Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- 9 From the Steppe to Ireland: The Impact of aDNA Research
- 10 Beaker Culture Metal and Mobility in Atlantic Europe: Some Implications for Genetic and Language Origins
- 11 “From the Ends of the Earth”: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Long-Distance Contact in Bronze Age Atlantic Europe
- 12 With the Back to the Ocean: The Celtic Maritime Vocabulary
- 13 European Prehistory between Celtic and Germanic: The Celto-Germanic Isoglosses Revisited
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
13 - European Prehistory between Celtic and Germanic: The Celto-Germanic Isoglosses Revisited
from Part III - The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2023
Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- 9 From the Steppe to Ireland: The Impact of aDNA Research
- 10 Beaker Culture Metal and Mobility in Atlantic Europe: Some Implications for Genetic and Language Origins
- 11 “From the Ends of the Earth”: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Long-Distance Contact in Bronze Age Atlantic Europe
- 12 With the Back to the Ocean: The Celtic Maritime Vocabulary
- 13 European Prehistory between Celtic and Germanic: The Celto-Germanic Isoglosses Revisited
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
Summary
Recent advances in the field of palaeogenomics have revealed that at the onset of the Late Neolithic, Europe was characterized by a major cultural and genetic transformation triggered by multiple population movements from the Pontic–Caspian steppe. Corded Ware populations show a large-scale introduction of Yamnaya steppe ancestry across the entire archaeological horizon (Allentoft et al. 2015; Haak et al. 2015; Malmström 2019). The emergence of the Bell Beaker burial identity in the early third millennium BCE was similarly accompanied by a dramatic genetic turnover, at least in Northwestern Europe (Olalde et al. 2018). These population changes call for the integration of genetic evidence into existing models for the linguistic Indo-Europeanization of Europe (cf. Kristiansen et al. 2017).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Indo-European Puzzle RevisitedIntegrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics, pp. 193 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adams, Douglas Q. 2013. A dictionary of Tocharian B, revised and greatly enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 10). Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
ALEW = Hock, Wolfgang, Fecht, Rainer, Feulner, Anna Helene, Hill, Eugen, & Wodtko, Dagmar S.. 2019. Altlitauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (ALEW).Google Scholar
Allentoft, Morten E., Sikora, Martin, Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Rasmussen, Simon, Rasmussen, Morten, Stenderup, Jesper, Damgaard, Peter B., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522(7555): 167–172.Google Scholar
Artursson, M. 2013. Ships in stone: Ship-like stone settings, war canoes and sailing ships in Bronze Age southern Scandinavia. In: Bergerbrant, S. & Sabatini, S. (ed.), Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen (British Archaeological Reports International Series), 499–504. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1967. Das gallische Namenelement *cassi- und die germanisch-keltische Kontaktzone. In: Meid, Wolfgang (ed.) Beiträge zur Indogermanistik und Keltologie: Julius Pokorny zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 13), 115–45. Innsbruck: Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1970. Germanen und Kelten bis zum Ausgang der Römerzeit: der Aussagewert von Wörtern und Sachen für die frühesten Keltisch-Germanischen Kulturbeziehungen (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschiften, philosophisch-historische Klasse: Sitzungsberichte 272). Vienna: Kommissionsverlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1999. Ein Strauß nicht durchwegs bekömmlicher Kräuter aus dem keltischen und germanischen Altertum: Wort- und Sachkundliches zu einigen Pflanzen. In: Anreiter, P., Erszebét, J. (ed.), Studia celtica et indogermanica: Festschrift für Wolfgang Meid zum 70. Geburtstag, 43–52. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 2012. Keltisches in germanischen Runennamen? In: Bammesberger, A., Waxenberger, A. & G. (ed.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen: Akten der Tagung in Eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003 (Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde), 80–100. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bjorvand, Harald, & Lindeman, Frederik O.. 2000. Våre arveord: Etymologisk ordbok. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk. F. H. 2003. On Gothic magaþ ~ Old Frisian megith and the form of some North European substratum words in Germanic. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 58: 11–28.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk F. H., & Kossmann, Maarten G.. 2001. On the etymology of “silver.” NOWELE : North-Western European Language Evolution 38: 3–15.Google Scholar
Brumlich, Markolf. 2005. Schmiedegräber der älteren vorrömischen Eisenzeit in Norddeutschland. Ethnogr.-Arch. Zeitschr. 46(2): 189–220.Google Scholar
