Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T03:34:04.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Modelling hydrological processes in arid and semi-arid areas: an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

By
H. S. Wheater
Edited by
Howard Wheater ,
Soroosh Sorooshian  and
K. D. Sharma
H. S. Wheater
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
Howard Wheater
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Soroosh Sorooshian
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
K. D. Sharma
Affiliation:
National Institute of Hydrology, India
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the arid and semi-arid regions of the world, water resources are limited, and under severe and increasing pressure due to expanding populations, increasing per capita water use and irrigation. Point and diffuse pollution, increasing volumes of industrial and domestic waste, and over-abstraction of groundwater provide a major threat to those scarce resources. Floods are infrequent, but extremely damaging, and the threat from floods to lives and infrastructure is increasing, due to urban development. Ecosystems are fragile, and under threat from groundwater abstractions and the management of surface flows. Added to these pressures is the uncertain threat of climate change. Clearly, effective water management is essential, and this requires appropriate decision support systems, including modelling tools.

Modelling methods have been widely used for over 40 years for a variety of purposes, but almost all modelling tools have been primarily developed for humid area applications. Arid and semi-arid areas have particular challenges that have received little attention. One of the primary aims of this workshop is to bring together world-wide experience and some of the world's leading experts to provide state-of-the-art guidance for modellers of arid and semi-arid systems.

The development of models has gone hand-in-hand with developments in computing power. While event-based models originated in the 1930s and could be used with hand calculation, the first hydrological models for continuous simulation of rainfall-runoff processes emerged in the 1960s, when computing power was sufficient to represent all of the land-phase processes in a simplified, “conceptual” way.

Type
Chapter
Information
Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas , pp. 1 - 20
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J. (1986a). An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systéme Hydrologique Européen, SHE. 1. History and philosophy of a physically based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J. (1986b). An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systéme Hydrologique Européen, SHE. 2. Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, G. B. and Hughes, M. W. (1978). The use of environmental chloride and tritium to estimate total recharge to an unconfined aquifer. Aust. J. Soil Res., 16, 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Weshah, R. A. and El-Khoury, F. (1999). Flood analysis and mitigation for Petra area in Jordan. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, May/June, 170–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, N. J., Wheater, H. S., Timmis, A. J. H., and Gaongalelwe, D. (1998). Sustainable development of alluvial groundwater in sand rivers of Botswana. In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, vol. II, ed. Howard Wheater and Celia Kirby. Chichester: Wiley, 367–76.Google Scholar
Beven, K. J. (1989). Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically based models. J. Hydrol., 105, 157–72.CrossRef
Beven, K. J. (1993). Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv. Water Resourc., 16, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. J. (2000). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling – the Primer. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A. M. (1992). The future of distributed models: model calibration and predictive uncertainty. Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binley, A. M. and Beven, K. J. (1989). A physically based model of heterogeneous hillslopes. 2: Effective hydraulic conductivities. Water Resour. Res., 25 (6)1227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, J., Edmunds, W. M., Fellman, E.et al. (1997). Estimation of rainfall inputs and direct recharge to the deep unsaturated zone of southern Niger using the chloride profile method. J. Hydrol., 188–189, 139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordery, I., Pilgrim, D. H., and Doran, D. G. (1983). Some hydrological characteristics of arid western New South Wales. The Institution of Engineers, Australia, Hydrology and Water Resources Symp. Nov, 287–92.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Isham, V. (1988). A simple spatial–temporal model of rainfall, Proc. Roy. Soc., A415, 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, N. H. and Linsley, R. K. (1966). Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model IV. Tech. Rpt. 39, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
Crerar, S., Fry, R. G., Slater, P. M., Langenhove, G., and Wheeler, D., (1988). An unexpected factor affecting recharge from ephemeral river flows in SWA/Namibia. In Estimation of Natural Groundwater Recharge, ed. Simmers, I. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 11–28.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. (1986). Statistical theory of groundwater flow and transport: pore to laboratory; laboratory to formation and formation to regional scale. Water Resour. Res., 22, 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, J. W. (1977). A parameterization of ground-surface moisture content for use in atmospheric prediction models. J. Applied. Meteorol., 16, 1182–5.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desconnets, J. C., Taupin, J. D., Lebel, T., and Leduc, C. (1997). Hydrology of the HAPEX-Sahel Central Super-Site: surface water drainage and aquifer recharge through the pool systems. J. Hydrol., 188–189, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., (2003). Calibration of watershed models. In Water Science and Application, Vol. 6, ed. Qingyun, , Duan, , Gupta, , , H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Washington DC:, American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, J., Parkin, G., and O'Connell, P. E. (2000). SHETRAN: distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. J. Hydrol. Eng., July, 250–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, A. L., Flint, L. E., Kwicklis, E. M., Fabryka-Martin, J. T., and Bodvarsson, G. S. (2002). Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA: comparison of methods. Hydro. J., 10, 180–204.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1981). Arid zone hydrology for agricultural development. Irrig. Drain. Pap. 37. Rome: FAO.
Freer, J., Beven, K., and Abroise, B. (1996). Bayesian uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resour. Res., 32, 2163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R. A. (1972). Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff. 2: Upstream source areas. Water Resour. Res., 8 (5)1272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R. A. and Harlan, R. L. (1969). Blueprint for a physically based, digitally simulated hydrologic response model. J. Hydrol., 9, 237–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, D. C., Lane, L. J., Shillito, R. M.et al. (1997). Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semi-arid watershed. Water Resour. Res., 33 (12), 2951–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
>Goodrich, D. C., Williams, D. G., Unkrich, C. L.et al. (2004). Comparison of methods to estimate ephemeral channel recharge, Walnut Gulch, San Pedro River Basin, Arizona. In Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States, ed. Hogan, J. F., Phillips, F. M., and Scanlon, B. R.. Water Science and Application 9. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 77–99.Google Scholar
Goutorbe, J. P., Dolman, A. J., Gash, J. H. C., Kerr, Y. H., Lebel, T., Prince, S. D., and Stricker, J. N. M. (eds.) (1997). HAPEX -Sahel. The Netherlands: Elsevier (reprinted from J. Hydrol. 188–89/1–4).Google Scholar
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1998). Towards improved calibration of hydrological models: multiple and non-commensurable measures of information. Water Resour. Res. 34 (4), 751–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, D. H. R. (1973). Evaporation of water from sand. 3: The loss of water into the atmosphere from a sandy river bed under arid climatic condtions. J. Hydrol., 18, 305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. A. (1995). Monthly rainfall-runoff models applied to arid and semi-arid catchments for water resource estimation purposes. Hydr. Sci. J., 40 (6), 751–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. A. and Sami, K., (1992). Transmission losses to alluvium and associated moisture dynamics in a semiarid ephemeral channel system in Southern Africa. Hydrol. Proc., 6, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Hydrology (1999). Flood Estimation Handbook, 5 vols. Wallingford UK: Institute of Hydrology.
Jordan, P. R. (1977). Streamflow transmission losses in Western Kansas. J. Hydr. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 108, HY8, 905–19.Google Scholar
Kleissen, F. M., Beck, M. B., and Wheater, H. S. (1990). Identifiability of conceptual hydrochemical models. Water Resour. Res., 26(2), 2979–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, L. J., Diskin, M. H., and Renard, K. G. (1971). Input–output relationships for an ephemeral stream channel system. J. Hydrol., 13, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, T., Taupin, J. D., and D'Amato, N. (1997). Rainfall monitoring during HAPEX-Sahel. 1: General rainfall conditions and climatology. J. Hydrol. 188–9, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, T. and Barbe, L. (1997). Rainfall monitoring during HAPEX-Sahel. 2: Point and areal estimation at the event and seasonal scales. J. Hydrol., 188–189, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, M. J. and Wagener, T. (1999). A Monte Carlo Analysis Toolbox (MCAT) for Matlab. User manual. Imperial College, London.Google Scholar
Liu, B., Phillips, F., Hoines, S., Campbell, A. R., and Sharma, P. (1995). Water movement in desert soil traced by hydrogen and oxygen isotopes, chloride, and chlorine-36, southern Arizona. J. Hydrol. 168, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, L. C. (1987). Regional evaporation and soil moisture analysis for irrigation application in arid areas. University of London, MSc thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering, Imperial College.Google Scholar
Mocke, R. (1998). Modelling the sand-rivers of Botswana: distributed modelling of runoff and groundwater recharge processes to assess the sustainability of rural water supplies. University of London, MSc thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Imperial College.Google Scholar
Michaud, J. D. and Sorooshian, S. (1994). Effect of rainfall-sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods. Water Resour. Res., 30 (10). 2765–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J. and Benyamini, Y. (1977). Rainfall infiltration into bare soils. Water Resour. Res., 13 (5), 813–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J., Rosenfeld, D., and Amitai, E. (1995). Radar rain field evaluation and possible use of its high temporal and spatial resolution for hydrological purposes. J. Hydrol., 172, 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A. (1979). Hydrological characteristics of arid zones. Proc. Symposium on the Hydrology of Areas of Low Precipitation, Canberra, IAHS Publ. No. 128, 105–23.Google Scholar
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (1975). Flood Studies Report, 5 vols. Wallingford, UK: NERC.
Nemec, J. and Rodier, J. A. (1979). Streamflow characteristics in areas of low precipitation. Proc. Symposium on the Hydrology of Areas of Low Precipitation. Canberra: IAHS Publ. No. 128, 125–40.Google Scholar
Northrop, P. J. (1998). A clustered spatial–temporal model of rainfall. Proc. Roy. Soc., A454, 1875–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrop, P. J., Chandler, R. E., Isham, V. S., Onof, C., and Wheater, H. S. (1999). Spatial–temporal stochastic rainfall modelling for hydrological design. In Hydrological Extremes: Understanding, Predicting, Mitigating, ed. Gottschalk, L., Olivry, J.-C., Reed, D., and Rosbjerg, D.IAHS Publn. No. 255. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Press, 225–35.Google Scholar
Onof, C. and Wheater, H. S. (1993). Modelling of British rainfall using a random parameter Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse model, J. Hydrol., 149, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onof, C. and Wheater, H. S. (1994). Improvements of the modelling of British rainfall using a modified random parameter Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse model, J. Hydrol, 157 177–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, H. B. and Reynolds, W. N. (1963). Convective storm patterns in the southwestern United States. Bull. IASH, 8 (3), 71–83.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. B., Renard, K. G., and Simanton, J. R., (1979). Dense networks to measure convective rainfalls in the southwestern United States. Water Resour. Res., 15 (6), 1701–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, H. B., Lane, L. J., and Hondley, J. F. (1972). Optimum gaging of thunderstorm rainfall in southestern Arizona. Water Resour. Res., 8 (1), 259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parissopoulos, G. A. and Wheater, H. S. (1990). Numerical study of the effects of layers on unsaturated-saturated two-dimensional flow. Water Resour. Mgmt.4, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parissopoulos, G. A. and Wheater, H. S. (1991). Effects of evaporation on groundwater recharge from ephemeral flows. In Advances in Water Resources Technology, ed. Tsakiris, G.. The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema. 235–45.Google Scholar
Parrisopoulos, G. A. and Wheater, H. S. (1992a). Experimental and numerical infiltration studies in a wadi stream-bed. J. Hydr. Sci., 37, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parissopoulos, G. A. and Wheater, H. S. (1992b). Effects of hysteresis on groundwater recharge from ephemeral flows, Water Resour. Res., 28 (11), 3055–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, D. H., Chapman, T. G., and Doran, D. G. (1988). Problems of rainfall-runoff modelling in arid and semi-arid regions. Hydrol. Sci. J., 33 (4), 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, D. H., Huff, D. D., and Steele, T. D. (1978). A field evaluation of subsurface and surface runoff. J. Hydrol., 38, 319–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1987). Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes. Proc. Roy. Soc., A410, 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1988). A point process model for rainfall: further developments. Proc. Roy. Soc., A417, 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, C. R. (1999). Stochastic rainfall modelling of convective storms in Walnut Gulch, Arizona. University of London Ph. D. Thesis.Google Scholar
Saudi, Arabian Dames and Moore, (1988). Representative Basins Study. Final Report to Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, 84 vols.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. D. (1997). Integrated and sustainable development of water resources of the Luni basin in the Indian arid zone. In Sustainability of Water Resources under Increasing Uncertainty, IAHS Publn. No.240. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Press, 385–93.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. D. (1998). Resource assessment and holistic management of the Luni River Basin in the Indian desert. In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, Vol II, eds. Wheater, H. and Kirby, C.. Chichester: Wiley, 387–95.Google Scholar
Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K. (eds.) (2002a). Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications, LLC.Google Scholar
Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K. (eds.) (2002b). Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications, LLC.Google Scholar
Sorey, M. L. and Matlock, W. G. (1969). Evaporation from an ephemeral streambed. J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 95, 423–38.Google Scholar
Sorman, A. U. and Abdulrazzak, M. J. (1993). Infiltration – recharge through wadi beds in arid regions. Hydr. Sci. J., 38 (3), 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear, R. C. and Hornberger, G. M. (1980). Eutrophication in Peel inlet, II: Identification of critical uncertainties via generalised sensitivity analysis. Water Resour. Res., 14, 43–9.Google Scholar
Telvari, A., Cordery, I. and Pilgrim, D. H. (1998). Relations between transmission losses and bed alluvium in an Australian arid zone stream. In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, ed. Wheater, H. and Kirby, C.. Chichester: Wiley, Vol II, 361–66.Google Scholar
Morgan, Travers (1993). Detailed hydrotechnical recharge studies in Wadi Ghulaji. Final Report to Ministry of Water Resources, Oman.Google Scholar
UNDP (1992). Surface Water Resources. Final report to the Government of the Republic of Yemen High Water Council UNDP/DESD PROJECT YEM/ 88/001 Vol III, June.
Wagener, T., Lees, M. J., and Wheater, H. S. (1999). A Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Toolbox (RRMT) for Matlab. User manual. Imperial College, London.Google Scholar
Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (2000). A framework for the development and application of hydrological models. Proc. BHS 7th National Symp., Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 3.75–3.81.Google Scholar
Wagener, T., Lees, M. J., and Wheater, H. S. (2002). A toolkit for the development and application of parsimonious hydrological models. In Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology, Vol. 2, ed. Singh, , Frevert, , and Meyer, . Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications LLC.Google Scholar
Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V. (2003a). Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrol. Proc., 17, 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagener, T.Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V. (2003b). Identification and evaluation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. In Advances in Calibration of Watershed Models, ed. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., Rousseau, A., and Turcotte, R.AGU Monograph SeriesUSA: American Geophysical Union, 29–47.Google Scholar
Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V. (2004). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in Gauged and Ungauged Catchments. London: Imperial College: Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, M. O. (1990). Transmission losses in arid region. J. Hydr. Eng., 116 (1), 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, H. S. and Bell, N. C. (1983). Northern Oman flood study. Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Part II, 75, 453–73.
Wheater, H. S. and Brown, R. P. C. (1989). Limitations of design hydrographs in arid areas: an illustration from southwest Saudi Arabia. Proc. 2nd Natl. BHS Symp.3.49–3.56.Google Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Bishop, K. H., and Beck, M. B. (1986). The identification of conceptual hydrological models for surface water acidification. J. Hydrol. Proc. 1, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Larentis, P., and Hamilton, G. S. (1989). Design rainfall characteristics for southwest Saudi Arabia. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Part 2, 87, 517–38.Google Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Butler, A. P., Stewart, E. J., and Hamilton, G. S. (1991a). A multivariate spatial–temporal model of rainfall in S.W. Saudi Arabia. I: Data characteristics and model formulation. J. Hydrol., 125, 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Onof, C., Butler, A. P., and Hamilton, G. S. (1991b). A multivariate spatial–temporal model of rainfall in southwest Saudi Arabia. II: Regional analysis and long-term performance. J. Hydrol., 125, 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J., and Beven, K. J. (1993). Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling. In Modelling Change in Environmental Systems, ed. Jakeman, A. J.Beck, M. B. and McAleer, M. J. Chichester: Wiley, 101–32.Google Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Jolley, T. J., and Peach, D. (1995). A water resources simulation model for groundwater recharge studies: an application to Wadi Ghulaji, Sultanate of Oman. In Proc. Intnl. Conf. on Water Resources Management in Arid Countries. Sultanate of Oman, Muscat: Ministry of Agriculture and Water, 502–10.Google Scholar
Wheater, H. S., Ballard, Woods B., and Jolley, T. J. (1997). An integrated model of arid zone water resources: evaluation of rainfall-runoff simulation performance. In Sustainability of Water Resources Under Increasing Uncertainty, ed., Rosbjerg, D.Bootayeb, N.–E.Gustard, A.Kundzewicz, Z. W. and Rasmusen, P. F.IAHS Pubn. No. 240, pp. 395–405.Google Scholar
Woolhiser, D. A. (1971). Deterministic approach to watershed modelling. Nordic Hydrol. 11, 146–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×