Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- An introduction to the imitative mind and brain
- Part I Developmental and evolutionary approaches to imitation
- Part II Cognitive approaches to imitation, body scheme, and perception-action coding
- Part III Neuroscience underpinnings of imitation and apraxia
- 14 From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations
- 15 Cell populations in the banks of the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque and imitation
- 16 Is there such a thing as functional equivalence between imagined, observed, and executed action?
- 17 The role of imitation in body ownership and mental growth
- 18 Imitation, apraxia, and hemisphere dominance
- Index
18 - Imitation, apraxia, and hemisphere dominance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- An introduction to the imitative mind and brain
- Part I Developmental and evolutionary approaches to imitation
- Part II Cognitive approaches to imitation, body scheme, and perception-action coding
- Part III Neuroscience underpinnings of imitation and apraxia
- 14 From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations
- 15 Cell populations in the banks of the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque and imitation
- 16 Is there such a thing as functional equivalence between imagined, observed, and executed action?
- 17 The role of imitation in body ownership and mental growth
- 18 Imitation, apraxia, and hemisphere dominance
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Neuropsychological research on imitation has a history of nearly a hundred years. Liepmann (1908) investigated performance of meaningful gestures on command, like giving a military salute or showing how to turn a key, in patients with damage to the right or left hemisphere and normal controls. He found that only patients with left-brain damage (LBD) committed errors even when they performed the gestures with the nonparetic left hand. As most LBD patients were aphasic they might have had difficulties understanding the verbal instructions. However, they also committed errors when imitating the same gestures. Liepmann ascribed defective gesturing in LBD patients to “apraxia.” He emphasized that, in contrast to other motor sequels of unilateral brain damage, apraxia affects not only the contralesional but also the ipsilesional limbs, and concluded that it interferes with motor actions at a level beyond “elementary” motor control. He conceived of two possibilities for a higher level of disturbances of motor control: apraxia might stem from an inability to conjure up a mental representation of the required action, or from an inability to convert the mental representation into appropriate motor commands. Errors on imitation testified to Liepmann that “there is not only an inexactness of the spatial-temporal image of the movement, but a difficulty or inability to direct the leftsided members according to certain spatial conceptions” (Liepmann, 1908).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Imitative MindDevelopment, Evolution and Brain Bases, pp. 331 - 346Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
- 2
- Cited by