Idealism and the idea of a constitution

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139626682.004

3 - Idealism and the idea of a constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2013

Chris Thornhill

General editor

Nicholas Boyle and

Liz Disley

Edited by

John Walker

Show author details

Chris Thornhill: Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Nicholas Boyle: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John Walker: Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Enlightenment and sociological formation of power

The Enlightenment, observed both as a historical and as a conceptual event, had its centre in the conviction that the European state needed to be constructed as a state under law. As a result, the legitimating function of the constitution was a matter of intense political concern for the Enlightenment. Most essentially, the Enlightenment converged around the view that a state could only be seen as legitimate if it was defined by a legal personality (a constitution), which distinguished acts of public will from acts of factual bearers of political authority and from all transient and particular interests seeking access to state power. Underlying the politics of Enlightenment, thus, was the general normative insistence that the state had to be constructed as a categorically public order, whose primary laws distinguished its power from all privately owned and exercised power, and constructed its authority as a sui generis resource, clearly separated from other spheres of social exchange.

This emphasis on constitutional formation was expressed in the political theories of the Enlightenment. Gaining momentum after Hobbes, the attempt to separate the state, under the public-legal order of a constitution, from mere acts of government unified all the diverse stances broadly categorised as reflecting the Enlightenment. Yet this emphasis was also evident in the practice of the Enlightenment. The most important reflection of this was in the tendency towards the codification of the legal system that was prevalent throughout Europe in the eighteenth century. The drive to codification was also motivated by the idea that the state could only be legitimate if it was framed by a single legal corpus, through which it ordered its relations with other societal actors. Indeed, the core Enlightenment concept of natural rights played a vital role in this process of codification, and the construction of natural rights became the basis for the formation of the state as an abstracted legal person.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 51 - 81

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626682.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fichte, Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Fichte, I. H., 8 vols. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971)

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (1651) (London: Dent, 1914), 66Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Zum Ewigen Frieden, in Werkausgabe, ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm, 6 vols. (Wiesbaden: Insel, 1956–62) [hereafter KW], vi, xi, 195–251Google Scholar

Svarez, Carl Gottlieb, Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Krause, Peter, 6 vols. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2000)Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart, Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution: allgemeines Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegung von 1791 bis 1848 (2nd edn, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1977)Google Scholar

Sonenscher, Michael, Work and Wages: natural law, politics and the eighteenth-century French trades (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 46Google Scholar

d’Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry Baron, La Politique naturelle ou discours sur les vrais principes du gouvernement, 2 vols. (London: n.p., 1773)Google Scholar

Sieyès, Emmanuel-Joseph, Qu'est-ce que le Tiers-Etat? (2nd edn, Paris, 1789), 79Google Scholar

‘Rapport fait à la Convention nationale sur le deuxième projet du Code Civil par Cambacérès’, in Fenet, Pierre-Antoine (ed.), Recueil complet des travaux préparatoires du Code civil, 15 vols. (Paris: Au Dépôt,1827), i, 99–109

Beaud, Olivier, La puissance de l’état (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994), 216–17CrossRef Google Scholar

von Ranke, Leopold, ‘Einleitung’, in Historisch-Politische Zeitschrift 1 (1832), 1–9Google Scholar

Bramson, Leon, The Political Context of Sociology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961), 13–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Strasser, Hermann, The Normative Structure of Sociology: conservative and emancipatory themes in social thought (London: Routledge, 1976), 27Google Scholar

Menzel, Adolf, ‘Naturrecht und Soziologie’, in Festschrift zum einunddreißigsten Deutschen Juristentag (Vienna: Kaiserliche und königliche Hof-Buchdruckerei, 1912), 1–60Google Scholar

Chernilo, Daniel, The Natural Law Foundations of Modern Social Theory: a quest for universalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRef Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile, Leçons de sociologie: physique des moeurs et du droit (1900) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950), 92–3Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, ‘Nonsense upon stilts’, in Bentham, Rights, Representation and Reform: ‘Nonsense upon stilts’ and other writings on the French Revolution, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C. and Blamires, C. (Oxford: Clarendon, 2002), 317–97Google Scholar

Timasheff, N. S., An Introduction to the Sociology of Law (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1974), 45Google Scholar

Manent, Pierre, La Cité de l'homme (Paris: Flammarion, 1997), 73Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile, Montesquieu et Rousseau: précurseurs de la sociologie, introduction by Davy, Georges (Paris: M. Rivière, 1953)Google Scholar

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), 542Google Scholar

Smith, Adam, Lectures on Jurisprudence (1762–6), ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 347Google Scholar

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government (1689) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960), 350Google Scholar

Thiry, Paul-Henri, d’Holbach, Baron, Éthocratie ou le Gouvernement fondé sur la Morale (Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey, 1776), 20–5Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘Du contrat social’ et autres oeuvres politiques (Paris: Garnier, 1975), 87Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris, ‘Sociological enlightenments and the sociology of political philosophy’, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie 259 (2012): 55–83Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert, Hegel's Practical Philosophy: rational agency as ethical life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 117CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, System der Philosophie ii: Ethik des reinen Willens (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1904), 269Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, ‘Über den Gemeinspruch: das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis’, KW vi, 127–72

Kant, Immanuel, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, KW iv, 645–879

Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, KW iv, 215

Cohen, Hermann, Kants Begründung der Ethik (2nd edn, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1910), 306Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Grundlage des Naturrechts, in Werke, ed. Fichte, I. H., 8 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971)Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Der geschlossene Handelsstaat, in Werke, ed. Fichte, I. H., iii, 387–513

Gehlen, Arnold, ‘Über die Geburt der Freiheit aus der Entfremdung’, in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 11 (1952/3), 338–53Google Scholar

Linker, Damon, ‘From Kant to Schelling: counter-Enlightenment in the name of reason,’ Review of Metaphysics 54, no. 2 (2000), 337–77Google Scholar

von Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, System des transcendentalen Idealismus, in Werke, ed. Schröter, Manfred, 12 vols. (Munich: Beck and Oldenbourg, 1927–54)Google Scholar

Hollerbach, Alexander, Der Rechtsgedanke bei Schelling: Quellenstudien zu seiner Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1957)Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, pt 3, in Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus, 20 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969–71)Google Scholar

Jonas, Friedrich, Geschichte der Soziologie i: Aufklärung, Idealismus, Sozialismus: Übergang zur industriellen Gesellschaft (2nd edn, Opladen: Westdeutscher, 1980)Google Scholar

Fine, Robert and Vázquez, Rolando, ‘Freedom and subjectivity in modern society: re-reading Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, in Freeman, Michael (ed.), Law and Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 241–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, Rainer, Verfassungskultur und Verfassungssoziologie: politischer und rechtlicher Konstitutionalismus im 19. Jahrhundert (Wiesbaden: Springer, 2012), 206CrossRef Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984), 261Google Scholar

Boldt, Hans, ‘Hegel und die konstitutionelle Monarchie – Bemerkungen zu Hegels Konzeption des Staates aus verfassungsgeschichtlicher Sicht’, in Weisser-Lohmann, Elisabeth and Köhler, Dietmar (eds.), Verfassung und Revolution: Hegels Verfassungskonzeption und die Revolutionen der Neuzeit (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2000), 167–209Google Scholar

von Savigny, Friedrich Carl, Das Recht des Besitzes: eine civilistische Abhandlung (1803; 6th edn, Giessen: Georg Friedrich Meyer, 1837)Google Scholar

Benzenberg, Johann Friedrich, Ueber Verfassung (Dortmund: Wilhelm Mallinckrodtsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1816), 247–8Google Scholar

Huber, Ernst Rudolf, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte seit 1789, 6 vols. (2nd edn, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1957)Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, in Frühe Schriften, ed. Lieber, J.-J. and Furth, P. (Stuttgart: Cotta, 1962), 506–665Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, Kritik des Hegelschen Staatsrechts, in Werke, ed. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, 43 vols. (Berlin: Dietz, 1956), 203–333Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris, ‘Luhmann and Marx: social theory and social freedom’, in Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas and La Cour, Anders (eds.), Observing Luhmann: radical theoretical encounters (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013), 263–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, Zur Judenfrage, in Werke, ed. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, i, 347–77

Marx, Karl, ‘Verhandlungen des 6. rheinischen Landtags: Debatten über das Holzdiebstahlgesetz’, in Werke, ed. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, i, 109–47

Engels, Friedrich and Marx, Karl, Die heilige Familie, in Werke, ed. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, ii, 7–223

von Haller, Carl Ludwig, Restauration der Staatswissenschaft, 6 vols. (2nd edn,Winterthur: Steiner, 1821–5)Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Ideenevolution: Beiträge zur Wissenssoziologie, ed. Kieserling, André (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2008)Google Scholar