Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:21:06.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Estonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Michael Lang
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Pasquale Pistone
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Josef Schuch
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Claus Staringer
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

The relevance of the OECD and UN Model Conventions and their Commentaries for the interpretation of Estonian tax treaties

Estonian tax treaties are based on the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (OECD Model), although certain provisions are historically framed in line with the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries (UN Model). New tax treaties are generally based on the latest version of the OECD Model.

The positions in Estonian tax treaties that differ from the OECD approach can often be found in the OECD Commentary under the positions of the non-Member countries. These positions can broadly be divided into two categories: the first category consists of the provisions that extend to Estonia's rights to tax the income at source; and the second category contains provisions of an explanatory nature. The provisions in the first category have mostly been taken from the UN Model.

On 10 May 2010 Estonia was invited to join the OECD and the Accession Agreement was signed on 3 June 2010. In Annex 1 to the Accession Treaty – ‘Specific remarks on acceptance of OECD legal instruments’ – Estonia has accepted the recommendation of the Council concerning the OECD Model Tax Convention, but has made certain reservations to the Model. Therefore, as of the moment that the Accession Agreement becomes effective, Estonia’s position as a non-Member country will be replaced by the reservations to the Model.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pahapill, H.‘Estonia's Tax Treaty Policy’Lang, M.Braccioni, P.Garbarino, C.Schönstein, W.European Union: Tax Treaties of the Central and Eastern European CountriesViennaLinde 2008 55Google Scholar
Uustalu, E.‘Estonia’Lang, M.Aigner, H.-J.Scheuerle, U.Stefaner, M.CFC Legislation: Domestic Provisions, Tax Treaties and EC LawViennaLinde 2004 173Google Scholar
Pahapill, H.Albin, T.‘The History of Estonia's Double Tax Conventions’Kube, H.Lang, M.Pistone, P.Reimer, E.Schuch, J.Staringer, C.Their, A.Waldhoff, C.The History of Double Tax ConventionsViennaLinde 2011Google Scholar
Tõntson, V.Uustalu, E.Lentsius, H.‘Estonia’Smits, A.Verlinden, I.Substance – Aligning International Tax Planning with Today's Business RealitiesSint-Stevens-WoluwePwC 2009 232Google Scholar
Klauson, I.‘Estonia’Tax Treaties and Tax Avoidance: Application of Anti-avoidance Provisions, IFA Cahiers de droit fiscal internationalRotterdamInternational Fiscal Association 2010 291Google Scholar
Kelder, K. A. M.‘Estonia’Lang, M.Recent Tax Treaty Developments Around the GlobeViennaLinde 2009 117Google Scholar
Kurist, A.Uustalu, E.‘Estonia’Trends in Company/Shareholder Taxation: Single or Double Taxation, IFA Cahiers de droit fiscal internationalRotterdamInternational Fiscal Association 2003 333Google Scholar
Albin, T.Pahapill, H.‘Estonia’Is There a Permanent Establishment?, IFA Cahiers de droit fiscal internationalRotterdamInternational Fiscal Association 2009 265Google Scholar
Uustalu, E.Kalamäe, P.‘Estonia’Reimer, E.Urban, N.Schmid, S.Permanent Establishments: A Domestic Taxation, Bilateral Tax Treaty and OECD PerspectiveAlphen aan den RijnKluwer 2010 1Google Scholar
Burns, L.Krever, R.‘Individual Income Tax’Thuronyi, V.Tax Law Design and DraftingWashington DCIMF 1998 495Google Scholar
Uustalu, E.‘Ettevõtlusvormi valikuvabaduse piiramisest Eestis ehk püsivate tegevuskohtade diskrimineerimisest tulumaksuseaduses’MaksuMaksja 5 2008 40Google Scholar
Uustalu, E.‘EU Accession and the Estonian Tax System’European Taxation 5 2003 162Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×