Caudullo, G., Welk, E., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. 2017. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data in Brief 12: 662–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Iranian verb (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 2). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cleary, Kerry, & Gibson, Catriona. 2019. Connectivity in Atlantic Europe during the Bronze Age (2800-800 BC). In: Cunliffe, B. & Koch, J. T. (ed.), Exploring Celtic origins: New ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics (Celtic Studies Publications XXII), 80–116. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, Barry, & Koch, John T.. (ed.). 2019. Exploring Celtic origins: New ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics (Celtic Studies Publications 22). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
de Bernardo Stempel, Patrizia. 2001. Gotisch in-weitiþ guþ und gallisch ande-díon uēdiíu-mi (Chamalières, Z. 1 ). Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 114: 164–170.Google Scholar
Demiraj, Bardhyl. 1997. Albanische Etymologien (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 7). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Dinneen, Patrick S. 1904. Foclóir Gaedhilge agus Béarla. An Irish-English dictionary. Dublin: Irish Text Society.Google Scholar
Ebel, H. 1861. Die stellung des celtischen. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung 2: 137–194.Google Scholar
EDHIL = Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
eDIL = 2019. An electronic dictionary of the Irish language. Accessed July 29, 2021. www.dil.ie.Google Scholar
EDLI = Vaan, Michiel de. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPC = Matasović, Ranko. 2009. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Celtic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 9). Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPG = Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 11). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Antoine, Fages, et al. 2019. Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series. Cell 177(6): 1419–1435.e31.Google Scholar
Falileyev, Alexander. 2000. Etymological glossary of Old Welsh (Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 18). Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleuriot, Léon. 1964. Dictionnaire des gloses en vieux breton (Collection linguistique 62). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. 1962–1965. Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
French, Katherine E. 2017. Palaeoecology and GIS modeling reveal historic grasslands as “hotspots” of biodiversity and plant genetic resources. Journal of Ethnobiology 37: 581–600.Google Scholar
Gnesin, G. G., 2016. Iron Age: Origin and evolution of ferrous metallurgy. Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics 55: 114–123.Google Scholar
Haak, Wolfgang, Lazaridis, Iosif, Patterson, Nick, Rohland, Nadin, Mallick, Swapan, Llamas, Bastien, et al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522: 207–211.Google Scholar
Heidermanns, Frank. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive (Studia Linguistica Germanica 33). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2002. Ein germanisch-keltisches Suffix für Nominalabstrakta. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 62: 39–70.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2012. Die Entwicklung von *u vor unsilbischem *i in den indogermanischen Sprachen Nord- und Mitteleuropas: die Stammsuppletion bei u-adjektiven und das Präsens von “sein.” NOWELE 64/65: 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. G., Halstead, P., Wilson, P. J., & Davis, S.. 1999. Functional interpretation of archaeobotanical data: Making hay in the archaeological record. Veget. Hist. Archaebot. 8: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Hyllested. 2010. The precursors of Celtic and Germanic. In: Jamison, S. W., Melchert, H. C., Vine, B. H, & Mercado, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference: Los Angeles, October 30th and 31st, 2009, 107–28. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Hyllested, Adam. 2014. Word exchange at the gates of Europe: Five millenia of language contact. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Irslinger, Britta. 2002. Abstrakta mit Dentalsuffixen im Altirischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Iversen, Rune, & Kroonen, Guus. 2017. Talking Neolithic: Linguistic and archaeological perspectives on how Indo-European was implemented in southern Scandinavia. American Journal of Archaeology 121: 511–525.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth Hurlstone. 1953. Language and History in Early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, first to twelfth century A.D. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Jens Winter. 2016. Heavy metal: Lead in Bronze Age Scandinavia. Fornvännen 111: 153–161.Google Scholar
Johnston, Robert. 2013. Bronze Age fields and land division. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, 311–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Anders Richardt. 2006. Etymologies to go: Some further reflexes of Celtic *keng-. Keltische Forschungen 1: 59–71.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1913. Urgermanisch: Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte. Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Ko = Koch, John T.. 2018. Rock art and Celto-Germanic vocabulary: Shared iconography and words as reflections of Bronze Age contact. Adoranten: 1–16.Google Scholar
Koch, John T. 2020. Celto-Germanic: Later prehistory and Post-Proto-Indo-European vocabulary in the north and west. Aberystwyth: Canolfan Uwchefrydiau Cymreig a Cheltaidd Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar
KPV = Schumacher, Stefan. 2004. Die keltischen Primärverben: ein vergleichendes, etymologisches und morphologisches Lexikon. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Kristian, et al. 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(356): 334–347.Google Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2011. The Proto-Germanic n-stems. A study in diachronic morphophonology (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 18). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2012. Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: Evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate. In: Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (ed.), A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe, 239–260. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
LEIA = Vendryes, Joseph, Bachallery, Édouard, & Lambert, Pierre-Yves. 1959–1996. Lexique étymologique de l’irlandais ancien. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Lidén, Evald. 1891. Etymologien. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 15: 507–522.Google Scholar
LIV² = Rix, Helmut, Kümmel, Martin, Zehnder, Thomas, Lipp, Reiner, & Schirmer, Briggite. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben, 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludweig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 1988. On the system of nominal accentuation in Sanskrit and Indo-European (Memoirs of the Kern Institute 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie. 1988. Expressivität und Lautgesetz im Germanischen (Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 15). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Lull, Vicente, Micó, Roberto, Herrada, Christina Rihuete, & Risch, Roberto. 2014. The social value of silver in El Argar. In: Meller, Harald, Risch, Roberto, & Pernicka, Ernst (ed.), Metalle der Macht – frühes Gold und Silber (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 11/2), 557–576. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, archaeology and myth. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., 2016. Archaeology and language shift in Atlantic Europe. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry W. (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the Metal Ages: Questions of Shared Language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 387–406. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Huld, Martin. 1984. Proto-Indo-European ‘silver’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 97(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Marstrander, Carl. 1915. Bidrag til det norske sprogs historie i Irland (Skrifter Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. II-Hist.-filos. klasse 5). Kristiania: I kommission hos J. Dybwad.Google Scholar
McClatchie, Meriel. 2018. Barley, rye, and oats. In: Varela, Sandra L. López (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, 1–4. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Meller, Harald. 2019. Princes, armies, sanctuaries: The emergence of complex authority in the central German Únětice culture. Acta Archaeologica 90: 39–79.Google Scholar
Neumann, Günter. 1961. Hethitische Etymologien. III. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 77: 76–81.Google Scholar
Noble, Gordon. 2017. Woodland in the Neolithic of Northern Europe: The forest as ancestor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, William. 2016. Language shift and political context in Bronze Age Ireland: Some implications of hill fort chronology. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the metal ages: Questions of shared language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 219–246. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettinger, Norbert. 1997. Grundsätzliche Überlegungen Zum Nordwest-Indogermanischen. Incontri Linguistici 20: 93–111.Google Scholar
Oettinger, Norbert. 1999. Zum nordwest-indogermanischen Lexikon (mit einer Bemerkung zum hethitischen Genitiv auf -l). In: Anreiter, P. & Erszebét, J. (ed.), Studia celtica et indogermanica: Festschrift für Wolfgang Meid zum 70. Geburtstag, 261–267. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Olalde, Iñigo, Brace, Selina, Allentoft, Morten E., Armit, Ian, Kristiansen, Kristian, Booth, Thomas, et al. 2018. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555(7695): 190–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panaino, Antonio. 2016. Later Avestan maɣauua- (?) and the (mis)adventures of a “pseudo-ascetic.” In: Redard, C. (ed.), Des Contrées Avestiques à Mahabad, via Bisotun. Etudes Offertes En Hommage à Pierre Lecoq, 167–186. Neuchâtel: Recherches et Publications.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1913. Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen II. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Pl = Polomé, Edgar C.. 1983. Celto-Germanic isoglosses (revisited). Journal of Indo-European Studies 11: 281–298.Google Scholar
Pr = Porzig, Walter. 1974. Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Pronk-Tiethoff, Saskia Elisabeth. 2012. The Germanic loanwords in Proto-Slavic: Origin and accentuation. PhD diss., Leiden University.Google Scholar
Pryor, Francis. 2010. The making of the British landscape: How we have transformed the land, from prehistory to today. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Riecke, Jörg. 1996. Die schwachen jan-Verben des Althochdeutschen: Ein Gliederungsversuch (Studien zum Althochdeutschen 32). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Robinson, Patrick. 1986. Trees as fodder crops. In: Cannell, M. G. R. & Jackson, J. E. (ed.), Attributes of trees as crop plants, 281–296. Penicuik: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, NERC.Google Scholar
Rübekeil, Ludwig. 2001. Einige Bemerkungen zur Wortfamilie um germ. *hatis-. In: Brogyányi, B. (ed.), Germanisches Altertum und christliches Mittelalter: Festschrift für Heinz Klingenberg zum 65. Geburtstag, 239–294. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Rusu, Mircea. 1969. Das keltische Fürstengrab von Ciumeşti in Rumänien. Germania 50: 267–300.Google Scholar
Sahlgren, G. F. Jöran. 1953. Ortnamnet Nymden och lat. nemus. Namn och Bygd: Tidskrift för nordisk ortnamnsforskning 41: 46–50.Google Scholar
SBCHP = Schrijver, Peter C. H.. 1995. Studies in British Celtic historical phonology (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 5). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schm = Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1991. The Celts and the ethnogenesis of the Germanic people. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 104: 129–152.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 1997. Animal, vegetable and mineral: Some Western European substratum words. In: Lubotsky, A. (ed.), Sound law and analogy (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 9), 293–314. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2003. The etymology of Welsh chwith and the semantics and morphology of PIE *k(w)sweibh-. In: Russell, Paul (ed.), Yr Hen Iaith: Studies in Early Welsh, 1–24. Aberystwyth: Celtic Studies Publications.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2004. Apes, dwarfs, rivers and Indo-European internal derivation. In: Hyllested, Adam & Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård (ed.), Per aspera ad asteriscos: Studia Indogermanica in honorem Jens Elmegård Rasmussen sexagenarii Idibus Martiis anno MMIV, 507–511. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2016. Sound change, the Italo-Celtic linguistic unity, and the Italian homeland of Celtic. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the metal ages: Questions of shared language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 489–502. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Schu = Schumacher, Stefan. 2007. Die Deutschen und die Nachbarstämme: Lexikalische und strukturelle Sprachkontaktphänomene entlang der keltisch-germanischen Übergangszone. Keltische Forschungen 2: 167–208.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 85). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, Patrick., 2020. An alternative to “Celtic from the East” and “Celtic from the West.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30(3): 1–19.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 1998. Study in red. Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40: 202–223.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2009. The Proto-Germanic shift *ā>*ō and early Germanic linguistic contacts. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 122: 268–83.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2011. Lack of syncope and other nichtlautgesetzlich vowel developments in OIr. consonant-stem nouns. Animacy rearing its head in morphology? In: Krisch, Thomas & Lindner, Thomas (ed.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, 556–565. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2015. The language of the poems of blathmac. In: Ó Riain, Pádraig (ed.), The poems of Blathmac son of Cú Brettan: Reassessments (Irish Texts Society Subsidiary Series 27), 47–103. London: Irish Texts Society.Google Scholar
Stika, Hans-Peter, & Heiss, Andreas G.. 2013. Plant cultivation in the Bronze Age. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, 348–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Whitley. 1901. Irish etymologies. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 3: 467–473.Google Scholar
Thier, Katrin. 2011. Language and technology: Some examples from seafaring (Germanic and Celtic). Transactions of the Philological Society 109: 186–199.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Nick. 2013. Warfare in the European Bronze Age. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, 234–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Reinhold. 1923. Baltisch-Slavisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Van der Vaart-Verschoof, Sasja. 2017. Fragmenting the chieftain: A practice-based study of Early Iron Age Hallstatt C elite burials in the Low Countries (Papers on Archaeology of the Leiden Museum of Antiquities 15A). Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Van Windekens, Albert Joris. 1941. Lexique étymologique des dialectes tokhariens (Bibliothèque du Muséon 11). Louvain: Bureaux du Muséon.Google Scholar
Wadstein, Elis. 1895. Bidrag till tolkning och belysning av skalde- ock Edda-dikter. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 11: 64–92.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan R., 1980. The manufacture of mail in medieval Europe: A technical note. Gladius 15: 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wissmann, Wilhelm. 1961. Ahd. seffo. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 77: 81.Google Scholar
Wright, John. 2016. A natural history of the hedgerow: And ditches, dykes and dry stone walls. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Zair, N. 2013. Lat. glārea ‘gravel.’ Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 126: 280–286.Google Scholar