Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- 9 The Politics of Popular Coalitions
- 10 After Corporatism
- 11 Expanding the Public Square
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
10 - After Corporatism
Party Linkages with Popular Sector Organizations in Neoliberal Latin America
from Part III - New Party–Society Linkages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2021
Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- 9 The Politics of Popular Coalitions
- 10 After Corporatism
- 11 Expanding the Public Square
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
Summary
What role do popular sector associations play in party building in contemporary Latin America? While corporatist ties to hierarchically organized labor and peasant associations have diminished, a bevy of “dissident” popular sector organizations have emerged, such as neighborhood associations, indigenous movements, and informal sector associations. These organizations have played contrasting roles in party building for new left-wing parties such as Brazil’s PT, Bolivia’s MAS, Mexico’s PRD, Uruguay’s FA, and Venezuela’s AD, varying from durable and programmatic neo-corporatism to contingent patronage ties. Based on these cases, this chapter inductively identifies founding party traits that shape linkage type. Parties that established formal rules for incorporating organizational allies in party leadership and included a major segment of the labor movement in their founding coalition were most successful at institutionalizing spaces for allied organizations’ programmatic influence. This argument is tested through a subnational analysis of Mexican state governments under the PRD.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies , pp. 327 - 361Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Anria, Santiago. 2016. “Democratizing Democracy? Civil Society and Party Organization in Bolivia.” Comparative Politics 48(4): 459–478.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago. 2018. When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago, and Cyr, Jennifer. 2017. “Inside Revolutionary Parties: Coalition-Building and Maintenance in Reformist Bolivia.” Comparative Political Studies 50(9): 1255–1287.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 1999. “‘From the Client’s Point (s) of View’: How Poor People Perceive and Evaluate Political Clientelism.” Theory and Society 28(2): 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentancur, Verónica Pérez, Rodríguez, Rafael Piñeiro, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2019. “Efficacy and the Reproduction of Political Activism: Evidence from the Broad Front in Uruguay.” Comparative Political Studies 52(6): 838–867.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2008. Urban Protest in Mexico and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2013. “El PRD y los movimientos urbanos populares en el distrito federal.” In El PRD: orígenes, itinerario, retos, edited by Cadena-Roa, Jorge and López Leyva, Miguel Armando, 133–154. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Bueno, Natália S. 2018. “Bypassing the Enemy: Distributive Politics, Credit Claiming, and Nonstate Organizations in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 51(3): 304–340.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina, and Levitsky, Steven. 2003. “Explaining Populist Party Adaptation in Latin America: Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela.” Comparative Political Studies 36(8): 881–911.Google Scholar
Caire Martínez, Georgina. 2009. “Decentralización Participativa en Ausencia de Recursos: Los Consejos Municipales de Desarrollo Rural Sustentable.” PhD thesis. Facultad Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales-Sede Académico México.Google Scholar
Cantú, Francisco. 2019. “The Fingerprints of Fraud: Evidence from Mexico’s 1988 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 113(3): 710–726.Google Scholar
Cazarín Martínez, Angélica. 2013. “El PRD en Tlaxcala.” In El PRD: Orígenes, Itinerario, Retos, edited by Jorge Cadena-Roa, and López Leyva, Miguel Armando, 399–412. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1992. The Contradictory Alliance: State–Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. Berkeley, CA: International and Area Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1979. “Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating ‘Corporatism.’” American Political Science Review 73(4): 967–986.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel. 2009. “Logics of Collective Action, State Linkages, and Aggregate Traits: The UP-Hub versus the A-Net.” In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, edited by Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel, 61–92. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
De la Garza, Enrique. 2006. “El sindicalismo y el cambio en las relaciones laborales durante el gobierno de Vicente Fox.” In El sindicalismo en México, Mexico City: CENPROS-Plaza y Valdez.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1959. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A. 2011. Politics, Identity, and Mexico’s Indigenous Rights Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan A. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46(2): 151–184.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2009. “Associational Linkages to Labor Unions and Political Parties.” In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, edited by Berins Collier, Ruth and Handlin, Samuel, 260–290. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Aguilar, María del Carmen. 2013. “De la oposición al gobierno: luces y sombras del PRD en Chiapas.” In El PRD: orígenes, ininerario, retos, edited by Cadena-Roa, Jorge and López Leyva, Miguel Armando, 437–463. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Gledhill, John. 1995. Neoliberalism, Transnationalization, and Rural Poverty: A Case Study of Michoacán, Mexico. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gómez Bruera, Hernán F. 2013. Lula, the Workers’ Party and the Governability Dilemma in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Handlin, Samuel, and Berins Collier, Ruth. 2011. “The Diversity of Left Party Linkages and Competitive Advantages.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth M., 139–161. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk Andrew, and Hansen, David R.. 2006. “Dependent Civil Society: The Circulos Bolivarianos in Venezuela.” Latin American Research Review 41(1): 102–132.Google Scholar
Hevia de la Jara, Felipe J., and Isunza Vera, Ernesto. 2012. “Constrained Participation: The Impact of Consultative Councils on National-Level Policy in Mexico.” In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Hershberg, Eric, and Sharpe, Kenneth E., 75–98. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgers, Tina. 2008. “Causes and Consequences of Political Clientelism: Mexico’s PRD in Comparative Perspective.” Latin American Politics and Society 50(4): 123–153.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C., and Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2015. “Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 48(9): 1186–1223.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1992. The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6–7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. Free Market Democracy and the Chilean and Mexican Countryside. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, and Van Dyck, Brandon. 2016. “Introduction: Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Van Dyck, Brandon, and Domínguez, Jorge I., 1–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. 2011. “Introduction: Latin America’s ‘Left Turn’: A Framework for Analysis.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth M., 1–28. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
López Leyva, Miguel Armando. 2007. La encrucijada: entre la protesta social y la participación electoral (1988). Mexico City: FLACSO Mexico.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2007. “Frente Amplio and the Crafting of a Social Democratic Alternative in Uruguay.” Latin American Politics & Society 49(4): 1–30.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2014. “Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America.” World Politics 66(4): 561–602.Google Scholar
Nichter, Simeon, and Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2015. “Clientelism, Declared Support, and Mexico’s 2012 Campaign.” In Mexico’s Evolving Democracy: A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections, edited by Domínguez, Jorge I., Greene, Kenneth F., Lawson, Chappell H., and Moreno, Alejandro, 200–226. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2016. “Interest Organizations and Distributive Politics: Small-Business Subsidies in Mexico.” World Development 84: 97–117.Google Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2019. “Evading the Patronage Trap: Organizational Capacity and Demand Making in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 52(13–14): 2097–2134.Google Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, Brian, Garay, Candelaria, and Poertner, Mathias. 2020. “Incentives for Organizational Participation: A Recruitment Experiment in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies. Online at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414020919927Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penfold-Becerra, Michael. 2007. “Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez’s Misiones.” Latin American Politics and Society 49(4): 63–84.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramírez Sevilla, Luis. 1997. Dibujo de sol con nubes: Una aproximación a los límites y potencialidades del PRD en un municipio michoacano (historia de una utopía nonata). Zamora, Mexico: Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Party–Society Linkages and Democratic Representation in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes 27(53): 9–34.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2003. “Social Correlates of Party System Demise and Populist Resurgence in Venezuela.” Latin American Politics and Society 45(3): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1969. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1142–1158.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 2017. “Reorganizing Popular Sector Incorporation: Propositions from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.” Politics & Society 45(1): 91–122.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 93–110.Google Scholar
Solano Ramírez, Gabino. 2013. “¿Fracaso de una utopía? El PRD en Guerrero.” In El PRD: orígenes, itinerarios, retos, edited by Cadena-Roa, Jorge and Armando López Leyva, Miguel, 361–379. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–325.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2013. “The Microfoundations of Political Clientelism: Lessons from the Argentine Case.” Latin American Research Review 48(2): 32–54.Google Scholar
Tavera Fenolloso, Ligia. 2013. “El movimiento urbano popular y el Frente Democrático Nacional: campo organizacional y liderazgos.” In El PRD: orígenes, itinerario, retos, edited by Cadena-Roa, Jorge and López Leyva, Miguel Armando, 105–31. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014. Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon. 2017. “The Paradox of Adversity: The Contrasting Fates of Latin America’s New Left Parties.” Comparative Politics 49(2): 169–192.Google Scholar
Wuhs, Steven Todd. 2008. Savage Democracy: Institutional Change and Party Development in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaremberg, Gisela. 2012. “‘We’re Either Burned or Frozen Out’: Society and Party Systems in Latin American Municipal Development Councils (Nicaragua, Venezuela, Mexico, and Brazil).” In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Hershberg, Eric, and Sharpe, Kenneth E., 21–51. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by