Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:12:10.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

37 - The USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Michael Lang
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Pasquale Pistone
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Josef Schuch
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Claus Staringer
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

The relevance of the OECD and UN Model Conventions and their Commentaries for the interpretation of US tax treaties

General comments

The USA is currently a party to about sixty bilateral double income tax treaties that apply with respect to approximately sixty-five countries (because the old treaty with the USSR continues to apply to certain members of the Commonwealth of Independent States).

The USA has a rather peculiar history with the development of model treaties within the framework of the OECD and the UN. A US professor was one of the team of international tax experts that developed the famous study of international tax policy under the auspices of the League of Nations, even though the USA never became a member of that organization. US representatives and experts have been heavily engaged in the development of model treaties by both the OECD and the UN. However, the US Treasury has declined fully to embrace either Model as the basic treaty negotiating position of the US government when endeavouring to establish double tax treaties with potential and existing treaty partners.

The attitude of the US government in this respect is not unique to tax treaty matters. The phenomenon is sometimes referred to critically as ‘US exceptionalism’. For example, US members of the International Law Commission were deeply involved in the negotiation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Vienna Convention) and consulted regularly with attorneys and other officials of the US government. However, the USA has never acceded to the Vienna Convention and is not a party to it. Nonetheless, US representatives have sometimes made reference to the Vienna Convention on the ground that, at least in certain situations, it represents the ‘best evidence’ of customary international law with respect to treaty interpretation and administration. As indicated later in this chapter, such a position is similar to pronouncements made periodically with respect to the US attitude to the model treaties developed by the OECD and the UN.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gustafson, C. HPeroni, R. JPugh, R. CTaxation of International TransactionsEaganThompson-West 2006Google Scholar
Vogel, KShannon, H. ADoernberg, R. Lvan Raad, KUS Income Tax TreatiesBostonKluwer 1995 66Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The USA
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.039
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The USA
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.039
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The USA
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.039
Available formats
×