Aalto, P., The New International Energy Charter: instrumental or incremental progress in governance? Energy Research and Social Sciences 2016, 11: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aalto, P. (ed.), Electrification: Accelerating the Energy Transition. Academic Press/Elsevier, 2021.Google Scholar

Abraham-Dukuma, M. C., Dioha, M. O., Okpaleke, F. N., Bogado, N., Improving the climate change mitigation regime of major emitting countries: the case of South Africa, China, Germany, and the United States of America. Environmental Policy and Governance 2022, 32(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abu-Baker, A., Water-deprived. Sur – International Journal on Human Rights 2017, 14(25): 37–55.Google Scholar

Achieng Owuor, J., Giessen, L., Prior, L. C., Cilio, D., Winkel, G., Trends in forest-related employment and tertiary education: insights from selected key countries around the globe. European Forest Institute report, 2021. https://efi.int/publications-bank/trends-forest-related-employment-and-tertiary-education-insights-selected-key.Google Scholar

Adolfsen, J. F., Kuik, F., Lis, E. M., Schuler, T., The impact of the war in Ukraine on Euro area energy markets. ECB Economic Bulletin, 2022. www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/focus/2022/html/ecb.ebbox202204_01~68ef3c3dc6.en.html.Google Scholar

Agencia EFE, La UE estudia cómo celebrar cumbre con A.Latina al faltar Brasil en CELAC. SwissInfo, 1 October 2021. www.swissinfo.ch/spa/ue-latinoam%C3%A9rica_la-ue-estudia-c%C3%B3mo-celebrar-cumbre-con-a-latina-al-faltar-brasil-en-celac/46995970.Google Scholar

Ahmad, I., The new hydro-political situation in Africa: challenges for Nile River Basin countries. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues 2018, 22(4): 60–75.Google Scholar

Alberici, S., Grimme, W., Toop, G., Biomethane, Production Potentials in the EU: Gas for Climate Report 2022. European Biogas, 2022. www.europeanbiogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/GfC_national-biomethane-potentials_070722.pdf.Google Scholar

Albrecht, G., The age of Solastalgia. The Conversation, 7 August 2012. https://theconversation.com/the-age-of-solastalgia-8337.Google Scholar

Alogna, I., Clifford, E., Climate Change Litigation: Comparative and International Perspectives. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2020.Google Scholar

Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P., Climate change litigation: global perspectives, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation. Brill, Nijhoff, 2021, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Al-Qahtani, A., Parkinson, B., Hellgardt, K., Shah, N., Guillen-Gosalbez, G., Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation. Applied Energy 2021, 281: 115958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, P., The ‘not-a-cat’ syndrome: can the international human rights regime accommodate non-state actors?, in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Alterman, J. B., Hall, N., Todman, W., Sustainable States. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2021.Google Scholar

Andersen, A. D., On digitalization and sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2021, 41: 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, M. S., Border adjustment with taxes or allowances to level the price of carbon, in Ashiabor, H., Milne, J. E., Hymel, M., Kreiser, L. (eds.), Innovation Addressing Climate Change Challenges. Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9: 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristova, E., O’Regan, C. (eds.), Civil Liability for Human Rights Violations: A Handbook for Practitioners. Bonavero Institute for Human Rights, 2022.Google Scholar

Arko, A., A Canadian border carbon adjustment? GATT compliance and underexplored exceptions. Global Trade & Customs Journal 2021, 16(9): 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, A., Climate Change and Storytelling. Narratives and Cultural Meaning in Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar

Arvind, T. T., Stirton, L., Explaining the reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: a fuzzy set qualitative analysis. Legal Studies 2010, 30(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ascensão, F., Fahrig, L., Clevenger, A. P., et al., Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nature Sustainability 2018, 1: 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayuso, A., CIDOB – Claves para Reactivar la Asociación UE-CELAC y Encauzar la Globalización del Futuro. March 2021. www.cidob.org/ca/publicacions/series_de_publicacio/notes_internacionals/247/claves_para_reactivar_la_asociacion_ue_celac_y_encauzar_la_globalizacion_del_futuro.Google Scholar

Baber, W. F., The arts of the natural: Herbert Simon and artificial intelligence. Public Administration Quarterly 1988, 12(3): 329–347.Google Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Deliberative Environmental Politics. MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Global Democracy and Sustainable Jurisprudence. MIT Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Consensus and Global Environmental Governance: Deliberative Democracy in Nature’s Regime. MIT Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Democracy and climate justice: the unfolding tragedy, in Bhavnani, K. K., Foran, J., Kurian, P. A., Munshi, D. (eds.), Climate Futures: Reimaging Global Climate Justice. ZED Publishing, 2019, pp. 143–151.Google Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Environmental Human Rights in Earth System Governance. Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Democratic Norms of Earth System Governance: Deliberative Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacchus, J., Legal issues with the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. CATO Briefing Paper no. 125, 2021.Google Scholar

Backer, L., Considering a Treaty on Corporations and Human Rights: mostly failures but with a glimmer of success, in Černič, J., Santarelli, N. (eds.), The Future of Business and Human Rights: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for a UN Treaty. Intersentia Press, 2018, pp. 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banya, N., Reid, H., Insight: In Zimbabwe, coal power project seeks other backing after China’s U-turn. Reuters 2022. www.reuters.com/business/energy/zimbabwe-coal-power-project-seeks-other-backing-after-chinas-u-turn-2022-03-30.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, K., Lula’s victory in Brazil comes just in time to save the Amazon – can he do it? The Conversation, 2 November 2022 (Australia and New Zealand edition). https://theconversation.com/lulas-victory-in-brazil-comes-just-in-time-to-save-the-amazon-can-he-do-it-193618.Google Scholar

Barak, O., The failure of the Israeli–Palestinian peace process, 1993–2000. Journal of Peace Research 2005, 42(6): 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, S., Mulholland, E., Directors’ Liability and Climate Risk: Comparative Paper – Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Commonwealth Climate and Law Initiative, 2019.Google Scholar

Barry, T., Daviðsdóttir, B., Einarsson, N., Yung, O. R., How does the Arctic Council support conservation of Arctic biodiversity? Sustainability 2020, 12: 5042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barteková, E., Börkey, P., Digitalisation for the transition to a resource efficient and circular economy. OECD Environment Working Papers no. 192, 2022.Google Scholar

Bartlet, J., Familiar Quotations. Little, Brown and Co., 10th ed., 2019.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, L., Carman, R., Jo, Y., Latin America and the Caribbean – the state of climate ambition. United Nations Development Programme, June 2022. https://climatepromise.undp.org/sites/default/files/research_report_document/Climate%20Ambition-LAC-ENG_v6.pdf.Google Scholar

Baztan, J., Vanderlinden, J.-P., Jaffrès, L., Jorgensen, B., Zhu, Z., Facing climate injustices: community trust-building for climate services through arts and sciences narrative co-production. Climate Risk Management (2020) 28 100253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belkhir, L. and Elmeligi, A., Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 177: 448–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellora, C., Fontagné, L., Possible carbon adjustment policies: an overview. Report to the European Parliament, 2020.Google Scholar

Belmans, R., dos Reis, P. C., Viengerhoets, P., Electrification and Sustainable Fuels: Competing for Wind and Sun. Florence: European University Institute, 2021. https://fsr.eui.eu/publications/?handle=1814/71402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bengo, I., Boni, L., Sancino, A., EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: a comprehensive framework on finance for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2022, 29(4): 809–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, L., The duty of due consideration in the Anthropocene: climate risk and English directorial duties. Carbon and Climate Law Review 2017, 11(2): 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, L., The road to Paris runs through Delaware: climate litigation and directors’ duties. Utah Law Review 2020, 2(1): 313–381.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L., Companies and Climate Change. Theory and Law in the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, L., Bhargava, A., Franta, B., et al., Climate-washing litigation: legal liability for misleading climate communications. Policy briefing. The Climate Social Science Network, 2022.Google Scholar

Bennis, A., Power surge: how the European green deal can succeed in Morocco and Tunisia. European Council on Foreign Relations, 26 January 2021. https://ecfr.eu/publication/power-surge-how-the-european-green-deal-can-succeed-in-morocco-and-tunisia.Google Scholar

Benson, C., Yim, C., Orlowski, V., The Energy Charter Treaty, in Bishop, D., Kaiser, G. (eds.), The Guide to Energy Arbitrations, 2nd ed. Law Business Research Ltd, 2017, p. 33.Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., Brouwer, K. M., The human right to a safe climate – putting democracy under judicial guardianship. RealClear Energy, 2021. www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2021/06/21/the_human_right_to_a_safe_climate__putting_democracy_under_judicial_guardianship_782320.html.Google Scholar

Berhe, E. G., Morocco Green Economy Financing Facility (GEFF), EU External Investment Plan – European Commission, 14 January 2020. https://ebrdgeff.com/morocco_facilities.Google Scholar

Berhe, E. G., South Africa, International Partnerships – European Commission, 27 September 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/where-we-work/south-africa_en.Google Scholar

Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformation on the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 53–54.Google Scholar

Bernard, K. N., State of forest genetic resources in Kenya. Working Paper, The Sub-regional Workshop FAO/IPGRI/ICRAF on the conservation, management, sustainable utilization and enhancement of forest genetic resources in Sahelian and North-Sudanian Africa, 22–24 September 1998. www.fao.org/3/ab396e/ab396e.pdf.Google Scholar

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D., Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to advance the low-carbon transition. Transnational Dispute Management 2019, 1.Google Scholar

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D., Cosbey, A., et al., Treaty on sustainable investment for climate change mitigation and adaptation: aligning international investment law with the urgent need for climate change action. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 7–35.Google Scholar

Beshtawi, A., The human right to water and the realisation of water rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Utrecht Law Review 2020, 16(2): 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyene, S., Ethiopia: Meles Zanawi’s ploy for Copenhagen Conference. Ethiopian Review 23 November 2009. www.ethiopianreview.com/index/11401.Google Scholar

Bińczyk, E., Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu [The Era of Man. Rhetoric and the Stagnation of the Anthropocene]. PWN Scientific Publishing House, 2018.Google Scholar

Birol, F., What does the current global energy crisis mean for energy investment? IEA Commentary, 13 May 2022. www.iea.org/commentaries/what-does-the-current-global-energy-crisis-mean-for-energy-investment.Google Scholar

Bishop, R., Collaborative storytelling: meeting indigenous people’s desires for self-determination. Paper presented at the World Indigenous People’s Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 15–22, 1999.Google Scholar

Blackmon, D., China drives dramatic rise in global emissions in 2021. Forbes, 26 August 2021. www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2021/08/26/china-drives-dramatic-rise-in-global-coal-usage-in-2021/?sh=1cb37f2e3193.Google Scholar

Blaser, M., Storytelling Globalization from the Chaco and Beyond. Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Blay, S. K. N., New trends in the protection of the Antarctic environment: the 1991 Madrid Protocol. American Journal of International Law 1992, 86: 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobylev, S. N., Chereshnya, O. Yu., Kulmala, M., et al., Sustainability indicators for digitalization of sustainable development goals in PEEX program. Geography, Environment, Sustainability 2018, 11(1): 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodansky, D., The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2016, 25(2): 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodansky, D., The role of the International Court of Justice in addressing climate change: some preliminary reflections. Arizona State Law Journal 2017, 49: 689–712.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., The ocean and climate change law. Exploring the relationships, in Barnes, R., Long, R. (eds.), Frontiers in International Environmental Law: Oceans and Climate Challenges. Essays in Honour of David Freestone, Brill, 2021, p. 317.Google Scholar

Boehme-Neßler, V., Grenzüberschreitung: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht mach Klimapolitik. Cash.online, 2021. www.cash-online.de/recht-steuern/2021/grenzueberschreitung-das-bundesverfassungsgericht-macht-klimapolitik/565281.Google Scholar

Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., Rutherford, T. F., Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nature Climate Change 2022, 12: 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, P., Després, M., da Silva, L. A. P., Samama, F., Svartzman, R., The Green Swan: Central Banking and Financial Stability in the Age of Climate Change. Bank for International Settlements, 2020. www.bis.org/publ/othp31.htm.Google Scholar

Bomberg, E., The 2020 US election and its climate consequences. Environmental Politics 2021, 20(5): 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonneuil, C., The geological turn: narratives of the Anthropocene, in Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., Gemenne, F. (eds.), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Routledge, 2015, pp. 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bookchin, M., The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. AK Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Boswell, J., The Life of Samuel Johnson, 1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourke, I., Net zero is the energy answer to Russian aggression. The New Statesman, 24 February 2022.Google Scholar

Boute, A., Combating climate change through investment arbitration. Fordham International Law Journal 2012, 25(3): 613–664.Google Scholar

Bouwer, K., The unsexy future of climate change litigation. Journal of Environmental Law 2018, 30: 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, D. M. J. S., What is the relevance of pyrogeography to the Anthropocene? The Anthropocene Review 2015, 2(1): 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, D. R., The Environmental Rights Revolution. University of British Columbia Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Boyd, P. W., Bach, L. T., Hurd, C. L., et al., Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2022, 6: 675–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boykoff, M. T., Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradford, A., The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review 2012, 107: 1.Google Scholar

Bradford, A., The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branford, S., Torres, M., As climate summit unfolds, no Biden–Bolsonaro Amazon deal forthcoming. Mongabay News, 22 April 2021. https://news.mongabay.com/2021/04/as-climate-summit-unfolds-no-biden-bolsonaro-amazon-deal-forthcoming.Google Scholar

Brauch, M. D., Tackling climate change through sustainable investment: all in a Treaty? IISD SDG Knowledge hub, 2018. http://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/tackling-climate-change-through-sustainable-investment-all-in-a-treaty.Google Scholar

Braun, S., Opinion: EU Green Deal can spark a decarbonization revolution. Deutsche Welle, 11 December 2019. www.dw.com/en/opinion-eu-green-deal-can-spark-a-decarbonization-revolution/a-51623313.Google Scholar

Bremmer, I., The Power of Crisis. Simon and Schuster, 2022.Google Scholar

Brewer, R., Conservancy: The Land Trust Movement in America. Dartmouth College Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Brimont, L., Saujot, M. Affichage environnemental alimentaire: révéler les visions pour construire un compromise politique. Iddri, October 2021. www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/202110-ST0821-AE_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Brock, T., A conversation with Max Boykoff: climate change and the media. Boulder Magazine, 2016. https://getboulder.com/conversation-max-boykoff-climate-change-media.Google Scholar

Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. V., A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice to Inform Theory. Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Bruggeman, V., Delvaux, B., EU energy policy and legislation under pressure since the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, in Peeters, M., Deketelaere, K. (eds.), EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives. Edward Elgar, 2006, p. 233.Google Scholar

Brulle, R. J., The climate lobby: a sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change 2018, 149: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunkhorst, H., Sociological constitutionalism: an evolutionary approach, in Blokker, P. and Thornhill, C. (eds.), Sociological Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 95–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck, S., The Global Commons. An Introduction. Island Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Budziszewska, M., Jak opowiedzieć powagę zmiany klimatu, Zmieniamy opowieść. Kryzys klimatyczny jako kryzys wyobraźni Jak opowiedzieć powagę zmiany klimatu (radio program episode, Audycje TOK FM, 8 December 2021), https://audycje.tokfm.pl/podcast/115516,Jak-opowiedziec-powage-zmiany-klimatu.Google Scholar

Buell, L., The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Burgers, L., Should judges make climate change law? Transnational Environmental Law 2020, 9: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgers, L., An apology leading to dystopia: or, why fuelling climate change is tortious. Transnational Environmental Law 2022, 11(2): 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burinskienė, A., Seržantė, M., Digitalisation as the indicator of the evidence of sustainability in the European Union. Sustainability 2022, 14(14): 8371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butmeh, A., Palestine is a climate justice issue. Al Jazeera, 28 November 2019. www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/11/28/palestine-is-a-climate-justice-issue.Google Scholar

Cabuzel, T., The EU and Morocco form a green partnership on energy, climate and the environment ahead of COP 26. Climate Action – European Commission, 28 June 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/eu-and-morocco-form-green-partnership-energy-climate-and-environment-ahead-cop-26_en.Google Scholar

Cameron, E., Mearns, R., McGrath, J. T., Translating climate change: adaptation, resilience, and climate politics in Nunavut, Canada. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2015, 105(2): 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, C., Trigo, A., A vision for green foreign direct investment: proposals for an investor–state collaborative effort. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 135–160.Google Scholar

Carlarne, C. P., The essential role of climate litigation and the courts in averting climate crisis, in Mayer, B., Zahar, A. (eds), Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casalini, F. and González, J. L., Trade and cross-border data flows. OECD paper, 2019.Google Scholar

Cascão, A. E., Nicol, A., GERD: new norms of cooperation in the Nile Basin? Water 2016, 41(4): 550–573.Google Scholar

Casier, T., The rise of energy to the top of the EU–Russia agenda: from interdependence to dependence? Geopolitics 2011, 16(3): 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castree, N., The Anthropocene and the environmental humanities: extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities 2014, 5(1): 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cave, L. A., Blomquist, G. C., Environmental policy in the European Union: fostering the development of pollution havens? Ecological Economics 2008, 65: 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cenevska, I., A thundering silence: environmental rights in the dialogue between the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Environmental Law 2016, 28: 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarty, D., The climate of history: four theses. Critical Inquiry 2009, 35(2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, D. S. W., Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy: social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. Pacific Review 2017, 30: 674–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., Markowitz, E. M., Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change 2017, 7(12): 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, O., Abdelhalim, A., Liu, Y., Rico-Ramirez, M., Han, D., Climate change adaptations for food security in vulnerable areas of the Egyptian Nile – For tackling the overlooked nexus hazards of hydrological extremes and waste pollutions. Water 2021, 13(4): 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Y., Colloff, M. J., Lukasiewicz, A., Pittock, J., A trickle, not a flood: environmental watering in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 2021, 72(5): 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, W., The green investment principles: from a nodal governance perspective. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2023, 23: 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09595-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiu, A., Massachusetts just passed a massive Climate and Clean Energy Bill. Washington Post, 11 August 2022.Google Scholar

Cho, R., Can soil help combat climate change? Columbia University News (2018). https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2018/02/21/can-soil-help-combat-climate-change.Google Scholar

Christel, L., Gutierrez, R., Making rights come alive. Journal of Environment & Development 2017, 26(3): 322–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A., Justwan, F., Carlisle, J. E., Clark, M., Polarization politics and hopes for a green agenda in the United States. Environmental Politics 2020, 29(4): 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, R., Water: The International Crisis. Earthscan, 1991.Google Scholar

Clinton, B., Knittel, C., Metaxoglou, K., Electrifying transport: issues and opportunities, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar

Closas, A., Villholth, K. G., Groundwater governance: addressing core concepts and challenges. WIREs Water 2020, 7(1): e1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coenen, J., Bager, S., Meyfroidt, P., Newig, J., Challies, E., Environmental governance of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 2021, 31: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colby, H., Ebbersmeyer, A. S., Helm, L. M., Røssaak, M. K., Judging climate change: the role of the judiciary in the fight against climate change. Oslo Law Review 2020, 7(3): 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, H., Newlyn, C., Climate change will reshape Russia. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2021. www.csis.org/analysis/climate-change-will-reshape-russia.Google Scholar

Conway, D., Nicholls, R. J., Brown, S., et al., The need for bottom-up assessments of climate risks and adaptation in climate-sensitive regions. Nature Climate Change 2019, 9(7): 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, B. R., de Lourdes Melo Zurita, M., Fulfilling the promise of participation by not resuscitating the deficit model. Global Environmental Change 2019, 56: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, B., Rosneft, Gazprom, and Russia’s failure to adopt green policies. Policy note, Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2021.Google Scholar

Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., Munnings, C., Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2019, 13(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coudert, F. R., Non-belligerency in international law. Virginia Law Review 1942, 29(2): 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cozzi, L., Gould, T., What would it take to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5°C? 2019. www.iea.org/commentaries/what-would-it-take-to-limit-the-global-temperature-rise-to-15c.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Second report on state responsibility, UN Doc. A/ CN.4/ 498 and Add.1–4 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1999, II(1): 3.Google Scholar

Crippa, M. D., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., et al., GHG Emissions of All World Countries – 2021 Report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.Google Scholar

Cullell, J. M., El programa electoral de Lula da Silva: subidas de impuestos a los ricos y protección a las minorías. El País (30 October 2022). https://elpais.com/internacional/2022-10-30/el-programa-electoral-de-lula-da-silva-subidas-de-impuestos-a-los-ricos-y-proteccion-a-las-minorias.html.Google Scholar

Da Cunha, C., Rochas, A. P. F., Cardon, M., et al., Adaptation planning in France: inputs from narratives of change in support of a community-led foresight process. Climate Risk Management 2020, 30: 100243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damaska, M. R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

David, R., Brierley, J. E. C., Major Legal Systems in the World Today. Stevens & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar

Davidson, H., Morton, A., Molan, L., The frontline inside Australia’s climate emergency: the killer . The Guardian (2021). www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2020/feb/27/killer-heat-how-a-warming-land-is-changing-australia-forever.Google Scholar

Davis, K. F., Dalin, C., Kummu, M., et al., Beyond the green revolution: a roadmap for sustainable food systems research and action. Environmental Research Letters 2022, 17: 100401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davydova, Y., Record breaking fires in Siberia. 2021. www.greenpeace.org/international/story/49171/russia-record-breaking-fires-siberia.Google Scholar

De Graaf, K. J., Jans, J. H., The Urgenda decision: Netherlands liable for role in causing dangerous global climate change. Journal of Environmental Law 2015, 27: 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Groen, W.P., Alcidi, C., Simonelli, F., et al., Study on the non-financial reporting directive – final report. CEPS, 2020.Google Scholar

De la Esperanza Mata, Pérez, M., Scholten, D., Stegen, K. S., The multi-speed energy transition in Europe: opportunities and challenges for EU energy security. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019, 26: 100415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Luca, A. Renewable energy in the EU, the Energy Charter Treaty, and Italy’s withdrawal therefrom. Transnational Dispute Management 2015, 1. www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2232.Google Scholar

De Tocqueville, A. (Reeve, H., trans.), Democracy in America. Schocken Books, 1961.Google Scholar

Delbeke, J., A way forward for a carbon border adjustment mechanism by the EU. STG Policy Brief, 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/69155.Google Scholar

Delforge, P., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, S., Home Idle load: devices wasting huge amounts of electricity when not in active use. NRDC Issue Paper, 2015.Google Scholar

Demerew, K., From Red Sea to the Nile: water, power, and politics in northeast Africa. Third World Quarterly 2021, 42(12): 2883–2901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deva, S., Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations – Humanizing Business. Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Division on Earth and Life Studies National Research Council of the National Academies, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. The National Academies Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Dobrowolska, L., Ormond-Skeaping, T., Luki w narracjach o klimacie (interview by Aleksandra Lipczak, Przekrój, 22 July 2020). https://przekroj.pl/kultura/luki-w-narracjach-o-klimacie-aleksandra-lipczak.Google Scholar

Doix, V., Border tax adjustments: qualification and interactions with the international trade system. Revue internationale de droit économique 2020, 3: 319–342.Google Scholar

Dough, H. The impact of new and emerging internet technologies on climate change and human rights. Submission to the Advisory Committee to the UN Human Rights Council (2019).Google Scholar

Drahos, P., Survival Governance: Energy and Climate in the Chinese Century (2021) Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyer, I., Erixon, F. and Winkler, R., The quest for gas market competition fighting Europe’s dependency on Russian gas more effectively. Research Report No. 1/2010, ECIPE Occasional Paper. www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/174707.Google Scholar

Dumitru, A., Kölbl, B., Wijffelaars, M., The carbon border adjustment mechanism explained (July 16, 2021). https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2021/july/cbam-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-eu-explained.Google Scholar

Durán, G. M., EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: key issues going forward. European Foreign Affairs Review 2021, 26(4): 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dürbeck, G., Hüpkes, P., The Anthropocenic Turn: The Interplay between Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Responses to a New Age. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., et al., Climate change and COP26: are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management 2022, 63: 102456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckes, C., The Urgenda case is separation of powers at work. Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-39, 2021.Google Scholar

Eckes, C., Separation of powers in climate cases. Comparing cases in Germany and the Netherlands. Verfassungsblog (2022). https://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-in-climate-cases.Google Scholar

Efron, S., Fischbach, J. R., Blum, I., Karimov, R. I., Moore, M., The Public Health Impacts of Gaza’s Water Crisis: Analysis and Policy Options. RAND Corporation, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, K., Imagination in Teaching and Learning: The Middle School Years. University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Eguegu, O., Does Guinea’s coup matter to China? The Diplomat (21 September 2021). https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/does-guineas-coup-matter-to-china.Google Scholar

Eilperin, J., Dennis, B., Muyskens, J., Tracking Biden’s environmental actions. Washington Post, 26 May 2022.Google Scholar

Ekholm, B., Rockström, J., Digital technology can cut global emissions by 15%. Here’s how (2019). www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/why-digitalization-is-the-key-to-exponential-climate-action.Google Scholar

Elrifai, S. N., Rusinek, H., Sinsel, S. R., A model multilateral treaty for the encouragement of investment in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Sayed, M. K., Mansour, R. S., Water scarcity as a non-traditional threat to security in the Middle East. India Quarterly 2017, 73(2): 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elshirbiny, H., Abrahamse, W., Public risk perception of climate change in Egypt: a mixed methods study of predictors and implications. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2020, 10(3): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Englisch, J., Falcão, T., EU carbon border adjustments and WTO law, part one. Environmental Law Reporter 2021, 51(10): 10857.Google Scholar

Epp, C., Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epp, C. R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and the Supreme Court in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evangelidis, H., Davies, R., Are you aware of your digital carbon footprint? 2021. www.capgemini.com/gb-en/insights/expert-perspectives/are-you-aware-of-your-digitalcarbon-footprint.Google Scholar

Fabrichnaya, Y., Russia says Czech oil supply cut ‘not political’. 15 July 2008. www.reuters.com/article/czech-russia-oil-idUSL1451616820080714.Google Scholar

Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L., Watt, L. A., Buying Nature: The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780–2004. MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Fajardy, M., Reiner, D., Electrification of residential and commercial heating, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar

Falefuafua Tapu, I., Finding Fonua: disappearing Pacific Island Nations, sea level rise, and cultural rights. Arizona Law Review 2020, 63: 785–803.Google Scholar

Falkner, R., Buzan, B., Great Powers, Climate Change, and Global Environmental Responsibilities. Oxford University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faulkner, N., Empire and Jihad: The Anglo-Arab Wars of 1870–1920. Yale University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Fehske, A., Fettweis, G., Malmodin, J., Biczok, G., The global footprint of mobile communications: the ecological and economic perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine 2011, 49(8): 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhendler, I., The securitization of water discourse: theoretical foundations, research gaps and objectives of the special issue. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2015, 15(3): 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, E., Climate change litigation, obsession and expertise: reflecting on the scholarly response to Massachusetts v. EPA. Law & Policy 2013, 35(3): 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., Responsibility and climate change. German Yearbook of International Law 2010, 53: 89–138.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., The Kyoto Protocol Compliance Regime and Treaty Law. Singapore Yearbook of International Law 2004, 8: 23.Google Scholar

Flitter, E., There’s a new cop on the banking beat: chief climate risk officer. New York Times, 12 September 2022.Google Scholar

Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., Narratives in climate change discourse. WIREs Climate Change 2017, 8(1): e429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fofack, H., A competitive Africa. Finance & Development 2018, 55(4): 48+.Google Scholar

Folke, C., Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16: 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonfara, T., Storino, B., Fochesatto, A., Rosetto, A., La disolución de la UNASUR: un análisis desde el realism. Córdoba Global – Centro de Estudios Internacionales (9 September 2019). https://cbaglobal.com.ar/la-disolucion-de-la-unasur-un-analisis-desde-el-realismo.Google Scholar

Forster, C. E., Novel climate tort? The New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Smith v. Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited and others. Environmental Law Review 2022, 24(3): 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, W., Bals, C., Grimm, J., The case of Huaraz: first climate lawsuit on loss and damage against an energy company before German courts., in Mechler, R., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linneroth-Bayer, J. (eds.), Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Springer, 2019, pp. 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franta, B., Weaponizing economics: big oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay. Environmental Politics 2022, 31(4): 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman-Maloy, D., Remembering Balfour: empire, race and propaganda. Race & Class 2018, 59(3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, D., Kotzé, L. J. (eds.), Research Handbook on Law, Governance and Planetary Boundaries. Edward Elgar, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, L., Tankersley, J., After signing climate bill, Biden plans more actions to cut emissions. New York Times, 19 August 2022.Google Scholar

Friedman, M., A Friedman doctrine – the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970.Google Scholar

Gaja, G., Fourth Report on the Responsibility of International Organisations, UN Doc. A/CN.4/564.Google Scholar

Galica, M., Marczuk, M., How to word it: the nature and climate change narrative’s shortcomings. The Twenties (2021). https://lata-dwudzieste.pl/en.Google Scholar

Galiffa, C., Bercero, I. G., How WTO-consistent tools can ensure the decarbonization of emission-intensive industrial sectors. American Journal of International Law 2022, 116: 196–201.Google Scholar

Ganguly, G., Setzer, J., Heyvaert, V., If at first you don’t succeed: suing corporations for climate change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2018, 38(4): 841–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, R., Argentina asume liderazgo de Celac en medio de tensión por DD.HH en la region. SwissInfo (7 January 2022). www.swissinfo.ch/spa/celac-reuni%C3%B3n_argentina-asume-liderazgo-de-celac-en-medio-de-tensi%C3%B3n-por-dd-hh-en-la-regi%C3%B3n/47246072.Google Scholar

Garside, M., Global cobalt reserves by country 2020. Statista (16 February 2021). www.statista.com/statistics/264930/global-cobalt-reserves.Google Scholar

Garton Ash, T., I went viral in Germany for a meme about Scholzing – but the Chancellor’s hesitancy over Ukraine is no joke. The Guardian, 4 February 2023. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/03/germany-olaf-scholz-twitter-ukraine.Google Scholar

Gebresenbet, F., Wondemagegnehu, D. Y., New dimensions in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam negotiations: ontological security in Egypt and Ethiopia. African Security 2021, 14(1): 80–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehring, M., Kent, A., Sustainable development and international investment agreements: from objective to practice, in De Mestral, A., Lévesque, C. (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements. Routledge, 2013, pp. 286–288.Google Scholar

Gerrard, M. B., Climate change litigation in the United States: high volume of cases, mostly about statutes, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives Brill Nijhoff, 2021, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gertner, J., The Ice at the End of the World. Random House, 2019.Google Scholar

Ghaleigh, N. S., Rossati, D., The spectre of carbon border-adjustment measures. Climate Law 2011, 2(1): 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghosh, A., The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giakoumis, T., Voulvoulis, N., The transition of EU water policy towards the Water Framework Directive’s Integrated River Basin Management Paradigm. Environmental Management 2018, 62(5): 819–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gifford, D. G., Climate change and the public law model of torts: reinvigorating judicial restraint doctrines. South Carolina Law Review 2010, 62: 202–259.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Reckoning with Risk. Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., How authoritarians use international law. Journal of Democracy 2020, 31(4): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giordano, M., Bassini, E., Climate change and Africa’s future. Governance in an Emerging World [Winter Series 2019], no. 119. Hoover Institution. www.hoover.org/research/climate-change-and-africas-future.Google Scholar

Glachant, J.-M., Reforming the EU Internal Electricity Market in the Middle of a Huge Energy Crisis: An Absolute Short-Term Emergency or Preparation for the Future? European University Institute, 2023.Google Scholar

Gleick, P. H., Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. International Security 1993, 18(1): 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godson, A., King or pawn? Where does REPowerEU leave Europe? 2022. https://eurocities.eu/latest/king-or-pawn-where-does-repowereu-leave-europe.Google Scholar

Goldberg, P., Climate change lawsuits are ineffective political stunts. The Hill, 2018. https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/376307-climate-change-lawsuits-are-showy-ineffective-political-stunts.Google Scholar

Golding, G., A critical comparison of the schemes of the French and German codes. Irish Jurist 1971, 6(2): 305–322.Google Scholar

Golnaraghi, M., Setzer, J., Brook, N., Lawrence, W., Williams, L., Climate Change Litigation – Insights into the Evolving Global Landscape. The Geneva Association: 2021.Google Scholar

Goodman, M. P., Thandani, A., Wayland, M., Global Gateway’s Infrastructure Plan for Africa Announced at EU–AU Summit, Center for Strategic and International Studies (28 February 2022). www.csis.org/analysis/global-gateways-infrastructure-plan-africa-announced-eu-au-summit.Google Scholar

Goren, S. L. (trans.), The German Civil Code: (as amended to January 1, 1992): And the Introductory Act to the Civil Code of August 15, 1896 (including amendments to January 1, 1992): And the Act on the Liability for Defective Products of December 15, 1989, Revised Edition. Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1994.Google Scholar

Gottschall, J., The Storytelling Human: How Stories Make Us Human. Mariner Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Grab, A., Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gradoni, L., Mantovani, M., No kidding! Mapping youth-led climate change litigation across the north-south divide. Verfassungsblog (24 March 2022). https://verfassungsblog.de/no-kidding.Google Scholar

Grafton, R. Q., Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the ‘do’s’ and ‘do’nots’. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2019, 63(1): 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gramaglia, C., Why is there no environmental justice movement in France? Analyze und Kritik 2014, 2: 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, S., Why your internet habits are not as clean as you think. BBC (6 March 2020), www.bbc.com/future/article/20200305-why-your-internet-habits-are-not-as-clean-as-you-think.Google Scholar

Grinberg, M., Wartime commercial policy and trade between enemies. International Security 2021, 46(1): 9–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, D., Warming up to a not-so-radical idea: tort-based climate change litigation. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 2003, 28: 9–33.Google Scholar

Guha, R., Radical environmentalism: a third-world critique, in Merchant, C. (ed.), Key Concepts in Critical Theory: Ecology. Humanity Books, 1999, p. 71.Google Scholar

Gunderson, R., Fyock, C., The political economy of climate change litigation: is there a point to suing fossil fuel companies? New Political Economy 2022, 27(3): 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunningham, N., Divestment, nonstate governance, and climate change. Law & Policy 2017, 39: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunningham, N., A quiet revolution: central banks, financial regulators, and climate finance. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2020, 12: 9596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, J., The watercourses convention, hydro-hegemony and transboundary water issues. The International Spectator 2016, 51(3): 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustafson, T., Klimat: Russia in the Age of Climate Change. Harvard University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, K. M., Environmental discourses and biodiversity: the construction of a storyline in understanding and managing an environmental issue. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2013, 10(1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol 2 – Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S., de Strasser, L., Prospects for renewable energy in Africa, in Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S., de Strasser, L. (eds.), Energy in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, 2018, pp. 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagemann, K., Green deal at the heart of Kenya’s green transition and resilience. European Commission (22 July 2021), https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/intpa/items/715970/en.Google Scholar

Hager, C., Green politics, expertise, and democratic discourse in the two Germanies, 1989–2019. German Politics and Society 2019, 37(4): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancher, L., Meeus, L., Nouicer, A., Reif, V. (eds.), The EU Green Deal: 2022 Edition (EUI, Technical Report 2022/06, 2022), https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/75156.Google Scholar

Harlan, T., Green development or greenwashing? A political ecology perspective on China’s green Belt and Road. Eurasian Geography and Economics 2020, 62: 202–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, D. M., Telling stories about climate change’ (2020) 72(3) The Professional Geographer 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, D. L., Global Physical Climatology, 2nd ed. Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar

Hawkins, H., Kanngieser, A., Artful climate change communication: overcoming abstractions, insensibilities, and distances. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2017, 8(5): e472. doi:10.1002/wcc.472.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A., The corporation in a democratic society: in whose interest ought it and will it be run?, in Ansoff, H. I. (ed.), Business Strategy: Selected Readings. Penguin books, 1969, p. 231.Google Scholar

Heede, R., Carbon Majors: Accounting for Carbon and Methane Emissions 1854–2010, Methods and Results Report. Climate Accountability, 2014.Google Scholar

Heede, R., Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change 2014, 122: 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heede, R., Oreskes, N., Potential emissions of CO₂ and methane from proved reserves of fossil fuels: an alternative analysis. Global Environmental Change 2016, 36: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helbing, D., Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 2013, 497(7447): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henin, P., Howley, J., Keene, A., Peart, N., Innovating international investment agreements: a proposed green investment protocol for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 37–70.Google Scholar

Herdegen, M., Principles of International Economic Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, C., Martinez, M., Maxwell, A., Latin America at the Leaders Summit on Climate. NRDC (23 April 2021), www.nrdc.org/experts/carolina-herrera/latin-america-leaders-summit-climate.Google Scholar

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., et al., The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2020, 146(730): 1999–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilson, C., The visibility of environmental rights in the EU legal order; eurolegalism in action? Journal of European Public Policy 2018, 25(11): 1589–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobér, K., Investment arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2010, 1(1): 153–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekman, B., Realizing European soft power in external cooperation and trade. Final Project Report (2021). https://respect.eui.eu/working-papers-and-reports-by-topic.Google Scholar

Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H., Resilience and adaptive cycles, in Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, 2002, pp. 26–52.Google Scholar

Holmberg, A.-S., Gaston-Mathé, M., Paving the way for green energy financing in the Mediterranean. DAI Global Developments (15 November 2019). https://dai-global-developments.com/articles/paving-the-way-for-green-energy-financing-in-the-mediterranean.Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W., Jr., The Common Law, Dover, 1991.Google Scholar

Hon Coffin, T. M., American Courts in climate emergency. IUCN, 2019. www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/content/documents/2019/american_courts_in_climate_emergency.pdf.Google Scholar

Horster, M., Papadopoulos, K., Climate change and proxy voting in the U.S. and Europe. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, 2019. https://corpgovlaw.harvard.edu/2019/01/07/climate-change-and-proxy-voting-in-the-u-s-and-europe.Google Scholar

Hösli, A., Milieudefensie, et al. v. Shell: a tipping point in climate change litigation against corporations? Climate Law 2021, 11: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hösli, A., Weber, R. H., Climate change reporting and due diligence: frontiers of corporate climate responsibility. European Company and Financial Law Review 2021, 18(6): 948–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hösli, A., Weber, R. H., Klimaklagen gegen Unternehmen. Internationale Entwicklungen und deren Bedeutung für die Schweiz. Jusletter 2021, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Bang, G., Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations 2012, 18(1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, A. C., Understanding and minimizing environmental impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Conservation Biology 2019, 33: 883–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hughes, A. C., Lechner, A. M., Chitov, A., et al., ‘Horizon scan of the Belt and Road Initiative’, (2020) 35 Trends in Ecology and Evolution 583–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hurd, C. L., Law, C. S., Bach, L. T., et al., Forensic carbon accounting: assessing the role of seaweeds for carbon sequestration. Journal of Psychology 2022, 58: 347–363.Google ScholarPubMed

IPCC, Food security, in Climate Change and Land. Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007.Google Scholar

Itab, S., Futur Etiquetage Environnemental: le Planet-score prochainement affiché sur les produits alimentaires grâce au soutien de la société civile et à la mobilisation d’entreprises désireuses d’accélérer la transition écologique (Very Good Future, 2021). http://itab.asso.fr/downloads/affichage-environnemental/itab_sayari_vgf_-_communique_planet-score_-_20211028_vz.pdf.Google Scholar

Jakubowiak, M., Ostatni Ludzie: Wymyślanie Końca Świata. Czarne, 2021.Google Scholar

James, A., Majoritarianism. Bond Law Review 2017, 29(2): 187–196.Google Scholar

Jameson, B., Nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas, is on the rise from ocean dead zones. The Conversation (5 July 2021). https://theconversation.com.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. D., Mayfield, E. N., Farbes, J., et al., Preliminary report: the climate and energy impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. REPEAT Project, Princeton, NJ, 12 August 2022.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. D., Mayfield, E. N., Jones, R., et al., Summary report: the climate impacts of congressional infrastructure and budget bills. REPEAT Project, Princeton, NJ, 28 February 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6311986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jens, J., Wang, A., van der Leun, K., Peters, D., Buseman, M., Extending the European Hydrogen Backbone: A European Hydrogen Infrastructure Vision Covering 21 Countries (Gas for Climate 2050, 2021). https://gasforclimate2050.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/European-Hydrogen-Backbone_April-2021_V3.pdf.Google Scholar

Jirušek, M., Kuchyňková, P., The conduct of Gazprom in Central and Eastern Europe: a tool of the Kremlin, or just an adaptable player? East European Politics and Societies 2018, 32(4): 818–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joffé, G., The impending water crisis in the MENA region. The International Spectator 2016, 51(3): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D. G., The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis 2017, 37(2): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, C., Kneebone, J., Piebalgs, A., Cost-effective Decarbonisation Study. Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar

Kakoulaki, G., Kougias, I., Taylor, N., et al., Green hydrogen in Europe – A regional assessment: substituting existing production with electrolysis powered by renewables. Energy Conversion and Management 2021, 228: 113649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karagianni, G.-E., A Greek Initiative for an EU Energy Crisis Solidarity Facility. 28 February 2022. https://eu-sysflex.com/a-greek-initiative-for-an-eu-energy-crisis-solidarity-facility.Google Scholar

Kardish, C., Elbrecht, J., Acworth, W., Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness: California’s Treatment of Imported Electricity and New Zealand’s Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Levy. International Carbon Action Partnership, 2021. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/carbon-leakage-and-competitiveness-californias-treatment-imported-electricity-and-new.Google Scholar

Kasraoui, S., Morocco’s Ambassador to Germany to return to Berlin this week. Morocco World News, 24 January 2022. www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/01/346709/moroccos-ambassador-to-germany-to-return-to-berlin-this-week.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, C., National contact points and access to remedy under the UNGP – why two can make a dream so real, in Bonucci, N., Kessedjian, C. (eds.), 40 Years of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD, 2018, p. 175.Google Scholar

Keating, D. EU Governments under pressure to quit Energy Charter Treaty (2019). www.forbes.com/sites/davekeating/2019/12/10/eu-governments-under-pressure-to-quit-energy-charter-treaty/#38bb572163ed.Google Scholar

Keen, M. Parry, I., Roaf, J., Border Carbon Adjustments: Rationale, Design and Impact. IMF Working Paper, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kell, G., The global compact: selected experiences and reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 2005, 59(1–2): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, H., General Theory of Norms, trans. M. Hartney. Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, L., Bypassing the ‘ratification straitjacket’: reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement. Climate Policy 2016, 16(8): 1011–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kempf, C. N., Why did so many do so little? Movement building and climate change litigation in the time of Juliana v. United States. Texas Law Review 2021, 99(5): 1005–1040.Google Scholar

Kessler, E., et al., Final evaluation: promoting low emission urban development strategies in emerging economy countries. 2016. https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/Urban%20LEDS%20Final%20Evaluation%2022%20Dec%202016.pdf.Google Scholar

Kharasch, R. N., The Institutional Imperative. Charterhouse, 1973.Google Scholar

Khouri, F. J., The Jordan River controversy. The Review of Politics 1965, 27(1): 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, J. W., Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, updated ed. Pearson, 2010.Google Scholar

Klawitter, S., Water resources at stake: the mountain aquifer beneath the Occupied West Bank, Palestinian Territories. 2006. https://hdr.undp.org/en/content/water-resources-stake.Google Scholar

Kneebone, J., Conti, I., A first look at REPowerEU: the European Commission’s plan for energy independence from Russia. Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, K., Is normative power cosmopolitan: rethinking European unity, norm diffusion, and international political theory. Cooperation and Conflict 2021, 56(2): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kofman, M., Fink, A., Gorenburg, D., et al., Russian military strategy: core tenets and operational concepts. CNA Research memorandum, 2021.Google Scholar

Korteweg, R., Energy as a tool of foreign policy of authoritarian states, in particular Russia. European Parliament Paper, 2018.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., Report on the fragmentation of international law, UN Doc. A/ CN.4/L.682, 2006.Google Scholar

Kousksou, T., Allouhi, A., Belattar, M., et al. Renewable energy potential and national policy directions for sustainable development in Morocco. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015, 47: 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krakow, C. A., The international law and politics of water access: experiences of displacement, statelessness, and armed conflict. Water 2020, 12(2): 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauß, W., Bremer, S., The role of place-based narratives of change in climate risk governance. Climate Risk Management 2020, 28: 100221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krickovic, A., When interdependence produces conflict: EU–Russia energy relations as a security dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy 2015, 36(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunnas, J., Storytelling: from the early Anthropocene to the good or the bad Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review 2017, 4(2): 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuusi, T., Björklund, M., Kaitala, V., et al., Carbon border adjustment mechanisms and their economic impact on Finland and the EU. Prime Minister’s Office, Helsinki, 2020.Google Scholar

Kysar, D. A., Climate change and the International Court of Justice. Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper, 2013, pp. 16–18. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2309943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, I. R., Abdelhamid, A., Hooper, L., Food and climate change: a review of the effects of climate change on food within the remit of the Food Standards Agency. Food Standards Agency, 2010. www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/575-1-1008_X02001__Climate_Change_and_Food_Report__28_Sept_2010.pdf.Google Scholar

Lalive, J.-F., International organization and neutrality. British Yearbook of International Law 1947, 24: 72.Google Scholar

Lamy, P., Pons, G., Garzon, I., Kaufmann, L. GT8 – Domestic and international aspects of the EU CBAM: two sides of the same coin. Europe Jacques Delors, 2022. www.europejacquesdelors.eu/publications/domestic-and-international-aspects-of-the-eu-cbam.Google Scholar

Lamy, P., Pons, G., Leturcq, P., A European border carbon adjustment proposal. Renewable Energy Law & Policy Review 2020, 10(1): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, K.-O., Westphal, K., Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper, vol. 3, 2017.Google Scholar

Latour, B., An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. New Literary History, 2010, 41; 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latrech, O., Morocco reaffirms support to EU’s ‘Global Gateway’ strategy. Morocco World News, 22 June 2022. www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/06/349853/morocco-reaffirms-support-to-eus-global-gateway-strategy.Google Scholar

Lazard, O., Russia’s Ukraine invasion and climate change go hand in hand. Commentary, Carnegie Europe, 2022.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. J., Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review 2009, 94: 1153–1234.Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A., Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 2006, 77(1–2): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiserowitz, A., Global Warming’s Six Americas. Yale University, 2016. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/about/projects/global-warmings-sixamericas.Google Scholar

Lenton, T., Arctic tipping points. Ambio 2012, 41: 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenton, T., Held, H., Kreigler, E., et al., Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2008, 105(6): 1786–1793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lenzu, M. D., Reunión Ministerial UE–CELAC, 27 de Octubre de 2022. Consejo de La Unión Europea (27 October 2022). www.consilium.europa.eu/es/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2022/10/27.Google Scholar

Leonelli, G. C., Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of ‘defensive’ policies: comparing the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and the US proposal for a border carbon adjustment. Legal Studies 2022, 42(4): 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewenstein, B. V., Models of public communication of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 2003. https://perma.cc/S8ZL-TPKB.Google Scholar

Lewis, P., The Earth Summit: negotiators in Rio agree to increase aid to third world. New York Times, 14 June 1992. www.nytimes.com/1992/06/14/world/the-earth-summit-negotiators-in-rio-agree-to-increase-aid-to-third-world.html.Google Scholar

Lewis, S., Madry, K., Ellis, A., COP 27-Mexico to make major climate commitment, says John Kerry. Reuters, 2 November 2022. www.reuters.com/business/cop/cop-27-mexico-make-major-climate-commitment-says-john-kerry-2022-11-02.Google Scholar

Li, M., Petersen, C. A., Tautges, N. E., Scow, K. M., Gaudin, A. C. M., Yields and resilience outcomes of organic, cover crop, and conventional practices in a Mediterranean climate. Science Reports 2019, 9: 12283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48747-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, J. Y., Wang, X., Dual circulation: a new structural economics view of development. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 2022, 20: 303–322.Google Scholar

Liu, L., China Exim says bank no longer finances new overseas coal power projects and remains committed to supporting emission reduction upgrades for completed projects. Business & Human rights Resource Centre, 2022. www.business-humanrights.org.Google Scholar

Lo, J., Japan blocks green reform of major energy investment treaty. 2020. www.climatechangenews.com/2020/09/08/japan-blocks-green-reform-major-energy-investment-treaty.Google Scholar

Lyster, R., Bradbrook, A., Energy Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ma, J., Zadek, S., Decarbonizing the Belt and Road: a green finance roadmap. 2019. www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/BRI_Exec_Summary_v13-screen_hi.pdf.Google Scholar

Mabey, N., McNally, R., Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: From Pollution Havens to Sustainable Development. OECD, 1999. www.oecd.org/investment/mne/2089912.pdf.Google Scholar

Macchi, C., van Zeben, J., Business and human rights implications of climate change litigation: Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell, RECIEL 2021, 30: 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mace, M. J., Verheyen, R., Loss, damage and responsibility after COP21: all options open for the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 2016, 25: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacNeil, R., Alternative climate policy pathways in the US. Climate Policy 2013, 13(2): 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacPherson, E. J., Indigenous Water Rights in Law and Regulation. Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madden, P., Figure of the week: foreign direct investment in Africa. Brookings Blog, 9 October 2019. www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2019/10/09/figure-of-the-week-foreign-direct-investment-in-africa.Google Scholar

Maffei, A., Grahm, S., Nuur, C., Characterisation of the impact of digitalisation on the adoption of sustainable business models in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2019, 81: 765–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magalharaes, P. C., Explaining the constitutionalization of social rights: Portuguese hypotheses and a cross-national test, in Galligan, D. J., Versteeg, M. (eds.), Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 432–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magraw, D., Chennouffi, L., Cowling, K., et al. Model green investment treaty: international investment and climate change. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 95–134.Google Scholar

Maher, D. T., Call, M., Santos, I. R., Sanders, C. J., Beyond burial: lateral exchange is a significant atmospheric carbon sink in mangrove forests. Biology Letters 2018, 14(7): 20180200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mallet, V., Munshi, N., Pilling, D., Why Macron’s attempt to reset French ties to Africa has hit trouble. Financial Times, 27 October 2020. www.ft.com/content/cea9cdd9-c500-41bc-a2ae-2e4c01eaf2e8.Google Scholar

Mani, M., Wheeler, D., In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. Journal of Environment and Development 1998, 7(3): 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manley, D., Cust, J. F., Cecchinato, G., Stranded nations? The climate policy implications for fossil fuel-rich developing countries. OxCarre Policy Paper 34, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcu, A., Dybka, D., Status of the border carbon adjustments’ international developments. European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition, 2021.Google Scholar

Mares, R., Global corporate social responsibility, human rights, and the law: an interactive regulatory perspective on the voluntary–mandatory dichotomy. Transnational Legal Theory 2010, 1(2): 221–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, R., Legalizing human rights due diligence and the separation of entities principle, in Deva, S., Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours. Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 266–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, R., Corporate transparency regulations: a hollow victory? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2018, 36(3): 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, R., Securing human rights through risk-management methods: breakthrough or misalignment? Leiden Journal of International Law 2019, 32(3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, R., Draft UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights, in Marx, A., Van Calster, G., Wouters, J., Otteburn, K., Lica, D. (eds.), Research Handbook on Business and Human Rights. Edward Elgar, 2022, pp. 22–44.Google Scholar

Mares, R., Directors’ duties during the green transition: reasons for reform and the regulatory ecosystem approach in the EU. Nordic Journal of European Law (forthcoming 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marjanac, S., Patton, L., Extreme weather event attribution science and climate change litigation: an essential step in the causal chain? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 2018, 36: 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markard, J., Rinscheid, A., Widdel, L., Analyzing transitions through the lens of discourse networks: coal phase-out in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2021, 40: 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markowitz, E. M., Shariff, A. F., Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change 2012, 2(4): 243–247. doi:10.1038/nclimate1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marlon, J. R., Bloodhart, B., Ballew, M. T., et al., How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization, Frontiers in Communication 2019, 4(20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marossi, A. Z., Bassett, M. R. (eds.), Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences. TMC Asser Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marschütz, B., Bremer, S., Runhaar, H., et al., Local narratives of change as an entry point for building urban climate resilience. Climate Risk Management 2020, 28: 100223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martínez, J., Puertas, R., Martín, J. M. M., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., Innovation and environmental policies aimed at achieving sustainable production. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022, 32: 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, M., Zeitoun, M., El Sheikh, R., Conflict and social vulnerability to climate change: lessons from Gaza. Climate and Development 2011, 3(4): 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. OECD Library, 2021.Google Scholar

Mbow, C., et al., Food security, in Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. (eds.), Climate Change and Land. Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 437–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007.Google Scholar

Matalucci, S., Elmed Interconnector aims to bring solar power from the Sahara to Europe. Deutsche Welle, 24 May 2019. www.dw.com/en/elmed-interconnector-aims-to-bring-solar-power-from-the-sahara-to-europe/a-48843725.Google Scholar

May, J. R., The case for environmental human rights: recognition, implementation, and outcomes. Cordozo Law Review 2021, 42(3): 983–1037.Google Scholar

May, N., Neuhoff, K., New technologies on the supply side, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, p. 332.Google Scholar

Mayer, B., The relevance of the no-harm principle to climate change law and politics. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 2016, 19: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, B. Obligations of conduct in the international law on climate change: a defence. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2018, 27:130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, B., Temperature targets and state obligations on the mitigation of climate change. Journal of Environmental Law 2021, 33(3): 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, B., The duty of care of fossil-fuel producers for climate change mitigation. Transnational Environmental Law 2022, 11(2): 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, B., Rajavuori, M., National fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation under international law. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 2016, 44: 55.Google Scholar

McLure, C. E., Jr., The GATT—legality of border adjustments for carbon taxes and the cost of emissions permits: a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Florida Tax Review 2011, 11(4): 221–294.Google Scholar

McNamara, K. E., Westoby, R., Solastalgia and the gendered nature of climate change: an example from Erub Island, Torres Strait. EcoHealth 2021, 8(2): 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeus, L., Batlle, C., Glachant, J.-M., et al., The 5th EU Electricity Market Reform: A Renewable Jackpot for All Europeans Package? Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar

Megbowon, E., Mlambo, C., Adekunle, B., Impact of China’s outward FDI on sub-Saharan Africa’s industrialization: evidence from 26 countries. Cogent Economics & Finance 2019, 7(1): 1681054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meguro, M., State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. The American Journal of International Law 2020, 114(4): 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehling, M. A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., Verkuijl, C., Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law 2019, 113(3): 433–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meidinger, E. E., ‘Private’ environmental regulation, human rights, and community. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal Spring 2000, 7: 123–238.Google Scholar

Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H., Wilke, H. A. M., Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis 2001, 21(5): 955–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Melhem, A., New Chapter Begins in Israel–Palestine Water Dispute. Al-Monitor, 2017. www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/06/palestine-israel-joint-water-committee-dispute-meeting.html.Google Scholar

Merino, Á., La población joven en el mundo. El Orden Mundial (September 14, 2020). https://elordenmundial.com/mapas-y-graficos/poblacion-joven-mundo.Google Scholar

Merryman, J. H., Perez-Perdomo, R., The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miche, D., Computers that learn could lead to disaster. New Scientist 1980, 160.Google Scholar

Mildenberger, M., Development of climate institutions in the United States. Environmental Politics 2021, 30(1–2): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mile, A., Emerging legal doctrines in climate change law: seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice. Texas International Law Journal 2021, 56: 59–94.Google Scholar

Mills, R., A fine balance: the geopolitics of the global energy transition in MENA, in Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S. (eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Cham: Springer International Publishing, vol. 73, 2020, 115–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., et al., Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 2017, 292: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minnerop, P., Otto, F. E. L., ‘Climate change and causation: joining law and climate science on the basis of formal logic. Buffalo Journal of Environmental Law 2020, 27(1): 49–86.Google Scholar

Mitchell, A. D., Sheargold, E., Principles of International Trade and Investment Law. Edward Elgar, 2022.Google Scholar

Mitrova, T., Arctic resource development: economics and politics, in Corell, R. W., Kim, J. D., Kim, Y. H., et al. (eds.), The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on Global-Arctic Interactions: The Arctic Moves from Periphery to Center. Korea Maritime Institute and East–West Center, 2019, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar

Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., Rotmann, S., Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science 2017, 31: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohamed, A., Aboubakr, E., El Massaoui, H., El Markhi, H., Renewable energy potential and available capacity for wind and solar power in Morocco towards 2030. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 2018, 11(1): 189–198.Google Scholar

Molina, C., Sánchez anuncia una cumbre entre la Unión Europea y América Latina para 2023. Público, 24 August 2022. www.publico.es/politica/sanchez-anuncia-cumbre-union-europea-y-america-latina-2023.html.Google Scholar

Möllers, C., The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondejar, M. E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H. L. B., et al., Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: steps towards a smart green planet. Science of the Total Environment 2021, 794: 1483539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, C., Waterworld: climate change, statehood, and the right to self-determination, in Quirico, O., Boumghar, M. (eds.), Climate Change and Human Rights. An International and Comparative Law Perspective. Routledge, 2016, p. 104.Google Scholar

Mora Díaz, D., Cambio climático: América Latina será una de las regiones más afectadas. Noticias ONU, 17 August 2021. https://news.un.org/es/story/2021/08/1495582.Google Scholar

Morena, E., Krause, D., Stevis, D. (eds), Just Transitions, Social Justice in the Shift Towards a Low-Carbon World. Pluto Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Morgera, E., Corporate Environmental Accountability in International Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Morrow, J., Mixed government, balanced constitutions and the separation of powers, in History of Political Thought. Palgrave, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mörsdorf, G., A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment. Energy Policy 2022, 161: 112596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, T., Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Morton, T., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., Bretschneider, P., The future that may (or may not) come: how framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21(1): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, S. C., Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change 2010, 1(1): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muchlinski, P. M., ‘Global Bukowina’ examined: viewing the multinational enterprise as a transnational law-making community, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law Without a State. Dartmouth, 1997, pp. 79–106.Google Scholar

Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., et al., Towards a Green and Digital Future: Key Requirements for Successful Twin Transitions in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.Google Scholar

Murray, J., Which countries have committed to legally binding net zero carbon emissions? NS Energy, 2021. www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/countries-net-zero-emissions.Google Scholar

Myllyvirta, L., Analysis: China’s New 2030 targets promise more low-carbon power than meets the eye. Carbon Brief, 15 December 2020. www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-new-2030-targets-promise-more-low-carbon-power-than-meets-the-eye.Google Scholar

Nagle, M. K., Tracing the origins of fairly traceable: the black hole of private climate change litigation. Tulane Law Review 2010, 85: 477–518.Google Scholar

Najib, M., Palestine runs dry: ‘Our water they steal and sell to us’. 2021. www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/7/15/water-war-palestinians-demand-more-water-access-from-israel.Google Scholar

Nasr, H., Neef, A., Ethiopia’s challenge to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile River Basin: the case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Geopolitics 2016, 21(4): 969–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nathan, B., Chafetz, E., Electricity as a good or a service: some shocking developments. Business Credit, 2013.Google Scholar

Nedopil, C., Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Shanghai, Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University, 2022. https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri.Google Scholar

Nedopil, C., Green finance for soft power: an analysis of China’s green policy signals and investments in the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 2022, 32(2): 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nedopil, C., De Boer, D., Fan, D., Understanding China’s latest guidelines for greening the Belt and Road. China Dialogue, 2022. https://chinadialogue.net/en/business/understanding-chinas-latest-guidelines-for-greening-the-belt-and-road.Google Scholar

Nerets, V., Kazāks, A., Concerns about investment protection in Russia during its invasion of Ukraine. 18 March 2022. www.sorainen.com/publications/concerns-about-investment-protection-in-russia-during-its-invasion-of-ukraine.Google Scholar

Nissen, A., Not that assertive: the EU’s take on enforcement of labour obligations in its free trade agreement with South Korea. European Journal of International Law EJIL 2022, 33(2): 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nixon, R., Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Nixon, R., The Great Acceleration and the Great Divergence: vulnerability in the Anthropocene. Profession 2014, 14.Google Scholar

Noussan, M., Raimondi, P. P., Scita, R., Hafner, M., The role of green and blue hydrogen in the energy transition – a technological and geopolitical perspective. Sustainability 2020, 13(1): 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, S., The role of courts in remedying climate chaos: transcending judicial nihilism and taking survival seriously. Georgetown Environmental Law Review 2020, 32(4): 743–778.Google Scholar

Nurton, J., Patenting trends in renewable energy. World Intellectual Property Organization Magazine, March 2020. www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2020/01/article_0008.html.Google Scholar

Nyabiage, J., Why is China looking beyond Africa for oil supplies? South China Morning Post, (5 September 2020). www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3100367/why-china-looking-beyond-africa-oil-supplies.Google Scholar

Nyabiage, J., Guinea coup adds to growing knots in China’s belt and road plans. South China Morning Post, 12 September 2021. www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3148473/guinea-coup-adds-growing-knots-chinas-belt-and-road-plans.Google Scholar

Oates, T., Carbon border adjustment methods. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2022, 20(4):206.Google Scholar

O’Neill, S., Nicholson-Cole, S., ‘Fear won’t do it’: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 2009, 30(3): 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orfield, L. B., The Growth of Scandinavian Law. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Osaka, S., Why the Climate Bill’s impact might not match what many expect: models could be over- (or under-!) estimating the climate impact of the Inflation Reduction Act. Washington Post, 12 August 2022.Google Scholar

Osofsky, H. M., The geography of climate change litigation: implications for transnational regulatory governance. Washington University Law Quarterly 2005, 83: 1789–1855.Google Scholar

Oud, M., Drinhausen, K. (eds.), The Decoding China Dictionary (2021). https://decodingchina.eu/download/decoding-china.Google Scholar

Ozai, I., Designing an equitable border carbon adjustment mechanism. Canadian Tax Journal 2022, 70(1): 1–33.Google Scholar

Park, S., The politics of 21st century environmental disasters. Environmental Politics 2022, 31(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, J., Climate change, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2016, p. 1009.Google Scholar

Peel, J., Lin, J., Transnational climate litigation: the contribution of the Global South. The American Journal of International Law 2019, 113(4): 679–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, J., Osofsky, H. M., Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, J., Osofsky, H. M., Climate change litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 2020, 16: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, M. S., Critical commentary on the Energy Charter Treaty. European Energy Journal 2018, 7(4): 47–54.Google Scholar

Pirani, S., Stern, J., Yafimava, K., The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pirlot, A., Carbon border adjustment measures: a straightforward multi-purpose climate change instrument? Journal of Environmental Law 2022, 34(1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plumwood, V., Animals and Ecology: Towards a Better Integration. Working/technical paper, Australian National University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41767.Google Scholar

Plumwood, V., Ecosocial feminism as a general theory of oppression, in Merchant, C. (ed.), Key Concepts in Critical Theory: Ecology. Humanity Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Polak, P., Polakova, B., Changes in the EU’s geopolitical position and energy doctrine in light of the Ukraine invasion. Society 2022, 59: 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pompili, B., Le Maire, B., Dussopt, O., Le Budget Vert: La France est le premier pays au monde à mesurer l’impact du budget de l’Etat sur l’environnement. Press Release No. 219, Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances, 30 September 2020.Google Scholar

Porter, M. E., Kramer, M., Serafeim, G., Where ESG fails. Institutional Investor, 16 October 2019.Google Scholar

Porterfeld, M. C., Reforming the International Investment Regime through a Framework Convention on Investment and Sustainable Development. 2020. https://uncitral.un.org.Google Scholar

Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Pressman, J., Wildavsky, A., Implementation. University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Prest, J., Woodyatt, J., Pettit, J., Comparing the hydrogen strategies of the EU, Germany, and Australia: legal and policy issues. Oil Gas & Energy Law Intelligence 2021, 19(2): paper no. 21.Google Scholar

Preston, B. J., The influence of climate change litigation on governments and the private sector. Climate Law 2011, 2: 485–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirico, O., Towards a peremptory duty to curb greenhouse gas emissions? Fordham International Law Journal 2021, 44: 923–965.Google Scholar

Rached, E., Brooks, D. B., Water governance in the Middle East and North Africa: an unfinished agenda. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2010, 26(2): 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rajamani, L., International Climate Change Law. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Rajavuori, M., The role of non-state actors in climate law, in Mayer, B., Zahar, A. (eds.), Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rapier, R., The World’s Top Lithium Producers. Forbes, 13 December 2020. www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2020/12/13/the-worlds-top-lithium-producers.Google Scholar

Razavi, K., Have We Improved the Way We Talk about Climate Change? 2019. https://opencanada.org/have-we-improved-way-we-talk-about-climate-change.Google Scholar

Readfearn, G. et al., Inside Australia’s climate emergency: the new fire zone. The Guardian, 12 February 2020. www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2020/feb/12/living-in-the-climate-emergency-australias-new-fire-zone.Google Scholar

Rees, J., Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy 1997, 19(4): 477–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, R., Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few. Alfred Knopf, 2015.Google Scholar

Restrepo, T., Modification of renewable energy support schemes under the energy Charter Treaty: Eiser and Charanne in the context of climate change. Goettingen Journal of International Law 2018, 8(1): 101–137.Google Scholar

Rhodes, E. L., Environmental Justice in America: A New Paradigm. Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Rice, J. L., Burke, B. J., Heynen, N., Knowing climate change, embodying climate praxis: Experiential knowledge in southern Appalachia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2015, 105(2): 253–262. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.985628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riegert, B., EU will mit Chinas “Neuer Seidenstraße” konkurrieren. Deutsche Welle, 1 December 2021. www.dw.com/de/eu-will-mit-chinas-neuer-seidenstra%C3%9Fe-konkurrieren/a-59980143.Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A., Moynihan, R., Magsig, B.-O., Transboundary Water Governance and Climate Change Adaptation: International Law, Policy Guidelines and Best Practice Application. United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2015, p. 35.Google Scholar