Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Towards a history of humanitarian intervention
- Part I Early modern precedents
- Part II The Great Powers and the Ottoman Empire
- Part III Intervening in Africa
- Part IV Non-European states
- 13 Humanitarian intervention, democracy, and imperialism: the American war with Spain, 1898, and after
- 14 The innovation of the Jackson–Vanik Amendment
- 15 Fraternal aid, self-defence, or self-interest? Vietnam's intervention in Cambodia, 1978–1989
- Part V Postscript
- Index
15 - Fraternal aid, self-defence, or self-interest? Vietnam's intervention in Cambodia, 1978–1989
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Towards a history of humanitarian intervention
- Part I Early modern precedents
- Part II The Great Powers and the Ottoman Empire
- Part III Intervening in Africa
- Part IV Non-European states
- 13 Humanitarian intervention, democracy, and imperialism: the American war with Spain, 1898, and after
- 14 The innovation of the Jackson–Vanik Amendment
- 15 Fraternal aid, self-defence, or self-interest? Vietnam's intervention in Cambodia, 1978–1989
- Part V Postscript
- Index
Summary
The righteous actions of the Vietnamese people and the people of Kampuchea are in harmony with the principles of the Non-aligned Movement and the United Nations Charter.
Truong Chinh, Ve Van De Cam-pu-chia (1979)Vietnam's march into its smaller, weaker neighbour in late 1978, with weapons supplied by the Soviet Union, looked to many observers like a classic annexation. The Vietnamese themselves did not attempt to defend their action as a ‘humanitarian intervention’, although they expected much of the world to approve their removal of the Pol Pot regime. This obsessively secretive Cambodian government had cut off its population from most contacts with the outside world since coming to power in April 1975. Over the nearly four years of Pol Pot's rule, news of the brutal agrarian regime he inflicted on Cambodia had seeped out via refugees who made their way to the Thai border. A Khmer-speaking US diplomat, Charles Twining, had spent months in these border camps interviewing refugees and cross-checking their stories of hunger and executions. Another Khmer speaker, Father François Ponchaud, had published his findings on Khmer Rouge brutality in Le Monde in February 1976, when he estimated that as many as 800,000 killings had occurred. The basic outlines of what was going on in Cambodia were thus becoming well known when Twining testified at hearings of the House International Relations Subcommittee in July 1977.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Humanitarian InterventionA History, pp. 343 - 362Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 4
- Cited by