithiasis and testicular cancer: review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 2016;48:1079–86.Google Scholar
Winter, TC, Kim, B, Lowrance, WT, Middleton, WD. Testicular microlithiasis: what should you recommend? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:1164–9.Google Scholar
Richenberg, J, Belfield, J, Ramchandani, P, et al. Testicular microlithiasis imaging and follow-up: guidelines of the ESUR scrotal imaging subcommittee. Eur Radiol 2015;25:323–30.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;110:1239–45.Google Scholar
Gravholt, CH, Chang, S, Wallentin, M, Fedder, J, Moore, P, Skakkebæk, A. Klinefelter syndrome: integrating genetics, neuropsychology, and endocrinology. Endocr Rev 2018;39:389–423.Google Scholar
Vloeberghs, V, Verheyen, G, Santos-Ribeiro, S, et al. Is genetic fatherhood within reach for all azoospermic Klinefelter men? PLoS One 2018;13:e0200300.Google Scholar
Cooper, TG, Noonan, E, von Eckardstein, S, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–45.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019;111:873–80.Google Scholar
Yu, J, Chen, Z, Ni, Y, Li, Z. CFTR mutations in men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD): a systemic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2012;27:25–35.Google Scholar
Li, L, Liang, C. Ultrasonography in diagnosis of congenital absence of the vas deferens. Med Sci Monit 2016;22:2643–7.Google Scholar
Daudin, M, Bieth, E, Bujan, L, Massat, G, Pontonnier, F, Mieusset, R. Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: clinical characteristics, biological parameters, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations, and implications for genetic counseling. Fertil Steril 2000;74:1164–74.Google Scholar
McCallum, T, Milunsky, J, Munarriz, R, Carson, R, Sadeghi-Nejad, H, Oates, R. Unilateral renal agenesis associated with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: phenotypic findings and genetic considerations. Hum Reprod 2001;16:282–8.Google Scholar
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Urological Association. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of an ultrasound examination in the practice of urology. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:133–44.Google Scholar
Weintraub, MP, De Mouy, E, Hellstrom, WJ. Newer modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1993;150:1150–4.Google Scholar
Pryor, JP, Hendry, WF. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in subfertile males: analysis of 87 patients. Fertil Steril 1991;56:725–30.Google Scholar
Kayser, O, Osmonov, D, Harde, J, Girolami, G, Wedel, T, Schäfer, P. Less invasive causal treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction by balloon dilation: a case report, literature review and suggestion of a CT- or MRI-guided intervention. Ger Med Sci 2012;10:Doc06.Google Scholar
Belker, AM, Steinbock, GS. Transrectal prostate ultrasonography as a diagnostic and therapeutic aid for ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1990;144(2 Pt 1):356–8.Google Scholar
McQuaid, JW, Tanrikut, C. Ejaculatory duct obstruction: current diagnosis and treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2013;14:291–7.Google Scholar
Modgil, V, Rai, S, Ralph, DJ, Muneer, A. An update on the diagnosis and management of ejaculatory duct obstruction. Nat Rev Urol 2016;13:13–20.Google Scholar
Jarow, JP. Transrectal ultrasonography of infertile men. Fertil Steril 1993;60:1035–9.Google Scholar
Purohit, RS, Wu, DS, Shinohara, K, Turek, PJ. A prospective comparison of 3 diagnostic methods to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 2004;171:232–5; discussion 235–6.Google Scholar
Jarow, JP. Seminal vesicle aspiration in the management of patients with ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1994;152:899–901.Google Scholar
Jarow, JP. Seminal vesicle aspiration of fertile men. J Urol 1996;156:1005–7.Google Scholar
Engin, G. Transrectal US-guided seminal vesicle aspiration in the diagnosis of partial ejaculatory duct obstruction. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:488–95.Google Scholar
Nagler, HM, Rotman, M, Zoltan, E, Fisch, H. The natural history of partial ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 2002;167:253–4.Google Scholar
Jones, TR, Zagoria, RJ, Jarow, JP. Transrectal US-guided seminal vesiculography. Radiology 1997;205:276–8.Google Scholar
Kirkali, Z, Yigitbasi, O, Diren, B, Hekimoglu, B, Ersoy, H. Cysts of the prostate, seminal vesicles and diverticulum of the ejaculatory ducts. Eur Urol 1991;20:77–80.Google Scholar
Takatera, H, Sugao, H, Sakurai, T. Ejaculatory duct cyst: the case for effective use of transrectal longitudinal ultrasonography. J Urol 1987;137:1241–2.Google Scholar
Shebel, HM, Farg, HM, Kolokythas, O, El-Diasty, T. Cysts of the lower male genitourinary tract: embryologic and anatomic considerations and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 33:1125–43.Google Scholar
Lotti, F, Corona, G, Cocci, A, et al. The prevalence of midline prostatic cysts and the relationship between cyst size and semen parameters among infertile and fertile men. Hum Reprod 2018;33:2023–34.Google Scholar
Guo, Y, Liu, G, Yang, D, et al. Role of MRI in assessment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Xray Sci Technol 2013;21:141–6.Google Scholar
Engin, G, Kadioğlu, A, Orhan, I, Akdöl, S, Rozanes, I. Transrectal US and endorectal MR imaging in partial and complete obstruction of the seminal duct system. A comparative study. Acta Radiol 2000;41:288–95.Google Scholar
Smith, JF, Walsh, TJ, Turek, PJ. Ejaculatory duct obstruction. Urol Clin North Am 2008;35:221–7, viii.Google Scholar
Schroeder-Printzen, I, Ludwig, M, Köhn, F, Weidner, W. Surgical therapy in infertile men with ejaculatory duct obstruction: technique and outcome of a standardized surgical approach. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1364–8.Google Scholar
Turek, PJ, Aslam, K, Younes, AK, Nguyen, HT. Observations on seminal vesicle dynamics in an in vivo rat model. J Urol 1998;159:1731–4.Google Scholar
Sexton, WJ, Jarow, JP. Effect of diabetes mellitus upon male reproductive function. Urology 1997;49:508–13.Google Scholar
Cornud, F, Amar, E, Hamida, K, Hélénon, O, Moreau, JF. Ultrasound findings in male hypofertility and impotence. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2126–36.Google Scholar
Schoysman, R. [Epididymal oligospermia]. Reprod Nutr Dev 1988;28:1339–45.Google Scholar
Weatherly, D, Wise, PG, Mendoca, S, et al. Epididymal cysts: are they associated with infertility? Am J Mens Health 2018;12:612–16.Google Scholar
Ammar, T, Sidhu, PS, Wilkins, CJ. Male infertility: the role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Br J Radiol 2012;85 Spec No:S59–68.Google Scholar
Locke, JA, Noparast, M, Afshar, K. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:437–45.Google Scholar
Chu, DI, Zderic, SA, Shukla, AR, et al. Does varicocelectomy improve semen analysis outcomes in adolescents without testicular asymmetry? J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:76.e1–5.Google Scholar
Kroese, ACJ, de Lange, NM, Collins, J, Evers, JLH. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD000479.Google Scholar
Asafu-Adjei, D, Judge, C, Deibert, C, Li, G, Stember, D, Stahl, PJ. Systematic review of the impact of varicocele grade on response to surgical management. J Urol 2020;203:48–56.Google Scholar
Jurewicz, M, Gilbert, BR. Imaging and angiography in male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1432–42.Google Scholar
Rais-Bahrami, S, Montag, S, George, AK, Rastinehad, AR, Palmer, LS, Siegel, DN. Angiographic findings of primary versus salvage varicoceles treated with selective gonadal vein embolization: an explanation for surgical treatment failure. J Endourol 2012;26:556–60.Google Scholar
Motta, A, Caltabiano, G, Pizzarelli, M, et al. Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization. Radiol Med 2019;124:438–43.Google Scholar
Herwig, R, Tosun, K, Schuster, A, et al. Tissue perfusion-controlled guided biopsies are essential for the outcome of testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1071–6.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Du, J, Tian, R, Xie, S, Li, F, Li, Z. Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol 2018;18:48.Google Scholar
Farley, S, Barnes, R. Stenosis of ejaculatory ducts treated by endoscopic resection. J Urol 1973;109:664–6.Google Scholar
Avellino, GJ, Lipshultz, LI, Sigman, M, Hwang, K. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts: etiology of obstruction and surgical treatment options. Fertil Steril 2019;111:427–43.Google Scholar
Manohar, T, Ganpule, A, Desai, M. Transrectal ultrasound- and fluoroscopic-assisted transurethral incision of ejaculatory ducts: a problem-solving approach to nonmalignant hematospermia due to ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Endourol 2008;22:1531–5.Google Scholar
Sávio, LF, Palmer, J, Prakash, NS, Clavijo, R, Adamu, D, Ramasamy, R. Transurethral resection of ejaculatory ducts: a step-by-step guide. Fertil Steril 2017;107:e20.Google Scholar
Donkol, RH. Imaging in male-factor obstructive infertility. World J Radiol 2010;2:172–9.Google Scholar
Sávio, LF, Carrasquillo, RJ, Dubin, JM, Shah, H, Ramasamy, R. Transurethral ablation of a prostatic utricle cyst with the use of a holmium laser. Fertil Steril 2018;110:1410–11.Google Scholar
Jarow, JP. Transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Androl 17:467–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×