Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Acronyms
- List of Contributors
- Introduction
- SECTION A MOTIVATION
- SECTION B CAPTURING PHYSICS WITH NUMERICS
- 3 Subgrid-Scale Modeling: Issues and Approaches
- 4 Numerics for ILES
- 5 Numerical Regularization: The Numerical Analysis of Implicit Subgrid Models
- 6 Approximate Deconvolution
- SECTION C VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
- SECTION D FRONTIER FLOWS
- Index
- Plate section
4 - Numerics for ILES
from SECTION B - CAPTURING PHYSICS WITH NUMERICS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Acronyms
- List of Contributors
- Introduction
- SECTION A MOTIVATION
- SECTION B CAPTURING PHYSICS WITH NUMERICS
- 3 Subgrid-Scale Modeling: Issues and Approaches
- 4 Numerics for ILES
- 5 Numerical Regularization: The Numerical Analysis of Implicit Subgrid Models
- 6 Approximate Deconvolution
- SECTION C VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
- SECTION D FRONTIER FLOWS
- Index
- Plate section
Summary
Introduction
Large eddy simulation (LES) has emerged as the next-generation simulation tool for handling complex engineering, geophysical, astrophysical, and chemically reactive flows. As LES moves from being an academic tool to being a practical simulation strategy, the robustness of the LES solvers becomes a key issue to be concerned with, in conjunction with the classical and well-known issue of accuracy. For LES to be attractive for complex flows, the computational codes must be readily capable of handling complex geometries. Today, most LES codes use hexahedral elements; the grid-generation process is therefore cumbersome and time consuming. In the future, the use of unstructured grids, as used in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approaches, will also be necessary for LES. This will particularly challenge the development of high-order unstructured LES solvers. Because it does not require explicit filtering, Implicit LES (ILES) has some advantages over conventional LES; however, numerical requirements and issues are otherwise virtually the same for LES and ILES. In this chapterwe discuss an unstructured finite-volume methodology for both conventional LES and ILES, that is particularly suited for ILES. We believe that the next generation of practical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models will involve structured and unstructured LES, using high-order flux-reconstruction algorithms and taking advantage of their built-in subgrid-scale (SGS) models.
ILES based on functional reconstruction of the convective fluxes by use of high-resolution hybrid methods is the subject of this chapter. We use modified equation analysis (MEA) to show that the leading-order truncation error terms introduced by such methods provide implicit SGS models similar in form to those of conventional mixed SGS models.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Implicit Large Eddy SimulationComputing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, pp. 94 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
- 14
- Cited by