Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- 2 Including Outsiders in Latin America
- 3 Diffusion Dynamics
- 4 Inclusion Without Power?
- 5 Brazil’s Participatory Infrastructure
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
5 - Brazil’s Participatory Infrastructure
Opportunities and Limitations for Inclusion
from Part I - Extending Social Policy and Participation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2021
Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- 2 Including Outsiders in Latin America
- 3 Diffusion Dynamics
- 4 Inclusion Without Power?
- 5 Brazil’s Participatory Infrastructure
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
Summary
This chapter sets out a roadmap to understand the new politics of participation in Latin America by exploring the intersection between two important transformations in society and the state. First, we highlight new actors in state and society who are pressing for policy reform. Whereas the existing literature focuses on interests organized around social class and indigenous identity, we reveal a rainbow of societal actors that span class lines, as well as the emergence of activist bureaucrats, who work together to demand greater social inclusion and policy change. Second, while prior studies emphasize representative institutions as the main site to advance policy change, we analyze the importance of new institutions for participation in the executive and the judicial branches of government. These sites have been central for activism in a range of underexplored policy areas, including the environment; the rights of women, people with disabilities, and sexual minorities; and crime. Together, we argue, these new actors and institutions are redefining the politics of participation today in Latin America.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies , pp. 155 - 182Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Almeida, Carla, and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2012. “Os conselhos gestores sob o crivo da política: balanços e perspectivas.” Serviço Social e Sociedade 109 (January/March): 68–92.Google Scholar
Almeida, Deborah Resende de. 2013. “Representação política e conferências: Estabelecendo uma agenda de pesquisa.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, 173–204. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Altschuler, Daniel, and Corrales, Javier. 2012. “The Spillover Effects of Participatory Governance: Evidence from Community-Managed Schools in Honduras and Guatemala.” Comparative Political Studies 45(5): 636–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore and Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press and Woodrow Wilson Center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2012. Conferências nacionais: Ampliando e redefinindo os padrões de participação social no Brasil. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo, and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, eds. 2013. Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, ed. 2003. Radicals in Power: The Workers’ Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Chavez, Daniel, and Goldfrank, Benjamin, eds. 2004. The Left in the City: Participatory Local Governments in Latin America. London: Latin America Bureau and Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan P. 2006. “Democratization of the Brazilian Health Councils: The Paradox of Bringing the Other Side into the Tent.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(3): 656–671.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1977. “Who Does What, to Whom, and How: Toward a Comparative Analysis of Latin American Corporatism.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James, 489–512. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel. 2009. “Logics of Collective Action, State Linkages, and Aggregate Traits: The UP-Hub versus the A-Net.” In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, edited by Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel, 61–92. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 2012. Relatório Final da 14a Conferência Nacional de Saúde. Brasilia: Conselho Nacional de Saúde and Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas, ed. 2011. Participação e saúde no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas, Silva, Marcelo Kunrath, Réos, Janete Cardoso, and Barcelos, Márcio. 2011. “Conselho Nacional de Saúde: Histórico, paper institucional e atores estatais e societais.” In Participação e saúde no Brasil, edited by Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas, 41–71. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Cunha, Elenora Shettini Martins. 2009. “Efetividade deliberativa: Estudo comparado de Conselhos Municipais de Assistência Social (1997/2006).” PhD thesis, Departamento de Ciência Política, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Cunha, Elenora Shettini Martins. 2013. “Conferências de políticas públicas e inclusão participativa.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinânmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, 141–171. Brasilia: IPEA.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1998. “Culture, Citizenship, and Democracy: Changing Discourses and Practices of the Latin American Left.” In Cultures of Politics, Politics of Culture: Re-Visioning Latin American Social Movements, edited by Alvarez, Sonia, Dagnino, Evelina and Escobar, Arturo, 33–63. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah, and de Bloch, Renata Arruda. 2005. “As conferências nacionais de saúde na construção do SUS.” In Saúde e democracia: História e perspetivas do SUS, edited by Lima, Nísia Trindade, Gerschman, Silvia, Edler, Flavio Coelho and Suárez, Julio Manuel, 83–119. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Fleury, Sônia. 1987. “Cidadania, direitos sociais e Estado.” In Anais da 8a Conferência Nacional de Saúde: 17 a 21 de março de 1986, 91–112. Brasília: Centro de Documentação do Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Fuks, Mario, Perissinotto, Renato Monseff, and Souza, N. R., eds. 2004. Democracia e participação: Os conselhos gestores do Paraná. Curitiba: UFPR.Google Scholar
Multitudes, Fundación. 2015. ¿Hay COSOC? Radiografía de los Consejos de la Sociedad Civil Municipales, 2da edición. Santiago: Fundación Multitudes.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin, eds. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gerschman, Silvia. 2004. “Conselhos municipais de saúde: Atuação e representação das comunidades populares.” Caderno de Saúde Pública 20 (6): 1670–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohn, Maria da Glória, ed. 2001. Conselhos gestores e participação sociopolítica. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
González, Yanilda. 2019. “Participation as a safety valve: Police reform through participatory security in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(2): 68–92.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, Acharya, Arnab, and Houtzager, Peter. 2005. “Beyond comparative anecdotalism: Lessons on civil society and participation from São Paulo, Brazil.” World Development 33 (6):951–964.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, Voigt, Jessica, and Serafim, Lizandra. 2016. “O que fazem os conselhos e quando o fazem? Padrões decisórios e o debate dos efeitos das instituições participativas.” Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais 59 (3): 609–650.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, Houtzager, Peter, and Castello, Graziela. 2006. “Representação política e organizações civis: Novas instâncias de mediação e os desafios da legitimidade.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 21(60): 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Veronica. 2017. “From Participatory Promises to Partisan Capture: Local Democratic Transitions and Mexican Water Politics.” Comparative Politics 49(4): 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBGE. 2012. Perfíl dos Municipios Brasileiros: Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais. Brasília.Google Scholar
Leite de Souza, Clóvis Henrique, Cruxên, Isadora Araujo, Lima, Paula Pompeu Fiuza, Alencar, Joana Luiza Oliveira, and Ribeiro, Uriella Coelho. 2013. “Conferências típicas e atípicas: Um esforço de caracterização do fenômeno político.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, 25–52. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Malloy, James. 1977. “Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America: The Modal Pattern.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James, 3–19. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2013. “Bringing the Public into Policymaking: National participatory Institutions in Latin America.” PhD thesis, Department of Political Science, University of California.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019a. Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America: Reform Coalitions and Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019b. “The Origins of Strong Institutional Design: Policy Reform and Participatory Institutions in Brazil’s Health Sector.” Comparative Politics 51(2): 275–294.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2011. Voice and Vote: Decentralization and Participation in Post-Fujimori Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2013. “Participatory Democracy? Exploring Peru’s Efforts to Engage Civil Society in Local Governance.” Latin American Politics and Society 55(3):69–92.Google Scholar
Mericle, Kenneth. 1977. “Corporatist Control of the Working Class: Authoritarian Brazil since 1964.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James M., 303–338, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ministério da Saúde. 1993. Relatório final da IX Conferência Nacional de Saúde: Municipalizão é o caminho. Brasília.Google Scholar
Petinelli, Viviane. 2013. “Contexto político, natureza da política, organização da sociedade civil e desenho institucional: alguns condicionantes da efetividade das conferências nacionais.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and Leite de Souza, Clóvis Henrique, 207–242. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Samuels, David. 2014. “The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences.” Comparative Politics 46(3): 313–332.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Santos, Fabiano. 2011. “Participação como representação: O impacto das conferências nacionais de políticas públicas no Congresso Nacional.” Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais 54(3): 259–305.Google Scholar
Presidência da República. 2012. “Portal da transparência do governo federal.” www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/ (accessed January 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2013. “Grassroots Bureaucracy: Intergovernmental Relations and Popular Mobilization in Brazil’s AIDS Policy Sector.” Latin American Politics and Society 55(2): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019a. “Making National Participatory Institutions Work: Bureaucrats, Activists, and AIDS Policy in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(2): 45–67.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019b. State-Sponsored Activism: Bureaucrats and Social Movements in Democratic Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saffioti, Heleieth Iara Bongiovani. 1987. “Feminismos e seus frutos no Brasil.” In Movimentos sociais na transição democrática, edited by Sader, Emir, 105–158. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1971. Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” World Politics 36(1): 85–131.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ana Claudia Chaves, Leite de Souza, Clóvis Henrique, and Fiuza Lima, Paula Pompeu. 2012. Arquitetura da participação no Brasil: Uma leitura das representações políticas em espaços participativos nacionais. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Touchton, Michael, Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Wampler, Brian. 2017. “Democracy at Work: Moving beyond Elections to Improve Well-Being.” American Political Science Review 111(1): 68–82.Google Scholar
Tranjan, J. Ricardo. 2016. Participatory Democracy in Brazil: Socioeconomic and Political Origins. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. “Can Participatory Institutions Promote Pluralism? Mobilizing Low-Income Citizens in Brazil.” Studies in Comparative International Development 41(4): 57–78.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2008. “When Does Participatory Democracy Deepen the Quality of Democracy? Lessons from Brazil.” Comparative Politics 41 (1): 61–82.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2015. Activating Democracy in Brazil: Popular Participation, Social Justice, aAnd Interlocking Institutions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2010. Peru: Evaluacion del presupuesto participativo y su relación con el presupuesto por resultados. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zaremberg, Gisela. 2012. “‘We’re Either Burned or Frozen Out’: Society and Party Systems in Latin American Municipal Development Councils (Nicaragua, Venezuela, Mexico, and Brazil).” In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, edited by Cameron, Maxwell, Hershberg, Eric, and Sharpe, Kenneth, 21–52. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by