Historically, one of the major strengths of ichnology is its utility in facies analysis and paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Undoubtedly, marine ichnology has been the main focus of most trace-fossil research in this respect. However, our knowledge of marine ichnofaunas is still uneven. The vast majority of ichnological studies applied to facies analysis and paleoenvironmental reconstruction deals with ichnofaunas from siliciclastic successions, rather than carbonates, mixed carbonates-clastics, or volcaniclastics. In siliciclastic settings, both shallow- and deep-marine ichnofaunas have received similar attention. However, ichnological studies in shallow-marine environments have attained better integration with sedimentological data than those in deep-marine settings. In turn, the ichnology of wave-dominated shallow-marine environments has been explored in more detail than their tide-dominated counterparts. In connection with this, the ichnological content of sandy shores is much better known than that of muddy coasts. In fact, some specific types of muddy shorelines, such as chenier plains (e.g. Augustinus, 1989), remain essentially unrecognized in the geological record. Also, end members, with respect to wave and tidal dominance, are better understood than mixed systems (e.g. Anthony and Orford, 2002). In this chapter, we will review the ichnology of different shallow-marine clastic environments, covering wave-dominated, tide-dominated, mixed systems, and muddy shorelines.