Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2010). Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2014). On future in commands. Future Times, Future Tenses. De Brabanter, P., Kissine, M. and Sharifzadeh, S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alapatov, V. (2001). Modern Japanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 106–125.Google Scholar

Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. (1971). ‘Meaning and communication’. Philosophical Review 80: 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2001). ‘Indirect speech acts’. Synthese 128: 183–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003a). Imperatives in dialogue. The Semantics and the Pragmatics of Dialogue for the New Millennium. Kuehnlein, P., Rieser, H. and Zeevat, H. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–24.Google Scholar

Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003b). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1956). ‘Ifs and cans’. Proceedings of the British Academy 42: 109–132.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Second edition, Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M. (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avramides, A. (1989). Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bach, K. (1998). Standardization revisited. Pragmatics: Critical Assessment. Vol. IV. Kasher, A. (ed.). London: Routledge: 712–722.Google Scholar

Bach, K. (1999). ‘The myth of conventional implicature’. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bailyn, J. F. (2012). The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barker, S. (2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsley, E. L. (1944). ‘Imperative sentences in relation to indicatives’. Philosophical Review 53: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedell, G. and Kee Shein Mang, K. T. (2009). ‘Agreement in Laizo’. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 11–22.Google Scholar

Belnap, N. D. (1990). ‘Declaratives are not enough’. Philosophical Studies 59: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belnap, N. D., Perloff, M. and Xu, M. (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benbaji, Y. (2003). ‘Who needs semantics of quotation marks?’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 27–49.Google Scholar

Benbaji, Y. (2004). ‘A demonstrative analysis of “open quotation”’. Mind and Language 19(5): 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birjulin, L. A. and Xrakovski, V. S. (2001). Imperative sentences: theoretical problems. Typology of imperative constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 3–50.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’. Journal of Pragmatics 11(2): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeder, W. (2010). Mood in modern Georgian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 603–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisvert, D. and Ludwig, K. (2006). Semantics for nondeclaratives. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Lepore, E. and Smith, B. C. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 864–893.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1998). Intonation in American English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45–55.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Breheny, R. (2006). ‘Communication and folk psychology’. Mind and Language 21: 74–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breu, W. (2010). Mood in Albanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, R. and Segerberg, K. (1984). Basic modal logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. III. Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 1–88.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bystrov, I. S. and Stankevič, N. V. (2001). Imperative in Vietnamese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 461–474.Google Scholar

Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (1997). ‘Varieties of quotation’. Mind 106(423): 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (2007). Language Turned on Itself: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metalinguistic Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Kempson, R. M. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–181.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlow, N. (2010). Restricting and embedding imperatives. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, LNAI 6042. Aloni, M. and Schultz, K. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 223–233.Google Scholar

Cherchi, M. (1999). Georgian. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, B. (1993). ‘Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H. and Schunk, D. H. (1980). ‘Polite responses to polite requests’. Cognition 8(2): 111–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, L. J. (1964). ‘Do illocutionary forces exist?’ Philosophical Quarterly 14(55): 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condoravdi, C. and Lauer, S. (2012). Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9. Piñon, C. (ed.) University of California, Santa Cruz: 37–58.Google Scholar

Cook, K. W. (2006). The Hawaiian passive/imperative particle. Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani. Tsunoda, T. and Kageyama, T.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–14.Google Scholar

Cornulier, B. d. (1985). Effets de sens. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Crnič, L. and Trinh, T. (2009). Embedding imperatives in English. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13. Riester, A. and Solstad, T. (eds.). University of Stuttgart: 113–127.Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (1997). ‘Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination’. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1979). Moods and Performances. Meaning and use. Margalit, A. (ed.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001a). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001b). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, E. (1986). The English Imperative. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

De Brabanter, P. (2005). Quotations and the intrusion of non-linguistic communication into utterances. Modeling and Using Context: Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2005. Dey, A. K., Kokinov, B. N., Leake, D. B. and Turner, R. M. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Clerck, B. (2006). ‘The imperative in English: a corpus-based, pragmatic analysis’, Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent, Ghent University.

De Haan, F. (2011). Tense, aspect, and modality systems. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Song, J. J. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 445–464.Google Scholar

Đình-Hoà, N. (1997). Vietnamese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dobronravin, N. A. and Smirnova, M. A. (2001). Imperative constructions in Hausa. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 329–351.Google Scholar

Dobrushina, N., Van der Auwera, J. and Goussev, V. (2005). The optative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 298–301.Google Scholar

Dominicy, M. and Franken, N. (2002). Speech acts and Relevance theory. Essays in speech act theory. Vanderveken, D. and Kubo, S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 263–283.Google Scholar

Du Feu, V. (1996). Rapanui. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. (1993). Mood, force and convention. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 202–223.Google Scholar

