Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar

St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar

Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar

Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar

Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar

Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khalid. Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Matthew. “‘Offenbarung, Philosophie, und Theologie’: Karl Barth and Georges Florovsky in Dialogue,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2016, pp. 59–93.Google Scholar

Breidert, Martin. Die kenotische Christologie des 19. Jahrhunderts. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1977.Google Scholar

Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. “What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian ‘Definition’,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E. God Visible: Patristic Christology Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “Nature and ‘Mode of Union’: Late Patristic Models for the Personal Unity of Christ,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 164–96.Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “‘One Thing and Another’: The Persons in God and the Person of Christ in Patristic Theology.” Pro Ecclesia 15 (2005): 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “The Giant’s Twin Substances: Ambrose and the Christology of Augustine’s Contra sermonem Arianorum,” in Lienhard, Joseph T., SJ, Muller, Earl C., SJ, and Teske, Roland J., SJ, eds., Augustine: Presbyter Factus Sum. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1993, pp. 477–95.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Origen, trans. by Mitchell, Walter. London: Sheed & Ward, 1955 [reprint by Wipf & Stock].Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

DeHart, Paul J. Beyond the Necessary God: Trinitarian Faith and Philosophy in the Thought of Eberhard Jüngel. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar

de Lubac, Henri, SJ. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen, trans. by Nash, Anne Englund. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Stephen. Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gallaher, Brandon. “‘A Supertemporal Continuum’: Christocentric Trinity and the Dialectical Reenvisioning of Divine Freedom in Bulgakov and Barth,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 95–133.Google Scholar

Gallaher, Brandon. Freedom and Necessity in Modern Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gavrilyuk, Paul. “The Kenotic Christology of Sergius Bulgakov.” Scottish Journal of Theology 58 (2005): 251–69.Google Scholar

Gavrilyuk, Paul. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gockel, Matthias. “Mediating Theology in Germany,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 301–18.Google Scholar

Grillmeier, Aloys, SJ. Christ in Christian Tradition, Vol. 1. London and Oxford: Mobrays, 1975.Google Scholar

Heron, Alasdair. Table and Tradition. Edinburgh: The Handsel Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Emanuel. Geschichte der neuern evangelischen Theologie, Vol. 5. Gütersloh: Gütershoher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1960.Google Scholar

Holte, Ragnar. Die Vermittlungstheologie: Ihre theologischen Grundbegriffe kritisch untersucht. Upsala: Almquist & Wiksells, 1965.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth’s Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character,” in Hunsinger, George, Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar

Jones, Paul Dafyyd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. London: T. & T. Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Kilby, Karen. Balthasar: A (Very) Critical Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar

Kirkland, Scott A. “Some Reflections on Election and Apophasis: Barth and Lossky,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 163–88.Google Scholar

Law, David R. “Kenotic Christology,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar

Louth, Andrew. “Analogy in Karl Barth and Orthodox Theology,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar

Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Martin, Jennifer Newsome. Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Critical Appropriation of Russian Religious Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “God Is His Decision: The Jüngel-Gollwitzer ‘Debate’ Revisted,” in McCormack, Bruce L. and Bender, Kimlyn J., eds., Theology as Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth’s Historicized Christology: Just How ‘Chalcedonian’ Is It?” in McCormack, Bruce L., Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008, pp. 201–33.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John. Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Mark A. “Christology,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar

Nichols, Aidan, OP. A Key to Balthasar: Hans Urs von Balthasar on Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Light in Darkness: Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Catholic Doctrine of Christ’s Descent into Hell. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Christ’s Descent into Hell: John Paul II, Joseph Ratzinger, and Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Theology of Holy Saturday. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy: An Exchange.” First Things (2006, December): 25–32.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “More on Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy.” First Things (2007, January): 16–19.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Responses to ‘Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy’.” First Things (2007, March): 5–14.Google Scholar

Quash, Ben. “The Theo-Drama,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stead, Christopher. Philosophy in Christian Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Trigg, Joseph Wilson. Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Trostyanskiy, Sergey. St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar

Valliere, Paul. Modern Russian Theology, Bukharev, Soloviev, Bulgakov: Orthodox Theology in a New Key. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

van Loon, Hans. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of the Writings of Origen, trans. by Daly, Robert J., SJ. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Wigley, Stephen. Balthasar’s Trilogy. London: T. & T. Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar

St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar

Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar

Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar

Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar

Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

István, Páztori-Kupán. Theodoret of Cyrus. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Leontius of Byzantium. Complete Works, ed. and trans. by Daley, Brian E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

McLeod, Frederick G., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Origen. Contra Celsum, trans. by Chadwick, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Origen. On First Principles, ed. and trans. by Behr, John, two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Athanasius, Saint. On the Incarnation, trans. by Behr, John. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Against Those Who are Unwilling to Confess That the Holy Virgin Is Theotokos. Rollinsford, NH: Orthodox Research Institute, 2004.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Three Christological Treatises. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2014.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius [Orations 27–31]. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Google Scholar

St. Gregory of Nyssa. Anti-Apollinarian Writings. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 2015.Google Scholar

St. Gregory Thaumaturgus. Life and Works, trans. by Slusser, Michael. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

St. John of Damascus. Writings, trans. by Chase, Frederic H. Jr. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Tanner, Norman P., SJ, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bruce, Alex. B. The Humiliation of Christ, 5th ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1900.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich. “The Fourth Decade, the Sixth Sermon,” in Bullinger, Heinrich, Decades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1851.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols, ed. by McNeill, John T.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Martin. The Two Natures in Christ. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1971.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Christi von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die neuesten, dargestellt. Stuttgart: Verlag von S. G. Liesching, 1939.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August Entwicklungsgeschichte von der Person Chirsti von der ältesten bis auf die neueste dargestellt, Zweiter Teil.Berlin: Gustav Schlawitz, 1853.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Rezension von G. Thomasius, Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie,” Allgemeines Repertorium fü die theologische Literatur und kirchliche Statisik 5 (1846): 33–50.Google Scholar

Dorner, Isaak August “Ueber die richtige Fassung des dogmatischen Begriffs der Unveränderlichkeit Gottes,” in Dorner, Isaak August ed., Gesammelte Schriften aus dem Gebiet der systermatischen Theologie, Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1883, pp. 188–377.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Peter Taylor The Person and Place of Jesus Christ. London: Independent Press Ltd, 1946.Google Scholar

Geß, Wolfgang Friedrich. Die Lehre von der Person Christi entwickelt aus dem Selbstbewußtsein Christi und aus dem Zeugnisse der Apostel. Basel: Bahnmeiers Buchhandlung (C. Detloff), 1856.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827 (One Volume Edition), ed. by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Hugh Ross. The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927.Google Scholar

Martensen, Hans Lassen Die christliche Dogmatik. Berlin: Verlag von Gustav Schlawitz, 1870.Google Scholar

Stephan, Horst and Schmidt, Martin. Geschichte der evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland seit dem Idealismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1973.Google Scholar

Strauss, David Friedrich. Die christliche Glaubenslehre, Zweiter Band. Tübingen and Stuttgart: C. F. Osiander and F. H. Köhler, 1841.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Beiträge zur kirchlichen Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1845.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Dartellung der evangelische-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkt der Christologie. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Bläsing, 1853.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Philipperbriefes. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1927. English translation: The Epistle to the Philippians. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Erster Band: Prolegomena, 1924. Zürich: TVZ, 1985. English translation: The Göttingen Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. “Unterricht in der christlichen Religion,” Dritter Band: Die Lehre von der Versöhung / Die Lehre von der Erlösung, 1925/1926. Zürich: TVZ, 2003.Google Scholar

Bulgakov, Sergius. The Lamb of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Explorations in Theology, Vol. I: The Word Made Flesh. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. III: Dramatis Personae: Persons in Christ. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. IV: The Action. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. New York: Nelson, 1963.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. God After God. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Christ in the Trinity: Communicatio Idiomatum,” in Holmes, Stephen R. and Rae, Murray, eds., The Person of Christ. London: T. & T. Clark, 2005, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Communicatio Idiomatum Revisited,” unpublished paper, 2005.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Ipsa pater non est impassibilis,” in Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, OP, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 117–26.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “Once More on the Logos asarkos,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W. “You Wonder Where the Spirit Went,” in Jenson, Robert W., Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics, ed. by John Wright, Stephen. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014, pp. 110–18.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gottes Sein ist im Werden: Verantwortliche Rede vom Sein Gottes bei Karl Barth, Eine Paraphrase, 2nd improved ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. Gott als Geheimis der Welt: Zur Begründung der Theologie des Gekreuzigten im Streit zwischen Theismus und Atheismus, 3rd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1978.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Das Verhältnis von ‘ökonomischer’ und ‘immanenter’ Trinität: Erwägungen über eine biblische Begründung der Trinitätslehre – im Anschluß an und in Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Rahner’s Lehre vom dreifaltigen Gott als transzendentem Urgrung der Heilsgeschichte,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Entsprechungen: Gott – Wahrheit – Mensch, Theologische Erörterungen. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1980, pp. 265–75. [Originally published in 1975.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “ … keine Menschenlosigkeit Gottes: Zur Theologie Karl Barths zwischen Theismus und Atheismus,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Barth-Studien. Zürich-Köln/Güterloh: Benziger Verlag and Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1982, pp. 332–47. [Originally published in Evangelische Theologie in 1971.]Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Toward the Heart of the Matter.” The Christian Century 108 (1991): 228–33.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. “Thesen zur Grundlegung der Christologie,” in Jüngel, Eberhard, Unterwegs zur Sache: Theological Erörterungen, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000, pp. 274–95. [Orginally presented in a lecture course on Christology in Tübingen, WS 1969/1970.]Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khalid. Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Matthew. “‘Offenbarung, Philosophie, und Theologie’: Karl Barth and Georges Florovsky in Dialogue,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2016, pp. 59–93.Google Scholar

Breidert, Martin. Die kenotische Christologie des 19. Jahrhunderts. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1977.Google Scholar

Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. “What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian ‘Definition’,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E. God Visible: Patristic Christology Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “Nature and ‘Mode of Union’: Late Patristic Models for the Personal Unity of Christ,” in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 164–96.Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “‘One Thing and Another’: The Persons in God and the Person of Christ in Patristic Theology.” Pro Ecclesia 15 (2005): 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daley, Brian E. “The Giant’s Twin Substances: Ambrose and the Christology of Augustine’s Contra sermonem Arianorum,” in Lienhard, Joseph T., SJ, Muller, Earl C., SJ, and Teske, Roland J., SJ, eds., Augustine: Presbyter Factus Sum. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1993, pp. 477–95.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Origen, trans. by Mitchell, Walter. London: Sheed & Ward, 1955 [reprint by Wipf & Stock].Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

DeHart, Paul J. Beyond the Necessary God: Trinitarian Faith and Philosophy in the Thought of Eberhard Jüngel. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar

de Lubac, Henri, SJ. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen, trans. by Nash, Anne Englund. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Stephen. Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gallaher, Brandon. “‘A Supertemporal Continuum’: Christocentric Trinity and the Dialectical Reenvisioning of Divine Freedom in Bulgakov and Barth,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 95–133.Google Scholar

Gallaher, Brandon. Freedom and Necessity in Modern Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gavrilyuk, Paul. “The Kenotic Christology of Sergius Bulgakov.” Scottish Journal of Theology 58 (2005): 251–69.Google Scholar

Gavrilyuk, Paul. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gockel, Matthias. “Mediating Theology in Germany,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 301–18.Google Scholar

Grillmeier, Aloys, SJ. Christ in Christian Tradition, Vol. 1. London and Oxford: Mobrays, 1975.Google Scholar

Heron, Alasdair. Table and Tradition. Edinburgh: The Handsel Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Emanuel. Geschichte der neuern evangelischen Theologie, Vol. 5. Gütersloh: Gütershoher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1960.Google Scholar

Holte, Ragnar. Die Vermittlungstheologie: Ihre theologischen Grundbegriffe kritisch untersucht. Upsala: Almquist & Wiksells, 1965.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth’s Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character,” in Hunsinger, George, Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar

Jones, Paul Dafyyd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. London: T. & T. Clark, 2008.Google Scholar

Kilby, Karen. Balthasar: A (Very) Critical Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar

Kirkland, Scott A. “Some Reflections on Election and Apophasis: Barth and Lossky,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 163–88.Google Scholar

Law, David R. “Kenotic Christology,” in Fergusson, David, ed., The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth Century Theology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar

Louth, Andrew. “Analogy in Karl Barth and Orthodox Theology,” in Moyse, Ashley John, Kirkland, Scott A., and McDowell, John C., eds., Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar

Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Martin, Jennifer Newsome. Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Critical Appropriation of Russian Religious Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “God Is His Decision: The Jüngel-Gollwitzer ‘Debate’ Revisted,” in McCormack, Bruce L. and Bender, Kimlyn J., eds., Theology as Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth’s Historicized Christology: Just How ‘Chalcedonian’ Is It?” in McCormack, Bruce L., Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008, pp. 201–33.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John. Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Mark A. “Christology,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar

Nichols, Aidan, OP. A Key to Balthasar: Hans Urs von Balthasar on Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Light in Darkness: Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Catholic Doctrine of Christ’s Descent into Hell. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra. Christ’s Descent into Hell: John Paul II, Joseph Ratzinger, and Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Theology of Holy Saturday. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy: An Exchange.” First Things (2006, December): 25–32.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “More on Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy.” First Things (2007, January): 16–19.Google Scholar

Pitstick, Alyssa Lyra and Oakes, Edward T., SJ. “Responses to ‘Balthasar, Hell, and Heresy’.” First Things (2007, March): 5–14.Google Scholar

Quash, Ben. “The Theo-Drama,” in Oakes, Edward T., SJ, and Moss, David, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stead, Christopher. Philosophy in Christian Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Trigg, Joseph Wilson. Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Trostyanskiy, Sergey. St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar

Valliere, Paul. Modern Russian Theology, Bukharev, Soloviev, Bulgakov: Orthodox Theology in a New Key. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

van Loon, Hans. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of the Writings of Origen, trans. by Daly, Robert J., SJ. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Wigley, Stephen. Balthasar’s Trilogy. London: T. & T. Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew W. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in New Testament & Early Christian Interpretation of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” in Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard, Driver, Daniel B., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan, eds. The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. The Epistle to the Philippians. London: A. & C. Black, 1997.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. “‘The Form of God’ (Phil.2:6): Variations on a Theme of Jewish Mysticism.” Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 48 (1997): 1–23.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. “The New Testament and Kenosis Christology,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. Pauline Christology. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. God of the Living: A Biblical Theology, trans. by Biddle, Mark E.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. Menschwerdung. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke, 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1981/1985.Google Scholar

Fowl, Stephen. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, Gerald F. Philippians. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions About Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J. Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P. Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rehfeld, Emmanuel L. Relationale Ontologie bei Paulus. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Tilling, Chris. Paul’s Divine Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar

Vincent, Marvin. Philippians and Philemon. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1985.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannes Evangelium (Kapitel 1–8), ed. by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: TVZ, 1976.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in the New Testament & Early Christian Interpretations of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Is ‘High Human Christology’ Sufficient? A Critical Response to J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 503–25.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” In Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar

Bovon, Francois. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 3 vols. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002, 2012, 2013.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar

Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 2. London: T. & T. Clark, 1991.Google Scholar

Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 3. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 1997.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon J. The Pre-Existent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar

Henrichs-Tarasenkova, Nina. Luke’s Christology of Divine Identity. London: T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Kirk, J. R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Markschies, Christoph. Gottes Körper: Jüdische, christliche and pagane Gottesvorstellungen in der Antike. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2016.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “The Identity of the Son: Karl Barth’s Exegesis of Hebrews 1:1–4,” in Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J., eds., Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar

Turner, Max. Power From On High: The Spirit in Israel’s Restoration and Witness in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew W. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in New Testament & Early Christian Interpretation of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” in Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard, Driver, Daniel B., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan, eds. The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. The Epistle to the Philippians. London: A. & C. Black, 1997.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. “‘The Form of God’ (Phil.2:6): Variations on a Theme of Jewish Mysticism.” Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 48 (1997): 1–23.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. “The New Testament and Kenosis Christology,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. Pauline Christology. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. God of the Living: A Biblical Theology, trans. by Biddle, Mark E.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Feldmeier, Reinhard and Spieckermann, Hermann. Menschwerdung. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke, 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1981/1985.Google Scholar

Fowl, Stephen. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, Gerald F. Philippians. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions About Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J. Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P. Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P. Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rehfeld, Emmanuel L. Relationale Ontologie bei Paulus. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Tilling, Chris. Paul’s Divine Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar

Vincent, Marvin. Philippians and Philemon. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1985.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannes Evangelium (Kapitel 1–8), ed. by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: TVZ, 1976.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in the New Testament & Early Christian Interpretations of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Is ‘High Human Christology’ Sufficient? A Critical Response to J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 503–25.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Revelatory Word or Beloved Son? Barth on the Johannine Prologue,” In Migliore, Daniel L., ed., Reading the Gospels with Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2017, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar

Bovon, Francois. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 3 vols. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002, 2012, 2013.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar

Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 2. London: T. & T. Clark, 1991.Google Scholar

Davies, William David and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, Vol. 3. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 1997.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon J. The Pre-Existent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar

Henrichs-Tarasenkova, Nina. Luke’s Christology of Divine Identity. London: T. & T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Kirk, J. R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Markschies, Christoph. Gottes Körper: Jüdische, christliche and pagane Gottesvorstellungen in der Antike. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2016.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “The Identity of the Son: Karl Barth’s Exegesis of Hebrews 1:1–4,” in Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J., eds., Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews. London: T. & T. Clark, 2012, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar

Turner, Max. Power From On High: The Spirit in Israel’s Restoration and Witness in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn. Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Barron, Robert. The Priority of Christ: Towards a Postliberal Catholicism. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

Brown, David. Divine Humanity: Kenosis and the Construction of a Christian Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. “Does Kenosis Rest on a Mistake? Three Kenotic Models in Patristic Exegesis,” in Evans, C. Stephen, ed., Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 246–64.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. “Kenosis and Subversion: On the Repression of ‘Vulnerability’ in Christian Feminist Writing,” in Coakley, Sarah, Powers and Submissions: Spirituality, Philosophy and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver. Divinity and Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver and Sanders, Fred, eds. Christology Ancient and Modern: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2013.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Dalferth, Ingolf U. Crucified and Resurrected: Restructuring the Grammar of Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, and O’Collins, Gerald, eds. The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Del Colle, Ralph. Christ and the Spirit: Spirit-Christology in Trinitarian Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Stephen, ed. Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Holy Spirit. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Geyer, Hans-Georg. Andenken: Theologische Aufsätze. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Haight, Roger, SJ. Jesus: Symbol of God. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Kasper, Walter. Jesus the Christ. New York: Paulist Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Lampe, Geoffrey William Hugo. God as Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Legge, Dominic, OP. The Trinitarian Christology of St Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Marmadoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, eds. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Meyendorff, John. Christ in Eastern Christian Thought. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen. Der gekreuzigte Gott: Der Kreuz Christi als Grund und Kritik christlicher Theologie. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Pârvan, Alexandra and McCormack, Bruce L. “Immutability, (Im)passibility and Suffering: Steps Towards a ‘Psychological’ Ontology of God.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie 59 (2017): 1–25.Google Scholar

Tanner, Kathryn. Christ the Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tanner, Kathryn. Jesus, Humanity and the Trinity. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Turretin, Francis. Institutes of Elenctic Theology, Vol. 2. Phillipsburg, NJ: P. & R. Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar

van Driel, Edwin Chr. Incarnation Anyway: Arguments for Supralapsarian Christology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Welker, Michael. God the Revealed: Christology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar

White, Thomas Joseph, OP. The Incarnate Lord: A Thomistic Study in Christology. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Williams, Rowan. Christ the Heart of Creation. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar