Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:39:17.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Word Mining: Metal Names and the Indo-European Dispersal

from Part II - Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2023

By
Rasmus Thorsø ,
Andrew Wigman ,
Anthony Jakob ,
Axel I. Palmér ,
Paulus van Sluis  and
Guus Kroonen
Edited by
Kristian Kristiansen ,
Guus Kroonen  and
Eske Willerslev
Kristian Kristiansen
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Guus Kroonen
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Eske Willerslev
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

The first use of metals in the production of objects among human societies was undoubtedly a defining event with a profound, irreversible impact on craftsmanship, agriculture, trade, warfare, and other cultural and political phenomena. The continuous refinement of metallurgical practice, including the introduction of new metals, has left behind some of the most conspicuous and important archaeological remains. Furthermore, the linguistic and archaeological evidence provided by metals can be combined to cast light on the relative placement of reconstructed languages in time and space through the use of linguistic palaeontology (cf. already Schrader 1883). For the study of the expansion of the Indo-European (IE) languages, examining the inventory of metallurgical vocabulary is thus highly relevant – not only for dating and locating the dissolution of each language, but also for determining the branching and spread of the successive daughter languages, and how they were influenced by foreign languages.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
Integrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics
 , pp. 105 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaev = V.I. Abaev. 1958–89. Istoriko-etimologičeskij slovar’ osetinskogo jazyka. 4 vols. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Adams, Douglas Q. 2013. A dictionary of Tocharian B. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Aikio, Ante. 2015. The Finnic ‘secondary e-stems’ and Proto-Uralic vocalism. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 95: 25–66.Google Scholar
Akanuma, Hideo. 2007. Analysis of iron and copper production activity in central Anatolia during the Assyrian colony period. Anatolian Archaeological Studies 16: 125–139.Google Scholar
Alessio, Giovanni. 1941. L’etrusco e due problemi etimologici latini. Aevum 15(4): 545–558.Google Scholar
d’Arbois de Jubainville, Henri. 1902. Cours de litterature celtique XII: Principaux auteurs de l’antiquité à consulter sur l’histoire des Celtes depuis les temps les plus anciens jusqu’au règne de Theodose Ier. Paris: Fontemoing.Google Scholar
Bailey, Harold W. 1979. Dictionary of Khotan Saka. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baxter-Sagart = Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014–. List of Old Chinese reconstructions by Grammata Seria Recensa number. http://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/.Google Scholar
Bebermeier, Wiebke et al. 2016. The coming of iron in a comparative perspective. In: Graßhoff, Gerd & Meyer, Michael (ed.), Space and knowledge: Topoi Research Group articles, 152–189. Berlin: Excellence Cluster Topoi.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Miles. 1998. The ‘Hanging of Hera’ and the meaning of Greek ἄκμων. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 1999. The Greek word for ‘lead’. Münchener Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 59: 7–14.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 2002. The prehistory of the Lydians, the origin of the Etruscans, Troy and Aeneas. Bibliotheca Orientalis 59: 205–241.Google Scholar
Bejko, Lorenc, Fenton, Todd, & Foran, David. 2006. Recent advances in Albanian mortuary archaeology, human osteology, and ancient DNA. In: Bejko, Lorenc & Hodges, Richard (ed.), New directions in Albanian archaeology: Studies presented to Muzafer Korkuti, 309–322. Tirana: International Centre for Albanian Archaeology.Google Scholar
Belardi, Walter. 1949. Review of Traité de phonétique grecque by Michel Lejeune (Paris: Klincksieck, 1947). Maia 2: 308–312.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Kate. 2018. Investigating interaction between South America and West Mexico through the lexicon of metallurgy. In: Iversen, Rune & Kroonen, Guus (ed.), Digging for words: Archaeolinguistic case studies from the XV Nordic TAG Conference held at the University of Copenhagen, 16–18 April 2015, 1–19. Oxford: BAR Publishing.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1983. Chwaresmischer Wortindex. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Berger, D. et al. 2019. Isotope systematics and chemical composition of tin ingots from Mochlos (Crete) and other Late Bronze Age sites in the eastern Mediterranean Sea: An ultimate key to tin provenance? PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218326.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 2010. Indo-European “smith” and his divine colleagues (JIES Monograph No. 58). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 2017. Indo-European “gold” in time and space. Journal of Indo-European Studies 45(3/4): 267–311.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav, & Schwartz, Michal. 2016. The early Indo-Europeans in Central Asia and China: Cultural relations reflected in language. Innsbruck: IBK.Google Scholar
