Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:20:55.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The immune self declared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Alfred I. Tauber
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

FRANK MACFARLANE BURNET, PROTOIMMUNOLOGIST

The concern with arriving at a science of immunology that addresses both the pathogen challenge and the surveillance of normal /abnormal body economy expanded immunology into the science of self /not-self discrimination. In this narrative I have so far scrupulously avoided using the term self as noun, but now we are prepared to evaluate critically how it entered the language of immunology and consider what its conceptual utility has been. The concept of the self was formally inaugurated into immunology by Sir Frank Macfarlane Burnet (Figure 2). In the second edition of,The Production of Antibodies (1949), Burnet and Frank Fenner introduced the “self-marker ” hypothesis, which eventually evolved into the theory that tolerance is a result of the elimination of lymphocytes reactive to autologous constituents:

It is an obvious physiological necessity and a fact fully established by experiment that the body's own cells should not provoke antibody formation. Minor exceptions to this rule concern only tissues which are “unexpendable” parts of the central nervous system and the eye. An animal's own red cells are non-antigenic. This is not due to any intrinsic absence of antigenic components; the same cells injected into a different species or even into another unrelated animal of the same species may give rise to active antibody production. The failure of antibody production against autologous cells demands the postulation of an active ability of the reticulo-endothelial cells to recognize “self” pattern from “not-self” pattern in organic material taken into their substance. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The Immune Self
Theory or Metaphor?
, pp. 81 - 123
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×