Bullying behaviour, empathy and imitation: an attempted synthesis

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489808.021

15 - Bullying behaviour, empathy and imitation: an attempted synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009

Kerstin Dautenhahn ,

Sarah N. Woods and

Christina Kaouri

Edited by

Chrystopher L. Nehaniv and

Kerstin Dautenhahn

Show author details

Kerstin Dautenhahn: Affiliation:
Adaptive Systems Research Group, University of Hertfordshire, UK
Sarah N. Woods: Affiliation:
Adaptive Systems Research, University of Hertfordshire, UK
Christina Kaouri: Affiliation:
Adaptive Systems Research Group, University of Hertfordshire, UK
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv: Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Kerstin Dautenhahn: Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Overview

This chapter proposes a possible connection between bullying behaviour, empathy and imitation. The primary aim of our work is to provide a clearer understanding of bullying behaviour, by focusing on cognitive and emotional states that might cause bullies to show anti-social behaviour. We begin by providing a review of relevant research about bullying behaviour including definitions of bullying behaviour, the behavioural characteristics of bullies and victims, precursors of bullying behaviour and several ideas about how bullies become bullies. This is followed by a discussion of empathy and imitation where two contrasting case studies of autism and psychopathy are given to illustrate differences in imitation and empathic skills and deficits. Finally, we try to bring together these different lines of research and present the hypothesis that bullies possess well-developed automatic as well as cognitive empathy, and that bullying behaviour is caused by an overemphasis of goal-directed processes of controlled empathy that work towards non-empathy. The importance of gaining a deeper understanding of empathic and imitation skills/deficits for different bullying roles is highlighted and discussed in relation to implications for anti-bullying intervention initiatives, where empathy and imitative interactive behaviour can be integrated.

What is bullying?

The pervasive nature and deleterious consequences of bullying and victimization behaviour has generated a great deal of research interest over the past decade. Bullying behaviour is distinguishable from aggressive behaviour per se as it has to be a repeated action that occurs regularly over time (Olweus, 1999), and it usually involves an imbalance in strength, either real or perceived (Whitney and Smith, 1993).

Type: Chapter
Information: Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions
, pp. 323 - 340

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489808.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arsenio, W. F., Cooperman, S. and Lover, A. (2000). Affective predictors of preschoolers' aggression and peer acceptance: direct and indirect effects. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 438–48.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?Cognition, 21, 37–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: a review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3/4), 177–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blair, R. J. R., Sellars, C., Strickland, I., Clark, F., et al. (1996). Theory of mind in the psychopath. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7(1), 15–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blair, R. J. R. (1997). Moral reasoning and the child with psychopathic tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), 731–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bond, L., Carlin, J. B., Thomas, L., Kerryn, R. and Patton, G. (2001). Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. BMJ, 323, 480–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bowers, L., Smith, P. K. and Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully/victims in middle childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 215–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruner, J. and Feldman, C. (1993). Theories of mind and the problem of autism. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. and Cohen, D. J. (eds.), Understanding other Minds: Perspectives from Autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charman, T. S. and Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). Another look at imitation in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 1–4.Google Scholar

Cleckley, H. (1984). Mask of Insanity. Mosby: St Louis: C.V.Google Scholar

Crick, N. R. and Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy, A Social Psychological Approach. USA: Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.Google Scholar

Dishion, T. J. (1990). The family ecology of boys' peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 864–73.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eslea, M. and Smith, P. K. (1998). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research, 40(2), 1–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, I. M., Heriot, S. A. and Friedman, A. G. (2002). A behavioural pattern of irritability, hostility and inhibited empathy in children. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 211–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice, Vol. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago, 381–458.Google Scholar

Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hare, R. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Hare, R. (1993). Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Hobson, P. (1993). Understanding persons: the role of affect. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. and Cohen, D. J. (eds.). In Understanding Other Minds, Perspectives from Autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 204–27.Google Scholar

Hodges, S. D. and Wegner, D. M. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. In Ickes, W. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy. Guildford: The Guildford Press, 311–39.Google Scholar

Johns, J. H. and Quay, H. C. (1962). The effect of social reward on verbal conditioning in psychopathic and neurotic military offenders. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 217–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnstone, L. and Cooke, D. (2004). Psychopathic-like traits in childhood: conceptual and measurement concerns. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 103–25.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jordan, R. (1999) Autistic Spectrum Disorders – An Introductory Handbook for Practitioners. London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar

Kaukiainen, A., Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Osterman, K., Salmivalli, C., Rothberg, S. and Ahlbom, A. (1999). The relationship between social intelligence, empathy and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 25, 81–9.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRef Google Scholar

Maines, B. and Robinson, G. (1991). Don't beat the bullies. Educational Psychology in Practice, 7(3), 168–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martens, W. H. J. (2000). Antisocial and psychopathic personality disorders: causes, course and remission – a review article. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 406–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. (1996). The human infant as imitative generalist: a 20 year progress report on infant imitation with implications for comparitive psychology. In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, Galef, B. G. and Heyes, C. M. (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 347–70.CrossRef

Nadel, J. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In Meltzoff, A. N. and Prinz, W. (eds.), The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution and Brain Bases. Cambridge studies in cognitive perceptual development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 42–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nadel, J. and Pezé, A. (1993). What makes immediate imitation communicative in toddlers and autistic children? In Nadel, J. and Camaioni, L. (eds.), New Perspectives in Early Communicative Development. London, New York: Routledge, 139–56.Google Scholar

Nadel, J., Guérini, C. and Pezé, A. (1999). The evolving nature of imitation as a format of communication. In Nadel, J. and Butterworth, G. (eds.), Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 209–34.Google Scholar

Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. and Slee, P. (eds.), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective. London: Routledge, 10.Google Scholar

Patrick, C. J., Cuthbert, B. N. and Lang, P. J. (1994). Emotion in the criminal psychopath: fear image processing. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 523–34.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pellegrini, A. D. and Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pitchford, I. (2001) The origins of violence: is psychopathy an adaptation?The Human Nature Review, 1, 28–36.Google Scholar

Pikas, A. (1989). A pure concept of mobbing gives the best results for treatment. School Psychology International, 10, 95–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quinsey, V. L. and Lalumière, M. L. (1995) Psychopathy is a nonarbitrary class. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 18, 571.CrossRef Google Scholar

Randall, P. (1997). Adult Bullying: Perpetrators and Victims. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rogers, S. J. (1999). An examination of the imitation deficit in autism. In Nadel, J. and Butterworth, G. (eds.), Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 254–83.Google Scholar

Roland, E. (2000). Bullying in school: three national innovations in Norwegian schools in 15 years. Aggressive Behaviour, 26, 135–43.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubin, K. H., LeMare, L. J. and Lollis, S. (1990). Social withdrawal in childhood: developmental pathways to peer rejection. In Asher, S. R. and Coie, J. D. (eds.), Peer Rejection in Childhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, G., James, A. and Smith, D. M. (1998). Bullying in schools: self reported anxiety, depression and self esteem in secondary school children. British Medical Journal, 317, 924–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saltaris, C. (2002). Psychopathy in juvenile offenders: Can temperament and attachment be considered as robust developmental precursors? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 729–52.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stephenson, P. and Smith, D. (1989). Bullying in the junior school. In Tattum, D. P. L. (ed.), Bullying in Schools, 1st edn. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books, 45–57.Google Scholar

Stevens, V., Bourdeaudhuij, I. and Oost, P. (2002). Relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6), 419–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sutton, J. and Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: an adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behaviour, 25, 97–111.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRef Google Scholar

Sutton, J., Smith, P. K. and Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C., Kokkinaki, T. and Fiamenghi Jr., G. A. (1999). What infants' imitation communicate: with mothers, with fathers and with peers. In Nadel, J. and Butterworth, G. (eds.), Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 127–85.Google Scholar

Whitney, I. and Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., Suddendorf, T. and Perrett, D. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 287–95.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L. and Karstadt, L. (2000). The association between direct and relational bullying and behaviour problems among primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(8), 989–1002.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wolke, D. and Stanford, K. (1999). Bullying in school children. In Messer, D. and Millar, S. (eds.), Developmental Psychology. London: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar

Woods, S., Hall, L., Sobral, D., Dautenhahn, K. and Wolke, D. (2003a). Animated characters in bullying intervention. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2792, 310–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, S., Hall, L., Sobral, D., Dautenhahn, K. and Wolke, D. (2003b). A study into the believability of animated characters in the context of bullying intervention, presented at Intelligent Virtual Agents 2003, Kloster, Germany.Google Scholar

Woods, S. and Wolke, D. (2005). Emotion recognition abilities, and empathy in bullies and victims. Paper presented at the Ⅻth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, University of Laguna, Faculty of Psychology, Tenerife, 24–28 August.