Dũng, Đ. T., Hưong, T. T. and Boulakia, G. (1998). Intonation in Vietnamese. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 395–416.Google Scholar

Elbert, S. H. and Pukui, M. K. (1979). Hawaiian Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. R. (2000). ‘Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality’. Linguistic Typology 4: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erelt, M. and Metslang, H. (2004). ‘Grammar and pragmatics: changes in the paradigm of the Estonian imperative’. Linguistica Uralica 40: 161–178.Google Scholar

Fiengo, R. (2007). Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, J., Grabe, E. and Warren, P. (2005). Intonational variation: the High Rising Tone. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Jun, S.-A. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortuin, E. (2008). ‘Polisemia imperative v ruskom iazyke’. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1: 3–23.Google Scholar

Fortuin, E. (2010). ‘Explicit second-person subjects in Russian imperatives: semantics, word-order, and a comparison with English’. Linguistics 48: 431–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortuin, E. and Boogaart, R. (2009). ‘Imperative as conditional: from constructional to compositional semantics’. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 641–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. (1918–1919/1997). Thought/Der Gedanke. The Frege Reader. Beaney, M. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 325–345.Google Scholar

Geis, M. L. and Zwicky, A. M. (1971). ‘On invited inferences’. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566.Google Scholar

Geurts, B. (1998). ‘The mechanisms of denial’. Language 74: 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geurts, B. (2005). ‘Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals’. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geurts, B. (2011). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1978). ‘Response cries’. Language 54: 787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golovko, E. V. (2001). Imperative in Aleut. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 300–314.Google Scholar

Grande Alija, F. J. (1997). ‘Los imperativos condicionales’. Contextos 15(29–30): 49–65.Google Scholar

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. and Veltman, F. (1996). Coreference and modality. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Lappin, S. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 179–213.Google Scholar

Gruzdeva, E. Y. (2001). Imperative sentences in Nivkh. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 59–77.Google Scholar

Gunlogson, C. (2008). ‘A question of commitment’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136.Google Scholar

Hacquard, V. (2006). ‘Aspects of modality’, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

Hamblin, C. (1987). Imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Han, C.-H. (2000). The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Hare, R. M. (1967). ‘Some alleged differences between imperatives and indicatives’. Mind 76: 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnish, R. M. (1994). Mood, meaning and speech acts. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Tsohatzidis, S. (ed.). London: Routledge: 407–459.Google Scholar

Heal, J. (1976–1977). ‘Insincerity and commands’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heal, J. (1984). Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hirst, D. (1998). Intonation in British English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 56–77.Google Scholar

Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, A. and McKinsey, J. C. C. (1939). ‘On the logic of imperatives’. Philosophy of Science 6: 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holvoet, A. (2010). Mood in Latvian and Lithuanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Horn, L. R. (2000). ‘From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J. (1996). A New Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntley, M. (1984). ‘The semantics of English imperatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jary, M. (2007). ‘Are explicit performatives assertions?’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jary, M. (2009). Relevance, assertion and possible worlds: a cognitive approach to the Spanish subjunctive. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 235–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jary, M. (2010). Assertion. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jary, M. (2011). Assertion, relevance and the declarative mood. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 267–289.Google Scholar

Jensen, B. (2003). ‘Syntax and semantics of imperative subjects’. Nordlyd 31: 150–164.Google Scholar

Jörgensen, J. (1937). ‘Imperatives and logic’. Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. (2005). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. Amog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 481–563.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, M. (2012). Interpreting Imperatives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, M. and Kaufmann, S. (forthcoming). ‘Epistemic particles and performativity’. Proceedings of SALT 22.

Kenesei, I., Vago, R. M. and Fenyvesi, A. (1998). Hungarian. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2008a). ‘Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary’. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2008b). ‘Why will is not a modal’. Natural Language Semantics 16: 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2009). ‘Illocutionary forces and what is said’. Mind and Language 24: 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2011). ‘Misleading appearances: Searle, assertion, and meaning’. Erkenntnis 74: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, K. M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissine, M. (2013). From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koehn, E. and Koehn, S. (1986). Apalaí. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. . Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 33–127.Google Scholar

König, E. and Siemund, P. (2007). Speech act distinctions in grammar. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. Second edition. Shopen, T. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 276–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kordi, E. E. (2001). Imperative sentences in French. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 372–389.Google Scholar

Kozintseva, N. A. (2001). Imperative sentences in Armenian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 245–267.Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. (1977). ‘What “must” and “can” must and can mean’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Rieser, H. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 38–74.Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D. (eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 639–650.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Larson, R. K. and Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K. (2003). Truth and meaning. Donald Davidson. Ludwig, K. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 15–63.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. and Evans, N. (2009). ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 32: 429–448, 472–492.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. K. (1972). General semantics. Semantics of Natural Language. Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 169–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, D. K. (1979). ‘Score-keeping in a language game’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindstedt, J. (2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludlow, P. (2005). A note on alleged cases of nonsentential assertion. Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Elugardo, R. and Stainton, R. J.. Dordrecht: Springer: 95–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacFarlane, J. (2008). Truth in the garden of forking paths. Relative Truth. Kölbel, M. and García-Carpintero, M. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinn, C. (1977). ‘Semantics for non-indicative sentences’. Philosophical Studies 12: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maier, E. (2010). Quoted imperatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14. Prinzhorn, M., Schmitt, V. and Zobel, S. (eds.). Vienna: 289–304.Google Scholar

Malčukov, A. L. (2001). Even. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 159–180.Google Scholar

Malygina, L. V. (2001). Modern Hebrew. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 268–286.Google Scholar

Mastop, R. (2005). ‘What can you do? Imperative mood in semantic theory’. Ph.D. dissertation: Amsterdam University.

Mastop, R. (2011). ‘Imperatives as semantic primitives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauck, S. and Zanuttini, R. (2004). The subjects of English imperatives. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics.

Meeussen, A. E. (1959). Essai de grammaire rundi. Tervuren: Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge.Google Scholar

Merchant, J. (2004). ‘Fragments and ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Metslang, H. and Sepper, M.-M. (2010). Mood in Estonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, R. (2010). Mood in Czach and Slovak. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (2004). Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. IX: Pragmatics. Cole, P. (ed.). New York: Academic Press: 261–280.Google Scholar

Nasilov, D. M., Isxakova, X. F., Safarov, Š. S. and Nevskaja, I. A. (2001). Imperative sentences in Turkic languages. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 181–220.Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, I. A. (2007). Constructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Nikolaeva, I. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 138–180.Google Scholar

Ninan, D. (2005). Two puzzles about deontic necessity. New Work on Modality. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 51.)Gajewski, J., Hacquard, V., Nickel, B. and Yalcin, S. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 149–178.Google Scholar

Ó Baoill, D. (2010). Mood in Irish. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odhiambo, N. and Malherbe, M. (2009). Parlons Luo: langue du Kenya. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Ogloblin, A. K. (2001). Imperative sentences in Javanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 221–242.Google Scholar

Pak, M., Portner, P. and Zanuttini, R. (forthcoming). ‘The syntax and semantics of jussive clauses in Korean’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.

Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality: Issues in the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Pérez Henrandez, L. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2002). ‘Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. (2007). ‘The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, C. and Rosengren, I. (1998). ‘On the subject of imperatives: a minimalist account of the imperative clause’. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polinsky, M. S. (2001). Maori. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 404–419.Google Scholar

Popjes, J. and Popjes, J. (1986). Canela-Krahô. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. I. Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 128–199.Google Scholar

Portner, P. (2005). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV. Watanabe, K. and Young, R. B. (eds.). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar

Portner, P. (2007). ‘Imperatives and modals’. Natural Language Semantics 4: 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Portner, P. (forthcoming). Imperatives. Cambridge Handbook of Semantics. Aloni, M. and van Rooij, R. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Postma, G. and van der Wurff, W. (2007). How to say no and don’t: negative imperatives in Romance and Germanic. Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. van der Wurff, W. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (1987). Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (2001). ‘Open quotation’. Mind 110: 637–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recanati, F. (2002). ‘Does linguistic communication rest on inference?’. Mind and Language 17: 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recanati, F. (2003). The limits of expressibility. John Searle. Smith, B. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (2013). ‘Content, mood, and force’. Philosophical Compass: 622–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, C. (1989). ‘Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 683–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, J. R. (1990). ‘Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages’. Journal of Linguistics 26: 363–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, A. (1944). ‘Imperatives and logic’. Philosophy of Science 11: 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, J. R. (1970). On declarative sentences. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.). Waltham: Ginn: 222–277.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (2007). ‘Imperatives in conditional conjunction’. Natural Language Semantics 15: 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. M. and Zwicky, A. M. (1985). Speech act distinctions in syntax. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. Shopen, T. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–196.Google Scholar

Salim, A. (2001). Indonesian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 420–437.Google Scholar

Schachter, P. and Otanes, F. T. (1972). Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. (2005). The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). Proceedings of Going Romance XVII. Geerts, T., van Ginneken, I. and Jacobs, H. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 269–309.Google Scholar

Schmerling, S. F. (1982). ‘How imperatives are different, and how they aren’t’. Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Nondeclaratives: 202–218.

Schreiber, P. A. (1972). ‘Style disjuncts and the performative analysis’. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 321–347.Google Scholar

Scontras, G. and Gibson, E. (2011). ‘A quantitative investigation of the imperative-and-declarative construction in English’. Language 87: 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975a). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.). New York: Academic Press: 59–82.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge. Gunderson, K. (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 344–369.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (2001a). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (2001b). ‘Unstable meanings, stable communication. Reply to Recanati’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2: 284–286.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segal, G. (1991). ‘In the mood for a semantic theory’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sémon, J.-P. (2006). L’impératif russe. Mode de la rupture. Études de Linguistique Contrastive. Soutet, O. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 149–164.Google Scholar

Shan, C.-C. (2007). Causal reference and inverse scope as mixed quotation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. Aloni, M., Dekker, P. and Roelofsen, F. (eds.). Amsterdam: ILLC: 199–204.Google Scholar

Sigurdðsson, H. Á. (2010). Mood in Icelandic. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 31–55.Google Scholar

Smith, C. S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solnit, D. (1997). Eastern Kayah Li. Hawaii: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1982). Comments on Clark and Carlson’s paper. Mutual Knowledge. Smith, N. (ed.). London: Academic Press: 46–51.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stainton, R. J. (1997). ‘What assertion is not’. Philosophical Studies 85: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainton, R. J. (1998). ‘Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness “in isolation”, and ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainton, R. J. (2005). In defense of non-sentential assertion. Semantics versus Pragmatics. Szabó, Z. G. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 383–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainton, R. J. (2006). Neither fragments nor ellipsis. The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Progovac, L., Paesani, K., Casielles, E. and Barton, E. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainton, R. J. and Elugardo, R. (2004). ‘Shorthand, syntactic ellipsis, and the pragmatic determinants of what is said’. Mind and Language 19: 442–471.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9. Cole, P. (ed.). New York: Academic Press: 315–322.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. C. (1999). Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stalnaker, R. C. (2002). ‘Common ground’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, J. (2002). ‘Making it articulated’. Mind and Language 17(1–2): 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Talking about the future: unsettled truth and assertion. Future Times, Future Tenses. De Brabanter, P., Kissine, M. and Sharifzadeh, S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1964). ‘Intention and convention in speech acts’. Philosophical Review 73: 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sussex, R. and Cubberley, P. V. (2006). The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takahashi, H. (2012). A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative. With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1985). Nkore-Kiga. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2009). What use is what is said. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thieroff, R. (2010). Mood in German. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Rothstein, B. and Thieroff, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornburg, K.-U. and Panther, L. (1998). ‘A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 30(6): 755–769.Google Scholar

Thorne, J. P. (1966). ‘English imperative sentences’. Journal of Linguistics 2: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tosheva, A. (2006). L’impératif en bulgare. Études de linguistique contrastive. Soutet, O. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 191–212.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, J. (1986). Conditionals and speech acts. On Conditionals. Traugott, E. C., ter Meulen, A. G. B. and Reilly, J. S. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Auwera, J. (1997). ‘Pragmatics in the last quarter century: the case of conditional perfection’. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Auwera, J., Dobrushina, N. and Goussev, V. (2005). Imperative–hortative systems. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 294–296.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, J. and Lejeune, L. (2005a). The morphological imperative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 286–289.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, J. and Lejeune, L. (2005b). The prohibitive. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Haspelmath, M. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 290–293.Google Scholar

van der Wurff, W., ed. (2007). Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanderveken, D. (1991). Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vanderveken, D. (2002). Universal grammar and speech act theory. Essays in Speech Act Theory. Vanderveken, D. and Kubo, S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25–62.Google Scholar

Vanderveken, D. (2005). Success, satisfaction and truth in speech acts and formal semantics. Semantics: A Reader. Davis, S. and Gillon, B. S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 710–734.Google Scholar

Veltman, F. (1996). Data semantics and the pragmatics of indicative conditionals. On Conditionals. Traugott, E. C., ter Meulen, A., Reilly, J. S. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 147–168.Google Scholar

Verstraete, J.-C. (2005). ‘The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia’. Linguistic Typology 9: 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S. (2012). ‘Imperative puzzles’. Slides for the paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, Amherst.

Willis, E. W. (2002). ‘Is there a Spanish imperative intonation revisited: local consideration’. Linguistics 40: 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, D. (1998–1999). Non-truth conditional semantics: Mood indicators I. UCL Linguistics Dept. lecture notes.

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. Human Agency, Language, Duty and Value: Philosophical Essays in Honour of J. O. Urmson. Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. M. and Taylor, C. C. W. (eds.). Stanford: Stanford University Press: 77–101.Google Scholar

Zanuttini, R. (2008). ‘Encoding the addressee in the syntax: evidence from English imperative subjects’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zanuttini, R., Pak, M. and Portner, P. (2012). ‘A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 1231–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zerbian, S. (2010). ‘Developments in the study of intonational typology’. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 874–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, S. (1990). ‘The status of imperatives in theories of grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.

Zimmermann, T. E. (2000). ‘Free choice disjunctions and epistemic possibility’. Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar