Aarts, Kees, and Semetko, Holli A.. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement.” The Journal of Politics 65, no. 3 (2003): 759–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A.. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Austen, Ian, and Kanter, James. “Canada Settles a Crop Trade Complaint against Europe.” New York Times, July 16, 2009.Google Scholar

Barke, Richard P., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. “Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy.” Risk Analysis 13 (1993): 425–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bauer, Martin W., Kohring, Matthias, Allansdottir, Agnes, and Gutteling, Jan. “The Dramatisation of Biotechnology in Elite Mass Media.” In Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy, edited by Gaskell, George and Bauer, Martin W., 35–52. London: Science Museum, 2001.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Jones, Bryan D., Mortensen, Peter B., Huytemans, Michiel Nuytemans, and Walgrave, Stefaan. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2009): 603–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., De Boef, Suzanna L., and Boydstun, Amber E.. The Decline of Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

Bee, Peta. “Sport Braced as the Gene Genie Escapes from Its Bottle.” The Guardian, September 13, 2004.Google Scholar

Beetham, David. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Rist, Ray C., and Vedung, Evert, eds. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar

Bennett, Colin J., and Howlett, Michael. “The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25 (1992): 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, Arthur F. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908.Google Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas. Genes, Trade and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bleiklie, Ivar, Goggin, Malcolm, and Rothmayr, Christine, eds. Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Cross Country Comparison. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Bohman, James, and Rehg, William. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolt, Neville. The Violent Image: Insurgent Propaganda and the New Revolutionaries. Columbia/Hurst Series. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bonneuil, Christophe. “Cultures Épistémiques et Engagement Public Des Chercheurs Dans La Controverse OGM.” Natures Sciences Sociétés 14, no. 3 (July 2006): 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonny, Sylvie. “How Have Opinions about GMOs Changed over Time? The Situation in the European Union and the USA.” CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3 (2008): 1–17.Google Scholar

Boykoff, Maxwell T. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boykoff, Maxwell T., and Boykoff, Jules M.. “Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press.” Global Environmental Change 14, no. 2 (July 2004): 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Raymond S. Global Warming and Political Intimidation: How Politicians Cracked Down on Scientists as the Earth Heated Up. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Braybrooke, David, and Lindblom, Charles E.. A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: The Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Brooks, David. “What Moderation Means.” New York Times, October 26, 2012.Google Scholar

Brulle, Robert J., Carmichael, Jason, and Jenkins, Craig J.. “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114, no. 2 (2012): 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacciatore, Michael A., Yeo, Sara K., Scheufele, Dietram A., Xenos, Michael A., Choi, Doo-Hun, Brossard, Dominique, Becker, Amy B., and Corley, Elizabeth A.. “Misperceptions in Polarized Politics: The Role of Knowledge, Religiosity, and Media.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47, no. 3 (July 2014): 654–61.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. Agir Dans Un Monde Incertain: Essai Sur La Démocractie Technique. Paris: éditions du Seuil, 2001.Google Scholar

Cappella, Joseph N., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel P. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Chase, Steven. “GM Food-Label Panel Reaches an Impasse: Ottawa Should Set Mandatory Regulations for Genetically Modified Fare, Critics Urge.” Globe and Mail, March 14, 2003.Google Scholar

Clovers, Charles. “Exclusion Zones around GM Crops to Be Extended.” Daily Telegraph, January 19, 2002.Google Scholar

Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D.. “The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory.” The Journal of Politics 33, no. 4 (November 1, 1971): 892–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, Roger W., and Rochefort, David A.. “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice.” Policy Studies Journal 21 (1993): 56–71.Google Scholar

Coleman, William D., and Skogstad, Grace, eds. Policy Communities and Policy Networks: A Structural Approach. Missisauga: Copp Clark Pitman, 1990.Google Scholar

Collingridge, David, and Reeve, Colin. Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policymaking. London: Frances Printers, 1986.Google Scholar

Cook, Timothy E. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coroller, Catherine. “Le Gouvernement Rend Les OGM Transparents.” Libération, July 26, 2001.Google Scholar

Crick, Bernard. In Defence of Politics. 5th ed. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Doering, Ronald L., and Hughes, Valerie. “We Need to Win: Once Digested, Arguments over EU’s Moratorium on Genetically Modified Crops Boil Down to Science v. Politics.” National Post, February 7, 2006.Google Scholar

Domingo, José L., and Bordonaba, Jordi Giné. “A Literature Review on the Safety of Genetically Modified Plants.” Environment International 37 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas, Mary, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: California University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication 22, no. 4 (October 2005): 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dubuc, Alain. “Le 1%: Mythes et Réalités.” La Presse, January 30, 2013.Google Scholar

Edwards, Steven. “Wealthy Continent Mired in Poverty: National Leaders Enrich Themselves at People’s Expense.” National Post, March 31, 2004.Google Scholar

Einsiedel, Edna F., Jelsøe, Erling, and Breck, Thomas. “Publics at the Technology Table: The Consensus Conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia.” Public Understanding of Science 10 (2001): 83–98.Google Scholar

Elenbaas, Matthijs, and de Vreese, Claes H.. “The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism and Vote Choice among Young Voters.” Journal of Communication 58 (2008): 550–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliasoph, Nina. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Entman, Robert M. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Entman, Robert M., and Herbst, Susan. “Reframing Public Opinion as We Have Known It.” In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, edited by Bennett, Lance W. and Entman, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Faden, Ruth R. and Gearhart, John D.. “Facts on Stem Cells.” Washington Post, August 2004.Google Scholar

Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., and Leiserowitz, A.. “Climate on Cable: The Nature and Impact of Global Warming Coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flinders, Matthew V. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Andrew. “Administrative Role Definition and Social Change.” Human Organization 22, no. 4 (December 1, 1963): 238–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. “Our Cloning Policy, Hostage to a Stalemate.” Washington Post, February 15, 2004.Google Scholar

Gans, Herbert J. Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W., and Durant, John. “The Representation of Biotechnology: Policy, Media and Public Perception.” In Biotechnology in the Pubic Sphere: A European Sourcebook, edited by Durant, John, Bauer, Martin W., and Gaskell, George, 3–12. London: Science Museum, 1998.Google Scholar

Gillis, Justin. “Monsanto Pulls Plan to Commercialize Gene-Altered Wheat.” Washington Post, May 11, 2004.Google Scholar

Gillis, Justin. “No Deal on Biotech Food: Industry, Opponents Fail to Agree on Recommendation for Regulation.” Washington Post, May 30, 2003.Google Scholar

Gillis, Justin. “GM Food v. Manure.” National Post, August 2001.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. “The Impact of Social Structures on Economic Outcomes.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2005): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis F.. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis F.. “The Mindsets of Political Compromise.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2010): 1125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutteling, Jan M., Olofsson, Anna, Fjoestad, Byörn, Kohring, Matthias, Goerke, Alexander, Bauer, Martin W. and Rusanen, Timo. “Media Coverage 1973–1996: Trends and Dynamics.” In Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, edited by Bauer, Martin W. and Gaskell, George, 95–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hajer, Maarten A. Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (1993): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Stephen S. “Panel About to Weigh In On Rules for Assisted Fertility.” New York Times, March 30, 2004.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1977.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, edited by King, Anthony. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Henderson, Mark. The Geek Manifesto: Why Science Matters. London: Bantam, 2012.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth, Theiss-Morse. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Highfield, Roger. “Britain May Pay the Price for Botched GM Debate, Says Reith Lecturer.” Daily Telegraph, April 16, 2005.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. 20th anniversary ed. / with a new foreword by Frank, Robert H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holyoke, Thomas T. Competitive Interests: Competition and Compromise in American Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, Ikeda, Ken’ichi, and Pappi, Franz Urban. “Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2005): 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Kathy L., Scott, Joan, and Faden, Ruth. Values in Conflict: Public Attitudes on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Baltimore, MD: The Genetics and Public Policy Center Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, 2005.Google Scholar

Hulme, Mike. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, Karin. “Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy: Ingold: Network Structures within Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 3 (August 2011): 435–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, Karin, and Gschwend, Muriel. “Science in Policy-Making: Neutral Experts or Strategic Policy-Makers?” West European Politics 37, no. 5 (September 3, 2014): 993–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, Karin, and Varone, Frédéric. “Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22, no. 2 (April 1, 2012): 319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jack, Ian. “Canada to Join the U.S. in Fighting EU’s GM Food Ban.” National Post, May 13, 2003.Google Scholar

Jackson, Dan. “Strategic Media, Cynical Public? Examining the Contingent Effects of Strategic News Frames on Political Cynicism in the United Kingdom.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (2011): 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30, no. 3 (June 1, 2003): 157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., and Murray, Christopher. “Beliefs about Radiation: Scientists, the Public and Public Policy.” Health Physics 97, no. 5 (2009): 519–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., St-Clair, Gilbert K., and Woods, Brian. “Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems: Analysis of Coalition Stability and Defection over Time.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (1991): 851–80.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Jowit, Juliette and Vidal, John. “Genetically Modified Crops Could Bring Benefits, Says Environmental Secretary.” The Guardian, June 5, 2010.Google Scholar

Kagan, Jerome. The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, Slovic, Paul, Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Braman, Donald, and Mandel, Gregory. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change, May 27, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kass, Leon R. “How One Clone Leads to Another.” New York Times, January 24, 2003.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira. Desolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge after Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust. New York; Chichester: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Marc. “Gene-Spliced Wheat Stirs Global Fears.” Washington Post, February 27, 2001.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Marc. “Journal Editors Disavow Article on Biotech Corn.” Washington Post, April 4, 2002.Google Scholar

Brants, Kees, de Vreese, Claes, Möller, Judith, and van Praag, Philip. “The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust between Politicians and Journalists.” International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (2010): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, David A. Dyadic Data Analysis. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kickert, Walter. “Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education.” Governance 8, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, Paul. “The Excel Depression.” New York Times, April 19, 2003.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kuyek, Devlin. Good Crop/Bad Crop: Seed Politics and the Future of Food in Canada. Toronto: Between the Lines, 2007.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Lachapelle, Erick, Montpetit, Éric, and Gauvin, Jean-Philippe. “Public Perceptions of Expert Credibility on Policy Issues: The Role of Expert Framing and Political Worldviews.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 4 (November 2014): 674–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakshmi, Rama. “Indian Harvests First Biotech Cotton Crop: Controversy Surrounds Policy Change.” Washington Post, May 2003.Google Scholar

Larcher, Gérard, Bizet, Jean, and Pastor, Jean-Marc. “OGM: Sortir de L’impasse.” Le Figaro, June 25, 2003.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. “From the World of Science to the World of Research?” Science 280, no. 5361 (April 10, 1998): 208–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Launay, Guillaume. “Pour Que Les OGM Se Vendent, on Leur Invente Une Utilité Sociale.” Libération, February 4, 2008.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” The American Political Science Review 97 (2003): 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, Felicity. “It Is Not Too Late to Shut the Door on GM Foods.” The Guardian, October 17, 2009.Google Scholar

Leach, William D., and Sabatier, Paul A.. “To Trust An Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models in Collaborative Policymaking.” American Political Science Review 99 (2005): 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E. “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through.” Public Administration Review 39 (1979): 517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E., and Woodhous, Edward J.. The Policy Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.Google Scholar

Lipset, Martin S., and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Lodge, Martin, and Matus, Kira. “Science, Badgers, Politics: Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Change in Bovine Tuberculosis Policy in Britain.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 3 (August 2014): 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lundberg, Erik. “Does the Government Selection Process Promote or Hinder Pluralism? Exploring the Characteristics of Voluntary Organizations Invited to Public Consultations.” Journal of Civil Society, March 14, 2013, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. Evidence, Argument & Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane J. “A Deliberative Theory of Interest Representation.” In The Politics of Interest: Interest Groups Transformed, 32–57. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar

May, Robert. “GM Could Be Good for You.” The Guardian, November 29, 2002.Google Scholar

Mennessier, Marc, and Cyrile, Louis. “Un Champ de ‘maïs Médicament’ Détruit.” Le Figaro, September 3, 2003.Google Scholar

Miller, Scott. “EU Deadlocks on Biotech Food.” Globe and Mail, December 9, 2003.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Neil J., Herron, Kerry G., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Whitten, Guy D.. “Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide: Scientists’ Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and European Union.” British Journal of Political Science 37, no. 04 (September 18, 2007): 753–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizruchi, Mark S. “Similarity of Political Behavior among Large American Corporations.” American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 2 (September 1, 1989): 401–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, Jeffery J. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “A Policy Network Explanation of Biotechnology Policy Differences between the United States and Canada.” Journal of Public Policy 25 (2005): 339–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “Between Detachment and Responsiveness: Civil Servants in Europe and North America.” West European Politics 34 (2011): 1250–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “Does Holding Beliefs with Conviction Prevent Policy Actors from Adopting a Compromising Attitude?” Political Studies 60, no. 3 (2012): 621–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “Governance and Policy Learning in the European Union: A Comparison with North America.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (2009): 1185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “Policy Design for Legitimacy: Expert Knowledge, Citizens, Time and Inclusion in the United Kingdom’s Biotechnology Sector.” Public Administration 86 (2008): 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric. “Scientific Credibility, Disagreement, and Error Costs in 17 Biotechnology Subsystems.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 3 (2011): 513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Éric, Rothmayr, Christine, and Varone, Frederic, eds. The Politics of Biotechnology in North America and Europe: Policy Networks, Institutions and Internationalization. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Montpetit, Éric, and Rouillard, Christian. “Cultures and the Democratization of Risk Management: The Widening Biotechnology Gap between Canada and France.” Administration and Society 39 (2008): 907–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mucciaroni, Gary, and Quirk, Paul J.. Deliberative Choices: Debating Public Policy in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Kenneth. “Mass Media Effects: Mobilization or Media Malaise?” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1999): 577–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, Matthew C. “Public Opinion about Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (2004): 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. New York: Schocken, 1971.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. A Question of Trust. 5. printing. The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. Class War?: What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinard, Maurice. Motivational Dimensions in Social Movements and Contentious Collective Action. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollitt, Christopher. The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University, 2003.Google Scholar

Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.Google Scholar

Pralle, Sarah B. “Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23, no. 3 (September 2003): 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pressman, Jeffrey, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Pross, Paul A. Group Politics and Public Policy. Vol. 2nd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Quatremer, Jean. “L’Europe S’apprête À Dire Oui Aux OGM.” Libération, July 2, 2003.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rap, Carole. “Monsanto Cultive L’amalgame.” Libération, September 22, 2006.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R.A.W. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Elisabeth. “Both Sides Cite Science to Address Altered Corn.” New York Times, December 2007.Google Scholar

Roy, Alexis. Les Experts Face Au Risque: Le Cas Des Plantes Transgéniques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (1988): 129–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. “Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8 (1987): 649–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. “Policy Change over a Decade or More.” In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, edited by Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., 13–40. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., eds. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 117–66. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, Christopher M.. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A.., 117–67. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., and Zafonte, Matthew. “Policy Knowledge: Advocacy Organizations.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B., 17:11563–68. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., and Zafonte, Matthew. “The Views of Bay/Delta Water Policy Activists on Endangered Species Issues.” West/Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 2 (1995): 131–46.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A., Hunter, Susan, and McLaughlin, Susan. “The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents.” Political Research Quarterly 40, no. 3 (September 1, 1987): 449–76.Google Scholar

Saint-Martin, Denis. Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Salter, Lord. Memoirs of a Public Servant. London: Faber and Faber, 1961.Google Scholar

Sample, Ian. “Oil-Rich GM Plant May Ease Pressure on Fish Stocks.” The Guardian, May 12, 2004.Google Scholar

Sanger, David E. “Bush Links Europe’s Ban on Bio-Crops with Hunger.” New York Times, May 22, 2003.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. “The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.” Public Administration 66 (1988): 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer E. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1975.Google Scholar

Schneider, Ann L., and Ingram, Helen. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schön, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: BasicBooks, 1994.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Michiel, and Thompson, M.. Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Scoffield, Heather. “Altered Corn a Threat to Butterflies Monarchs.” Globe and Mail, August 25, 2000.Google Scholar

Scoffield, Heather. “Farmers Face a Growing Problem as the Agriculture Industry Braces Itself for a Consumer-Led Backlash Against Genetically Modified Foods.” Globe and Mail, January 10, 2000.Google Scholar

Selden, Sally Coleman, Brewer, Gene A., and Brudney, Jeffrey L.. “Reconciling Competing Values in Public Administration: Understanding the Administrative Role Concept.” Administration & Society 31, no. 2 (May 1, 1999): 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semetko, Holli A., and Valkenburg, Patti M.. “Framing Europe Politics: A Content of Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2000): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva, Carol L., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Barke, Richard P.. “Reconciling Scientists’ Beliefs about Radiation Risks and Social Norms: Explaining Preferred Radiation Protection Standards.” Risk Analysis 27, no. 3 (June 2007): 755–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, Jeremy. “Stakes Are Raised in Euro GMO Debate: EU Wants End to Bans.” National Post, June 6, 2007.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart N. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. “Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 04 (August 22, 2005): 665–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staats, Elmer B. “Public Service and the Public Interest.” Public Administration Review 48, no. 2 (1988): 601–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoker, Gerry. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2006.Google Scholar

Stone, Deborah A. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (1989): 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strömbäck, Jesper, and Shetaha, Adam. “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships between News Media Exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (2010): 575–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swedlow, Brendon. “Advancing Policy Theory with Cultural Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue: Advancing Policy Theory with Cultural Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 4 (November 2014): 465–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Synthetic Cells: It’s Life, but Not as We Know It.” The Guardian, May 22, 2010.Google Scholar

Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (July 2006): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney G. “Mad Cows and Social Activists: Contentious Politics in the Trilateral Democracies’.” In Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, edited by Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney G. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taverne, Dick. “Careless Science Costs Lives.” The Guardian, February 18, 2005.Google Scholar

Thompson, M, Ellis, Richard, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Toke, David, and Marsh, David. “Policy Networks and the GM Crops Issue: Assessing the Utility of a Dialectical Model of Policy Networks.” Public Administration 81 (2003): 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truman, David B. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951.Google Scholar

Vliegenthart, Rens, and Walgrave, Stefaan. “When the Media Matter for Politics: Partisan Moderators of the Mass Media’s Agenda-Setting Influence on Parliament in Belgium.” Party Politics 17, no. 3 (June 11, 2010): 321–42.Google Scholar

Vogel, David. “Ships Passing in the Night: GMOs and the Politics of Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States.” Working Paper of the Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources. European Institute of Business Administration, 2002.Google Scholar

Wade, Nicholas C. “In the Genome Race, the Sequel Is Personal.” New York Times, September 4, 2007.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Weible, Christopher M. “Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (2008): 615–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weible, Christopher M., Siddiki, Saba N., and Pierce, Jonathan J.. “Foes to Friends: Changing Contexts and Changing Intergroup Perceptions.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 13 (2011): 499–526.Google Scholar

Weinger, Mackenzie. “POLITICO’S Top 10 State of the Union Moments.” Politico, January 2012.Google Scholar

Williams, Richard. “Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects.” The Stata Journal 12, no. 2 (2012): 308–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Emily. “Faced by Public Fears, the Government Hopes It Can Dodge the Genetically Modified Fudge.” The Guardian, September 27, 2003.Google Scholar

Younge, Gary. “New York Times Journalist Jailed.” The Guardian, July 2005.Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar