Abarbanel, Isaac, Perush ‘al Nevi'im Aḥaronim, Jerusalem: Bnei Arbel, 1960.Google Scholar

Aristobulus, ‘Fragments’, trans. Collins, Adela Yarbro, in Charlesworth, James H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1985, II, 831–42.Google Scholar

Ascher, Saul, Leviathan oder über Religion im Rücksicht des Judentums, Berlin: in Buchhandlung, Frankeschen, 1792.Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von, The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics, vol. V: The Realm of Metaphysics in the Modern Age, trans. Davies, Oliver, Louth, Andrew, McNeil, Brian, Saward, John and Williams, Rowan, San Francisco: Ignatius, 1991.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Anselm: fides quaerens intellectum, trans. I. Robertson, London: SCM, 1960.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Church Dogmatics, vol. I.1, ed. and trans. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F. 2nd edn, Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Church Dogmatics, vol. I.2, ed. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F., trans. Thomson, G. T. and Knight, Harold, Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1956.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Church Dogmatics, vol. III.1, ed. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F., trans. Edwards, J. W., Bussey, O. and Knight, Harold, Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1958.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Der Römerbrief, 2nd edn, Munich: Christian Kaiser, 1922.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Die Protestantische Theologie im 19. Jahrhundert, Zurich: Zollikon, 1947.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Die Protestantische Theologie im 19. Jahrhundert: ihre Vorgeschichte und ihre Geschichte, 6th edn, Zürich: EVZ, 1994.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Its Background and History, ed. Gunton, Colin, trans. Cozens, Brian and Bowden, John, London: SCM Press, 2001 (first published 1947).Google Scholar

Barth, Karl,The Epistle to the Romans, trans. Hoskyns, Edwyn C. (from 6th edn), London: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian, Das Christenthum und die christliche Kirche der ersten drei Jahrhunderte, Tübingen: Fues 1853.Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian,Die christliche Gnosis; oder die christliche Religionsphilosophie in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Tübingen: Osiander, 1835.Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian,Die Epochen der kirchlichen Geschichtsschreibung, Tübingen: Fues, 1852.Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian,Symbolik und Mythologie oder die Naturreligionen des Althertums, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1824.Google Scholar

Benamozegh, Elijah, Israel and Humanity, trans. Maxwell Luria, Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Benamozegh, Elijah,Israël et l'humanité. Étude sur le problème de la religion universelle et sa solution, Paris: Leroux, 1914.Google Scholar

Bendavid, Lazarus, Etwas zur Charakteristik der Juden, Leipzig: Stabel, 1793.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, ‘Theses on the philosophy of history’, in Illuminations, ed. Arendt, Hannah, trans. Zohn, Harry, New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans, Work on Myth, trans. Wallace, Robert M., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Boethius, , De consolatione philosophiae. Opuscula theologica, ed. Moreschini, C., Munich: K. G. Saur, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich, Letters and Papers from Prison: The Enlarged Edition, ed. Bethge, E., London: SCM Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Brosses, Charles de, Du culte des dieux fétiches, ou Parallèle de l'ancienne Religion de l’Egypte avec la Religion actuelle de Nigritie (1760).Google Scholar

Buber, Martin, Die Legende des Baalschem, Frankfurt am Main: Rütten & Loening, 1908.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin,‘Offenbarung und Gesetz. Aus Briefen an Franz Rosenzweig’, Almanach des Schocken Verlags auf das Jahr 5697, Berlin: Schocken, 1936–7, 147–54.

Buber, Martin,‘Revelation and law (Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig)’, in Rosenzweig, Franz, On Jewish Learning, trans. Glatzer, Nahum, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1955, 109–18.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin,‘The history of the dialogical principle’, in Between Man and Man, trans. Friedman, Maurice, London: Routledge, 1947, 249–64.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin,The Legend of the Baal Shem, trans. Friedman, Maurice, London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin,‘Zur Geschichte des dialogischen Prinzips’, in Das Dialogische Prinzip, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2006, 299–320.Google Scholar

Calvin, Jean, Institution de la religion chrétienne, Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1967.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Charakteristik der Ethik Maimunis in Bacher, Wilhelm, Brann, Markus, Simonsen, David and Guttman, Jakob (eds.), Moses ben Maimon, Leipzig: Fock, 1908, 63–134 [reprinted in Cohen, Jüdische Schriften, ed. Bruno Strauss, 3 vols., Berlin: Schwetschke, 1924, III, 221–89].Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal – Methode und seine Geschichte, Berlin: Dümmler, 1883.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,‘Das Problem der Jüdischen Sittenlehre: Eine Kritīk von Lazarus’ Ethik des Judenthums’, Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums [reprinted in Cohen, Jüdische Schriften, III, 1–35].

Cohen, Hermann,Der Begriff der Religion im System der Philosophie, Giessen: Töppelman, 1915.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Ethics of Maimonides, trans. Bruckstein, Almut, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, Berlin: Dümmler, 1871; 2nd edn, 1885; 3rd edn, Berlin: Cassirer, 1918.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Platons Ideenlehre und die Mathematik, Marburg: Elwertsche, 1878.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums, Leipzig: Fock, 1919.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann,Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism, trans. Kaplan, Simon, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Danzig, Abraham, Ḥayyei Adam, Vilna: Kschandz Lubansky, 1810.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak, A System of Christian Doctrine, trans. Cave, Alfred and Banks, J. S., Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1888–91 (vol. I, 1888).Google Scholar

Empson, William, Collected Poems, London: Chatto, 1977.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Ludwig, Das Wesen des Christentums, Leipzig: Wigand, 1841.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Ludwig,Das Wesen des Christentums: Text nach der dritten Auflage Leipzig 1849, Leipzig: Reclam, 1969.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Ludwig,Essence of Christianity, trans. Evans, M., New York: Blanchard, 1855.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory, trans. Paslick, Robert H., New York: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg,Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, 4th edn, Tübingen: Mohr, 1975.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Eduard von, Die Selbstzersetzung des Christentums und die Religion der Zukunft, Berlin: Duncker, 1874.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Elucidations of Hölderlin's Poetry, trans. Hoeller, Keith, New York: Humanity Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried, Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit, in Schriften zu Philosophie, Kunst und Altertum 1774–1787, ed. Brummack, Jürgen and Bollacher, Martin (Bibliothek deutscher Klassiker, 105), Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried,Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit, Text, in Werke, ed. Wolfgang Pross, III. i, Munich: Hanser, 2003.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried,Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Suphan, B., 33 vols., Berlin: Weidmann, 1877–1913.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried,Über den Ursprung der Sprache, in Frühe Schriften 1764–1772, ed. Gaier, Ulrich (Bibliothek deutscher Klassiker, 1), Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried,Vom Geist der ebräischen Poesie, in Schriften zum Alten Testament, ed. Smend, Rudolf (Bibliothek deutscher Klassiker, 93), Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Herrera, Abraham Cohen de, Gate of Heaven, trans. Krabbenhoft, Kenneth, Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Herrera, Abraham Cohen de,Puerto del cielo, ed. Krabbenhoft, Kenneth (ed.), Madrid: Fundación Universitaria Española, 1987.Google Scholar

Hess, Johann Jakob, ‘Grenzenbestimmung dessen, was in der Bibel Mythos und was wahre Geschichte ist’, Bibliothek der heiligen Geschichte, vol. II (1792), 153–254.Google Scholar

Heyne, Christian Gottlob, ‘Ueber den Ursprung und die Veranlassung der Homerischen Fabeln’, Neue Bibliothek der schönen Wissenschaften und der freyen Künste 23, 1 (1779), 1–53.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich, Poems and Fragments, trans. Hamburger, Michael, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Pinchas Eliyahu, Sefer ha-Brit, Brünn: Josef Karl Neumann, 1797.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, Auserlesener Briefwechsel, ed. Roth, Friedrich, Leipzig: Fleischer, 1825.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich,Main Philosophical Writings, trans. Giovanni, George di, Montreal, QC, and Kingston, , ON: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich,Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn, Breslau: Löwe, 1785.Google Scholar

Jaucourt, Louis, Chevalier de, , ‘Mythologie’, in The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project, trans. Hoyt, Nelly S. and Cassirer, Thomas, Ann Arbor: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library, 2003.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Concluding Unscientific Postscript, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Either/Or, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Fear and Trembling, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks, ed. and trans. Cappelørn, Niels Jørgen et al., 11 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007– .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Philosophical Fragments, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Practice in Christianity, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,Søren Kierkegaard's Journals and Papers, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., 7 vols., Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967–8.

Kierkegaard, S.,Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, ed. Cappelørn, Niels Jørgen et al., 55 vols., Copenhagen: Gad, 1997– .

Kierkegaard, S.,The Concept of Irony, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,The Point of View, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S.,The Sickness unto Death, ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Krochmal, Naḥman, Moreh Nevukhei ha-Zeman, in Kitvei Rabi Naḥman Krokhmal, ed. Rawidowicz, Simon, Berlin: Ajanoth, 1924.Google Scholar

Lazarus, Moritz, Die Ethik des Judentums, 2 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Kaufmann, 1901.Google Scholar

Lazarus, Moritz,The Ethics of Judaism, trans. Szold, Henrietta, 2 vols., Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 1900.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel, Totalité et Infini, La Haye: Nijhoff, 1961.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel,Totality and Infinity, trans. Lingis, Alphonso, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotze, Rudolf Hermann, Logic, trans. Bosanquet, Bernard, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888.Google Scholar

Lotze, Rudolf Hermann,Logik, 3 vols., Leipzig: Hirzel, 1874.Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon, Essay on Transcendental Philosophy, trans. Midgley, Nick, Somers-Hall, Henry, Welchman, Alistair and Reglitz, Merten, New York: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon,Gibeath Hamore in More Nebuchim, ed. Euchel, Isaac, Berlin: Officina Scholae Liberae Judaicae, 1791.Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon,Philosophisches Wörterbuch, Berlin: Unger, 1792.Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon,Salomon Maimons Lebensgeschichte, 2 vols., Berlin: Vieweg, 1792–3; partially translated as Autobiography by John Clark Murray, London: Alexander Gardner, 1888 [reprinted Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2001].Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon,Streifereien im Gebiete der Philosophie, Berlin: Vieweg, 1793.Google Scholar

Maimon, Salomon,Versuch über die Transcendentalphilosophie, Berlin: Voß und Sohn, 1790.Google Scholar

Maimonides, Moses, Guide of the Perplexed, trans. Pines, Shlomo, 2 vols., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Marheineke, Philipp Konrad, Die Grundlehren der christlichen Dogmatik als Wissenschaft, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1827.Google Scholar

Martensen, Hans Lassen, Af Mit Levnet, 3 vols., Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1882–3.

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, Die deutsche Ideologie, in Werke, 42 vols., Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1960–83, III.

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich,The German Ideology, parts 1 and 3, trans. Pascal, Roy, London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1940.Google Scholar

Molitor, Franz Josef, Philosophie der Geschichte oder über die Tradition, 4 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Hermannsche Buchhandlung, 1827; Münster: in der Theissingschen Buchhandlung, 1834, 1839, 1853.Google Scholar

Møller, Poul Martin, ‘Om Begrebet Ironie’, in Efterladte Skrifter, 2nd edn, 3 vols., Copenhagen: Reitzel, 1848, III, 152–8.Google Scholar

Møller, Poul Martin,Tanker over Mueligheden af Beviser for Menneskets Udødelighed, med Hensyn til den nyeste derhen hørende Literatur, in Efterladte Skrifter, 3 vols., Copenhagen: Reitzel, 1842, II, 158–272.Google Scholar

Moritz, Karl Philipp, Götterlehre, oder mythologische Dichtungen der Alten, ed. Günther, Horst, Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig: Insel, 1999.Google Scholar

Müller, Friedrich Max, Contributions to the Science of Mythology, London: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1897.Google Scholar

Müller, J. T. (ed.), Die symbolischen Bücher der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirche, deutsch und lateinisch, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1900.

Novalis, , Werke, ed. Schulz, Gerhard, 4th edn, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2001.Google Scholar

Przywara, Erich, Analogia entis. Ur-Struktur und All-Rhythmus, Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar

Przywara, Erich,Gottgeheimnis in der Welt, Munich: Theatiner Verlag, 1923.Google Scholar

Przywara, Erich,Hölderlin: Eine Studie, Nuremburg: Glock und Lutz, 1949.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity, trans. Dych, William V., New York: Crossroad, 1978–87.

Rahner, Karl,‘On the theology of the incarnation’, in Theological Investigations, trans. Smyth, Kevin, vol. IV, New York: Crossroad, 1982, 105–20.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl,‘The theology of the symbol’ in Theological Investigations, trans. Smyth, Kevin, vol. IV, London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966, 221–52.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl,The Trinity, trans. Donceel, Joseph, London: Burns and Oates, 1970.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl,‘Trinity, divine; trinity in theology’, in Sacramentum Mundi, ed. Rahner, Karl et al., vol. VI, New York: Herder, 1970, 295–308.Google Scholar

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard, ‘Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie’, 4 instalments, Der Teutsche Merkur, Weimar: Verlag der Gesellschaft, 1786–7 [reprinted in expanded form, 2 vols., Leipzig: Göschen, 1790–2].

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard,Letters on the Kantian Philosophy, trans. Hebbeler, James, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Doing philosophy after Kierkegaard’, in Smith, Joseph H. (ed.), Kierkegaard's Truth: The Disclosure of the Self, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981, 325–42.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul,‘Kierkegaard and evil’, in Kierkegaard's Truth: The Disclosure of the Self, ed. Smith, Joseph H., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981, 313–25.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul,‘Kierkegaard et le mal’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie 4 (1963), 292–302.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul,‘Philosopher après Kierkegaard’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie 4 (1963), 303–16.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul,‘Toward a hermeneutic of the idea of revelation’, trans. David Pellauer, Harvard Theological Review 70,1–2 (January–April 1977), 1–37.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul,The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. Czerny, Robert with McLaughlin, Kathleen and Costello SJ, John, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar

Rosenkranz, Karl, Der christliche Glaube, in Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik (1830), Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar

Rosenroth, Christian Knorr von et al., Kabbala Denudata, 2 vols., Sulzbach, 1677 and Frankfurt am Main, 1684.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Franz, ‘Einleitung’, in Cohen, Hermann, Jüdische Schriften, ed. Strauss, Bruno, Berlin: Schwetschke, 1924.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Franz,Philosophical and Theological Writings, trans. Franks, Paul and Morgan, Michael, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Franz,Der Stern der Erlösung, Frankfurt am Main: Kaufmann, 1921.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Franz,The Star of Redemption, trans. Galli, Barbara, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich, Essays, ed. Hinderer, Walter and Dahlstrom, Daniel O., New York: Continuum, 1995.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich,On the Aesthetic Education of Man, trans. Wilkinson, E. M. and Willoughby, L. A., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich,Sämtliche Werke, ed. Riedel, Wolfgang, 5 vols., Munich: Carl Hanser, 2004.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich,Über naïve und sentimentalische Dichtung, Leipzig: Reclam, 2002.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich–Schlegel–Ausgabe, ed. Behler, Ernst, Munich: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1967– .Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E., Der christliche Glaube nach den Grundsätzen der evangelischen Kirche, Berlin: Reimer, 1822.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E.,Hermeneutik und Kritik, ed. Frank, Manfred, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E.,Über die Religion. Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächtern, ed. Rothert, H.-J. (Philosophische Bibliothek, 255). Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1970.Google Scholar

Staudenmaier, F. A., Darstellung und Kritik des Hegelschen Systems. Aus dem Standpunkt der christlichen Philosophie, Mainz: Kupferberg, 1844; Frankfurt: Minerva, 1966.Google Scholar

Staudenmaier, F. A.,Pragmatismus der Geistesgaben, Tübingen: Laup, 1835.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich, Das Leben Jesu kritisch bearbeitet, 1st edn, 2 vols., Tübingen: Osiander, 1835.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich,Die christliche Glaubenslehre in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung und im Kampfe mit der modernen Wissenschaft, vol. I, Darmstadt: WBG, 2009.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich,The Life of Jesus Critically Examined, trans. Evans, M., London: Chapman Brothers, 1846.Google Scholar

Tillich, P., ‘Schelling und die Anfänge des existentialistischen Protestes (1955)’, in Paul Tillich: Gesammelte Werke IV: Philosophie und Schicksal, ed. Albrecht, Renate, Stuttgart: Evangelisches Verlagswerk, 1961, 133–44.Google Scholar

Tillich, P.,Systematische Theologie I/II, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tillich, P.,‘Systematische Theologie von 1913’, in Paul Tillich: Gesammelte Werke. Ergänzungs- und Nachlassbände, vol. IX, ed. Hummel, Doris and Lax, Gerd, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2009, 273–434.Google Scholar

Tindal, Matthew, Christianity as Old as the Creation: or, The Gospel, a Republication of the Religion of Nature, London: [s.n.], 1730.Google Scholar

Toland, John, Christianity not Mysterious Or, A Treatise shewing, that there is Nothing in the Gospel Contrary to Reason, Nor above it: And that no Christian Doctrine can be Properly call'd a Mystery, London: [s.n.], 1702 (1st edition 1696).Google Scholar

Troeltsch, Ernst, ‘Die Krise des Historismus’, Neue Rundschau 33,1 (1922).Google Scholar

Troeltsch, Ernst,Religion in History, trans. Luther Adams, James and Bense, Walter F., Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Troeltsch, Ernst,The Christian Faith, ed., le Fort, Gertrud von, trans. Paul, Garrett E., Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar

Vallée, Gérard, The Spinoza Conversations between Lessing and Jacobi: Texts with Excerpts from the Ensuing Controversy, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988.

Adams, Nicholas, ‘Eschatology sacred and profane: the effects of philosophy on theology in Pannenberg, Rahner and Moltmann’, International Journal of Systematic Theology 2 (2000), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Nicholas,‘The Bible’, in Adams, Nicholas, Pattison, George, Ward, Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theology and Modern European Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 545–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Nicholas,The Eclipse of Grace: Divine and Human Action in Hegel, Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley, 2013.

Agamben, Giorgio, The Time that Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Axt-Piscalar, C., Der Grund des Glaubens. Eine theologiegeschichtliche Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von Glaube und Trinität in der Theologie Isaak August Dorners, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1990.Google Scholar

Barth, Ulrich, Die Christologie Emanuel Hirschs: eine systematische und problemgeschichtliche Darstellung ihrer geschichtsmethodologischen, erkenntniskritischen und subjektivitätstheoretischen Grundlagen, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, Edward Allen, The Potencies of God(s): Schelling's Philosophy of Mythology, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard, Philosophical Profiles, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betz, John R., ‘Beyond the sublime: the aesthetics of the analogy of being’, Modern Theology 21,3 (2005), 367–411 and 22,1, 1–50.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew, ‘Introduction’, in Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Hermeneutics and Criticism, trans. Bowie, Andrew, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, vii–xxxi.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew,‘The philosophical significance of Schleiermacher's hermeneutics’, in Mariña, Jacqueline (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Nicholas, ‘Lessing, Biblical criticism and the origins of German classical culture’, German Life and Letters 34 (1981), 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Nicholas,Sacred and Secular Scriptures: A Catholic Approach to Literature, London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2004; Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Breuer, Isaac, Die Neue Kusari, Frankfurt am Main: Rabbiner Hirsch Gesellschaft, 1934 [partially translated in Concepts of Judaism, trans. Jacob Levinger, Jerusalem: Israel Universities Press, 1974].Google Scholar

Buckley, Michael, At the Origins of Modern Atheism, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Bungay, Steven, Beauty and Truth: A Study of Hegel's Aesthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Burbidge, John, ‘Unhappy consciousness in Hegel: an analysis of medieval Catholicism?’ in Hegel on Logic and Religion: The Reasonableness of Christianity, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992, 105–18.Google Scholar

Cahnman, Werner J., ‘Friedrich Wilhelm Schelling über die Judenemanzipation’, in Zeitschrift für Bayerische Landesgeschichte 37,2 (1974), 614–25.Google Scholar

Cahnman, Werner J.‘Schelling and the new thinking of Judaism’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 48 (1981), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copleston, F. C., A History of Philosophy, vol. VII: Modern Philosophy, Part 1: Fichte to Hegel, New York: Image Books, 1965.Google Scholar

Corduan, Winfried, ‘Elements of the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel in the transcendental method of Karl Rahner’, Ph.D. dissertation, Rice University, 1977.

Corduan, Winfried,‘Hegelian themes in contemporary theology’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 22 (1979), 351–61.Google Scholar

Crockett, C. and Davis, C. (eds.), Hegel and the Infinite, New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press, 2011.

Cunningham, Conor, Genealogy of Nihilism: Philosophies of Nothing and the Difference of Theology, London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Cupitt, Don, After God: The Future of Religion, London: Phoenix, 1998.Google Scholar

Cupitt, Don,The Meaning of the West: An Apologia for Secular Christianity, London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian, ‘Anselm and the ontological argument’, in Davies, Brian and Leftow, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Creston (ed.), Slavoj Žižek and John Milbank, in The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.

Derrida, Jacques, Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question, trans. Bennington, Geoffrey and Bowlby, Rachel, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques,‘On the newly arisen apocalyptic tone in philosophy’, in Fenves, Peter (ed.), Raising the Tone of Philosophy: Late Essays by Immanuel Kant, Transformative Critique by Jacques Derrida, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Deuser, Hermann, ‘Religious dialectics and Christology’, in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 376–96.Google Scholar

Deuser, Hermann,Søren Kierkegaard: Die paradoxe Dialektik des politischen Christen. Voraussetzungen bei Hegel. Die Reden von 1847/48 im Verhältnis von Politik und Ästhetik, Munich: Matthias–Grünewald–Verlag, 1974.

Dews, Peter, The Idea of Evil, Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

Dickey, Laurence, ‘Hegel on religion and philosophy’, in Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 301–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRef

Eagleton, Terry, Reason, Faith and Revolution, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles OP and Levering, Matthew (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRef

Evans, C. Stephen, Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays, Waco: Baylor University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fackenheim, Emil, The God Within: Kant, Schelling and Historicity, ed. Burbidge, John, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fackenheim, Emil,The Religious Dimension in Hegel's Thought, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Feldman, Burton and Richardson, Robert D. Jr, The Rise of Modern Mythology, 1680–1860, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Fischer, H., ‘Die Christologie als Mitte des Systems’, in Fischer, Hermann (ed.), Paul Tillich: Studien zu einer Theologie der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1989, 207–29.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckhart (ed.), The Course of Remembrance and other Essays on Hölderlin, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.

Frank, Manfred, Vorlesungen über die neue Mythologie, vol. I: Der kommende Gott, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1982, vol. II: Gott im Exil, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul, All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul,‘Inner anti-Semitism or Kabbalistic legacy? German Idealism's relationship to Judaism’ International Yearbook of German Idealism 7 (2010), 254–79.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul, ‘Nothing comes from nothing: Judaism, the Orient, and the Kabbalah in Hegel's reception of Spinoza’, in Rocca, Michael della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Franks, Paul,‘Sinai since Spinoza: reflections on revelation in modern Jewish thought’, in Brooke, George, Stuckenbruck, Loren and Najman, Hindy (eds.), The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 331–52.Google Scholar

Franz, Michael (ed.), ‘An der Galeere der Theologie’: Hölderlins, Hegels und Schellings Theologiestudium an der Universität Tübingen, Tübingen: Hölderlin–Gesellschaft; Eggingen: Edition Isele, 2007.

Frei, Hans W., The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Fulda, Ludwig, Aufruf an die Kulturwelt in Manifest der 93, text available online at .

Funkenstein, Amos, Theology and the Scientific Imagination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Markus, Der Mensch im Mythos. Untersuchungen über Ontotheologie, Anthropologie und Selbstbewußtseinsgeschichte in Schellings ‘Philosophie der Mythologie’, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasché, Rodolphe, The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Geiger, Wolfgang, Spekulation und Kritik: die Geschichtstheologie Ferdinand Christian Baurs, Munich: Kaiser, 1964.Google Scholar

Gerber, Uwe, Christologische Entwürfe, vol. I: Von der Reformation bis zur Dialektischen Theologie, Zürich: EVZ, 1970.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Robert, Correlations in Rosenzweig and Levinas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gockel, Heinz, Mythos und Poesie. Zum Mythosbegriff in Aufklärung und Frühromantik, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1981.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter Eli, Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Graevenitz, Gerhart von, Mythos. Zur Geschichte einer Denkgewohnheit, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1987.Google Scholar

Graf, Friedrich W., Kritik und Pseudo-Spekulation: David Friedrich Strauß als Dogmatiker im Kontext der positionellen Theologie seiner Zeit, Munich: Kaiser, 1982.Google Scholar

Guardini, Romano, Weltbild und Frömmigkeit, Paderborn: Matthias Grünewald / Schöningh, 1996 (originally published by Kösel Verlag in 1955).Google Scholar

Guetta, Alessandro, Kabbalah and Philosophy: Elijah Benamozegh and the Reconciliation of Western Thought and Jewish Esotericism, trans. Kahan, Helena, Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Der deutsche Idealismus der jüdischen Philosophen’, in Philosophisch–Politische Profile, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981, 39–64.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen,Philosophical–Political Profiles, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hachiya, Toshihisa, Paradox, Vorbild und Versöhner: S. Kierkegaards Christologie und deren Rezeption in der deutschen Theologie des 20. Jahrhunderts (Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe XXIII, vol. 836), Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2006.Google Scholar

Hannay, Alastair, Kierkegaard: A Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanssen, Beatrice, ‘“Dichtermut” and “Blödigkeit” – two poems by Friedrich Hölderlin, interpreted by Walter Benjamin’, in Benjamin, Andrew (ed.), Walter Benjamin and Romanticism, London: Athlone Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Harrelson, Kevin, The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2008.Google Scholar

Harris, H. S., Hegel's Development: Toward the Sunlight, 1770–1801, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Harris, H. S.,Hegel's Development, vol. II: Night Thoughts, Oxford: Clarendon, 1983.Google Scholar

Harris, Jay, Nachman Krochmal: Guiding the Perplexed of the Modern Age, New York: New York University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hart, Kevin, ‘The poetics of the negative’, in Prickett, Stephen (ed.), Reading the Text: Biblical Criticism and Literary Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, 281–340.Google Scholar

Hartlich, Christian and Sachs, Walter, Der Ursprung des Mythosbegriffes in der modernen Bibelwissenschaft, Tübingen: Mohr, 1952.Google Scholar

Harvey, James W., ‘Hegel, Rahner and Karl Barth: a study in the possibilities of a Trinitarian theology’, D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1989.

Henrich, Dieter, Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hick, John and McGill, Arthur, (eds.), The Many-Faced Argument: Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God, London: Macmillan, 1968.

Hirsch, Emanuel, Christliche Rechenschaft, ed. Gerdes, Hayo, vols. I and II, Tübingen: Katzmann, 1989.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Emanuel,Geschichte der neuern evangelischen Theologie im Zusammenhang mit den allgemeinen Bewegungen des europäischen Denkens, 3rd edn, vol. V, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1964.Google Scholar

Hodgson, Peter C., A Study of Ferdinand Christian Baur: The Formation of Historical Theology, New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar

Hodgson, Peter C.,God in History: Shapes of Freedom, Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hodgson, Peter C.,Hegel and Christian Theology: A Reading of the Lectures of Philosophy of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hühn, Lore, Kierkegaard und der Deutsche Idealismus: Konstellationen des Übergangs, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Hyppolite, Jean, Genesis and Structure of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Cherniak, S. and Heckman, J., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Idel, Moshe, ‘Jewish Kabbalah and Platonism in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance’, in Goodman, Lenn E. (ed.), Neo-Platonism and Jewish Thought, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992, 319–51.Google Scholar

Idel, Moshe,Kabbalah in Italy 1280–1510, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I., Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeschke, W., Reason in Religion, trans. Stewart, J. Michael and Hodgson, Peter C., Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jamme, Christoph, Einführung in die Philosophie des Mythos: Neuzeit und Gegenwart, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991.Google Scholar

Jamme, Christoph and Schneider, Helmut (eds.), Mythologie der Vernunft: Hegels ‘ältestes Systemprogramm’ des deutschen Idealismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984.

Janowski, J. C., Der Mensch als Maß: Untersuchungen zum Grundgedanken und zur Struktur von Feuerbachs Werk, Zürich, Cologne: Benziger, 1980.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith, Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis, London: T. and T. Clark International, 2010.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien, Gütersloh, Benziger, 1982.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard,God as the Mystery of the World: On the Foundation of the Theology of the Crucified One in the Dispute between Theism and Atheism, trans. Guder, Darell L., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1983.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard,Gott als Geheimnis der Welt. Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1977.Google Scholar

Kalkavage, Peter, The Logic of Desire: An Introduction to Hegel's ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’, Philadelphia: Paul Dry, 2007.Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti, The Trinity: Global Perspectives, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kilby, Karen, ‘Balthasar and Karl Rahner’, in The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004, 256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirmmse, Bruce (ed.), Encounters with Kierkegaard: A Life as Seen by his Contemporaries, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.

Kirmmse, BruceKierkegaard in Golden Age Denmark, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.

Koch, Carl Henrik, Den Danske Idealisme, Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 2004.Google Scholar

Kojève, Alexandre, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, ed. Queneau, R. and Bloom, Allan, trans. Nichols, J., New York: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kosky, Jeffrey L., ‘The birth of the modern philosophy of religion and the death of transcendence’, in Schwartz, Regina (ed.), Transcendence: Philosophy, Literature, and Theology Approach the Beyond, New York and London: Routledge, 2004, 13–30.Google Scholar

Krüger, Malte Dominik, Göttliche Freiheit: die Trinitätslehre in Schellings Spätphilosophie (Religion in Philosophy and Theology, 31), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Kühn, Manfred, Kant: Eine Biographie, Munich: Beck, 2003.Google Scholar

Kühn, U., Christologie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003.Google Scholar

Küng, Hans, The Incarnation of God: The Introduction to Hegel's Theological Thought as a Prolegomenon to a Future Christology, trans. Stephenson, J. R., New York: Crossroad, 1987.Google Scholar

Lacoste, Jean-Yves, Experience and the Absolute: Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, trans. Raftery-Skehan, Mark, New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, ‘Poetry's courage’, in Hanssen, Beatrice and Benjamin, Andrew (eds.), Walter Benjamin and Romanticism, New York: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

Lange, Dietz, Historischer Jesus oder mythischer Christus: Untersuchungen zum Gegensatz zwischen Friedrich Schleiermacher und David Friedrich Strauß, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagsanstalt, 1975.Google Scholar

Lash, Nicholas, A Matter of Hope: A Theologian's Reflections on the Thought of Karl Marx, London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1981.Google Scholar

Lewis, Thomas A., Religion, Modernity, and Politics in Hegel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Thomas A.,‘Religion and demythologization’, in Moyar, Dean and Quante, Michael (eds.), Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 192–209.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Bruce, Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Löwith, Karl, Von Hegel zu Nietzsche: Der revolutionäre Bruch im Denken des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, Zürich: Europa Verlag, 1941; English: From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought, trans. David E. Green, New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg, The Young Hegel, trans. Livingston, R., London: Merlin Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Macintyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd edn, London: Duckworth, 2007.Google Scholar

Magid, Shaul, From Metaphysics to Midrash: Myth, History, and the Interpretation of Scripture in Lurianic Kabbala, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Malabou, Catherine, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, Dialectic, trans. During, Lizabeth, New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc, ‘The withdrawal of the divine and the face of the father: Hölderlin’, in The Idol and the Distance: Five Studies, trans. Carlson, Thomas A., New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce, Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development, 1909–36, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce,‘Karl Barth's version of an “analogy of being”: a dialectical No and Yes to Roman Catholicism’, in The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? ed. Thomas Joseph White, OP, Grand Rapids, MI, and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2011, 88–144.Google Scholar

McCumber, John, The Company of Words: Hegel, Language, and Systematic Philosophy, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

McGrath, A., The Making of Modern Christology 1750–1990, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 1994.Google Scholar

Mechels, Eberhard, Analogie bei Erich Przywara und Karl Barth. Das Verhältnis von Offenbarungstheologie und Metaphysik, Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar

Milbank, John, ‘Postmodern critical Augustinianism: a short summa in forty-two responses to unasked questions’, in Milbank, John and Oliver, Simon (eds.), The Radical Orthodoxy Reader, London: Routledge, 2009, 49–50.Google Scholar

Milbank, John,Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, ed. Milbank, John, Pickstock, Catherine and Ward, Graham, London and New York: Routledge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milbank, John,The Suspended Middle: Henri de Lubac and the Debate Concerning the Supernatural, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Milbank, John,Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Milbank, John and Ward, Graham, ‘The radical orthodoxy ten years on – the return of metaphysics’, in Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham, The New Visibility of Religion: Studies in Religion and Cultural Hermeneutics, London and New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar

Mittelman, Alan, Between Kant and Kabbalah: An Introduction to Isaac Breuer's Philosophy of Judaism, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Morgan, Michael L., Discovering Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mostert, Christiaan, ‘From eschatology to Trinity: Pannenberg's doctrine of God’, Pacifica. Australasian Theological Studies 10 (1997), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nancy, Jean-Luc, ‘Myth interrupted’, in The Inoperative Community, ed. Connor, Peter, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991, 43–70.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, G., Tillichs frühe Christologie: Eine Untersuchung zu Offenbarung und Geschichte bei Tillich vor dem Hintergrund seiner Schellingrezeption (Theologische Bibliothek Töpelmann, 141), Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norgate, Jonathan, Isaak A. Dorner: The Triune God and the Gospel of Salvation, London: T. & T. Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

O’Meara, Thomas, Erich Przywara, S. J.: His Theology and his World, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. C., The Bible's Authority: A Portrait Gallery of Thinkers from Lessing to Bultmann, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1991.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. C.,‘The study of the New Testament’, in Smart, Ninian (ed.), Nineteenth-Century Religious Thought in the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

O’Regan, Cyril, Anatomy of Misremembering, vol. I: Balthasar and the Specter of Hegel, New York: Crossroad, 2013.Google Scholar

O’Regan, Cyril,‘Hegel and anti-Judaism: narrative and the inner circulation of the Kabbalah’, in The Owl of Minerva, 28,2 (Spring) (1997), 141–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Regan, Cyril,The Heterodox Hegel, New York: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar

O’Regan, Cyril,‘The Trinity in Kant, Hegel, and Schelling’, in Gilles Emery, OP and Levering, Matthew (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 254–66.Google Scholar

Ogden, Mark, The Problem of Christ in the Work of Friedrich Hölderlin, London: Modern Humanities Research Association for The Institute of Germanic Studies, University of London, 1991.Google Scholar

Oppy, Graham, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart, ‘Die Subjektivität Gottes und die Trinitätslehre. Ein Beitrag zur Beziehung zwischen Karl Barth und der Philosophie Hegels’, Kerygma und Dogma 23 (1977), 25–40.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart,‘La doctrina de la Trinidad en Hegel y su recepción en la teología alemana’, Estudios trinitarios 30 (1996), 35–51.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart,Jesus – God and Man, London: SCM, 1968.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, Wolfhart,Systematic Theology, trans. Bromiley, Geoffrey W., vol. I, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Pattison, George, Kierkegaard, Religion and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pattison, George,The Philosophy of Kierkegaard, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Petzold, M., Gottmensch und Gattung Mensch: Studien zur Christologie und Christologiekritik Ludwig Feuerbachs, Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1989.Google Scholar

Phan, Peter C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Trinity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRef

Philoneko, Alexis, La libérté humaine dans la philosophie de Fichte, Paris: Vrin, 1966.Google Scholar

Plant, Raymond, Hegel: An Introduction, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin (ed.), The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1965.

Pöggeler, Otto, ‘Hegel, der Verfasser des ältesten Systemprogramms des deutschen Idealismus’, in Jamme, and Schneider, (eds.), Mythologie der Vernunft, 126–43.

Pollock, Benjamin, Franz Rosenzweig and the Systematic Task of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Samuel M., ‘Nineteenth-century Protestant doctrines of the Trinity’, in Gilles Emery, OP and Levering, Matthew (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 267–80.Google Scholar

Powell, Samuel M.,‘The doctrine of the Trinity in nineteenth-century German Protestant theology: Philipp Marheineke, Isaak Dorner, Johann von Hofmann, and Alexander Schweizer’, Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, 1987.

Powell, Samuel M.,The Trinity in German Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Quash, Ben, ‘Drama and the ends of modernity’, in Gardner, Lucy, Moss, David, Quash, Ben and Ward, Graham (eds.), Balthasar at the End of Modernity, Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1999, 139–71.Google Scholar

Quash, Ben,Theology and the Drama of History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ravitsky, Aviezer, ‘Rabbi J. B. Soloveitchik on human knowledge: between Maimonidean and neo-Kantian philosophy’, Modern Judaism, 6,2 (May 1986), 157–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reardon, Bernard M. G., Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, London: Macmillan, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reijnen, Anne Marie, ‘Tillich's Christology’, in Manning, Russell Re (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Paul Tillich, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 56–73.Google Scholar

Rohls, Jan, Protestantische Theologie der Neuzeit, vols. I and II, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.Google Scholar

Rohls, Jan,Theologie und Metaphysik. Der ontologische Gottesbeweis und seine Kritiker, Gütersloh: Mohn, 1987.Google Scholar

Rose, Gillian, Hegel Contra Sociology, London: Athlone Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Rupprecht, Eva-Maria, Kritikvergessene Spekulation: Das Religions- und Theologieverständnis der spekulativen Theologie Ph. K. Marheinekes (Beiträge zur rationalen Theologie, 3), Frankfurt am Main and Berlin: Peter Lang, 1993.Google Scholar

Schlitt, Dale M., Divine Subjectivity: Understanding Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, Scranton, PA: Scranton University Press, 1990, 2009.Google Scholar

Schlitt, Dale M.,Hegel's Trinitarian Claim: A Critical Reflection, Leiden: Brill, 1984; Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Schulte, Christoph, Zimzum: Gott und Weltursprung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 2013.Google Scholar

Schütte, Hans-Walter, ‘Subjektivität und System: zum Briefwechsel E. Hirsch (1888–1972) und P. Tillich (1886–1965)’, in Danz, Christian (ed.), Theologie als Religionsphilosophie. Studien zu den problemgeschichtlichen und systematischen Voraussetzungen der Theologie Paul Tillichs (Tillich-Studien 9), Vienna: Lit, 2004, 3–22.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert, The Quest of the Historical Jesus: A Critical Study of its Progress from Reimarus to Wrede, trans. Montgomery, William, London: A. & C. Black, 1910.Google Scholar

Seidel, George, Activity and Ground: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, New York: George Olms Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar

Shanks, Andrew, Hegel and Religious Faith: Divided Brain, Atoning Spirit, London: T. and T. Clark International, 2011.Google Scholar

Shanks, Andrew,Hegel's Political Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smart, Ninian (ed.), Nineteenth-Century Religious Thought in the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Smith, Gary (ed.), Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

Söderquist, K. Brian, The Isolated Self: Truth and Untruth in Søren Kierkegaard's On the Concept of Irony, Copenhagen: Reitzel, 2007.

Soloveitchik, Joseph B., And From There You Shall Seek, trans. Goldblum, Naomi, Jersey City, NJ: Ktav, 2008.Google Scholar

Soloveitchik, Joseph B.,U-vikashtem mi-sham, Ha-Darom 47 (1979), 1–83.

Soulen, R. Kendall, The God of Israel and Christian Theology, Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1996.Google Scholar

Stepelevich, Lawrence S. (ed.), The Young Hegelians, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Stewart, Jon, ‘Hegel's philosophy of religion and the question of “right” and “left” Hegelianism’, in Moggach, Douglas (ed.), Politics, Religion and Art: Hegelian Debates, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jon,Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Jon,‘The paradox and the criticism of Hegelian mediation in philosophical fragments’, Kierkegaard Studies (2004), 184–207.

Stewart, Jon,(ed.), Kierkegaard and his Danish Contemporaries: Philosophy, Politics and Social Theory, vol. VII, tome 1 in Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jon,Kierkegaard and his Danish Contemporaries: Theology, vol. VII, tome 2 in Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jon,Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Literature and Aesthetics, vol. VI, tome 3 in Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jon,Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Philosophy, vol. VI, tome 1 in Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jon,Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Theology, vol. VI, tome 2 in Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar

Stolzenberg, Jürgen, ‘Hegel's critique of the Enlightenment’, in Westphal, Kenneth (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Striewe, H., ‘Reditio subjecti in seipsum. Der Einfluss Hegels, Kants und Fichtes auf die Religionsphilosophie Karl Rahners’, Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Philosophy, Freiburg-im-Brisgau University, 1979.

Taylor, Iain, Pannenberg on the Triune God, London: T. & T. Clark, 2007.Google Scholar

Taylor, Mark C., After God, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Mark C.,Altarity, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Taylor, Mark C.,Journeys to Selfhood: Hegel and Kierkegaard, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael, Der Begriff Verzweiflung: Korrekturen an Kierkegaard, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael,Kierkegaard's Concept of Despair, trans. Harshaw, Barbara and Illbruck, Helmut, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Thulstrup, Niels, Kierkegaard's Relation to Hegel, trans. Stengren, George L., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Thulstrup, Niels,Kierkegaards forhold til Hegel og til den spekulative Idealisme indtil 1846, Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1967.Google Scholar

Toews, John Edward, Hegelianism: The Path Towards Dialectical Humanism, 1805–1840, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Wagner, Falk, ‘Der Gedanke der Persönlichkeit Gottes bei Ph. Marheineke: Repristination eines vorkritischen Theismus’, Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religions philosophie 10 (1969), 44–88.Google Scholar

Ward, Graham, True Religion, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Daniel H., Paradox and the Prophets: Hermann Cohen and the Indirect Communication of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendte, Martin, Gottmenschliche Einheit bei Hegel: eine logische und theologische Untersuchung (Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 77), Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendte, Martin,‘Lamentation between contradiction and obedience: Hegel and Barth as diametrically opposed brothers in the spirit of modernity’, in Harasta, Eva and Brock, Brian (eds.), Evoking Lament: A Theological Discussion, London: T. & T. Clark, 2009, 77–98.Google Scholar

Wenz, Gunther, ‘Die reformatorische Perspektive: der Einfluss Martin Kählers auf Tillich’, in Fischer, Hermann (ed.), Paul Tillich: Studien zu einer Theologie der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1989, 62–92.Google Scholar

Wenz, Gunther,Geschichte der Versöhnungslehre in der evangelischen Theologie der Neuzeit, vol. I, Munich: Kaiser, 1984.Google Scholar

Westphal, Merold, ‘Kierkegaard and Hegel’, in Hannay, Alastair and Marino, Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 101–23.Google Scholar

Williams, Rowan, ‘Balthasar, Rahner and the apprehension of being’, in Williams, Rowan and Higton, Mike (eds.), Wrestling with Angels: Conversations in Modern Theology, London: SCM Press; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar

Williamson, George S., The Longing for Myth in Germany: Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Zager, W., ‘Einführung’, in Strauss, D. F., Die christliche Glaubenslehre in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung und im Kampfe mit der modernen Wissenschaft, vol. I, Darmstadt: WBG, 2009, 5–37.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj, ‘The Fear of Four Words: A Modest Plea for the Hegelian Reading of Christianity’, in Davis, Creston (ed.), The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj,The Fragile Absolute, London and New York: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar