Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T11:02:35.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2024

Christoph Bartneck ,
Tony Belpaeme ,
Friederike Eyssel ,
Takayuki Kanda ,
Merel Keijsers  and
Selma Šabanović
Christoph Bartneck
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Tony Belpaeme
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Friederike Eyssel
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Takayuki Kanda
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Merel Keijsers
Affiliation:
John Cabot University, Rome
Selma Šabanović
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Human-Robot Interaction
An Introduction
 , pp. 263 - 309
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, Andrea E., Hauke, Nicole, Peters, Kim, Louvet, Eva, Szymkow, Aleksandra, and Duan, Yanping. Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1810, 2016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abené, Clayton. San Francisco approves police proposal to use potentially deadly robots. The Guardian, 2022. URL www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/29/san-francisco-police-robots-deadly-force.Google Scholar
Abras, Chadia, Maloney-Krichmar, Diane, and Preece, Jenny. User-centered design. In Bainbridge, William Sims, editor, Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, volume 2, pages 763–767. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2004. ISBN 9780974309125. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/635690108.Google Scholar
Admoni, Henny and Scassellati, Brian. Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: A review. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 6(1):25–63, 2017. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.6.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Admoni, . Akdim, Khaoula, Belanche, Daniel, and Flavián, Marta. Attitudes toward service robots: Analyses of explicit and implicit attitudes based on anthropomorphism and construal level theory. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(8):2816–2837, 2021. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1406.Google Scholar
Al Momin, Md Abdullah and Islam, Md Nazmul. Teleoperated surgical robot security: Challenges and solutions. In Hei, Xiali, editor, Security, Data Analytics, and Energy-Aware Solutions in the IoT, pages 143–160. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2022. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7-998-7323-5.ch009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaerts, Kaat, Nackaerts, Evelien, Meyns, Pieter, Swinnen, Stephan P., and Wenderoth, Nicole. Action and emotion recognition from point light displays: An investigation of gender differences. PloS One, 6(6):e20989, 2011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldiss, Brian Wilson. Supertoys Last All Summer Long: And Other Stories of Future Time. St. Martin's Griffin, New York, 2001. ISBN 978-0312280611. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/956323493.Google Scholar
Alemi, Minoo, Meghdari, Ali, and Ghazisaedy, Maryam. Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 11(3):1450022, 2014. doi: 10.1142/S0219843614500224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alenljung, Beatrice, Lindblom, Jessica, Andreasson, Rebecca, and Ziemke, Tom. User experience in social human-robot interaction. In Rapid Automation: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pages 1468–1490. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2019. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8060-7.ch069.Google Scholar
Alexander, Christopher. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977. ISBN 978-0195019193. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/961298119.Google Scholar
Allan, Dwain Donald, Vonasch, Andrew, and Bartneck, Christoph. “I Have to Praise You Like I Should?” The effects of implicit self-theories and robot-delivered praise on evaluations of a social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14:1013–1024, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00848-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, Philipp, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, Kanda, Takayuki, Miyashita, Takahiro, and Christensen, Henrik I. Navigation for human-robot interaction tasks. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1894–1900. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2004. ISBN 0-7803-8232-3. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1308100.Google Scholar
Aly, Amir and Tapus, Adriana. A model for synthesizing a combined verbal and nonverbal behavior based on personality traits in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 325–332. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3055-8. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483606.Google Scholar
American Osteopathic Association. Survey finds nearly three-quarters (72%) of Americans feel lonely, 2016. URL www.osteopathic.org/inside-aoa/news-and-publications/media-center/2016-news-releases/Pages/10-11-survey-finds-nearly-three-quarters-of-americans-feel-lonely.aspx.Google Scholar
Andersen, Peter A. and Guerrero, Laura K. Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In Andersen, Peter A. and Guerrero, Laura K., editors, Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts, pages 49–96. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. ISBN 0-12-057770-4. doi: 10.1016/B978-012057770-5/50005-9.Google Scholar
Andrist, Sean, Tan, Xiang Zhi, Gleicher, Michael, and Mutlu, Bilge. Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 25–32. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4503-2658-2. doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559666.Google Scholar
Argall, Brenna D., Chernova, Sonia, Veloso, Manuela, and Browning, Brett. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57(5):469–483, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, Anshu Saxena, Fleming, Mayumi, Arora, Amit, Taras, Vas, and Xu, Jiajun. Finding “H” in HRI: Examining human personality traits, robotic anthropomorphism, and robot likeability in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT), 17(1):19–38, 2021. doi: 10.4018/IJIIT.2021010102.Google Scholar
Asaro, Peter. “Hands up, don't shoot!” HRI and the automation of police use of force. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(3):55–69, 2016. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.5.3.Asaro.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, Harold, editor, Groups, Leadership and Men: Research in Human Relations, pages 177–190. Carnegie Press, Oxford, UK, 1951. doi: psycinfo/1952-00803-001.Google Scholar
Asimov, Isaac. The Bicentennial Man and Other Stories. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, Book Club edition, 1976. ISBN 978-0385121989. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/85069299.Google Scholar
Asimov, Isaac. Prelude to Foundation. Grafton, London, 1988. ISBN 9780008117481. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/987248670.Google Scholar
Asimov, Isaac. I, Robot. Bantam Books, New York, 1991. ISBN 0553294385. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/586089717.Google Scholar
Aviezer, Hillel, Trope, Yaacov, and Todorov, Alexander. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111):1225–1229, 2012. doi: 10.1126/science.1224313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, Edmond, Dsouza, Sohan, Kim, Richard, Schulz, Jonathan, Henrich, Joseph, Shariff, Azim, Bonnefon, Jean-François, and Rahwan, Iyad. The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563:59–63, 2018. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axelsson, Minja, Oliveira, Raquel, Racca, Mattia, and Kyrki, Ville. Social robot co-design canvases: A participatory design framework. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(1):1–39, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3472225.Google Scholar
Badenes-Ribera, Laura, Frías-Navarro, Dolores, Monterde-i Bort, Héctor, and Pascual-Soler, Marcos. Interpretation of the p value: A national survey study in academic psychologists from Spain. Psicothema, 27(3):290–295, 2015. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.283.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, Wilma A., Hart, Justin W., Kim, Elizabeth S., and Scassellati, Brian. The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1):41–52, 2011. ISSN 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, Jay B. and Hansen, Mark H. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1):175–190, 1994. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrat, James. Why Stephen Hawking and Bill Gates are terrified of artificial intelligence. Huffington Post, 2015. URL http://huffingtonpost.com/james-barrat/hawking-gates-artific ial-intelligence_b_7008706.html.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Madeleine E., Edmunds, C. E. R., Belpaeme, Tony, and Thill, Serge. Have I got the power? Analysing and reporting statistical power in HRI. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(2):1–16, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3495246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph. eMuu: An embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2002. URL http://bartneck.de/publications/2002/eMuu/bartneckPHDThesis2002.pdf.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph. The science beyond the horizon [podcast transcript], 2021. URL www.human-robot-interaction.org/2021/09/15/flaky-conferences-and-journals-in-human-robot-interaction/.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph and Hu, Jun. Rapid prototyping for interactive robots. In The 8th Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS-8), pages 136–145. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2004. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5160775.v1.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph and Lyons, Michael J. Facial expression analysis, modeling and synthesis: Overcoming the limitations of artificial intelligence with the art of the soluble. In Vallverdu, Jordi and Casacuberta, David, editors, Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics: New Applications in Affective Computing and Artificial Intelligence, pages 33–53. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009. URL http://bartneck.de/publications/2009/facialExpressionAnalysisModelingSynthesisAI/bartneckLyonsEmotionBook2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph and Moltchanova, Elena. Expressing uncertainty in human-robot interaction. PLOS One, 15(7):1–20, 07 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartneck, Christoph and Rauterberg, M. HCI reality—An unreal tournament. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8):737–743, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph and Reichenbach, Juliane. Subtle emotional expressions of synthetic characters. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2):179–192, 2005. ISSN 1071-5819. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph, Nomura, Tatsuya, Kanda, Takayuki, Suzuki, Tomhohiro, and Kennsuke, Kato. Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. In AISB Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction, pages 1–4. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), Hatfield, UK, 2005. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22507.34085. URL http://bartneck.de/publications/2005/cultureNars/bartneckAISB2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph, Croft, Elizabeth, Kulic, Dana, and Zoghbi, Susana. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):71–81, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph, Duenser, Andreas, Moltchanova, Elena, and Zawieska, Karolina. Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PloS One, 10(4):e0121595, 2015a. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartneck, Christoph, Soucy, Marius, Fleuret, Kevin, and Sandoval, Eduardo B. The robot engine—making the Unity 3D game engine work for HRI. In 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 431–437. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2015b. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333561.Google Scholar
Bartneck, Christoph, Yogeeswaran, Kumar, Ser, Qi Min, Woodward, Graeme, Sparrow, Robert, Wang, Siheng, and Eyssel, Friederike. Robots and racism. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 196–204. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4503-4953-6. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171260.Google Scholar
Baumann, Timo and Schlangen, David. The INPROTK 2012 release. In NAACL-HLT Workshop on Future Directions and Needs in the Spoken Dialog Community: Tools and Data, pages 29–32. Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 2012. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2390444.2390464.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. and Leary, Mark R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3):497–529, 1995. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, Paul, Kennedy, James, Senft, Emmanuel, Lemaignan, Severin, and Belpaeme, Tony. From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations. In 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 391–398. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. ISBN 978-1-4673-8370-7. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451777.Google Scholar
Baytas, Mehmet Aydin, Çay, Damla, Zhang, Yuchong, Obaid, Mohammad, Yantaç, Asim Evren, and Fjeld, Morten. The design of social drones: A review of studies on autonomous flyers in inhabited environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300480.Google Scholar
Beck, Aryel, Hiolle, Antoine, Mazel, Alexandre, and Cañamero, Lola. Interpretation of emotional body language displayed by robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Affective Interaction in Natural Environments, pages 37–42. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4503-0170-1. doi: 10.1145/1877826.1877837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beedie, Christopher, Terry, Peter, and Lane, Andrew. Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition & Emotion, 19(6):847–878, 2005. doi: 10.1080/02699930541000057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belpaeme, Tony, Baxter, Paul E., Read, Robin, Wood, Rachel, Cuayáhuitl, Heriberto, Kiefer, Bernd, Racioppa, Stefania, Kruijff-Korbayová, Ivana, Athanasopoulos, Georgios, Enescu, Valentin, et al. Multimodal child-robot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(2):33–53, 2012. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Belpaeme.Google Scholar
Belpaeme, Tony, Kennedy, James, Baxter, Paul, Vogt, Paul, Krahmer, Emiel E. J., Kopp, Stefan, Bergmann, Kirsten, Leseman, Paul, Küntay, Aylin C., Göksun, Tilbe, et al. L2TOR-second language tutoring using social robots. In Proceedings of the ICSR 2015 WONDER Workshop. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2015. URL https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2900267/2900268.Google Scholar
Belpaeme, Tony, Kennedy, James, Ramachandran, Aditi, Scassellati, Brian, and Tanaka, Fumihide. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21):eaat5954, 2018. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, Sandra L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2):155–162, 1974. doi: 10.1037/h0036215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendel, Oliver. Love dolls and sex robots in unproven and unexplored fields of application. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12(1):1–12, 2021. doi: 10.1515/pjbr-2021-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghuis, Koen. Robot “preacher” can beam light from its hands and give automated blessings to worshippers. The Mirror, 2017. URL www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/robot-priest-can-beam-light-10523678.Google Scholar
Bernotat, Jasmin, Schiffhauer, Birte, Eyssel, Friederike, Holthaus, Patrick, Leichsenring, Christian, Richter, Viktor, Pohling, Marian, Carlmeyer, Birte, Köster, Norman, zu Borgsen, Sebastian Meyer, et al. Welcome to the future: How naïve users intuitively address an intelligent robotics apartment. In International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 982–992. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-47436-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernotat, Jasmin, Eyssel, Friederike, and Sachse, Janik. Shape it—The influence of robot body shape on gender perception in robots. In International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 75–84. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-70021-2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berzuk, James M. and Young, James E. More than words: A framework for describing human-robot dialog designs. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 393–401. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889423.Google Scholar
Bethel, Cindy L. and Murphy, Robin R. Survey of non-facial/non-verbal affective expressions for appearance-constrained robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38(1):83–92, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethel, Cindy L. and Murphy, Robin R. Review of human studies methods in HRI and recommendations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4):347–359, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0064-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethel, Cindy L., Salomon, Kristen, Murphy, Robin R., and Burke, Jennifer L. Survey of psychophysiology measurements applied to human-robot interaction. In The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 732–737. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007. ISBN 978-1-4244-1634-9. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415182.Google Scholar
Bhat, Ashwin Sadananda, Boersma, Christiaan, Meijer, Max Jan, Dokter, Maaike, Bohlmeijer, Ernst, and Li, Jamy. Plant robot for at-home behavioral activation therapy reminders to young adults with depression. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10 (3):1–21, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3442680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biros, David P., Daly, Mark, and Gunsch, Gregg. The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(2):173–189, 2004. doi: 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björling, Elin A., Xu, Wendy M., Cabrera, Maria E., and Cakmak, Maya. The effect of interaction and design participation on teenagers’ attitudes towards social robots. In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), pages 1–7. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2019. doi: 10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956427.Google Scholar
Björling, Elin A., Thomas, Kyle, Rose, Emma J., and Cakmak, Maya. Exploring teens as robot operators, users and witnesses in the wild. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7:5, 2020. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, James R. Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4):698–718, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Benjamin S. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6):4–16, 1984. doi: 10.3102/0013189X013006004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomberg, . Apple scales back self-driving car, delays debut until 2026. Automotive News Europe, 2022. URL https://europe.autonews.com/automakers/apple-scales-back-self-driving-car-delays-debut-until-2026.Google Scholar
Bogue, Robert. Exoskeletons and robotic prosthetics: A review of recent developments. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 36(5):421–427, 2009. doi: 10.1108/01439910910980141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, Dieter. Elon Musk: Negative media coverage of autonomous vehicles could be “killing people.” The Verge, 2016. URL www.theverge.com/2016/10/19/13341306/elon-musk-neg ative-media-autonomous-vehicles-killing-people.Google Scholar
Bonanno, George A., Goorin, Laura, and Coifman, Karin G. Social functions of emotion. In Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeanette M., and Feldman Barrett, Lisa, editors, Handbook of Emotions, volume 3, pages 456–468. Guilford Press, New York, 2008. ISBN 978-1-59385-650-2. URL http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.75 83&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Borenstein, Jason and Arkin, Ronald. Robots, ethics, and intimacy: The need for scientific research. In Berkich, Don and d’Alfonso, Matteo Vincenzo, editors, On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence, pages 299–309. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01800-9_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, Jason, Howard, Ayanna, and Wagner, Alan R. Pediatric robotics and ethics: The robot is ready to see you now, but should it be trusted? In Lin, Patrick, Abney, Keith, and Jenkins, Ryan, editors, Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, pages 127–141. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190652951.003.0009.Google Scholar
Bose, Debajyoti, Mohan, Karthi, Meera, C. S., Yadav, Monika, and Saini, Devender K. Review of autonomous campus and tour guiding robots with navigation techniques. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 21(5):1580–1590, 2022. doi: 10.1080/14484846.2021.2023266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahnam, Sheryl and De Angeli, Antonella. Gender affordances of conversational agents. Interacting with Computers, 24(3):139–153, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braitenberg, Valentino. Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986. ISBN 978-0262521123. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/254155258.Google Scholar
Brandstetter, Jürgen, Rácz, Péter, Beckner, Clay, Sandoval, Eduardo B., Hay, Jennifer, and Bartneck, Christoph. A peer pressure experiment: Recreation of the Asch conformity experiment with robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1335–1340. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4799-6934-0. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2014.6942730.Google Scholar
Brandstetter, Jurgen, Sandoval, Eduardo B., Beckner, Clay, and Bartneck, Christoph. Persistent lexical entrainment in HRI. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 63–72. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020257.Google Scholar
Breazeal, Cynthia. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003. ISBN 978-0262524315. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/758042496.Google Scholar
Breazeal, Cynthia. Function meets style: Insights from emotion theory applied to HRI. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2): 187–194, 2004a. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeal, Cynthia. Social interactions in HRI: The robot view. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2):181–186, 2004b. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeal, Cynthia and Scassellati, Brian. A context-dependent attention system for a social robot. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Volume 2, pages 1146–1151. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, 1999. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1624312.1624382.Google Scholar
Breazeal, Cynthia, Kidd, Cory D., Thomaz, Andrea Lockerd, Hoffman, Guy, and Berlin, Matt. Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot team-work. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 708–713. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-8912-3. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2005.1545011.Google Scholar
Bremner, Paul, Pipe, Anthony, Melhuish, Chris, Fraser, Mike, and Subramanian, Sriram. Conversational gestures in human-robot interaction. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pages 1645–1649. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4244-2793-2. doi: 10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346903.Google Scholar
Broadbent, Elizabeth, Stafford, Rebecca, and MacDonald, Bruce. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4):319–330, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broekens, Joost, Heerink, Marcel, and Rosendal, Henk. Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontechnology, 8(2):94–103, 2009. doi: 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bröhl, Christina, Nelles, Jochen, Brandl, Christopher, Mertens, Alexander, and Schlick, Christopher M. TAM reloaded: A technology acceptance model for human-robot cooperation in production systems. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 97–103. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40548-3_16.Google Scholar
Brooks, Rodney. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 2(1):14–23, 1986. doi: 10.1109/JRA.1986.1087032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Rodney A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):139–159, 1991. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Rodney Allen. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. Vintage, New York, 2003. ISBN 9780375725272. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/249859485.Google Scholar
Brown, Barry. The social life of autonomous cars. Computer, 50(2):92–96, 2017. doi: 10.1109/MC.2017.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brscić, Drazen, Kanda, Takayuki, Ikeda, Tetsushi, and Miyashita, Takahiro. Person tracking in large public spaces using 3-D range sensors. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 43(6):522–534, 2013. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2013.2283945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brscić, Drazen, Kidokoro, Hiroyuki, Suehiro, Yoshitaka, and Kanda, Takayuki. Escaping from children's abuse of social robots. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 59–66. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696468.Google Scholar
Bruno, Barbara, Chong, Nak Young, Kamide, Hiroko, Kanoria, Sanjeev, Lee, Jaeryoung, Lim, Yuto, Pandey, Amit Kumar, Papadopoulos, Chris, Papadopoulos, Irena, Pecora, Federico, et al. The CARESSES EU-Japan project: Making assistive robots culturally competent. arXiv, arXiv:1708.06276, 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06276.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Richard. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2):5–21, 1992. URL www.jstor.org/stable/1511637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgard, Wolfram, Cremers, Armin B., Fox, Dieter, Hähnel, Dirk, Lakemeyer, Gerhard, Schulz, Dirk, Steiner, Walter, and Thrun, Sebastian. The interactive museum tour-guide robot. In Proceedings of the 15th National/10th Conference on Artificial Intelligence/Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 11–18. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 1998. ISBN 0-262-51098-7. URL https://dl.a cm.org/citation.cfm?id=295249.Google Scholar
Cakmak, Maya, Srinivasa, Siddhartha S., Lee, Min Kyung, Forlizzi, Jodi, and Kiesler, Sara. Human preferences for robot-human hand-over configurations. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1986–1993. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2011. ISBN 978-1-61284-454-1. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094735.Google Scholar
Calvo, Rafael A., D’Mello, Sidney, Gratch, Jonathan, and Kappas, Arvid. The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing. Oxford University Press, New York, 2015. ISBN 9780199942237. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1008985555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, dir., James. The Terminator. Orion Pictures, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. ISBN 27616854735. URL www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/.Google Scholar
Campbell, Murray, Hoane, A. Joseph, and Hsu, Feng-hsiung. Deep Blue. Artificial Intelligence, 134(1-2):57–83, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00129-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, Kelly, Lapoint, Monica Anderson, Bird, Nathaniel, Panciera, Katherine, Veeraraghavan, Harini, Papanikolopoulos, Nikolaos, and Gini, Maria. Using robots to raise interest in technology among underrepresented groups. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14 (2):73–81, 2007. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2007.380640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Zhe, Simon, Tomas, Wei, Shih-En, and Sheikh, Yaser. Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1302–1310. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2017. ISBN 9781538604571. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.143.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Julie. Culture and Human-Robot Interaction in Militarized Spaces: A War Story. Routledge, New York, 2016. ISBN 978-1-4724-4311-3. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/95 1397181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpinella, Colleen M., Wyman, Alisa B., Perez, Michael A., and Stroessner, Steven J. The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and validation. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 254–262. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020208.Google Scholar
Carrere, Sybil and Gottman, John Mordechai. Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process, 38(3):293–301, 1999. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00293.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassell, Justine, Sullivan, Joseph, Prevost, Scott, and Churchill, Elizabeth. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000. ISBN 9780262032780. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/440727862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, Filippo, Limosani, Raffaele, Manzi, Alessandro, Bonaccorsi, Manuele, Esposito, Raffaele, Di Rocco, Maurizio, Pecora, Federico, Teti, Giancarlo, Saffiotti, Alessandro, and Dario, Paolo. Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cognitive Computation, 6(4):954–967, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12559-014-9290-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Wan-Ling and Šabanović, Selma. Interaction expands function: Social shaping of the therapeutic robot PARO in a nursing home. In HRI ’15: The Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 343–350. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charman, Tony, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Swettenham, John, Baird, Gillian, Cox, Antony, and Drew, Auriol. Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and Theory of Mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4):481–498, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00037-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya L. and Bargh, John A. The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6):893–910, 1999. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Ching-Fu and VG, Girish. Antecedents and outcomes of use experience of airport service robot: The stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework. Journal of Vacation Marketing, page 13567667221109267, 2022. doi: 10.1177/13567667221109267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Qian Qian and Park, Hyun Jung. How anthropomorphism affects trust in intelligent personal assistants. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 29(4):570–583, 2021. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-12-2020-0761.Google Scholar
Chen, Tiffany L., King, Chih-Hung Aaron, Thomaz, Andrea L., and Kemp, Charles C. An investigation of responses to robot-initiated touch in a nursing context. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1):141–161, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0215-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zhichao, Nakamura, Yutaka, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Android as a receptionist in a shopping mall using inverse reinforcement learning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3):7091–7098, 2022. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3180042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikaraishi, Takenobu, Yoshikawa, Yuichiro, Ogawa, Kohei, Hirata, Oriza, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Creation and staging of android theatre “sayonara” towards developing highly human-like robots. Future Internet, 9(4):75–92, 2017. doi: 10.3390/fi9040075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choset, Howie M., Hutchinson, Seth, Lynch, Kevin M., Kantor, George, Burgard, Wolfram, Kavraki, Lydia E., and Thrun, Sebastian. Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005. ISBN 978-026203327. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/762070740.Google Scholar
Christoforakos, Lara, Gallucci, Alessio, Surmava-Große, Tinatini, Ullrich, Daniel, and Diefenbach, Sarah. Can robots earn our trust the same way humans do? A systematic exploration of competence, warmth, and anthropomorphism as determinants of trust development in HRI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8:640444, 2021. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.640444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cillessen, Antonius H. N. and Rose, Amanda J. Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2):102–105, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, Robert. It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. In Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. Educationline, Bedford Heights, UK, 2002. URL http://leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49:997–1003, 1994. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Daniela, Di Nuovo, Santo, Buono, Serafino, and Di Nuovo, Alessandro. Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: a study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(1):51–62, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s12369-016-0359-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Mark. Experiments on orientation and proxemics. Human Relations, 23(1):61–76, 1970. doi: 10.1177/001872677002300107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, Martin, Kanda, Takayuki, Alissandarakis, Aris, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Designing enjoyable motion-based play interactions with a small humanoid robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2):173–193, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0212-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, Joshua, Park, Bernadette, Judd, Charles M, and Wittenbrink, Bernd. The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6):1314, 2002. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cribb, Jo and Glover, David. Don't Worry about the Robots. Allen & Unwin, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018. ISBN 9781760633509. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1042120802.Google Scholar
Crisp, Richard J. and Turner, Rhiannon N. Imagined intergroup contact: Refinements, debates, and clarifications. In Hodson, Gordon and Hewstone, Miles, editors, Advances in Intergroup Contact, pages 149–165. Psychology Press, London, 2013. ISBN 978-1136213908. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/694393740.Google Scholar
Crusco, April H. and Wetzel, Christopher G. The Midas touch: The effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(4):512–517, 1984. doi: 10.1177/0146167284104003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, Amy, Fiske, Susan, and Glick, Peter. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40:61–149, 2008. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, Geoff. Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4):286–300, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunneen, Martin, Mullins, Martin, and Murphy, Finbarr. Autonomous vehicles and embedded artificial intelligence: The challenges of framing machine driving decisions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 33(8):706–731, 2019. doi: 10.1080/08839514.2019.1600301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, Kate. Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior towards robotic objects. In Calo, Ryan A., Froomkin, Michael, and Kerr, Ian, editors, We Robot Conference. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2044797.Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Walters, Michael, Woods, Sarah, Koay, Kheng Lee, Nehaniv, Chrystopher L., Sisbot, A., Alami, Rachid, and Siméon, Thierry. How may I serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. In 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 172–179. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2006. ISBN 1-59593-294-1. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Joshua Ian, Senghas, Ann, Brandt, Fredric, and Ochsner, Kevin N. The effects of Botox injections on emotional experience. Emotion, 10(3):433, 2010. doi: 10.1037/a0018690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, Andrew J., Reid, Ian D., Molton, Nicholas D., and Stasse, Olivier. Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(6):1052–1067, 2007. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Angeli, Antonella. Ethical implications of verbal disinhibition with conversational agents. PsychNology Journal, 7(1):49–57, 2009. URL http://psychnology.org/File/PNJ7(1)/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_7_1_DEANGELI.pdf.Google Scholar
De Graaf, Maartje and Allouch, Somaya Ben. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(12):1476–1486, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, Maartje, Allouch, Somaya Ben, and Lutfi, Shariff. What are people's associations of domestic robots? Comparing implicit and explicit measures. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 1077–1083. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, Maartje, Ben Allouch, Somaya, and van Dijk, Jan. Why do they refuse to use my robot? Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 224–233. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020236.Google Scholar
de Graaf, Maartje, Ben Allouch, Somaya, and Van Dijk, Jan. Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2): 115–173, 2019. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Visser, Ewart J., Peeters, Marieke M. M., Jung, Malte F., Kohn, Spencer, Shaw, Tyler H., Pak, Richard, and Neerincx, Mark A. Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2):459–478, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, Frans. The Ape and the Sushi Master: Cultural Reflections of a Primatologist. Basic Books, New York, 2001. ISBN 978-0465041763. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/458716823.Google Scholar
Department of Transportation. Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey. Report, Department of Transportation, 2015. URL https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812115.Google Scholar
Devlin, Kate. Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots. Bloomsbury, London, 2020. ISBN 9781472950901. URL www.worldcat.org/title/1252735321.Google Scholar
Dick, Philip K. Blade Runner: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Ballantine Books, New York, 25th-Anniversary edition, 2007. ISBN 9780345350473. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/776604212.Google Scholar
Diehl, Joshua J., Schmitt, Lauren M., Villano, Michael, and Crowell, Charles R. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1):249–262, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiSalvo, Carl, Nourbakhsh, Illah, Holstius, David, Akin, Ayça, and Louw, Marti. The neighborhood networks project: A case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. In 10th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, pages 41–50. Indiana University, Indianapolis, 2008. ISBN 978-0-9818561-0-0. URL https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795241.Google Scholar
DiSalvo, Carl F., Gemperle, Francine, Forlizzi, Jodi, and Kiesler, Sara. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pages 321–326. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2002. ISBN 1-58113-515-7. doi: 10.1145/778712.778756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Steve. Metal performance humanizing robots, returning to nature, and camping about. TDR/The Drama Review, 48(4):15–46, 2004. ISSN 1054-2043. doi: 10.1162/1054204042442017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, Anhai, Ramakrishnan, Raghu, and Halevy, Alon Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4):86–96, 2011. doi: 10.1145/1924421.1924442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Nicola and Poeschl, Sandra. Love and sex with robots: A content analysis of media representations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4):665–677, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00517-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragan, Anca D., Lee, Kenton C. T., and Srinivasa, Siddhartha S. Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 301–308. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3099-2. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483603.Google Scholar
Duffy, Brian R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3):177–190, 2003. ISSN 0921-8890. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Autumn, Edwards, Chad, Spence, Patric R., Harris, Christina, and Gambino, Andrew. Robots in the classroom: Differences in students’ perceptions of credibility and learning between “teacher as robot” and “robot as teacher.” Computers in Human Behavior, 65:627–634, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, Naomi I., Lieberman, Matthew D., and Williams, Kipling D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643):290–292, 2003. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekkekakis, Panteleimon. The Measurement of Affect, Mood, and Emotion: A Guide for Health-Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511820724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul. Facial expressions of emotion: New findings, new questions. Psychological Science, 3(1):34–38, 1992. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00253.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul. Basic emotions. In Dalgleish, Tim and Power, Mick J., editors, Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, pages 45–60. Wiley Online Library, 1999. ISBN 978-1462509997. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/826592694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace. Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1978. doi: 10.1037/t27734-000.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace V. Unmasking the Face. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975. ISBN 978-1883536367. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/803874427.Google Scholar
El Ayadi, Moataz, Kamel, Mohamed S., and Karray, Fakhri. Survey on speech emotion recognition: Features, classification schemes, and databases. Pattern Recognition, 44(3): 572–587, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.09.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Makrini, Ilias, Elprama, Shirley A., Van den Bergh, Jan, Vanderborght, Bram, Knevels, Albert-Jan, Jewell, Charlotte I. C., Stals, Frank, De Coppel, Geert, Ravyse, Ilse, Potargent, Johan, et al. Working with Walt. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25:51–58, 2018. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2018.2815947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Alexis M. Friendship, Robots, and Social Media: False Friends and Second Selves. Routledge, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1138065666. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1016 009820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, Nicholas, Waytz, Adam, and Cacioppo, John T. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4):864–886, 2007. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, Nicholas, Waytz, Adam, Akalis, Scott, and Cacioppo, John T. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2):143–155, 2008. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erel, Hadas, Shem Tov, Tzachi, Kessler, Yoav, and Zuckerman, Oren. Robots are always social: Robotic movements are automatically interpreted as social cues. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–6. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3290607.3312758.Google Scholar
Etz, Alexander and Vandekerckhove, Joachim. Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1):5–34, 2018. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Commission. Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life. Technical Report Special Eurobarometer 460/Wave EB87.1, Directorate-General for Information Society and Media, 2017. URL https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2160.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St B. T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(3):255–278, 2008. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St BT and Stanovich, Keith E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3):223–241, 2013. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Katherine, de Moura, Nelson, Chauvier, Stéphane, Chatila, Raja, and Dogan, Ebru. Ethical decision making in autonomous vehicles: The AV ethics project. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26:3285–3312, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evers, Vanessa, Maldonado, Heidy C., Brodecki, Talia L., and Hinds, Pamela J. Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 255–262. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2008. ISBN 978-1-60558-017-3. doi: 10.1145/1349822.1349856.Google Scholar
Eyben, Florian, Weninger, Felix, Gross, Florian, and Schuller, Björn. Recent developments in OpenSMILE, the Munich open-source multimedia feature extractor. In 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 835–838. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4503-2404-5. doi: 10.1145/2502081.2502224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike. An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87(Supplement C):363–371, 2017. ISSN 0921-8890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.029. URL http://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889016305462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike and Hegel, Frank. (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9):2213–2230, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike and Kuchenbrandt, Dieta. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4):724–731, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyssel, Friederike and Loughnan, Steve. “It don't matter if you’re Black or White”? In International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 422–431. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike and Reich, Natalia. Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)— On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 121–122. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3101-2. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483531.Google Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike, Hegel, Frank, Horstmann, Gernot, and Wagner, Claudia. Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In 19th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 646–651. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598687.Google Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike, Kuchenbrandt, Dieta, and Bobinger, Simon. Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 61–68. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike, Kuchenbrandt, Dieta, Bobinger, Simon, de Ruiter, Laura, and Hegel, Frank. “If you sound like me, you must be more human”: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 125–126. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012a. ISBN 978-1-4503-1063-5. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157717.Google Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike, Kuchenbrandt, Dieta, Hegel, Frank, and de Ruiter, Laura. Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 851–857. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2012b. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343858.Google Scholar
Fagnant, Daniel J. and Kockelman, Kara. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77:167–181, 2015. ISSN 0965-8564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003. URL http://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415000804.Google Scholar
Faul, Franz, Erdfelder, Edgar, Lang, Albert-Georg, and Axel, Buchner. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2):175–191, 2007. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favaro, Francesca M., Nader, Nazanin, Eurich, Sky O., Tripp, Michelle, and Varadaraju, Naresh. Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in california. PLOS One, 12(9):1–20, 09 2017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feil-Seifer, David and Matarić, Maja J. Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(1):24–31, 2011. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2010.940150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Catherine, Azenkot, Shiri, and Cakmak, Maya. Designing a robot guide for blind people in indoor environments. In The 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, pages 107–108. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-3318-4. doi: 10.1145/2701973.2702060.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Francesco, Paladino, Maria Paola, and Jetten, Jolanda. Blurring human-machine distinctions: Anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2):287–302, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festerling, Janik and Siraj, Iram. Anthropomorphizing technology: A conceptual review of anthropomorphism research and how it relates to children's engagements with digital voice assistants. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 56(3):709–738, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09668-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, Andy. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2018. ISBN 9781526419514. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1030545826.Google Scholar
Field, Andy and Hole, Graham. How to Design and Report Experiments. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002. ISBN 978085702829. URL http://worldcat.org/title/how-to-d esign-and-report-experiments/oclc/961100072.Google Scholar
Fink, Julia. Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In Ge, Shuzhi Sam, Khatib, Oussama, Cabibihan, John-John, Simmons, Reid, and Williams, Mary-Anne, editors, Social Robotics, pages 199–208. Springer, Berlin, 2012. ISBN 978-3-642-34103-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Julia, Bauwens, Valérie, Kaplan, Frédéric, and Dillenbourg, Pierre. Living with a vacuum cleaning robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3):389–408, Aug 2013. ISSN 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0190-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Julia, Lemaignan, Séverin, Dillenbourg, Pierre, Rétornaz, Philippe, Vaussard, Florian, Berthoud, Alain, Mondada, Francesco, Wille, Florian, and Franinović, Karmen. Which robot behavior can motivate children to tidy up their toys? Design and evaluation of ranger. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 439–446. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4503-2658-2. doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559659.Google Scholar
Fisac, Jaime, Bajcsy, Andrea, Herbert, Sylvia, Fridovich-Keil, David, Wang, Steven, Tomlin, Claire, and Dragan, Anca. Probabilistically safe robot planning with confidence-based human predictions. In Kress-Gazit, Hadas, Srinivasa, Siddhartha S., Howard, Tom, and Atanasov, Nikolay, editors, Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. MIT PRess, Cambridge, MA, 2018. ISBN 978-0-9923747-4-7. doi: 10.15607/RSS.2018.XIV.069.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. Effect confirmed, patient dead: A commentary on Hoffman & Zhao's primer for conducting experiments in HRI. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1):1–4, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3439714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin, Lohan, Katrin, Saunders, Joe, Nehaniv, Chrystopher, Wrede, Britta, and Rohlfing, Katharina. The impact of the contingency of robot feedback on HRI. In International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, pages 210–217. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-6403-4. doi: 10.1109/CTS.2013.6567231.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., and Glick, Peter. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2):77–83, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter, and Xu, Jun. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6):878–902, 202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, Naomi T., Chowdhury, Yasmin, Cha, Elizabeth, Takayama, Leila, and Matarić, Maja J. Evaluating the effects of personalized appearance on telepresence robots for education. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 109–110. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3173386.3177030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Martin. The Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of Mass Unemployment. Oneworld Publications, London, 2015. ISBN 978-0465059997. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/993846206.Google Scholar
Forlizzi, Jodi and DiSalvo, Carl. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 258–265. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2006. ISBN 1-59593-294-1. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard, Lutz, Christoph, and Tamò-Larrieux, Aurelia. Gathering expert opinions for social robots’ ethical, legal, and societal concerns: Findings from four international workshops. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2):441–458, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Floyd J. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation, volume 38. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995. ISBN 978-0803945838. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/551387270.Google Scholar
Fowler, Floyd J. Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2013. ISBN 978-1452259000. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/935314651.Google Scholar
Fox, Dieter, Burgard, Wolfram, and Thrun, Sebastian. The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 4(1):23–33, 1997. doi: 10.1109/100.580977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Batya, Kahn, Peter, and Borning, Alan. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. Technical report, University of Washington, 2002.Google Scholar
Fujita, Masahiro. Aibo: Toward the era of digital creatures. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(10):781–794, 2001. doi: 10.1177/02783640122068092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Future of Life Institute. An open letter—Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence, January 2015. URL https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/.Google Scholar
Gargouri, Yassine, Hajjem, Chawki, Larivière, Vincent, Gingras, Yves, Carr, Les, Brody, Tim, and Harnad, Stevan. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLOS One, 5(10):1–12, 10 2010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, dir., Alex. Ex Machina. A24, New York, 2014. URL www.imdb.com/title/tt0470752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garreau, Joel. Bots on the ground. Washington Post, 2007. URL http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501009.html.Google Scholar
Gazzaley, Adam and Rosen, Larry D. The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016. ISBN 978-0262534437. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/978487215.Google Scholar
Geisslinger, Maximilian, Poszler, Franziska, Betz, Johannes, Lütge, Christoph, and Lienkamp, Markus. Autonomous driving ethics: From trolley problem to ethics of risk. Philosophy & Technology, 34:1033–1055, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00449-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendolla, Guido H. E. On the impact of mood on behavior: An integrative theory and a review. Review of General Psychology, 4(4):378–408, 2000. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.4.4.378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschow, Oliver, van Den Bossche, Sofie, Cracco, Emiel, Bardi, Lara, Rigoni, Davide, and Brass, Marcel. Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PloS One, 12(9): e0183784, 2017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Robert M. Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theology and Science, 4(3):229–246, 2006. doi: 10.1080/14746700600952993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Psychology Press, London, 2014. ISBN 978-1848725782. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/896794768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glas, Dylan F, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Teleoperation of multiple social robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(3):530–544, 2011. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.20 11.2164243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glas, Dylan F., Kanda, Takayuki, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Human-robot interaction design using Interaction Composer eight years of lessons learned. In 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 303–310. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451766.Google Scholar
Gockley, Rachel, Bruce, Allison, Forlizzi, Jodi, Michalowski, Marek, Mundell, Anne, Rosenthal, Stephanie, Sellner, Brennan, Simmons, Reid, Snipes, Kevin, Schultz, Alan C., et al. Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1338–1343. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-8912-3. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2005.1545303.Google Scholar
Gockley, Rachel, Forlizzi, Jodi, and Simmons, Reid. Interactions with a moody robot. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 186–193. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2006. ISBN 1-59593-294-1. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gockley, Rachel, Forlizzi, Jodi, and Simmons, Reid. Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 17–24. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007. ISBN 978-1-59593-617-2. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228720.Google Scholar
Goldacre, Ben. Bad Science. Fourth Estate, London, 2008. ISBN 9780007240197. URL http: //worldcat.org/oclc/760098401.Google Scholar
Gonsior, Barbara, Sosnowski, Stefan, Mayer, Christoph, Blume, Jürgen, Radig, Bernd, Wollherr, Dirk, and Kühnlenz, Kolja. Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. In 2011 RO-MAN, pages 350–356. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2011. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-González, Carina Soledad, Gil-Iranzo, Rosa María, and Paderewski-Rodríguez, Patricia. Human–robot interaction and sexbots: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 21 (1):216, 2020. doi: 10.3390/s21010216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodfellow, Ian, Bengio, Yoshua, and Courville, Aaron. Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016. ISBN 9780262035613. URL www.deeplearningbook.org.Google Scholar
Goodman, Joseph K., Cryder, Cynthia E., and Cheema, Amar. Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3):213–224, 2013. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Michael A. and Schultz, Alan C. Human–robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 1(3):203–275, 2008. URL http://doi.org/10.1 561/1100000005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graether, Eberhard and Mueller, Florian. Joggobot: A flying robot as jogging companion. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1063–1066. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4503-1016-1. doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Heather M., Gray, Kurt, and Wegner, Daniel M. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812):619–619, 2007. ISSN 0036-8075. doi: 10.1126/science.1134475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, Leslie S. Application of emotion in psychotherapy. In Lewis, Michael, Haviland-Jones, Jeanette M., and Feldman Barrett, Lisa, editors, Handbook of Emotions, volume 3, pages 88–101. Guilford Press, New York, 2008. ISBN 978-1-59385-650-2. URL http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.7583&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Gross, Horst-Michael, Boehme, Hans-Joachim, Schroeter, Christof, Müller, Steffen, König, Alexander, Einhorn, Erik, Martin, Christian, Merten, Matthias, and Bley, Andreas. TOOMAS: Interactive shopping guide robots in everyday use-final implementation and experiences from long-term field trials. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 2005–2012. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4244-3803-7. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354497.Google Scholar
Gross, James J. Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In Gross, James J., editor, Handbook of Emotion Regulation, pages 3–22. Guilford Press, New York, 2007. ISBN 978-1462520732. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1027033463.Google Scholar
Guest, Greg, Namey, Emily, and Chen, Mario. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PloS One, 15(5):e0232076, 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidi, Stefano, Boor, Latisha, van der Bij, Laura, Foppen, Robin, Rikmenspoel, Okke, and Perugia, Giulia. Ambivalent stereotypes towards gendered robots: The (im) mutability of bias towards female and neutral robots. In Social Robotics: 14th International Conference, ICSR 2022, Florence, Italy, December 13–16, 2022, Proceedings, Part II, pages 615–626. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_54.Google Scholar
Gunes, Hatice, Schuller, Björn, Pantic, Maja, and Cowie, Roddy. Emotion representation, analysis and synthesis in continuous space: A survey. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops, pages 827–834. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4244-9140-7. doi: 10.1109/FG.2011.5771357.Google Scholar
Haegele, Martin. World Robotics Service Robots. IFR Statistical Department, Chicago, IL, 2016. ISBN 9783816306948. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/979905174.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. The Silent Language. Anchor Books, USA, 1990. URL https://worldcat.org/oclc/21118399.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T., Birdwhistell, Ray L., Bock, Bernhard, Bohannan, Paul, Diebold, Jr., Richard, Durbin, Marshall, Edmonson, Munro, S., Fischer, J. L., Hymes, Dell, Kimball, Solon T., et al. Proxemics [and comments and replies]. Current Anthropology, 9(2/3):83–108, 1968. doi: 10.1086/200975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Jeonghye, Moore, Dylan, and Bae, Ilhan. Exploring the social proxemics of human–drone interaction. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 8(2):1–7, 2019. doi: 10.7236/IJASC.2019.8.2.1.Google Scholar
Han, Kun, Yu, Dong, and Tashev, Ivan. Speech emotion recognition using deep neural network and extreme learning machine. In 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, pages 223–227. International Speech Communication Association, 2014. URL www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2014/han14_interspeech.html.Google Scholar
Hancock, Peter A., Billings, Deborah R., Schaefer, Kristin E., Chen, Jessie Y. C., De Visser, Ewart J., and Parasuraman, Raja. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5):517–527, 2011. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, Peter A., Kessler, Theresa T., Kaplan, Alexandra D., Brill, John C., and Szalma, James L. Evolving trust in robots: Specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Human Factors, 63(7):1196–1229, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0018720820922080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, Takuya, Verner, Igor M., and Kobayashi, Hiroshi. Human-like robot as teacher's representative in a science lesson: An elementary school experiment. In Kim, Jong-Huan, Matson, Eric T., Myung, Hyun, and Xu, Peter, editors, Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications, volume 208 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pages 775–786. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37374-9_74.Google Scholar
Haslam, Nick. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3):252–264, 2006. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, Nick and Loughnan, Steve. Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1):399–423, 2014. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, Nick, Loughnan, Stephen, Kashima, Yoshihisa, and Bain, Paul. Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1):55–85, 2008. doi: 10.1080/10463280801981645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, Marc. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In Blythe, Mark A., Overbeeke, Kees, Monk, Andrew F., and Wright, Peter C., editors, Funology, pages 31–42. Springer, New York, 2003. ISBN 978-1-4020-2967-7. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Andrew J. and Lawler, Richard. Tesla finally begins shipping “Full Self-Driving”’ beta version 9 after a long delay. The Verge, 2021. URL www.theverge.com/2021/7/10/225 70081/tesla-fsd-v9-beta-autopilot-update.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Kotaro, Shiomi, Masahiro, Kanda, Takayuki, Hagita, Norihiro, and Robotics, AI. Friendly patrolling: A model of natural encounters. In Durrant-Whyte, Hugh, Roy, Nicholas, and Abbeel, Pieter, editors, Robotics: Science and Systems, Volume II, pages 121–129. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012. ISBN 978-0-262-51779-9. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/85 8018257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heerink, Marcel, Krose, Ben, Evers, Vanessa, and Wielinga, Bob. Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: A suggested toolkit. In RO-MAN 2009: The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 528–533. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2009. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326320.Google Scholar
Heerink, Marcel, Kröse, Ben, Evers, Vanessa, and Wielinga, Bob. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4):361–375, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Frank, Muhl, Claudia, Wrede, Britta, Hielscher-Fastabend, Martina, and Sagerer, Gerhard. Understanding social robots. In 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pages 169–174. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2009. doi: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Frank, Eyssel, Friederike, and Wrede, Britta. The social robot “Flobi”: Key concepts of industrial design. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 107–112. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598691.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz and Simmel, Marianne. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2):243–259, 1944. doi: 10.2307/1416950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldner, Mattias and Edlund, Jens. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4):555–568, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henschel, Anna and Cross, Emily S. No evidence for enhanced likeability and social motivation towards robots after synchrony experience. Interaction Studies, 21(1):7–23, 2020. doi: 10.1075/is.19004.hen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjortsjo, Carl-Herman. Man's Face and Mimic Language. Studen litteratur, Sweden, 1969. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/974134474.Google Scholar
Ho, Chin-Chang and MacDorman, Karl F. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6):1508–1518, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Guy. Dumb robots, smart phones: A case study of music listening companionship. In The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 358–363. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4673-4604-7. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343779.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Guy. Anki, Jibo, and Kuri: What we can learn from social robots that didn't make it. IEEE Spectrum, 2019. URL https://spectrum.ieee.org/anki-jibo-and-kuri-what-we-can-learn-from-social-robotics-failures.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Guy and Breazeal, Cynthia. Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2007. ISBN 978-1-59593-617-2. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228718.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Guy and Vanunu, Keinan. Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. In 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 317–324. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3099-2. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483605.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Guy and Weinberg, Gil. Shimon: An interactive improvisational robotic marimba player. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3097–3102. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. ISBN 978-1-60558-930-5. doi: 10.1145/1753846.1753925.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Guy and Zhao, Xuan. A primer for conducting experiments in human–robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1):1–31, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3412374.Google Scholar
Holm, Olle. Analyses of longing: Origins, levels, and dimensions. Journal of Psychology, 133 (6):621–630, 1999. doi: 10.1080/00223989909599768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Deanna, Lemaignan, Séverin, and Dillenbourg, Pierre. When children teach a robot to write: An autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. In 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 83–90. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696479.Google Scholar
Howard, Ayanna and Borenstein, Jason. Hacking the human bias in robotics. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 7(1):1–3, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3208974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Ayanna and Kennedy III, Monroe. Robots are not immune to bias and injustice. Science Robotics, 5(48):eabf1364, 2020. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abf1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Siying, Yen, Hen Chen, Yu, Ziwei, Zhao, Mingjian, Seaborn, Katie, and Liu, Can. Wizundry: A cooperative Wizard of Oz platform for simulating future speech-based interfaces with multiple wizards. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1):1–34, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3579591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggins, Matthew, Alghowinem, Sharifa, Jeong, Sooyeon, Colon-Hernandez, Pedro, Breazeal, Cynthia, and Park, Hae Won. Practical guidelines for intent recognition: Bert with minimal training data evaluated in real-world HRI application. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 341–350. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/343407 3.3444671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Andrew J. and Black, Alan W. Unit selection in a concatenative speech synthesis system using a large speech database. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 373–376. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 1996. ISBN 0-7803-3192-3. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1996.541110.Google Scholar
Hüttenrauch, Helge, Eklundh, Kerstin Severinson, Green, Anders, and Topp, Elin A. Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5052–5059. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0258-1. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.282535.Google Scholar
Hwang, Jinsoo, Kim, Heather, Joo, Kyu-Hyeon, and Lee, Won Seok. How to form rapport with information providers in the airport industry: Service robots versus human staff. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 27(8):891–906, 2022. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2022.2131447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarz, Julian, Tan, Jie, Finn, Chelsea, Kalakrishnan, Mrinal, Pastor, Peter, and Levine, Sergey. How to train your robot with deep reinforcement learning: Lessons we have learned. International Journal of Robotics Research, 40(4–5):698–721, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364920987859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Michita, Ono, Tetsuo, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Physical relation and expression: Joint attention for human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 50(4): 636–643, 2003. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2003.814769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inamura, Tetsunari, Mizuchi, Yoshiaki, and Yamada, Hiroki. VR platform enabling crowd-sourcing of embodied HRI experiments—Case study of online robot competition. Advanced Robotics, 35(11):697–703, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.1928551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irfan, Bahar, Kennedy, James, Lemaignan, Séverin, Papadopoulos, Fotios, Senft, Emmanuel, and Belpaeme, Tony. Social psychology and human-robot interaction: An uneasy marriage. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 13–20. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4503-5615-2. doi: 10.1145/3173386.3173389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Android science. In Thrun, Sebastian, Rodney, Brooks, and Hugh, Durrant-Whyte, editors, Robotics Research, pages 118–127. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-48110-2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-48113-3_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiguro, Hiroshi and Dalla Libera, Fabio. Geminoid Studies: Science and Technologies for Humanlike Teleoperated Androids. Springer Nature, Singapore, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, He Michael, Park, C. Whan, and Pol, Gratiana. Cuteness, nurturance, and implications for visual product design. In Batra, Rajeev, Seifert, Colleen M., and Brei, Diann, editors, The Psychology of Design, pages 168–179. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, 2015. ISBN 9781317502104. URL www.worldcat.org/title/914472421.Google Scholar
Johal, Wafa, Gatos, Doga, Yantac, Asim Evren, and Obaid, Mohammad. Envisioning social drones in education. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9:666736, 2022. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.666736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, Oliver P. and Srivastava, Sanjay. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, Lawrence A. and John, Oliver P., editors, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, pages 102–138. Guilford Press, New York, 2nd edition, 1999. ISBN 9781572306950. URL www.worldcat.org/title/1229125792.Google Scholar
Johnson, Michelle Jillian, Rai, Roshan, Barathi, Sarath, Mendonca, Rochelle, and Bustamante-Valles, Karla. Affordable stroke therapy in high-, low- and middle-income countries: From Theradrive to Rehab CARES, a compact robot gym. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 4:2055668317708732, 2017. doi: 10.1177/2055668317708732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonze, dir., Spike. Her. Warner Bros., Burbank, CA, 2013. URL www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1.Google Scholar
Joormann, Jutta and Gotlib, Ian H. Emotion regulation in depression: Relation to cognitive inhibition. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2):281–298, 2010. doi: 10.1080/02699930903407948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, Malte and Hinds, Pamela. Robots in the wild: A time for more robust theories of human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 7(1):2, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3208975.Google Scholar
Jung, Malte F., Martelaro, Nikolas, and Hinds, Pamela J. Using robots to moderate team conflict: The case of repairing violations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 229–236. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Minjoo, Lazaro, May Jorella S, and Yun, Myung Hwan. Evaluation of methodologies and measures on the usability of social robots: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11 (4):1388, 2021. doi: 10.3390/app11041388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Peter H., Freier, Nathan G., Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, Ruckert, Jolina H., Severson, Rachel L., and Kane, Shaun K. Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. In The 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 97–104. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2008. ISBN 978-1-60558-017-3. doi: 10.1145/1349822.1349836.Google Scholar
Kahn, Peter H., Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, Gill, Brian T., Ruckert, Jolina H., Shen, Solace, Gary, Heather E., Reichert, Aimee L., Freier, Nathan G., and Severson, Rachel L. Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 33–40. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4503-1063-5. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157696.Google Scholar
Kahn, Peter H., Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, Shen, Solace, Gary, Heather E., and Ruckert, Jolina H. Creative collaboration with a social robot. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 99–103. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4503-2968-2. doi: 10.1145/2632048.2632058.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-0374533557. URL https://worldcat.org/en/title/706020998.Google Scholar
Kamino, Waki and Šabanović, Selma. Coffee, tea, robots? The performative staging of service robots in “Robot Cafes” in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 183–191. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3568162.3576967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Takayuki, Hirano, Takayuki, Eaton, Daniel, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1):61–84, 2004. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2004.9667340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Takayuki, Kamasima, Masayuki, Imai, Michita, Ono, Tetsuo, Sakamoto, Daisuke, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Anzai, Yuichiro. A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human. Autonomous Robots, 22(1):87–100, 2007a. doi: 10.1007/s10514-006-9007-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Takayuki, Sato, Rumi, Saiwaki, Naoki, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):962–971, 2007b. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2007.904904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Takayuki, Shiomi, Masahiro, Miyashita, Zenta, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. A communication robot in a shopping mall. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(5):897–913, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2010.2062550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, Kenji, Kanehiro, Fumio, Kajita, Shuuji, Hirukawa, Hirohisa, Kawasaki, T., Hirata, M., Akachi, Kazuhiku, and Isozumi, Takakatsu. Humanoid robot HRP-2. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1083–1090, 2004. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneshige, Yuya, Satake, Satoru, Kanda, Takayuki, and Imai, Michita. How to overcome the difficulties in programming and debugging mobile social robots? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 361–369. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/34 34073.3444674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Kyong Il, Freedman, Sanford, Mataric, Maja J., Cunningham, Mark J., and Lopez, Becky. A hands-off physical therapy assistance robot for cardiac patients. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 337–340. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-9003-2. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501114.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Alexandra, Kessler, Theresa, Brill, Christopher, and Hancock, P. A. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-analytic findings. Human Factors, 65(2):337–359, 2021. doi: 10.1177/00187208211013988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, Frederic. Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1(3):1–16, 2004. doi: 10.1142/S0219843604000289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptelinin, Victor. Technology and the givens of existence: Toward an existential inquiry framework in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 270:1–270:14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4503-5620-6. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173844.Google Scholar
Karim, Raida, Zhang, Yufei, Alves-Oliveira, Patrícia, Björling, Elin A., and Cakmak, Maya. Community-based data visualization for mental well-being with a social robot. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 839–843. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Yusuke, Kanda, Takayuki, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. May I help you? Design of human-like polite approaching behavior. In 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 35–42. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696463.Google Scholar
Kätsyri, Jari, Förger, Klaus, Mäkäräinen, Meeri, and Takala, Tapio. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: Support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:390, 2015. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keijsers, Merel, Bartneck, Christoph, and Eyssel, Friederike. What's to bullying a bot? Correlates between chatbot humanlikeness and abuse. Interaction Studies, 22(1):55–80, 2021. doi: 10.1075/is.20002.kei.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher and Kring, Ann M. Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2(3):320–342, 1998. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Theodore D. How many emotions are there? Wedding the social and the autonomic components. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2):263–289, 1987. doi: 10.1086/228745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. ISBN 978-0521389389. URL http://worldcat.o rg/oclc/785489376.Google Scholar
Kennedy, James, Baxter, Paul, and Belpaeme, Tony. The robot who tried too hard: Social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 67–74. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696457.Google Scholar
Kennedy, James, Lemaignan, Séverin, Montassier, Caroline, Lavalade, Pauline, Irfan, Bahar, Papadopoulos, Fotios, Senft, Emmanuel, and Belpaeme, Tony. Child speech recognition in human-robot interaction: Evaluations and recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 82–90. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020229.Google Scholar
Kessler, Theresa T., Larios, Cintya, Walker, Tiffani, Yerdon, Valarie, and Hancock, P. A. A comparison of trust measures in human–robot interaction scenarios. In Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, pages 353–364. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, Cory D. and Breazeal, Cynthia. A robotic weight loss coach. In Proceedings of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence—Volume 2, pages 1985–1986. AAAI Press, Washington, DC, 2007. ISBN 978-1-57735-323-2. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1619797.1619992.Google Scholar
Kidd, Cory D. and Breazeal, Cynthia. Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3230–3235. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2008. ISBN 978-1-4244-2057-5. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113.Google Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, Powers, Aaron, Fussell, Susan R., and Torrey, Cristen. Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Social Cognition, 26(2):169–181, 2008. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ki Joon, Park, Eunil, and Sundar, S. Shyam. Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4):1799–1806, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirmeyer, Sandra L. and Lin, Thung-Rung. Social support: Its relationship to observed communication with peers and superiors. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1):138–151, 1987. doi: 10.5465/255900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitano, Naho. “Rinri”: An incitement towards the existence of robots in Japanese society. International Review of Information Ethics, 6(12/2):78–83, 2006. URL http://i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/006/006_Kitano.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassner, Frank. A case study of LEGO Mindstorms suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1):8–12, February 2002. ISSN 0097-8418. doi: 10.1145/563517.563345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koay, Kheng Lee, Sisbot, Emrah Akin, Syrdal, Dag Sverre, Walters, Mick L., Dautenhahn, Kerstin, and Alami, Rachid. Exploratory study of a robot approaching a person in the context of handing over an object. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, pages 18–24. AAAI Press, Washington, DC, 2007a. URL http://aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2007/SS-07-07/SS07-07-004.pdf.Google Scholar
Koay, Kheng Lee, Syrdal, Dag Sverre, Walters, Michael L., and Dautenhahn, Kerstin. Living with robots: Investigating the habituation effect in participants’ preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. In The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 564–569. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007b. ISBN 978-1-4244-1634-9. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415149.Google Scholar
Koike, Mayu and Loughnan, Steve. Virtual relationships: Anthropomorphism in the digital age. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(6):e12603, 2021. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koike, Mayu, Loughnan, Steve, and Stanton, Sarah C. E. Virtually in love: The role of anthropomorphism in virtual romantic relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1):600–616, 2022. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollar, Thomas, Tellex, Stefanie, Roy, Deb, and Roy, Nicholas. Toward understanding natural language directions. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 259–266. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4892-0. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453186.Google Scholar
Koo, Jeamin, Kwac, Jungsuk, Ju, Wendy, Steinert, Martin, Leifer, Larry, and Nass, Clifford. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 9(4):269–275, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, Stefan, Krenn, Brigitte, Marsella, Stacy, Marshall, Andrew N., Pelachaud, Catherine, Pirker, Hannes, Thórisson, Kristinn R., and Vilhjálmsson, Hannes. Towards a common framework for multimodal generation: The behavior markup language. In International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pages 205–217. Springer, Berlin, 2006. ISBN 978-3-540-37593-7. doi: 10.1007/11821830_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozima, Hideki, Michalowski, Marek P., and Nakagawa, Cocoro. Keepon. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):3–18, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s12369-008-0009-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausman, Andrea, Neubauer, Catherine, Forster, Daniel, Lakhmani, Shan, Baker, Anthony L., Fitzhugh, Sean M., Gremillion, Gregory, Wright, Julia L., Metcalfe, Jason S., and Schaefer, Kristin E. Trust measurement in human-autonomy teams: Development of a conceptual toolkit. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11(3):1–58, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3530874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriz, Sarah, Anderson, Gregory, and Trafton, J. Gregory. Robot-directed speech: Using language to assess first-time users’ conceptualizations of a robot. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 267–274. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453187.Google Scholar
Kruse, Thibault, Pandey, Amit Kumar, Alami, Rachid, and Kirsch, Alexandra. Human-aware robot navigation: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(12):1726–1743, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2013.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Hyunjin, Choi, Jason J, Lee, Soomin, Jang, Sunho, and Do, Wonkyung. Designing shelly, a robot capable of assessing and restraining children's robot abusing behaviors. In Companion of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 161–162. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3173386.3176973.Google Scholar
Kubota, Tomonori, Ogawa, Kohei, Yoshikawa, Yuichiro, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Alignment of the attitude of teleoperators with that of a semi-autonomous android. Scientific Reports, 12 (1):1–12, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13829-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuchenbrandt, Dieta, Riether, Nina, and Eyssel, Friederike. Does anthropomorphism reduce stress in HRI? In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 218–219. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4503-2658-2. doi: 10.1145/2559636.2563710.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition, 1970. ISBN 0226458032. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/468581998.Google Scholar
Kulic, Dana and Croft, Elizabeth A. Safe planning for human-robot interaction. Journal of Field Robotics, 22(7):383–396, 2005. doi: 10.1002/rob.20073.Google Scholar
Kulms, Philipp and Kopp, Stefan. More human-likeness, more trust? The effect of anthropomorphism on self-reported and behavioral trust in continued and interdependent human-agent cooperation. In Alt, Florian, Bulling, Andreas, and Döring, Tanja, editors, Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019, pages 31–42. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3340764.3340793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzuoka, Hideaki, Suzuki, Yuya, Yamashita, Jun, and Yamazaki, Keiichi. Reconfiguring spatial formation arrangement by robot body orientation. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 285–292. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4892-0. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453182.Google Scholar
Lang, Peter J., Bradley, Margaret M., and Cuthbert, Bruce N. Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In Lang, Peter J., Simons, Robert F., Balaban, Marie, and Simons, Robert, editors, Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes, pages 97–135. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1997. ISBN 9781135808204. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/949987355.Google Scholar
Lara, Juan S., Casas, Jonathan, Aguirre, Andres, Munera, Marcela, Rincon-Roncancio, Monica, Irfan, Bahar, Senft, Emmanuel, Belpaeme, Tony, and Cifuentes, Carlos A. Human-robot sensor interface for cardiac rehabilitation. In International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 1013–1018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2017. ISBN 978-1-5386-2296-4. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, David R., Harrington, Kyle, Burnett, Gary, Luton, Jacob, Thomas, Peter, and Bennett, Pete. To please in a pod: Employing an anthropomorphic agent-interlocutor to enhance trust and user experience in an autonomous, self-driving vehicle. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 49–59. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3342197.3344545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Randy J. and Diener, Edward. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In Clark, Margaret S., editor, Emotion: The Review of Personality and Social Psychology, volume 13, pages 25–59. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1992. ISBN 978-0803946149. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/180631851.Google Scholar
Law, Theresa, Chita-Tegmark, Meia, Rabb, Nicholas, and Scheutz, Matthias. Examining attachment to robots: Benefits, challenges, and alternatives. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(4):1–18, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3526105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, Roslyn. The grain of truth in the critique of Musk, Tesla and Full Self Driving (FSD). Forbes, 2022. URL www.forbes.com/sites/roslynlayton/2022/01/28/the-grain-of-truth-in-the-critique-of-musk-tesla-and-full-self-driving-fsd/?sh=336663d454b7.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1991. ISBN 978-0195092660. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/298419692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeCun, Yann, Bengio, Yoshua, and Hinton, Geoffrey. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Hee Rin, Sung, JaYoung, Šabanović, Selma, and Han, Joenghye. Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 803–808. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4673-4604-7. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343850.Google Scholar
Lee, Hee Rin, Šabanović, Selma, Chang, Wan-Ling, Nagata, Shinichi, Piatt, Jennifer, Bennett, Casey, and Hakken, David. Steps toward participatory design of social robots: Mutual learning with older adults with depression. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 244–253. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020237.Google Scholar
Lee, John D. and See, Katrina A. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1):50–80, 2004. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Min Kyung, Forlizzi, Jodi, Rybski, Paul E., Crabbe, Frederick, Chung, Wayne, Finkle, Josh, Glaser, Eric, and Kiesler, Sara. The Snackbot: Documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 7–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-404-1. doi: 10.1145/1514095.1514100.Google Scholar
Lee, Sau-lai, Lau, Ivy Yee-man, Kiesler, Sara, and Chiu, Chi-Yue. Human mental models of humanoid robots. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2767–2772. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-8914-X. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570532.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hagen, Saez-Pons, Joan, Syrdal, Dag Sverre, and Dautenhahn, Kerstin. In good company? Perception of movement synchrony of a non-anthropomorphic robot. PloS One, 10(5):e0127747, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leite, Iolanda, Castellano, Ginevra, Pereira, André, Martinho, Carlos, and Paiva, Ana. Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’12, pages 367–374, New York, 2012. Association for Computing Machinery, New York. ISBN 978-1-4503-1063-5. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157811.Google Scholar
Leite, Iolanda, Martinho, Carlos, and Paiva, Ana. Social robots for long-term interaction: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2):291–308, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, Iolanda, McCoy, Marissa, Lohani, Monika, Ullman, Daniel, Salomons, Nicole, Stokes, Charlene, Rivers, Susan, and Scassellati, Brian. Emotional storytelling in the classroom: Individual versus group interaction between children and robots. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 75–82. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696481.Google Scholar
Lemaignan, Séverin, Fink, Julia, and Dillenbourg, Pierre. The dynamics of anthropomorphism in robotics. In 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 226–227. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2014a. doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaignan, Séverin, Fink, Julia, Dillenbourg, Pierre, and Braboszcz, Claire. The cognitive correlates of anthropomorphism. In 2014 Human-Robot Interaction Conference, HRI: A Bridge between Robotics and Neuroscience Workshop. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2014b. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0263-x.Google Scholar
Lemaignan, Séverin, Hanheide, Marc, Karg, Michael, Khambhaita, Harmish, Kunze, Lars, Lier, Florian, Lütkebohle, Ingo, and Milliez, Grégoire. Simulation and HRI recent perspectives with the morse simulator. In Brugali, Davide, Broenink, Jan F., Kroeger, Torsten, and MacDonald, Bruce A., editors, Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots, pages 13–24. Springer International, Cham, Switzerland, 2014c. ISBN 978-3-319-11900-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11900-7_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaignan, Séverin, Hanheide, Marc, Karg, Michael, Khambhaita, Harmish, Kunze, Lars, Lier, Florian, Lütkebohle, Ingo, and Milliez, Grégoire. Simulation and HRI: Recent perspectives with the MORSE simulator. In Brugali, Davide, Broenink, Jan, Kroeger, Torsten, and MacDonald, Bruce, editors, Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots: 4th International Conference, SIMPAR 2014, Bergamo, Italy, October 20–23, 2014. Proceedings 4, pages 13–24. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014d. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11900-7_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaignan, Séverin, Warnier, Mathieu, Sisbot, E. Akin, Clodic, Aurélie, and Alami, Rachid. Artificial cognition for social human-robot interaction: An implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 247:45–69, 2017. ISSN 0004-3702. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2016.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenat, Douglas B. CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):33–38, 1995. doi: 10.1145/219717.219745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael, Wang, Jijun, and Hughes, Stephen. Usarsim: Simulation for the study of human-robot interaction. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1(1):98–120, 2007. doi: 10.1177/155534340700100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe. Retrospective and prospective thoughts about infrahumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6):807–817, 2009. doi: 10.1177/1368430209347330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, Paladino, Paola M, Rodriguez-Torres, Ramon, Vaes, Jeroen, Demoulin, Stephanie, Rodriguez-Perez, Armando, and Gaunt, Ruth. The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2):186–197, 2000. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyzberg, Daniel, Spaulding, Samuel, Toneva, Mariya, and Scassellati, Brian. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1882–1887. Cognitive Science Society, Seattle, WA, 2012. URL ht tps://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ck0p200.Google Scholar
Li, Fuan and Betts, Stephen C. Trust: What it is and what it is not. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 2(7), 2003. doi: 10.19030/iber.v2i7.3825.Google Scholar
Li, Mengjun and Suh, Ayoung. Machinelike or humanlike? A literature review of anthropomorphism in AI-enabled technology. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. University of Hawai, Honolulu, 2021. doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2021.493.Google Scholar
Li, Zhenni, Terfurth, Leonie, Woller, Joshua Pepe, and Wiese, Eva. Mind the machines: Applying implicit measures of mind perception to social robotics. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 236–245. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Patrick, Abney, Keith, and Bekey, George A. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012. ISBN 9780262016667. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1004334474.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Jessica and Andreasson, Rebecca. Current challenges for UX evaluation of human-robot interaction. In Schlick, Christopher and Trzcieliński, Stefan, editors, Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future, pages 267–277. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41697-7_24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Jessica and Ziemke, Tom. Social situatedness of natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior, 11(2):79–96, 2003. doi: 10.1177/10597123030112002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Jessica, Alenljung, Beatrice, and Billing, Erik. Evaluating the user experience of human–robot interaction. In Human-Robot Interaction, pages 231–256. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litman, Todd. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning, 2020. URL www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf.Google Scholar
Liu, Peng, Du, Yong, Wang, Lin, and Da Young, Ju. Ready to bully automated vehicles on public roads? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 137:105457, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Phoebe, Glas, Dylan F., Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. It's not polite to point: Generating socially-appropriate deictic behaviors towards people. In The 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 267–274. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3099-2. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483598.Google Scholar
Liu, Phoebe, Glas, Dylan F., Kanda, Takayuki, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Data-driven HRI: Learning social behaviors by example from human-human interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 32(4):988–1008, 2016. ISSN 1552-3098. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2588880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löffler, Diana, Dörrenbächer, Judith, and Hassenzahl, Marc. The uncanny valley effect in zoomorphic robots: The U-shaped relation between animal likeness and likeability. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 261–270. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3319502.3374788.Google Scholar
Loughnan, Stephen and Haslam, Nick. Animals and androids: Implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychological Science, 18(2):116–121, 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovett, Amber. Coding with Blockly. Cherry Lake, Ann Arbor, MI, 2017. ISBN 978-1634721851. URL https://worldcat.org/en/title/953327379.Google Scholar
Lowdermilk, Travis. User-Centered Design: A Developer's Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA, 2013. ISBN 978-1449359805. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/940703603.Google Scholar
Lowe, Andrew, Norris, Anthony C., Farris, A. Jane, and Babbage, Duncan R. Quantifying thematic saturation in qualitative data analysis. Field Methods, 30(3):191–207, 2018. doi: 10.1177/1525822X17749386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luber, Matthias, Spinello, Luciano, Silva, Jens, and Arras, Kai O. Socially-aware robot navigation: A learning approach. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 902–907. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4673-1737-5. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385716.Google Scholar
Lugrin, Birgit, Pelachaud, Catherine, André, Elisabeth, Aylett, Ruth, Bickmore, Timothy, Breazeal, Cynthia, Broekens, Joost, Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Gratch, Jonathan, Kopp, Stefan, Nadel, Jacqueline, Paiva, Ana, and Wykowska, Agnieszka. Challenge Discussion on Socially Interactive Agents: Considerations on Social Interaction, Computational Architectures, Evaluation, and Ethics, page 561–626. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1 edition, 2022. ISBN 9781450398961. doi: 10.1145/3563659.3563677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutin, Jerome M., Kornhauser, Alain L., and Lerner-Lam, Eva. The revolutionary development of self-driving vehicles and implications for the transportation engineering profession. ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers), 83(7):28–32, 2013. URL www.scopus.c om/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84883648917&partnerID=40&md5=33f8d1b58422c14 174e4690152c619cc.Google Scholar
Lyu, Xiao-Kang, Xu, Yuepei, Zhao, Xiao-Fan, Zuo, Xi-Nian, and Hu, Chuan-Peng. Beyond psychology: Prevalence of p value and confidence interval misinterpretation across different fields. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14:e6, 2020. doi: 10.1017/prp.2019.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDorman, Karl F., Vasudevan, Sandosh K., and Ho, Chin-Chang. Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI & SOCIETY, 23(4): 485–510, Jul 2009. ISSN 1435-5655. doi: 10.1007/s00146-008-0181-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. Neil and Quadflieg, Susanne. Perceiving People, chapter 12. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2010. ISBN 9780470561119. doi: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001012.Google Scholar
Manzeschke, Arne. Roboter in der Pflege: Von Menschen, Maschinen und anderen hilfreichen Wesen. EthikJournal, 2019(1), 2019. URL www.ethikjournal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/et hikjournal/Texte_Ausgabe_2019_1/Manzeschke_1.Nov_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Mar, Alex. Modern love: Are we ready for intimacy with androids? Wired Magazine, October 2017. URL www.wired.com/2017/10/hiroshi-ishiguro-when-robots-act-just-like-humans/. Online; accessed 7-September-2018.Google Scholar
Marchesi, Serena, Ghiglino, Davide, Ciardo, Francesca, Perez-Osorio, Jairo, Baykara, Ebru, and Wykowska, Agnieszka. Do we adopt the intentional stance toward humanoid robots? Frontiers in Psychology, 10:450, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, Aarian and Davies, Alex. Uber's self-driving car saw the woman it killed, report says. Wired Magazine, March 2018. URL www.wired.com/story/uber-self-driving-crash-a rizona-ntsb-report/. Online; accessed 7-November-2018.Google Scholar
Marshall, Paul, Rogers, Yvonne, and Pantidi, Nadia. Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 445–454. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4503-0556-3. doi: 10.1145/1958824.1958893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martelaro, Nikolas and Ju, Wendy. WoZ way: Enabling real-time remote interaction proto-typing & observation in on-road vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pages 169–182. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. doi: 10.1145/2998181.2998293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matarić, Maja J. The Robotics Primer. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007. ISBN 9780262633543. URL www.worldcat.org/oclc/604083625.Google Scholar
Matheus, Kayla, Vázquez, Marnyel, and Scassellati, Brian. A social robot for anxiety reduction via deep breathing. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 89–94. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavridis, Nikolaos. A review of verbal and non-verbal human–robot interactive communication. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 63(1):22–35, 2015. ISSN 0921-8890. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Scott E., Lau, Michael Y., and Howard, George S. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70 (6):487, 2015. doi: 10.1037/a0039400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, Richard E. and DaPra, C. Scott. An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3): 239–252, 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0028616.Google ScholarPubMed
McCorduck, Pamela. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1979. ISBN 978-1568812052. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/748860627.Google Scholar
McDermott, Drew. Yes, computers can think. New York Times, 1997. URL http://nytimes.co m/1997/05/14/opinion/yes-computers-can-think.html.Google Scholar
McLaren, Ian P. L., Forrest, Charlotte L. D., McLaren, Rossy P., Jones, Fergal William, Aitken, Michael, and Mackintosh, Nicholas J. Associations and propositions: The case for a dual-process account of learning in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 108:185–195, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuillin, Emily, Churamani, Nikhil, and Gunes, Hatice. Learning socially appropriate robo-waiter behaviours through real-time user feedback. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 541–550. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.202 2.9889395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. Basic Dimensions for a General Psychological Theory: Implications for Personality, Social, Environmental, and Developmental Studies. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Cambridge, MA, 1980. ISBN 978-0899460048. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/9251 30232.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert and Russell, James A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1974. ISBN 9780262630719. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/3181 33343.Google Scholar
Mehta, Vikas. The new proxemics: COVID-19, social distancing, and sociable space. Journal of Urban Design, 25(6):669–674, 2020. doi: doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1785283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalowski, Marek P., Šabanović, Selma, and Simmons, Reid. A spatial model of engagement for a social robot. In 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, pages 762–767. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 0-7803-9511-1. doi: 10.1109/AMC.2006.1631755.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Marek P., Šabanović, Selma, and Kozima, Hideki. A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. In 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 89–96. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007. ISBN 978-1-59593-617-2. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228729.Google Scholar
Mieczkowski, Hannah, Liu, Sunny Xun, Hancock, Jeffrey, and Reeves, Byron. Helping not hurting: Applying the stereotype content model and bias map to social robotics. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 222–229. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2019. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchel, Russ. DMV probing whether Tesla violates state regulations with self-driving claims. Los Angeles Times, 2021. URL www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-05-17/dmv-tesla-california-fsd-autopilot-safety.Google Scholar
Mitra, Sushmita and Acharya, Tinku. Gesture recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 37(3):311–324, 2007. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.893280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsunaga, Noriaki, Smith, Christian, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Adapting robot behavior for human–robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(4):911–916, 2008. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.926867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlekus, Lisa, Bentler, Dominik, Paruzel, Agnieszka, Kato-Beiderwieden, Anna-Lena, and Maier, Günter W. How to raise technology acceptance: User experience characteristics as technology-inherent determinants. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 51(3):273–283, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11612-020-00529-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moharana, Sanika, Panduro, Alejandro E., Lee, Hee Rin, and Riek, Laurel D. Robots for joy, robots for sorrow: community based robot design for dementia caregivers. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 458–467. IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2019. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Roger K. A Bayesian explanation of the “uncanny valley” effect and related psychological phenomena. Scientific Reports, 2:864, 2012. doi: 10.1038/srep00864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales Saiki, Luis Yoichi, Satake, Satoru, Kanda, Takayuki, and Hagita, Norihiro. Modeling environments from a route perspective. In 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 441–448. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4503-0561-7. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957815.Google Scholar
Morales Saiki, Luis Yoichi, Satake, Satoru, Huq, Rajibul, Glas, Dylan, Kanda, Takayuki, and Hagita, Norihiro. How do people walk side-by-side? Using a computational model of human behavior for a social robot. In 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 301–308. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4503-1063-5. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157799.Google Scholar
Mori, Masahiro. The uncanny valley. Energy, 7:33–35, 1970. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811.Google Scholar
Mori, Masahiro. The Buddha in the Robot. Tuttle Publishing, Tokyo, Japan, 1982. ISBN 9784333010028. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/843422852.Google Scholar
Mori, Masahiro, MacDorman, Karl F., and Kageki, Norri. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2):98–100, 2012. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosbergen, Dominique. Good job, America. You killed hitchBOT. Huffpost, 2015. URL www.huffpost.com/entry/hitchbot-destroyed-philadelphia_n_55bf24cde4b0b23e3c e32a67.Google Scholar
Moscow Times. Third Russian doctor falls from hospital window after coronavirus complaint. Moscow Times, May 2020. URL www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/05/04/third-russian-doctor-falls-from-hospital-window-after-coronavirus-complaint-a70176.Google Scholar
Mostafaoui, Ghiles, Schmidt, R. C., Hasnain, Syed Khursheed, Salesse, Robin, and Marin, Ludovic. Human unintentional and intentional interpersonal coordination in interaction with a humanoid robot. PLoS One, 17(1):e0261174, 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moujahid, Meriam, Hastie, Helen, and Lemon, Oliver. Multi-party interaction with a robot receptionist. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 927–931. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, Bonnie M. Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11):1905–1922, 1994. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumm, Jonathan and Mutlu, Bilge. Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 331–338. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4503-0561-7. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957786.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mike. The beginning of the end: Google's AI has beaten a top human player at the complex game of Go. Quartz, 2016. URL https://qz.com/636637/the-beginning-of-the-end-googles-ai-has-beaten-a-top-human-player-at-the-complex-game-of-go/.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Bilge and Forlizzi, Jodi. Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 287–294. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2008. ISBN 978-1-60558-017-3. doi: 10.1145/1349822.1349860.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Bilge, Forlizzi, Jodi, and Hodgins, Jessica. A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 518–523. Citeseer, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0199-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2006.321322.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Bilge, Shiwa, Toshiyuki, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In The 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 61–68. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-404-1. doi: 10.1145/1514095.1514109.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Bilge, Kanda, Takayuki, Forlizzi, Jodi, Hodgins, Jessica, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 1(2):12, 2012. doi: 10.1145/2070719.2070725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Junya, Kuramoto, Itaru, Baba, Jun, Ogawa, Kohei, Yoshikawa, Yuichiro, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Continuous hospitality with social robots at a hotel. SN Applied Sciences, 2(3):1–13, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2192-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakauchi, Yasushi and Simmons, Reid. A social robot that stands in line. Autonomous Robots, 12(3):313–324, 2002. doi: 10.1023/A:1015273816637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naneva, Stanislava, Sarda Gou, Marina, Webb, Thomas L., and Prescott, Tony J. A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(6):1179–1201, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimento, Alexandre Moreira, Vismari, Lucio Flavio, Molina, Caroline Bianca Santos Tancredi, Cugnasca, Paulo Sergio, Camargo, Joao Batista, de Almeida, Jorge Rady, Inam, Rafia, Fersman, Elena, Marquezini, Maria Valeria, and Hata, Alberto Yukinobu. A systematic literature review about the impact of artificial intelligence on autonomous vehicle safety. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(12):4928–4946, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2949915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Roads and Motorists’ Association. Driverless cars: The benefits and what it means for the future of mobility, 2018. URL www.mynrma.com.au/cars-and-driving/driver-train ing-and-licences/resources/driverless-cars-the-benefits-and-what-it-means-for-the-future-of-mobility.Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board. Collision between vehicle controlled by developmental automated driving system and pedestrian, Tempe, Arizona, March 18, 2018. Report, National Transportation Safety Board, 2019. URL www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1903.pdf.Google Scholar
Nauts, Sanne, Langner, Oliver, Huijsmans, Inge, Vonk, Roos, and Wigboldus, Daniël H. J. Forming impressions of personality: A replication and review of Asch's (1946) evidence for a primacy-of-warmth effect in impression formation. Social Psychology, 45(3):153, 2014. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navigli, Roberto and Ponzetto, Simone Paolo. BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artificial Intelligence, 193:217–250, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehaniv, Chrystopher L., Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Kubacki, Jens, Haegele, Martin, Parlitz, Christopher, and Alami, Rachid. A methodological approach relating the classification of gesture to identification of human intent in the context of human-robot interaction. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 371–377. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0780392744. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513807.Google Scholar
Newhart, Veronica Ahumada, Warschauer, Mark, and Sender, Leonard. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 23(4):9–25, 2016. ISSN 2327-2686. URL https://escholarship.o rg/uc/item/9zm4h7nf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Bang, Melewar, T. C., and Chen, Junsong. A framework of brand likeability: an exploratory study of likeability in firm-level brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21 (4):368–390, 2013. doi: 10.1177/030630701303800303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niimi, Ryosuke and Watanabe, Katsumi. Consistency of likeability of objects across views and time. Perception, 41(6):673–686, 2012. doi: 10.1068/p7240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishiguchi, Shogo, Ogawa, Kohei, Yoshikawa, Yuichiro, Chikaraishi, Takenobu, Hirata, Oriza, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Theatrical approach: Designing human-like behaviour in humanoid robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 89:158–166, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, Tatsuya, Kanda, Takayuki, Kidokoro, Hiroyoshi, Suehiro, Yoshitaka, and Yamada, Sachie. Why do children abuse robots? Interaction Studies, 17(3):347–369, 2016. doi: 10.1075/is.17.3.02nom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Don. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, New York, 2013. ISBN 9780465072996. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/862103168.Google Scholar
Norman, Donald A. The way I see it: Signifiers, not affordances. Interactions, 15(6):18–19, 2008. doi: 10.1145/1409040.1409044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Ebersole, Charles R., DeHaven, Alexander, and Mellor, David. The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11):2600–2606, 2017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourbakhsh, Illah R., Bobenage, Judith, Grange, Sebastien, Lutz, Ron, Meyer, Roland, and Soto, Alvaro. An affective mobile robot educator with a full-time job. Artificial Intelligence, 114(1–2):95–124, 1999. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00027-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourbakhsh, Illah Reza. Robot Futures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2013. ISBN 9780262018623. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/945438245.Google Scholar
Novikova, Jekaterina and Watts, Leon. Towards artificial emotions to assist social coordination in HRI. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1):77–88, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0254-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, Regina. Statistical errors. Nature, 506(7487):150, 2014. doi: 10.1038/506150a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obaid, Mohammad, Johal, Wafa, and Mubin, Omar. Domestic drones: Context of use in research literature. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pages 196–203. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3406499.3415076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, Daniel M., Meyvis, Tom, and Davidenko, Nicolas. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4):867–872, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, Andrew and Turner, Terence J. What's basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3):315, 1990. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald, and Collins, Allan. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988. ISBN 978-0521386647. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/910015120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osawa, Hirotaka, Ohmura, Ren, and Imai, Michita. Using attachable humanoid parts for realizing imaginary intention and body image. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):109–123, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s12369-008-0004-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacchierotti, Elena, Christensen, Henrik I., and Jensfelt, Patric. Evaluation of passing distance for social robots. In The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 315–320. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0564-5. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314436.Google Scholar
Paepcke, Steffi and Takayama, Leila. Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 45–52. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4892-0. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453268.Google Scholar
Paetzel, Maike, Peters, Christopher, Nyström, Ingela, and Castellano, Ginevra. Congruency matters—How ambiguous gender cues increase a robot's uncanniness. In Agah, Arvin, Cabibihan, John-John, Howard, Ayanna M., Salichs, Miguel A., and He, Hongsheng, editors, International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 402–412. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetzel-Prüsmann, Maike. The novelty in the uncanny: Designing interactions to change first impressions. PhD thesis, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2020. URL http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-418921.Google Scholar
Pantic, Maja, Pentland, Alex, Nijholt, Anton, and Huang, Thomas S. Human computing and machine understanding of human behavior: A survey. In S., Huang, T., Nijholt, A., Pantic, M., and Pentland, A., editors, Artificial Intelligence for Human Computing, volume 4451 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 47–71. Springer, Berlin, 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72348-6_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasuraman, Raja and Riley, Victor. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2):230–253, 1997. doi: 10.1518/001872097778543886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Hae Won, Gelsomini, Mirko, Lee, Jin Joo, and Breazeal, Cynthia. Telling stories to robots: The effect of backchanneling on a child's storytelling. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 100–108. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017a. ISBN 978-1-4503-4336-7. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020245.Google Scholar
Park, Hae Won, Rosenberg-Kima, Rinat, Rosenberg, Maor, Gordon, Goren, and Breazeal, Cynthia. Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 137–145. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017b. doi: 10.1145/2909824.3020213.Google Scholar
Partikska, and Kattepur, Ajay. Robotic tele-operation performance analysis via digital twin simulations. In 2022 14th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), pages 415–417. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/COMSNETS53615.2022.9668555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, Michael and Bartneck, Christoph. The Invisible Naked Guy: An exploration of a minimalistic robot. In The First International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pages II–2–p2, 2013. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A4YM5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, Alex and Heibeck, Tracy. Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010. ISBN 978-0262515122. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/646395585.Google Scholar
Pérez-Hurtado, Ignacio, Capitán, Jesús, Caballero, Fernando, and Merino, Luis. Decision-theoretic planning with person trajectory prediction for social navigation. In Robot 2015: Second Iberian Robotics Conference, pages 247–258. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-27148-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27149-1_20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perugia, Giulia and Lisy, Dominika. Robot's gendering trouble: A scoping review of gendering humanoid robots and its effects on HRI. arXiv, arXiv:2207.01130, 2022.Google Scholar
Perugia, Giulia, Guidi, Stefano, Bicchi, Margherita, and Parlangeli, Oronzo. The shape of our bias: Perceived age and gender in the humanoid robots of the ABOT database. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 110–119. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889366.Google Scholar
Perugia, Giulia, Boor, Latisha, van der Bij, Laura, Rikmenspoel, Okke, Foppen, Robin, and Guidi, Stefano. Models of (often) ambivalent robot stereotypes: Content, structure, and predictors of robots’ age and gender stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 428–436. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3568162.3576981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, Dorde, Mijailovic, Radomir, and Pesic, Dalibor. Traffic accidents with autonomous vehicles: Type of collisions, manoeuvres and errors of conventional vehicles’ drivers. Transportation Research Procedia, 45:161–168, 2020. ISSN 2352-1465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.003. URL http://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146520301654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., Tropp, Linda R., Wagner, Ulrich, and Christ, Oliver. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3):271–280, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, Rosalind W. Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge, MA, 1997. ISBN 978-0262661157. URL https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/affective-computing.Google Scholar
Pineau, Joelle, Montemerlo, Michael, Pollack, Martha, Roy, Nicholas, and Thrun, Sebastian. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4):271–281, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00381-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirsig, Robert M. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values. Morrow, New York, 1974. ISBN 0688002307. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/41356566.Google Scholar
Piumsomboon, Thammathip, Clifford, Rory, and Bartneck, Christoph. Demonstrating Maori haka with Kinect and Nao robots. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 429–430. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012. ISBN 9781450310635. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157832.Google Scholar
Pizzagalli, Diego A., Holmes, Avram J., Dillon, Daniel G., Goetz, Elena L., Birk, Jeffrey L., Bogdan, Ryan, Dougherty, Darin D., Iosifescu, Dan V., Rauch, Scott L., and Fava, Maurizio. Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(6):702–710, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plutchik, Robert Ed and Conte, Hope R. Circumplex Models of Personality and Emotions. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1997. ISBN 978-1557983800. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/442562242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop, Cristina Anamaria, Simut, Ramona, Pintea, Sebastian, Saldien, Jelle, Rusu, Alina, David, Daniel, Vanderfaeillie, Johan, Lefeber, Dirk, and Vanderborght, Bram. Can the social robot Probo help children with autism to identify situation-based emotions? A series of single case experiments. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 10(3):1350025, 2013. doi: 10.1142/S0219843613500254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Jonathan, Russell, James A., and Peterson, Bradley S. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3):715–734, 2005. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, Michael I. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. Guilford Press, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1609189853. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/958053069.Google Scholar
Powers, Aaron, Kramer, Adam D. I., Lim, Shirlene, Kuo, Jean, Lee, Sau-lai, and Kiesler, Sara. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 158–163. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-9274-4. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513773.Google Scholar
Powers, Aaron, Kiesler, Sara, Fussell, Susan, and Torrey, Cristen. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 145–152. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2007. ISBN 978-1-59593-617-2. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228736.Google Scholar
Press, Associated. San Francisco supervisors bar police robots from using deadly force for now. NPR, 2022. URL www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1141129944/san-francisco-deadly-robots-police.Google Scholar
Pulles, Niels J. and Hartman, Paul. Likeability and its effect on outcomes of interpersonal interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 66:56–63, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Alec, Kim, Jong Wook, Xu, Tao, Brockman, Greg, McLeavey, Christine, and Sutskever, Ilya. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. arXiv, arXiv:2212.04356, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.04356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Natasha, Bennett, Casey C., Šabanović, Selma, Nagata, Shinichi, Eldridge, Lori, Collins, Sawyer, and Piatt, Jennifer A. More than just friends: In-home use and design recommendations for sensing socially assistive robots (SARs) by older adults with depression. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10(1):237–255, 2019. doi: 10.1515/pjbr-2019-0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Natasha, Šabanović, Selma, Milojević, Staša, and Gupta, Apurva. Top of the class: Mining product characteristics associated with crowdfunding success and failure of home robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14:149–163, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00776-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Byron and Nass, Clifford Ivar. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. ISBN 978-1575860534. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/796222708.Google Scholar
Rehm, Matthias and Krogsager, Anders. Negative affect in human robot interaction— Impoliteness in unexpected encounters with robots. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 45–50. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628529.Google Scholar
Reich-Stiebert, Natalia and Eyssel, Friederike. Learning with educational companion robots? Toward attitudes on education robots, predictors of attitudes, and application potentials for education robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5):875–888, Nov 2015. ISSN 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich-Stiebert, Natalia and Eyssel, Friederike. Robots in the classroom: What teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 671–680. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-47436-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich-Stiebert, Natalia and Eyssel, Friederike Anne. Leben mit Robotern-Eine Online-Befragung im deutschen Sprachraum zur Akzeptanz von Servicerobotern im Alltag [Poster], 2013. URL https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/publication/2907019.Google Scholar
Reichardt, Jasia. Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction. Thames and Hudson, London, 1978. ISBN 9780140049381. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1001944069.Google Scholar
Remington, Nancy A., Fabrigar, Leandre R., and Visser, Penny S. Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2):286–300, 2000. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Charles, Ponsler, Brett, Holroyd, Aaron, and Sidner, Candace L. Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 375–382. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4892-0. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453163.Google Scholar
Riek, Laurel D. Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1):119–136, 2012. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, Laurel D. Robotics technology in mental health care. In Luxton, David D., editor, Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral and Mental Health Care, pages 185–203. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2016. doi: 10.1145/3127874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, Laurel D. Healthcare robotics. Communications of the ACM, 60(11):68–78, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3127874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, Laurel D., Paul, Philip C., and Robinson, Peter. When my robot smiles at me: Enabling human-robot rapport via real-time head gesture mimicry. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 3(1–2):99–108, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s12193-009-0028-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo and Craighero, Layla. The mirror neuron-system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(4):169–192, 2004. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, Ben, Dautenhahn, Kerstin, and Dickerson, Paul. From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In 2nd International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pages 205–211. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4244-3351-3. doi: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.32.Google Scholar
Robinson, Hayley, MacDonald, Bruce, and Broadbent, Elizabeth. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4):575–591, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesler, Eileen, Manzey, Dietrich, and Onnasch, Linda. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Science Robotics, 6(58):eabj5425, 2021. doi: 10.14279/depositonce-12447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roesler, Eileen, Naendrup-Poell, Lara, Manzey, Dietrich, and Onnasch, Linda. Why context matters: The influence of application domain on preferred degree of anthropomorphism and gender attribution in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14: 1155–1166, 2022. doi: 10.14279/depositonce-15458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfing, Katharina, Brand, R. J., and Gogate, L. J. Multimodal motherese. In Symposium at the X International Congress for Studies in Child Language IASCL 2005, 2005. URL https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2618244.Google Scholar
Ros, Raquel, Lemaignan, Séverin, Sisbot, E. Akin, Alami, Rachid, Steinwender, Jasmin, Hamann, Katharina, and Warneken, Felix. Which one? Grounding the referent based on efficient human-robot interaction. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 570–575. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 1944-9445. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Silvia, Ferland, François, and Tapus, Adriana. User profiling and behavioral adaptation for HRI: A survey. Pattern Recognition Letters, 99:3–12, 2017. ISSN 0167-8655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.06.002. URL www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167865517301976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothe, Rasmus, Timofte, Radu, and Gool, Luc Van. Deep expectation of real and apparent age from a single image without facial landmarks. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), 126(2):144–157, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11263-016-0940-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenbücher, Dirk, Li, Jamy, Sirkin, David, Mok, Brian, and Ju, Wendy. Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. In 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 795–802. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. ISBN 978-1-5090-3930-2. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745210.Google Scholar
Ruijten, Peter A. M., Terken, Jacques M. B., and Chandramouli, Sanjeev N. Enhancing trust in autonomous vehicles through intelligent user interfaces that mimic human behavior. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(4):62, 2018. doi: 10.3390/mti2040062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, James A. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6):1161–1178, 1980. doi: 10.1037/h0077714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, James A. and Barrett, Lisa Feldman. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5):805, 1999. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, James A., Lewicka, Maria, and Niit, Toomas. A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5):848–856, 1989. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Stuart and Norvig, Peter. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson, Essex, UK, 4th edition, 2022. ISBN 978-1292401133. URL www.worldcat.org/oclc/1242911311.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Mel D. and Towns, Ashley M. Scan path differences and similarities during emotion perception in those with and without autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7):1371–1381, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0525-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rymarczyk, Krystyna, Żurawski, Łukasz, Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila, and Szatkowska, Iwona. Neural correlates of facial mimicry: simultaneous measurements of EMG and BOLD responses during perception of dynamic compared to static facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:52, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Šabanović, Selma. Imagine all the robots: Developing a critical practice of cultural and disciplinary traversals in social robotics. PhD thesis, Doctoral Thesis Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2007. URL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13015/4057.Google Scholar
Šabanović, Selma. Emotion in robot cultures: Cultural models of affect in social robot design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design & Emotion (D&E2010), pages 4–11, 2010. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2596814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šabanović, Selma and Chang, Wan-Ling. Socializing robots: Constructing robotic sociality in the design and use of the assistive robot PARO. AI & Society, 31(4):537–551, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00146-015-0636-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šabanović, Selma, Michalowski, Marek P., and Simmons, Reid. Robots in the wild: Observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. In 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, pages 596–601. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 0-7803-9511-1. doi: 10.1109/AMC.2006.1631758.Google Scholar
Šabanović, Selma, Reeder, Sarah M., and Kechavarzi, Bobak. Designing robots in the wild: In situ prototype evaluation for a break management robot. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(1):70–88, 2014. ISSN 2163-0364. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Sabanovic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šabanović, Selma, Chang, Wan-Ling, Bennett, Casey C., Piatt, Jennifer A., and Hakken, David. A robot of my own: Participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, pages 104–114. Springer, Cham Switzerland, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20891-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_11.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9):1133–1170, 1993. doi: 10.1177/00187267930460090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Jefferson, Gail. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4):696–735, 1974. doi: 10.2307/412243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saerbeck, Martin and Bartneck, Christoph. Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 53–60. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4893-7. doi: 10.1145/1734454.1734473.Google Scholar
Saerbeck, Martin, Schut, Tom, Bartneck, Christoph, and Janse, Maddy. Expressive robots in education—Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In 28th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2010), pages 1613–1622. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. ISBN 978-1-60558-929-9. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753567.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Daisuke, Kanda, Takayuki, Ono, Tetsuo, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Android as a telecommunication medium with a human-like presence. In 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 193–200. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007. ISBN 978-1-59593-617-2. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228743.Google Scholar
Salem, Maha, Eyssel, Friederike, Rohlfing, Katharina, Kopp, Stefan, and Joublin, Frank. To err is human(-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3):313–323, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvini, P., Ciaravella, G., Yu, W., Ferri, G., Manzi, A., Mazzolai, B., Laschi, C., Oh, S. R., and Dario, P. How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 368–374. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-7991-7. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5654677.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Eduardo Benítez, Brandstatter, Jürgen, Yalcin, Utku, and Bartneck, Christoph. Robot likeability and reciprocity in human robot interaction: Using ultimatum game to determinate reciprocal likeable robot strategies. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4):851–862, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00658-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanghvi, Jyotirmay, Castellano, Ginevra, Leite, Iolanda, Pereira, André, McOwan, Peter W., and Paiva, Ana. Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect engagement with a game companion. In 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 305–311. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4503-0561-7. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957781.Google Scholar
Sargent, Porter Edward. The New Immoralities: Clearing the Way for a New Ethics. Porter Sargent, Boston, MA, 2013. ISBN 978-1258541880. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/3794581.Google Scholar
Satake, Satoru, Kanda, Takayuki, Glas, Dylan F., Imai, Michita, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. How to approach humans? Strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 109–116. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-404-1. doi: 10.1145/1514095.1514117.Google Scholar
Sauppé, Allison and Mutlu, Bilge. The social impact of a robot co-worker in industrial settings. In 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3613–3622. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-3145-6. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702181.Google Scholar
Scassellati, Brian. Imitation and mechanisms of joint attention: A developmental structure for building social skills on a humanoid robot. In L., Nehaniv, C., editor, Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents, volume 1562 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 176–195. Springer, Berlin, 1999. ISBN 978-3-540-65959-4. doi: 10.1007/3-540-48834-0_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scassellati, Brian. Investigating models of social development using a humanoid robot. In Webb, Barbara and Consi, Thomas, editors, Biorobotics: Methods and Applications, pages 145–168. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000. ISBN 9780262731416. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/807529041.Google Scholar
Scassellati, Brian, Admoni, Henny, and Matarić, Maja. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14:275–294, 2012. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, Kristin E., Chen, Jessie Y. C., Szalma, James L., and Hancock, Peter A. A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3):377–400, 2016. doi: 10.1177/0018720816634228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheepers, Daan, Spears, Russell, Doosje, Bertjan, and Manstead, Antony S. R. The social functions of ingroup bias: Creating, confirming, or changing social reality. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1):359–396, 2006. doi: 10.1080/10463280601088773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. Emotion as a multicomponent process: A model and some cross-cultural data. Review of Personality & Social Psychology, 5:37–63, 1984. URL https://doi.org/psyc info/1986-17269-001.Google Scholar
Schilbach, Leonhard, Wilms, Marcus, Eickhoff, Simon B., Romanzetti, Sandro, Tepest, Ralf, Bente, Gary, Shah, N. Jon, Fink, Gereon R., and Vogeley, Kai. Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12):2702–2715, 2010. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmiedel, Theresa, Zhong, Vivienne Jia, and Jäger, Janine. Value-sensitive design for AI technologies: Proposition of basic research principles based on social robotics research. In Proceedings of the 4th Upper-Rhine Artificial Intelligence Symposium, pages 74–79. Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, 2022. ISBN 978-3-00-073637-7. doi: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17162.77762.Google Scholar
Schnoebelen, Tyler and Kuperman, Victor. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for linguistic research. Psihologija, 43(4):441–464, 2010. doi: 10.2298/PSI1004441S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, Andrew, Sullivan, Dakota, Zhang, Ze Dong, Rakita, Daniel, and Mutlu, Bilge. Lively: Enabling multimodal, lifelike, and extensible real-time robot motion. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 594–602. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3568162.3576982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonenberg, Billy and Bartneck, Christoph. Mysterious machines. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 349–350. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4893-7. doi: 10.1145/1734454.1734572.Google Scholar
Schouten, Alexander P., Portegies, Tijs C., Withuis, Iris, Willemsen, Lotte M., and Mazerant-Dubois, Komala. Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Computers in Human Behavior, 126:106980, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, dir., Jake. Robot and Frank. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Culver City, CA, 2013. URL www.imdb.com/title/tt1990314/.Google Scholar
Seaborn, Katie, Barbareschi, Giulia, and Chandra, Shruti. Not only WEIRD but “uncanny”? A systematic review of diversity in human–robot interaction research. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15:1841–1870, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-00968-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. The Chinese room. In Wilson, Robert A. and Keil, Frank C., editors, The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999. URL https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil201/Searle.pdf.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3):417–457, 1980. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebo, Sarah, Stoll, Brett, Scassellati, Brian, and Jung, Malte F. Robots in groups and teams: A literature review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2): 1–36, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3415247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeger, Anna-Maria and Heinzl, Armin. Human versus machine: Contingency factors of anthropomorphism as a trust-inducing design strategy for conversational agents. In Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 129–139. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67431-5_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seger, Charles R., Smith, Eliot R., Percy, Elise James, and Conrey, Frederica R. Reach out and reduce prejudice: The impact of interpersonal touch on intergroup liking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1):51–58, 2014. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2013.856786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, Johanna, Vestergaard, Christina, and Damholdt, Malene F. The complexity of human social interactions calls for mixed methods in HRI: Comment on “A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human-robot Interaction,” by G. Hoffman and X. Zhao. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1):1–4, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3439715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sequeira, Pedro, Alves-Oliveira, Patrícia, Ribeiro, Tiago, Di Tullio, Eugenio, Petisca, Sofia, Melo, Francisco S., Castellano, Ginevra, and Paiva, Ana. Discovering social interaction strategies for robots from restricted-perception Wizard-of-Oz studies. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 197–204. IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, Aparna, Hamer, Mark, McMunn, Anne, and Steptoe, Andrew. Social isolation and loneliness: Relationships with cognitive function during 4 years of follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75(2):161–170, 2013. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31827f09cd.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharkey, Amanda and Sharkey, Noel. Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14:27–40, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, Amanda J. C. Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4):283–297, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Megha, Hildebrandt, Dale, Newman, Gem, Young, James E., and Eskicioglu, Rasit. Communicating affect via flight path: Exploring use of the Laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. In 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 293–300. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4673-3099-2. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483602.Google Scholar
Shaw-Garlock, Glenda. Looking forward to sociable robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(3):249–260, 2009. ISSN 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-009-0021-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Chao, Shiomi, Masahiro, Smith, Christian, Kanda, Takayuki, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. A model of distributional handing interaction for a mobile robot. In Newman, Paul, Fox, Dieter, and Hsu, David, editors, Robotics: Science and Systems, pages 24–28. RSS Proceedings, 2013. URL http://roboticsproceedings.org/rss09/p55.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, Takanori. Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100 (8):2527–2538, 2012. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, Takanori, Wada, Kazuyoshi, Ikeda, Yousuke, and Šabanović, Selma. Cross-cultural studies on subjective evaluation of a seal robot. Advanced Robotics, 23(4):443–458, 2009. doi: 10.1163/156855309X408826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Richard M. and Schneider, Walter. Automatic and controlled processing revisited. Psychological Review, 91(2):269–276, 1984. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiomi, Masahiro, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 305–312. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2006. ISBN 1-59593-294-1. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiomi, Masahiro, Zanlungo, Francesco, Hayashi, Kotaro, and Kanda, Takayuki. Towards a socially acceptable collision avoidance for a mobile robot navigating among pedestrians using a pedestrian model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3):443–455, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0238-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiwa, Toshiyuki, Kanda, Takayuki, Imai, Michita, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. How quickly should communication robots respond? In 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 153–160. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2008. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shourmasti, Elaheh Shahmir, Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo, Holone, Harald, and Demi, Selina. User experience in social robots. Sensors, 21(15):5052, 2021. doi: 10.3390/s21155052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siciliano, Bruno and Khatib, Oussama. Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, Berlin, 2016. ISBN 9783319325507. URL www.worldcat.org/oclc/945745190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction, volume 45. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1405159012. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/973423100.Google Scholar
Sidner, Candace L., Lee, Christopher, Kidd, Cory D., Lesh, Neal, and Rich, Charles. Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artificial Intelligence, 166(1–2):140–164, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert Alexander. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 3rd edition, 1996. ISBN 0262691914. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/552080160.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter W. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. Penguin, New York, 2009. ISBN 9781594201981. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/857636246.Google Scholar
Singh, Ashish and Young, James E. Animal-inspired human-robot interaction: A robotic tail for communicating state. In 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 237–238. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4503-1063-5. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157773.Google Scholar
Sirkin, David, Mok, Brian, Yang, Stephen, and Ju, Wendy. Mechanical ottoman: How robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 11–18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696461.Google Scholar
Sisbot, Emrah Akin, Marin-Urias, Luis F., Alami, Rachid, and Simeon, Thierry. A human aware mobile robot motion planner. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):874–883, 2007. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2007.904911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, Ka-Chun, Suh, Irene H, Mukherjee, Mukul, Oleynikov, Dmitry, and Stergiou, Nick. The effect of music on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance. Surgical Innovation, 17(4):306–311, 2010. doi: 10.1177/1553350610381087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloman, Steven A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1):3–22, 1996. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Aaron. US views of technology and the future: Science in the next 50 years. Pew Research Center, April 17, 2014. URL http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploa ds/sites/14/2014/04/US-Views-of-Technology-and-the-Future.pdf.Google Scholar
Smith, Colin Tucker and De Houwer, Jan. The impact of persuasive messages on iat performance is moderated by source attractiveness and likeability. Social Psychology, 45(6):437, 2014. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and DeCoster, Jamie. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2):108–131, 2000. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Olivia. Roomba creator responds to reports of “Poopocalypse”: “We see this a lot.” The Guardian, 2016. URL www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/15/roomba-robot-vac uum-poopocalypse-facebook-post.Google Scholar
Sosnowski, Stefan, Bittermann, Ansgar, Kuhnlenz, Kolja, and Buss, Martin. Design and evaluation of emotion-display EDDIE. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3113–3118. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0258-1. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.282330.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Robert. Robotic weapons and the future of war. In Tripodi, Paolo and Wolfendale, Jessica, editors, New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World, pages 117–133. Ashgate, Surrey, UK, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4094-0105-6. URL http://worldc at.org/oclc/960210186.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Robert. Robots, rape, and representation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9 (4):465–477, 2017. ISSN 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Robert and Howard, Mark. When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 80:206–215, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Robert and Sparrow, Linda. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2):141–161, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spatola, Nicolas and Wudarczyk, Olga A. Ascribing emotions to robots: Explicit and implicit attribution of emotions and perceived robot anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior, 124:106934, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spatola, Nicolas, Kühnlenz, Barbara, and Cheng, Gordon. Perception and evaluation in human–robot interaction: The human–robot interaction evaluation scale (HRIES)—A multicomponent approach of anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(7):1517–1539, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00667-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spatola, Nicolas, Marchesi, Serena, and Wykowska, Agnieszka. Different models of anthropomorphism across cultures and ontological limits in current frameworks the integrative framework of anthropomorphism. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9:863319, 2022. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.863319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spexard, Thorsten, Li, Shuyin, Wrede, Britta, Fritsch, Jannik, Sagerer, Gerhard, Booij, Olaf, Zivkovic, Zoran, Terwijn, Bas, and Krose, Ben. BIRON, where are you? Enabling a robot to learn new places in a real home environment by integrating spoken dialog and visual localization. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 934–940. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0258-1. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.281770.Google Scholar
Stahl, Bernd Carsten and Coeckelbergh, Mark. Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86:152–161, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapels, Julia G. and Eyssel, Friederike. Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. PloS One, 16(1):e0244697, 2021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapels, Julia G. and Eyssel, Friederike. Robocalypse? Yes, please! The role of robot autonomy in the development of ambivalent attitudes towards robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(3):683–697, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00817-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stedeman, Alison, Sutherland, Dean, and Bartneck, Christoph. Learning ROILA. CreateSpace, Charleston, SC, 2011. ISBN 978-1466494978.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. The artificial life roots of artificial intelligence. Artificial Life, 1(1/2):75–110, 1993. doi: 10.1162/artl.1993.1.1_2.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steil, Jochen, Finas, Dominique, Beck, Susanne, Manzeschke, Arne, and Haux, Reinhold. Robotic systems in operating theaters: New forms of team–machine interaction in health care. Methods of Information in Medicine, 58(S 01):e14–e25, 2019. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692465.Google ScholarPubMed
Stein, Nancy L. and Oatley, Keith. Basic emotions: Theory and measurement. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4):161–168, 1992. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stel, Mariëlle, Van Baaren, Rick B., and Vonk, Roos. Effects of mimicking: Acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6):965–976, 2008. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, Marlene, Kerwer, Martin, Lieb, Klaus, and Chasiotis, Anita. Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research. PloS One, 17(6):e0268789, 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, Fritz, Martin, Leonard L., and Stepper, Sabine. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5):768, 1988. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strömbergsson, Sofia, Hjalmarsson, Anna, Edlund, Jens, and House, David. Timing responses to questions in dialogue. In Proceedings of Interspeech, pages 2584–2588. International Speech Communication Association, 2013. URL www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2013/strombergsson13_interspeech.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Osamu, Kanda, Takayuki, Imai, Michita, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. Natural deictic communication with humanoid robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1441–1448. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2007. ISBN 978-1-4244-0911-2. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2007.4399120.Google Scholar
Suguitan, Michael and Hoffman, Guy. Blossom: A handcrafted open-source robot. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 8(1), 2019. doi: 10.1145/3310356.Google Scholar
Sung, Ja-Young, Guo, Lan, Grinter, Rebecca E., and Christensen, Henrik I. “My Roomba is Rambo”: Intimate home appliances. In 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 145–162. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-74852-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_9.Google Scholar
Sung, JaYoung, Grinter, Rebecca E., and Christensen, Henrik I. “Pimp my Roomba”: Designing for personalization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 193–196. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-246-7. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1518732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suri, Siddharth and Watts, Duncan J. Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PloS One, 6(3):e16836, 2011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweigart, Al. Scratch Programming Playground: Learn to Program by Making Cool Games. No Starch Press, San Francisco, CA, 2016. ISBN 9781718500211. URL https://worldcat.o rg/en/title/1125157436.Google Scholar
Szafir, Daniel, Mutlu, Bilge, and Fong, Terry. Communicating directionality in flying robots. In The 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 19–26. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-2883-8. doi: 10.1145/2696454.2696475.Google Scholar
Taichi, Tajika, Takahiro, Miyashita, Hiroshi, Ishiguro, and Norihiro, Hagita. Automatic categorization of haptic interactions—What are the typical haptic interactions between a human and a robot? In 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 490–496. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2006. ISBN 1-4244-0199-2. doi: 10.1109/ICHR.2006.321318.Google Scholar
Takayama, Leila, Dooley, Doug, and Ju, Wendy. Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 69–76. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4673-4393-0. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayama, Leila A. Throwing voices: Investigating the psychological effects of the spatial location of projected voices. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2008. URL https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/7860025.Google Scholar
Tan, Xiang Zhi, Vázquez, Marynel, Carter, Elizabeth J., Morales, Cecilia G., and Steinfeld, Aaron. Inducing bystander interventions during robot abuse with social mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 169–177. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171247.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Fumihide and Kimura, Takeshi. Care-receiving robot as a tool of teachers in child education. Interaction Studies, 11(2):263–268, 2010. doi: 10.1075/is.11.2.14tan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Fumihide, Cicourel, Aaron, and Movellan, Javier R. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(46):17954–17958, 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707769104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tapus, Adriana, Mataric, Maja J., and Scassellati, Brian. Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14(1):35–42, 2007. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2007.339605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapus, Adriana, Peca, Andreea, Aly, Amir, Pop, Cristina, Jisa, Lavinia, Pintea, Sebastian, Rusu, Alina S., and David, Daniel O. Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13(3): 315–347, 2012. doi: 10.1075/is.13.3.01tap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ross, Kardas, Marcin, Cucurull, Guillem, Scialom, Thomas, Hartshorn, Anthony, Saravia, Elvis, Poulton, Andrew, Kerkez, Viktor, and Stojnic, Robert. Galactica: A large language model for science. arXiv, arXiv:2211.09085, 2022. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2211.09085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temtsin, Sharon, Proudfoot, Diane, and Bartneck, C. A bona fide Turing test. In Proceedings of the Human-Agent Interaction Conference, pages 250–252. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3527188.3563918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellman, Sam, de Graaf, Maartje, and Ziemke, Tom. Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(4):1–51, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3526112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, Serge, Pop, Cristina A., Belpaeme, Tony, Ziemke, Tom, and Vanderborght, Bram. Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 3(4):209–217, 2012. doi: 10.2478/s13230-013-0107-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Frank, Johnston, Ollie, and Frank, Thomas. The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation. Hyperion, New York, 1995. ISBN 978-0786860708. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/974772 586.Google Scholar
Thrun, Sebastian, Burgard, Wolfram, and Fox, Dieter. Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005. ISBN 978-0-2622-0162-9. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/7055 85641.Google Scholar
Togler, Jonas, Hemmert, Fabian, and Wettach, Reto. Living interfaces: The thrifty faucet. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pages 43–44. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-493-5. doi: 10.1145/1517664.1517680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trafton, J. Gregory, Cassimatis, Nicholas L., Bugajska, Magdalena D., Brock, Derek P., Mintz, Farilee E., and Schultz, Alan C. Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective-taking in robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(4):460–470, 2005. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2005.850592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trappl, Robert, Petta, Paolo, and Payr, Sabine. Emotions in Humans and Artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003. ISBN 978-0262201421. URL https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/emotions-humans-and-artifacts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triebel, Rudolph, Arras, Kai, Alami, Rachid, Beyer, Lucas, Breuers, Stefan, Chatila, Raja, Chetouani, Mohamed, Cremers, Daniel, Evers, Vanessa, Fiore, Michelangelo, et al. Spencer: A socially aware service robot for passenger guidance and help in busy airports. In Field and Service Robotics, pages 607–622. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-27700-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27702-8_40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troshani, Indrit, Rao Hill, Sally, Sherman, Claire, and Arthur, Damien. Do we trust in AI? Role of anthropomorphism and intelligence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61 (5):481–491, 2021. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2020.1788473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, Lewis, Von Werra, Leandro, and Wolf, Thomas. Natural Language Processing with Transformers. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA, 2022. ISBN 9781098136796. URL www.worldc at.org/title/1321899597.Google Scholar
Turing, Alan M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236):433–460, 1950. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin, New York, 2016. ISBN 978-0143109792. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/960703115.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, New York, 2017. ISBN 9780465031467. URL www.basicbooks.com/titles/sherry-turkle/alone-together/9780465093663/.Google Scholar
Urquiza-Haas, Esmeralda G. and Kotrschal, Kurt. The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species. Animal Behaviour, 109:167–176, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaes, Jeroen, Paladino, Maria Paola, Castelli, Luigi, Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, and Giovanazzi, Anna. On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: The implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (6):1016–1034, 2003. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaillan, George E. Triumphs of Experience: The Men of the Harvard Grant Study. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015. ISBN 978-0674503816. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/9109 69527.Google Scholar
van Breemen, Albert, Yan, Xue, and Meerbeek, Bernt. iCat: An animated user-interface robot with personality. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 143–144. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2005. ISBN 1-59593-093-0. doi: 10.1145/1082473.1082823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Schoot, Rens, Winter, Sonja D, Ryan, Oisín, Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, Mariëlle, and Depaoli, Sarah. A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2):217, 2017. doi: 10.1037/met0000100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Oord, Aaron, Dieleman, Sander, Zen, Heiga, Simonyan, Karen, Vinyals, Oriol, Graves, Alex, Kalchbrenner, Nal, Senior, Andrew, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv, arXiv:1609.03499, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03499.Google Scholar
Van Erp, Jan B. F. and Toet, Alexander. How to touch humans: Guidelines for social agents and robots that can touch. In Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pages 780–785. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7695-5048-0. doi: 10.1109/ACII.2013.145.Google Scholar
van Harreveld, Frenk, Nohlen, Hannah U., and Schneider, Iris K. The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, volume 52, pages 285–324. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2015. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002.Google Scholar
Van Wynsberghe, Aimee. Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design and Implementation. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, 2016. ISBN 1032098600. URL www.worldcat.org/title/1246143567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandevelde, Cesar, Wyffels, Francis, Ciocci, Maria-Cristina, Vanderborght, Bram, and Saldien, Jelle. Design and evaluation of a DIY construction system for educational robot kits. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26:521–540, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10798-015-9324-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanLehn, Kurt. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4):197–221, 2011. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.611369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venture, Gentiane, Kadone, Hideki, Zhang, Tianxiang, Grèzes, Julie, Berthoz, Alain, and Hicheur, Halim. Recognizing emotions conveyed by human gait. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4):621–632, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0243-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertesi, Janet. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015. ISBN 978-0226155968. URL www.worldcat.org/oclc/904790036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veruggio, Gianmarco, Operto, Fiorella, and Bekey, George. Roboethics: Social and ethical implications. In Siciliano, Bruno and Khatib, Oussama, editors, Springer Handbook of Robotics, pages 2135–2160. Springer, New York, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-32550-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, James. A drunk man was arrested for knocking over Silicon Valley's crime-fighting robot. The Verge, April 2017. URL www.theverge.com/2017/4/26/15432280/security-robot-knocked-over-drunk-man-knightscope-k5-mountain-view.Google Scholar
Vincenti, Walter G. What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Johns Hopkins Studies in the History of Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1990. ISBN 0801839742. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/877307767.Google Scholar
Vollmer, Anna-Lisa, Read, Robin, Trippas, Dries, and Belpaeme, Tony. Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity. Science Robotics, 3(21):eaat7111, 2018. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vredenburg, Karel, Mao, Ji-Ye, Smith, Paul W., and Carey, Tom. A survey of user-centered design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 471–478. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2002. ISBN 1-58113-453-3. doi: 10.1145/503376.503460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, Kazuyoshi and Shibata, Takanori. Living with seal robots—Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23 (5):972–980, 2007. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2007.906261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, Jeffrey J., Roper, Karen S., Seemann, Eric, and Humphrey, Angela M. Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(7):755–774, 2003. doi: 10.1002/acp.914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, Justin, Jung, Eun Hwa, Sundar, S. Shyam, and Johnson, Ariel Celeste. Mental models of robots among senior citizens: An interview study of interaction expectations and design implications. Interaction Studies, 16(1):68–88, 2015. doi: 10.1075/is.16.1.04wal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Michael L., Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Te Boekhorst, René, Koay, Kheng Lee, Kaouri, Christina, Woods, Sarah, Nehaniv, Chrystopher, Lee, David, and Werry, Iain. The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 347–352. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-9274-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513803.Google Scholar
Walters, Michael L., Syrdal, Dag Sverre, Koay, Kheng Lee, Dautenhahn, Kerstin, and Te Boekhorst, René. Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles. In RO-MAN 2008—The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 707–712. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2008. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600750.Google Scholar
Walters, Michael L., Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Te Boekhorst, René, Koay, Kheng Lee, Syrdal, Dag Sverre, and Nehaniv, Chrystopher L. An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics. Proceedings of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 2009. URL http://hdl.handle.net/2299/9670.Google Scholar
Wang, Lin, Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick, Evers, Vanessa, Robinson, Benjamin Krisper, and Hinds, Pamela. When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 359–366, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2010. IEEE. ISBN 978-1-4244-4893-7. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453165.Google Scholar
Warner, Rebecca M., Malloy, Daniel, Schneider, Kathy, Knoth, Russell, and Wilder, Bruce. Rhythmic organization of social interaction and observer ratings of positive affect and involvement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11(2):57–74, 1987. doi: 10.1007/BF00990958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Miki, Ogawa, Kohei, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Can androids be salespeople in the real world? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 781–788. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4503-3146-3. doi: 10.1145/2702613.2702967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, Michael. GM ups spending on EVs and autonomous vehicles by 30% to $35 billion by 2025 on higher profits. CNBC News, 2021. URL www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/gm-ups-spending-on-evs-and-autonomous-vehicles-to-35-billion-by-2025.html.Google Scholar
Waymo. Waymo safety report. Report, Waymo, 2020. URL https://storage.googleapis.com/sdc-prod/v1/safety-report/2020-09-waymo-safety-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Waytz, Adam, Cacioppo, John, and Epley, Nicholas. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3):219–232, 2010. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waytz, Adam, Heafner, Joy, and Epley, Nicholas. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52: 113–117, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, Blay. Sometimes it's hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. Interacting with Computers, 20(3):326–333, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, Andrew, Goodall, Jane, McGrew, William C., Nishida, Toshisada, Reynolds, Vernon, Sugiyama, Yukimaru, Tutin, Caroline E. G., Wrangham, Richard W., and Boesch, Christophe. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399(6737):682–685, 1999. doi: 10.1038/21415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiese, Eva, Weis, Patrick P., Bigman, Yochanan, Kapsaskis, Kyra, and Gray, Kurt. It's a match: Task assignment in human–robot collaboration depends on mind perception. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(1):141–148, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00771-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Christian J. A. M., Huisman, Gijs, Jung, Merel M., van Erp, Jan B. F., and Heylen, Dirk K. J. Observing touch from video: The influence of social cues on pleasantness perceptions. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, pages 196–205. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-42323-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42324-1_20.Google Scholar
Williams, Kipling D. Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1):425–452, 2007. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, Lawrence E. and Bargh, John A. Keeping one's distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19(3):302–308, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, Tom, Thames, Daria, Novakoff, Julia, and Scheutz, Matthias. Thank you for sharing that interesting fact: Effects of capability and context on indirect speech act use in task-based human-robot dialogue. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 298–306. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4503-4953-6. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171246.Google Scholar
Wills, Paul, Baxter, Paul, Kennedy, James, Senft, Emmanuel, and Belpaeme, Tony. Socially contingent humanoid robot head behaviour results in increased charity donations. In The 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 533–534. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. ISBN 978-1-4673-8370-7. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451842.Google Scholar
Wilson, Daniel H. How to Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself against the Coming Rebellion. Bloomsbury, London, New York, 2005. ISBN 9781582345925. URL http://worldcat.org/oclc/1029483559.Google Scholar
Winkle, Katie, Caleb-Solly, Praminda, Turton, Ailie, and Bremner, Paul. Social robots for engagement in rehabilitative therapies: Design implications from a study with therapists. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 289–297. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2018. ISBN 978-1-4503-4953-6. doi: 10.1145/3171221.3171273.Google Scholar
Winkle, Katie, Lagerstedt, Erik, Torre, Ilaria, and Offenwanger, Anna. 15 years of (Who) man robot interaction: Reviewing the H in human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 12(3):1–28, 2023a. doi: 10.1145/3571718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkle, Katie, McMillan, Donald, Arnelid, Maria, Harrison, Katherine, Balaam, Madeline, Johnson, Ericka, and Leite, Iolanda. Feminist human-robot interaction: Disentangling power, principles and practice for better, more ethical hri. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 72–82. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2023b. doi: 10.1145/3568162.3576973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wistort, Ryan and Breazeal, Cynthia. Tofu: A socially expressive robot character for child interaction. In 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 292–293. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-395-2. doi: 10.1145/1551788.1551862.Google Scholar
Wojciechowska, Anna, Frey, Jeremy, Sass, Sarit, Shafir, Roy, and Cauchard, Jessica R. Collocated human-drone interaction: Methodology and approach strategy. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 172–181. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2019. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojciszke, Bogdan. Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1):155–188, 2005. doi: 10.1080/10463280500229619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Jeremy M., Kluender, Keith R., Levi, Dennis M., Bartoshuk, Linda M., Herz, Rachel S., Klatzky, Roberta L., Lederman, Susan J., and Merfeld, Daniel M. Sensation & Perception. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 2006. ISBN 9780197551967. URL www.worldcat.org/title/128 7073270.Google Scholar
Wolfert, Pieter, Robinson, Nicole, and Belpaeme, Tony. A review of evaluation practices of gesture generation in embodied conversational agents. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(3):379–389, 2022. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2022.3149173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrede, Britta, Fritsch, Jannik, and Rohlfing, Katharina. How can prosody help to learn actions? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005, pages 163–163. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. doi: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wullenkord, Ricarda. Messung und Veränderung von Einstellungen gegenüber Robotern-Untersuchung des Einflusses von imaginiertem Kontakt auf implizite und explizite Maße. PhD thesis, University of Bielefeld, 2017. URL https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/publication/29 13679.Google Scholar
Wullenkord, Ricarda and Eyssel, Friederike. Societal and ethical issues in HRI. Current Robotics Reports, 1(3):85–96, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00010-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wullenkord, Ricarda, Fraune, Marlena R., Eyssel, Friederike, and Šabanović, Selma. Getting in touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. In 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 980–985. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2016. ISBN 978-1-5090-3930-2. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745228.Google Scholar
Wykowska, Agnieszka. Robots as mirrors of the human mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1):34–40, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0963721420978609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Junchao, Broekens, Joost, Hindriks, Koen, and Neerincx, Mark A. Robot mood is contagious: Effects of robot body language in the imitation game. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pages 973–980. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4503-2738-1. URL https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2617401.Google Scholar
Yamaji, Yuto, Miyake, Taisuke, Yoshiike, Yuta, De Silva, P. Ravindra, S., and Okada, Michio. STB: Human-dependent sociable trash box. In 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 197–198. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. ISBN 978-1-4244-4892-0. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2010.5453196.Google Scholar
Yamaoka, Fumitaka, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. “Lifelike” behavior of communication robots based on developmental psychology findings. In 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 406–411. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-9320-1. doi: 10.1109/ICHR.2005.1573601.Google Scholar
Yamaoka, Fumitaka, Kanda, Takayuki, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, and Hagita, Norihiro. A model of proximity control for information-presenting robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26 (1):187–195, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2009.2035747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, Yuki, Ishihara, Hisashi, Ikeda, Takashi, and Asada, Minoru. Path analysis for the halo effect of touch sensations of robots on their personality impressions. In International Conference on Social Robotics, pages 502–512. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Alexander, Ratsamee, Photchara, Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, Uranishi, Yuki, Mashita, Tomohiro, Takemura, Haruo, Fjeld, Morten, and Obaid, Mohammad. Exploring proxemics for human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pages 81–88. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3125739.3125773.Google Scholar
Yogeswaran, Nivasan, Dang, Wenting, Navaraj, William Taube, Shakthivel, Dhayalan, Khan, Saleem, Polat, Emre Ozan, Gupta, Shoubhik, Heidari, Hadi, Kaboli, Mohsen, Lorenzelli, Leandro, et al. New materials and advances in making electronic skin for interactive robots. Advanced Robotics, 29(21):1359–1373, 2015. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2015.1095653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yohanan, Steve and MacLean, Karon E. The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(2):163–180, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s12369-011-0126-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Youngwoo, Wolfert, Pieter, Kucherenko, Taras, Viegas, Carla, Nikolov, Teodor, Tsakov, Mihail, and Henter, Gustav Eje. The GENEA challenge 2022: A large evaluation of data-driven co-speech gesture generation. In Tumuluri, Raj, Sebe, Nicu, Pingali, Gopal, Jayagopi, Dinesh Babu, Dhall, Abhinav, Singh, Richa, Anthony, Lisa, and Salah, Albert Ali, editors, Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pages 736–747. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3536221.3558058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, James E., Sung, JaYoung, Voida, Amy, Sharlin, Ehud, Igarashi, Takeo, Christensen, Henrik I., and Grinter, Rebecca E. Evaluating human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1):53–67, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Chen and Smith, Linda B. Joint attention without gaze following: Human infants and their parents coordinate visual attention to objects through eye-hand coordination. PloS One, 8 (11):e79659, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaga, Cristina. The design of robothings: Non-anthropomorphic and non-verbal robots to promote children's collaboration through play. PhD thesis, Univesity of Twente, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956427.Google Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2):1–27, 1968. doi: 10.1037/h0025848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaveri, Mihir. NYPD robot dog's run is cut short after fierce backlash. New York Times, 2021. URL www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/nyregion/nypd-robot-dog-backlash.html.Google Scholar
Zen, Heiga, Tokuda, Keiichi, and Black, Alan W. Statistical parametric speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 51(11):1039–1064, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Zhihong, Pantic, Maja, Roisman, Glenn I., and Huang, Thomas S. A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(1):39–58, 2009. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Yu, Park, Daniel S., Han, Wei, Qin, James, Gulati, Anmol, Shor, Joel, Jansen, Aren, Xu, Yuanzhong, Huang, Yanping, Wang, Shibo, et al. Bigssl: Exploring the frontier of large-scale semi-supervised learning for automatic speech recognition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 16(6):1519–1532, 2022. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2022.3182537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Chen, Miao, Ming-Cheng, Chen, Xin-Ran, Hu, Yi-Fei, Chang, Qi, Yan, Ming-Yuan, and Kuai, Shu-Guang. Human-behaviour-based social locomotion model improves the humanization of social robots. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4:1040–1052, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s42256-022-00542-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Złotowski, Jakub, Yogeeswaran, Kumar, and Bartneck, Christoph. Can we control it? Autonomous robots are perceived as threatening. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100:48–54, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Złotowski, Jakub, Sumioka, Hidenobu, Eyssel, Friederike, Nishio, Shuichi, Bartneck, Christoph, and Ishiguro, Hiroshi. Model of dual anthropomorphism: The relationship between the media equation effect and implicit anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5):701–714, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s12369-018-0476-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×