Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:47:42.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Preparation for Optimal Endometrial Receptivity in Cryo Cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2021

Human M. Fatemi
Affiliation:
IVI Middle East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Barbara Lawrenz
Affiliation:
IVI Middle East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Get access

Summary

Despite the various advances and increasing success rates of assisted conception treatment in recent years, implantation continues to be a rate limiting step (). The first successful IVF treatment performed by the pioneers Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards which led to the birth of Louise Joy Brown in 1978, was achieved in a fresh embryo transfer cycle. The subsequent implementation of cryopreservation techniques in the IVF laboratory facilitated the cryopreservation and storage of supernumerary embryos which were not chosen for a fresh transfer. Laboratory techniques have improved significantly over the years and due to the improved survival rates of cryopreserved oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst-stage embryos, cryopreservation of gametes and embryos has become part of everyday routine clinical practice ().

Type
Chapter
Information
Individualized In-Vitro Fertilization
Delivering Precision Fertility Treatment
, pp. 112 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Niederberger, C, Pellicer, A, Cohen, J, et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 2018;110(2):185324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loutradi, KE, Kolibianakis, EM, Venetis, CA, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2008;90(1):186193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Lannou, D, Griveau, JF, Laurent, MC, et al. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:368375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2005;83:16221628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;110(6):10221028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahdouh, EM, Balayla, J, García Velasco, JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104(6):15031512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navot, D, Scott, RT, Droesch, K, et al. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril 1991;55:114118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, MJK. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1992;6:351371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giudice, LC. Potential biochemical markers of uterine receptivity. Hum Reprod 1999;14(Suppl 2):316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoozemans, DA, Schats, R, Lambalk, CB, et al. Human embryo implantation: current knowledge and clinical implications in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;9:692715.Google Scholar
Kodaman, P, Taylor, H. Hormonal regulation of implantation. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2004;31:745766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, RW, Hertig, AT, Rock, J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950;1:561564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, LK, Devoto, L. Cholesterol transport and steroidogenesis by the corpus luteum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devoto, L, Fuentes, A, Kohen, P, et al. The human corpus luteum: life cycle and function in natural cycles. Fertil Steril 2009;92:10671079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loke, YW, King, A, Burrows, TD. Decidua in human implantation. Hum Reprod 1995;10(Suppl 2):1421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Psychoyos, A. Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1986;476:3642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Psychoyos, A. Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm 1973;31:201256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testart, J, Frydman, R, Feinstein, MC, et al. Interpretation of plasma luteinizing hormone assay for the collection of mature oocytes from women: definition of a luteinizing hormone surge-initiating rise. Fertil Steril 1981;36(1):5054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frydman, R, Testart, J, Feinstein, MC, et al. Interrelationship of plasma and urinary luteinizing hormone preovulatory surge. J Steroid Biochem 1984;20:617619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, PB, Soules, MR. The usefulness of urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krotz, S, McKenzie, LJ, Cisneros, P, et al. Prevalence of premature urinary luteinizing hormone surges in women with regular menstrual cycles and its effect on implantation of frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil Steril 2005;83(6):17421744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Wit, H, Schmitt, L, Purdy, R, et al. Effects of acute progesterone administration in healthy postmenopausal women and normally-cycling women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2001;26(7):697710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, ER, Sondheimer, SJ, Freeman, EW, et al. Serum progesterone levels following vaginal administration of progesterone during the luteal phase. Fertil Steril 1987;47(1):7175.Google Scholar
Villanueva, B, Casper, RF, Yen, SS. Intravaginal administration of progesterone: enhanced absorption after estrogen treatment. Fertil Steril 1981;35:433437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatemi, HM, Kyrou, D, Bourgain, C, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril 2010;94(6):20542058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, G, Ackermann, W, Alexander, H. Epithelial human chorionic gonadotropin is expressed and produced in human secretory endometrium during the normal menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod 2009;80:10531065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghobara, T, Vandekerckhove, P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23(1):CD003414.Google Scholar
Ghobara, T, Gelbaya, TA, Ayeleke, RO. Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7(7):CD003414.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattoli, M, Ciotti, PM, Seracchioli, R, et al. A randomized prospective study on cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus hormone replacement cycles. In: 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Brussels. Vol. 356. ESHRE, 1994:139.Google Scholar
Karimzadeh, MA, Mohammadian, F, Mashayekhy, M. Comparison of frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcome in natural cycle and hormone replacement cycle. Hum Reprod 2012;27(Suppl 2):284.Google Scholar
Groenewoud, ER, Cohlen, B, Al-Oraiby, A, et al. A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2016;31(7):14831492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groenewoud, ER, Cantineau, AE, Kollen, BJ, et al. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23(2):255261.Google ScholarPubMed
Morozov, V, Ruman, J, Kenigsberg, D, et al. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:119123.Google Scholar
Chang, EM, Han, JE, Kim, YS, et al. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28 369374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, Z, Zhou, X, Xu, W, et al. Natural cycle is superior to hormone replacement therapy cycle for vitrificated – preserved frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011;58:107112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardenas Armas, DF, Peñarrubia, J, Goday, A, et al. Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle increase implantation rates compared artificial cycle. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019;11:15.Google Scholar
Madani, T, Ramezanali, F, Yahyaei, A, et al. Live birth rates after different endometrial preparation methods in frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299(4):11851191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, K, Richter, KS, Widra, EA, et al. Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril 2018;109(2):266275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, Y, Sun, Y, Hao, C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med 2018;378(2):126136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, D, Liu, J-Y, Sun, Y, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:13101318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, MD, Chizen, DR, Pierson, RA. Characteristics of follicular evacuation during human ovulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4(6):488493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irani, M, Robles, A, Gunnala, V, et al. Optimal parameters for determining the LH surge in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers. J Ovarian Res 2017;10(1):70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×