Boisacq, Emile. 1938. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Boroffka, Nikolaus. 1991. Die Verwendung von Eisen in Rumänien von den Anfängen bis in das 8. Jahrhundert v. Chr.: Vortrag gehalten zu Ehren von John Alexander auf dem Symposium ‘Europe in the 1st Millenium B.C.’, New York, 3rd–4th April 1986, Institute of Archaeology Oxford. Berlin: self-published.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk, & Kossmann, Maarten. 1999. Some Berber parallels of European substratum words. Journal of Indo-European Studies 27: 87–100.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk, & Kossmann, Maarten. 2001. On the etymology of ‘silver’. NOWELE 38: 3–15.Google Scholar
Breyer, Gertraud. 1993. Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Brixhe, Claude. 2004. Corpus des Inscriptions Paléo-Phrygiennes. Supplément II. Kadmos 43: 1–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüch, Josef. 1914. Zwei ligurische Wörter im Lateinisch-Romanischen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 46(4): 351–373.Google Scholar
Brumlich, Markolf, Meyer, Michael, & Lychatz, Bernd. 2012. Archäologische und archäometallurgische Untersuchungen zur latènezeitlichen Eisenverhüttung im nördlichen Mitteleuropa. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 87(2): 433–473.Google Scholar
Bugge, Sophus. 1893. Beiträge zur etymologischen erläuterung der armenischen sprache. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 32(1): 1–87.Google Scholar
Burrow, T. 1972. A reconsideration of Fortunatov’s law. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 34: 538–559.Google Scholar
Buyaner, David B. On the etymology of the Old Iranian term for ‘iron’. In: Farridnejad, Shervin (ed.), zaraθuštrōtəma. Zoroastrian and Iranian studies in honour of Philip G. Kreyenbroek, 51–67. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cantera, Alberto. 2017. The phonology of Iranian. In: Klein, Jared, Joseph, Brian, & Fritz, Matthias (ed.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, 481–503. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Champion, Timothy. 2018. Iron and iron technology. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Iron Age.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Kun. 1972. Sino-Tibetan ‘iron’ *qhleks. Journal of the American Oriental Society 92(3): 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernykh, E. N. 1992. Ancient metallurgy in the USSR: The early Metal Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav A. 1996. Common West Caucasian: The reconstruction of its phonological system and parts of its lexicon and morphology. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Civil, Miguel. 1976. Notes on Sumerian lexicography III. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 28(3): 183–187.Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard. 1972. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Corretti, Alessandro, & Benvenuti, Marco. 2001. The beginning of iron metallurgy in Tuscany with special reference to Etruria Mineraria. Mediterranean Archaeology 14: 127–145.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren C., & Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Indo-Germanische Grammatik. Vol. 1.1. Halbband. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Danti, Michael D. 2013. Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in northwestern Iran. In: Potts, D.T. (ed.), Oxford handbook of ancient Iran, 327–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delamarre, Xavier. 2003. Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. 2nd ed. Paris: Editions Errance.Google Scholar
DELG = Chantraine, Pierre. 1999. Dictionaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots. 2nd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Derksen, Rick. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Slavic inherited lexicon. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Derksen, Rick. 2015. Etymological dictionary of the Baltic inherited lexicon. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Deshayes, Albert. 2003. Dictionnaire étymologique du breton. Chasse-Marée: Douarnenez.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor M. 1985. Hurro-Urartian borrowings in Old Armenian. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105(4): 597–603.Google Scholar
Dossin, Georges. 1948. Le vocabulaire de Nuzi SMN 2559. Révue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 42(1/2): 21–34.Google Scholar
Dossin, Georges. 1971. Grèce et Orient. Révue belge de Philologie et d’Historie 49(1): 5–13.Google Scholar
Driessen, Michiel. 2003. *h2é-h2us-o-, the Proto-Indo-European term for ‘gold’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 31: 347–362.Google Scholar
Dudarev, S. L. 2004. The mastering of iron-working by the peoples of the northern Caucasus in the Early Iron Age. Ancient West and East 3: 1–19.Google Scholar
DUL = Olmo Lete, Gregorio del & Sanmartín, Joaquín. 2015 . Dictionary of the Ugaritic language in the alphabetic tradition. 3rd ed. Translated and edited by Wilfred G.E. Watson. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDAIL = Martirosyan, Hrach. 2010. Etymological dictionary of the Armenian inherited lexicon. Leiden & Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EDG = Beekes, Robert S. P. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDHIL = Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDL = De Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPC = Matasović, Ranko. 2009. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPG = Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EIEC = Mallory, James P. & Adams, Douglas Q.. 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London & Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
EM = Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine. 2001. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. 4th ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Erb-Satullo, Nathaniel L. 2019. The innovation and adoption of iron in the ancient Near East. Journal of Archaeological Research 27: 557–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred. 1946. Philologica. Vol. I. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
EWAia = Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1992–1996. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Fick = Fick, August. 1890–1909. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der indogermanischen Sprachen. 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Rupprecht.Google Scholar
Flasdieck, Hermann M. 1952. Zinn und Zink: Studien zur abendländischen Wortgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. J. 1950. Metallurgy in Antiquity: A notebook for archaeologists and technologists. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fortunatov, Filipp F. 1881. L + dental im Altindischen. Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen 6: 215–219.Google Scholar
Foxhall, Lin. 2018. The central Mediterranean and the Aegean. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Iron Age.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Philip. 1999. Homeric κασσίτερος. Glotta 75(3/4): 222–225.Google Scholar
Furnée, Edzard J. 1972. Die wichtigsten konsonantischen Erscheinungen des Vorgriechischen. The Hague & Paris: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV. 2010. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. 2nd ed. Malden (Mass).: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garcia, Dominique. 2018. Southern France. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Iron Age.Google Scholar
Garner, Jennifer. 2015. Bronze Age tin mines in Central Asia. In Hauptmann, Andreas & Modarressi-Tehrani, Diana (ed.), Archaeometallurgy in Europe III: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference, Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum, June 29–July 1, 2011, 135–143. Bochum: Vereinigung der Freunde von Kunst und Kultur im Bergbau.Google Scholar
Garnier, Romain. 2017. La dérivation inverse en latin. Innsbruck: IBS.Google Scholar
Gebauer, Anne Birgitte, Sørensen, Lasse, Taube, Michelle, & Wielandt, Daniel. 2020. First metallurgy in Northern Europe: An Early Neolithic crucible and a possible tuyère from Lønt, Denmark. European Journal of Archaeology: 1–21.Google Scholar
Georgiev, Vladimir. 1936. Lat. ferrum, griech. χαλκός, abg. želězo und Verwandtes. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 63(3/4): 250–256.Google Scholar
Gerola, B. 1942. Substrato mediterraneo e latino. Studi Etruschi 16: 345–368.Google Scholar
GEW = Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960–1972. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Giardino, Claudio. 2005. Metallurgy in Italy between the Late Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age: The coming of iron. In: Attema, Peter, Nijboer, Albert, & Zifferero, Andrea (ed.), Papers in Italian archaeology VI: Communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval period, 491–505. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Gimatzidis, Stefanos. 2018. Northern Greece and the central Balkans. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells (, Peter S.ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Iron Age.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusfredi, Federico. 2017. On Sumerian ku₃(.g)-an (a metal) and some allegedly derived words. Mémoires de NABU, March 2017: 13–15.Google Scholar
Goetze, Albrecht. 1947. Contributions to Hittite lexicography. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1: 307–320.Google Scholar
HAB = Ačaṙyan, Hračᶜeay. 1971–1976. Hayeren armatakan baṙaran. 4 vols. 2nd ed. Yerevan: Erevani Hamalsaran.Google Scholar
Häberl, Charles. n.d. A question of orthography: The Latino-Punic inscriptions. Unpublished. https://www.academia.edu/19367013/A_Question_of_Orthography_the_Latino-Punic_Inscriptions.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2009. Kantauralin ajoitus ja paikannus: perustelut puntarissa. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 92: 9–56.Google Scholar
Halleux, Robert. 1969. Lapis-lazuli, azurite ou pâte de verre? À propos de kuwano et kuwanowoko dans les tablettes mycéniennes. Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 9: 45–63.Google Scholar
Harding, A. F. 2013. Trade and exchange. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, 370–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
HED = Puhvel, Jaan. 1984–. Hittite etymological dictionary. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2003. Untersuchungen zum inneren Sandhi des Indogermanischen (Münchner Forschungen zur historischen Sprachwissenschaft 1). Bremen: Hempen Verlag.Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther, & Koch, Heidemarie. 1987. Elamisches Wörterbuch. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hirt, Herman. 1905–1907. Die Indogermanen: Ihre Verbreitung, ihre Urheimat und ihre Kultur. 2 vols. Strassbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Hjärthner-Holdar, Eva. 1993. Järnets och järnmetallurgins introduktion i Sverige. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl, & Forssman, Bernhard. 1996. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 84). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. 1967. Review of Die Kaškäer: Ein Beitrag zur Ethnographie des alten Kleinasien by E. von Schuler (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1965). Journal of the American Oriental Society 87(2): 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. 1968. A Hittite text in epic style about merchants. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 22(2): 34–45.Google Scholar
Holopainen, Sampsa. 2019. Indo-Iranian borrowings in Uralic: Critical overview of the sound substitutions and distribution criterion. PhD diss., University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hommel, Fritz. 1881. Allgemeine Zeitung 231 (August 19, 1881).Google Scholar
Hübschmann, Heinrich. 1897. Armenische Grammatik. 1. Teil: Armenische Etymologie. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Huld, Martin E. 2012. Some observations on the development of Indo-European metallurgy. In: Huld, M. E., Jones-Bley, K., & Miller, D. (ed.), Archaeology and language: Indo-European studies presented to James P. Mallory (JIES Monograph No. 60), 281–356. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Hüsing, G. 1907. Miszellen. 4. Die Kassiteriden. Orientalistische Litteraturzeitung, January 1907, 1: 25–26.Google Scholar
IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vjačeslav. 1977. O proisxoždenii nekotoryx baltijskix nazvanij metallov. Baltistica 13(1): 223–236.Google Scholar
Iversen, Rune, & Kroonen, Guus 2017. Talking Neolithic: Linguistic and archaeological perspectives on how Indo-European was implemented in southern Scandinavia. American Journal of Archaeology 121(4): 511–525.Google Scholar
Jagersma, Abraham H. 2010. A descriptive grammar of Sumerian. PhD diss., Leiden University.Google Scholar
J̌ahowkyan, Gevorg B. 1987. Hayocᶜ lezvi patmowtᶜyown: naxagrayin žamanakašrǰan. Yerevan: Erevani Hamalsaran.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1983. On early Indo-European-Samoyed contacts. In: Janhunen, J., Peräniitty, A., & Suhonen, S. (ed.), Symposium saeculare Societas Fenno-Ugricae, 115–127. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Jens Winther. 2016. Heavy metal: Lead in Bronze Age Scandinavia. Fornvännen 111: 153–161.Google Scholar
Kallio, Petri. 2004. Tocharian loanwords in Samoyed? In: Hyvärinen, Irma, Kallio, Petri, & Korhonen, Jarmo (ed.), Etymologie, Entlehnungen und Entwicklungen: Festschrift für Jorma Koivulehto zum 70. Geburtstag (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 63), 129–137. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Karsten, T. E. 1928. Die Germanen: Eine Einführung in die Geschichte ihrer Sprache und Kultur. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Kas’jan, A.C. 2010. Leksičeskie kontakty xattskogo jazyka. Indoevropejskoe jazykoznanie i klassičeskaja filologija 10(1): 445–475.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, Friedrich. 1913. Deutsche Altertumskunde. 1. Hälfte: Von der Urzeit bis zur Völkerwanderung. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
KEWA = Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1953. Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindischen. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Klimov, Georgij A. 1964. Etimologičeskij slovar’ kartvel’skix jazykov. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Klingenschmitt, Gert. 2000. Mittelpersisch. In: Forssman, Bernhard & Plath, Robert (ed.), Indoarisch, Iranisch und die Indogermanistik: Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 2 bis 5 Oktober 1997 in Erlangen, 191–229. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Klinger, Jörg. 1995. Hattisch. In: Streck, M. P. (ed.), Sprachen des alten Orients, 128–134. Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
Koch, John T. 2020. Celto-Germanic: Later prehistory and Post-Proto-Indo-European vocabulary in the north and west. Aberystwyth: Canolfan Uwchefrydiau Cymreig a Cheltaidd Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar
Korn, Agnes. 2003. Towards a historical grammar of Balochi: Studies in Balochi historical phonology and vocabulary. PhD diss., Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila, Kuzminykh, Sergei & Beltikova, Galina. 2008. The introduction of iron technology into Central-Northern Eurasia. In: Forenius, Svante, Hjärthner-Holdar, Eva & Risberg, Christina (ed.), The introduction of iron in Eurasia: papers presented at the Uppsala Conference on October 4-8, 2001, 112–127. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieämbetet.Google Scholar
Krogmann, Willy. 1937. Lat. ferrum. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 64(3/4): 267–269.Google Scholar
Krogmann, Willy. 1940. Kelt. “omii̯o- „Erz, Kupfer”. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie 21: 48–49.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin. 2017. Even more traces of the accent in Armenian? In: Hansen, Bjarne S.S. et al. (ed.), Usque ad Radices: Indo-European studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen, 439–452. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin. 2018. The survival of laryngeals in Iranian. In: van Beek, Lucien, Kloekhorst, Alwin, Kroonen, Guus, Peyrot, Michaël, & Pronk, Tijmen (ed.), Farnah: Indo-Iranian and Indo-European studies in honor of Sasha Lubotsky, 162–172. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
de Lamberterie, Charles. 1978. Armeniaca I–VIII: Études lexicales. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 73: 243–283.Google Scholar
Lang, Valter. 2018. The eastern Baltic. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age.Google Scholar
LEIA = Vendryes, Joseph, Bachallery, Édouard, & Lambert, Pierre-Yves. 1959–1996. Lexique étymologique de l’irlandais ancien. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Levinsen, Karin. 1984. Jernets introduktion i Danmark. In: Kjærum, Poul (ed.), KUML 1982–1983: Årbog for Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, 153–168. Aarhus: Jysk Arkæologisk SelskabGoogle Scholar
LEW = Fraenkel, Ernst. 1962–1965. Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
LIV² = Rix, Helmut, Kümmel, Martin, Zehnder, Thomas, Lipp, Reiner, & Schirmer, Brigitte (ed.). 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Loma, Aleksandar. 2005. Zur Frage der frühesten griechisch-iranischen Sprachbeziehungen: Gr. κασσίτερος. In: Meiser, Gerhard & Hackstein, Olaf (eds.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel: Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17.–23. September 2000, Halle an der Saale, 332–340. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
LS = Lewis, Charlton T. & Short, Charles. 1897. A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lull, Vicente, Micó, Rafael, Herrada, Cristina Rihuete, & Risch, Roberto. 2014. The social value of silver in El Argar. In: Meller, H., Risch, R. & Pernicka, E. (ed.), Metalle der Macht: Frühes Gold und Silber: 6. Mitteldeutscher Archäologentag vom 17. bis 19. Oktober 2013 in Halle (Saale), 557–576. Halle (Saale): Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Machek, Václav. 1957. Etymologický slovník jazyka českého a slovenského. Prague: Nakladatelství C̆eskoslovenské akademie věd.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Huld, Martin E.. 1984. Proto-Indo-European ‘silver’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 97(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
McManus, Damian. 1991. A guide to Ogam. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
Masson, Emilia. 1967. Recherches sur les plus anciens emprunts sémitiques en grec. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1923. Review of Baltisch-slawisches Wörterbuch by R. Trautmann (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1923). Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 24(2): 135–139.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1936. Esquisse d’une grammaire comparée de l’arménien classique. 2nd ed. Vienna: Mekhitharistes.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig. 2008. Greek mólybdos as a loanword from Lydian. In: Collins, B. J., Bachvarova, M. R., & Rutherford, I. C. (ed.), Anatolian interfaces: Hittites, Greeks and their neighbours, 153–158. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Metzner-Nebelsick, Carola. 2018. Central Europe. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1911. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Militarev, Alexander, & Kogan, Leonid. 2000. Semitic etymological dictionary. Vol. I. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Muller, F. 1918. Etymologiae Graecae. Mnemosyne 46(2): 135–155.Google Scholar
Murtonen, A. 1989. Hebrew in its West Semitic setting. Leiden & New York: Brill.Google Scholar
NCED = Nikolayev, S. & Starostin, S. L.. 1994. A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich. 1995. Zur Herkunft des Inselnames Kypros. Glotta 73(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Nieling, Jens. 2009. Die Einführung der Eisentechnologie in Südkaukasien und Ostanatolien während der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
NIL = Wodtko, Dagmar S., Irslinger, Britta, & Schneider, Carolin. 2008. Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, H. W., Pernicka, E., & Vandkilde, H.. 2019. On the trail of Scandinavia’s early metallurgy: Provenance, transfer and mixing. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0219574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowakowski, Wojciech. 2018. Eastern Central Europe: Between the Elbe and the Dnieper. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696826.013.10.Google Scholar
Olsen, Birgit A. 1999. The noun in biblical Armenian: origin and word-formation – with special emphasis on the Indo-European heritage. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Orel, Vladimir. 1998. Albanian etymological dictionary. Leiden, Boston, & Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, John K., Bejko, Lorenc, & Morris, Sarah P.. 2007. Excavations at the prehistoric tumulus of Lofkënd in Albania: A preliminary report from the 2004–2005 seasons. American Journal of Archaeology 11(1): 105–147.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1909. Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen. Bd. 1. Einleitung und Lautlehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1924. Armenier. B. Sprache. In Ebert, Max (ed.), Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte, Vol. 1, 219–226. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petr, V. J. 1898. Über den Wechsel der Laute d und l im Lateinischen. Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen 25: 127–158.Google Scholar
Peyrot, Michaël. 2018. Tocharian B etswe ‘mule’ and Eastern East Iranian. In van Beek, Lucien, Kloekhorst, Alwin, Kroonen, Guus, & Pronk, Tijmen (ed.), Farnah: Indo-Iranian and Indo-European studies in honor of Sasha Lubotsky, 270–283. Ann Arbor and New York: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Pfiffig, Ambros Josef. 1969. Die etruskische Sprache. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Pigott, Vincent C. 1999. The archaeometallurgy of the Asian Old World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2006. Further links between the Indo-Iranian substratum and BMAC. In: Tikkanen, Betil & Hettrich, Heinrich (ed.), Themes and tasks in Old Middle Indo-Aryan linguistics (Papers of the 12th World Sanskrit Conference, vol. 5), 167–196. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
Pisani, Vittore. 1959. Saggi di linguistica storica. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Pleiner, Radomír. 1996. Das frühe Eisen: Von den Kleinwaagemengen zu der ältesten Industrie. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift 37(3): 283–291.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1833. Etymologische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Lemgo: Meyer.Google Scholar
Pronk, Tijmen. 2011. The “Saussure effect” in Indo-European languages other than Greek. Journal of Indo-European Studies 39: 176–193.Google Scholar
Pronk, Tijmen, & Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2019. Introduction: Reconstructing Proto-Indo-Anatolian and Proto-Indo-Uralic. In: Pronk, T. & Kloekhorst, A. (ed.), The precursors of Proto-Indo-European: The Indo-Anatolian and Indo-Uralic hypotheses, 1–14. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Räsänen, Martti. 1969. Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen. Vol. 1. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Remmer, Ulla. 2006. Frauennamen im Rigveda und im Avesta. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
REW = Vasmer, Max. 1953. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Richter, Thomas. 2012. Bibliographisches Glossar des Hurritischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Roberts, Benjamin W. 2009. Production networks and consumer choice in the earliest metal of Western Europe. Journal of World Prehistory 22: 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosół, Rafal. 2013. Frühe semitische Lehnwörter im Griechischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Stefan. 2001. Das Vernersche Gesetz und der innerparadigmatische Wechsel des urgermanischen im Nominalbereich. Innsbruck: IBS.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Stefan. 2016/17. Lateinisch rutilus, rötlich, gelbrot, goldgelb’, altirisch ruithen, Strahl, Glanz’ und mittelkymrisch rwt ‘Rost, Korrosion.’ Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 52(1): 101–123.Google Scholar
Schrader, Otto. 1883. Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte: Linguistisch-historische Beiträge zur Erforschung des indogermanischen Altertums. Jena: Hermann Costenoble.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1991. The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2018. Talking Neolithic: The case for Hatto-Minoan and its relationship to Sumerian. In: Kroonen, G., Mallory, J. P., & Comrie, B. (ed.), Talking Neolithic: Proceedings of the workshop on Indo-European origins held at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, December 2–3, 2013 (JIES Monograph No. 65), 336–374. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Schultze, Wolfgang. 2013. Historische und areale Aspekte der Bodenschatz-Terminologie in den ostkaukasischen Sprachen. Iran and the Caucasus 17: 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1913. Baskisch-hamitische Wortvergleichungen. Revista Internacional de Estudios Vascos/Revue International des Études Basques 7: 289–340.Google Scholar
Segert, Stanislav. 1976. A grammar of Phoenician and Punic. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Seyer, Heinz. 1982. Siedlung und archäologische Kulture der Germanen im Havel-Spree-Gebiet in den Jahrhunderten vor Beginn u.Z. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
De Simone, Carlo. 1970. Die griechischen Entlehnungen im Etruskischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Soysal, Oǧuz. 2004. Hattischer Wortschatz in hethitischer Textüberlieferung. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Soysal, Oǧuz. 2006. Das hethitische Wort für ‘Zinn’. Historische Sprachforschung 119: 109–116.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei. 1985. Kul’turnaja leksika v obščeseverokavkazskom slovarnom fonde. In: Piotrovskij, B.B., Ivanov, V.V., & Ardzinba, V.G. (ed.), Drevnjaja Anatolija, 74–94. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stéphanidès, Michel. 1918. Petites contributions à l’histoire des sciences. Revue des Études Grecques 31(142): 197–206.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 1998. Study in red. Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40: 202–223.Google Scholar
Stokes, Whitley & Bezzenberger, Adalbert. 1979. Wortschatz der keltischen Spracheinheit. 5th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1964. Syncope in Greek and Indo-European and the nature of the Indo-European accent. Naples: Instituto universitario orientale di Napoli.Google Scholar
Teržan, Biba, & de Marinis, Raffaele. 2018. The northern Adriatic. In: Haselgrove, Colin, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, & Wells, Peter S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696826.013.10.Google Scholar
Tietze, Andreas. 2002. Tarihi ve Etimolojik Türkiye Türkçesi sözlüğü. Istanbul & Vienna: Simurg Kitapçılık, ÖAW.Google Scholar
Tomaschek, Wilhelm. 1884. Review of Schrader 1883. Litteratur-Blatt für orientalische Philologie 1 (Oct. 1883–Sept. 1884): 121–30.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Basque. Edited for web publication by Max W. Wheeler. University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Reinhold. 1910. Die altpreussischen Sprachdenkmäler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Xavier. 2004. Chalcographie: Sur χαλκός, lit geležìs et turc qoruγžin. Historische Sprachforschung 117(2): 238–248.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Xavier. 2005. Irano-Tocharica et Tocharo-Iranica. Bulletin of SOAS 68(3): 421–449.Google Scholar
Tripathi, D. N. 1996. Tin in the ancient world: a literary study. In: Singh, Sarva Daman (ed.), Culture through the ages: Prof. B.N. Puri felicitation volume, 161–167. Delhi: Agam Kala Prakashan.Google Scholar
Trubachev, Oleg N. 1967. Iz slavjano-iranskix leksičeskix otnošenij. Ètimologija 1965: 3–81.Google Scholar
UEW = Rédei, Károly. 1986–1991. Uralisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3 vols. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Valério, M., and Yakubovich, I.. 2010. Semitic word for ‘iron’ as Anatolian loanword. In: Nikolaev, T. M. (ed.), Isseledovanija po lingvistike i semiotike: Sbornik statej k jubileju Vyač. Vs. Ivanova, 108–116. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Vaniček, Alois. 1881. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der lateinischen Sprache. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Vanséveren, Sylvie. 2012. Noms de métaux dans les textes hittites. Anatolica 38: 203–219.Google Scholar
Viitso, Tiit-Rein. 2013. Early metallurgy in language: The history of metal names in Finnic. In: Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (ed.), A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe, 185–200. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
WH = Walde, Alois & Hofmann, Johann Baptist. 1965–1972. Lateinisches Etymologische Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Wegner, Ilse. 2000. Einführung in die hurritische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael. 2020. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz. 2009. A wandering word for ‘hardened iron, steel’: A study in the history of concepts and words. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 14: 291–305.Google Scholar
van Windekens, Albert J. 1958. Pelasgisch und Westgermanisch: Neues Material. Die Sprache 4: 128–138.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ünsal. 1999. Early iron metallurgy in Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 49: 177–187.Google Scholar
Zapatero, Gonzalo Ruiz, Manuel Fernández-Götz, , & Álvarez-Sanchís, Jesús. 2012. Die Ausbreitung der Eisenmetallurgie auf der Iberischen Halbinsel. In: Kern, Anton et al. (ed.), Technologieentwicklung und -transfer in der Hallstatt- und Latènezeit, 149–166. Lagenweissbach: Beier & Beran.Google Scholar
Zhivlov, Mikhail. 2014. Studies in Uralic vocalism III. Journal of Language Relationship 12: 113–148.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×