Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T21:00:21.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The potential response of historical terrestrial carbon storage to changes in land use, atmospheric CO2, and climate

from Part I - Climate system science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Atul K. Jain
Edited by
Michael E. Schlesinger ,
Haroon S. Kheshgi ,
Joel Smith ,
Francisco C. de la Chesnaye ,
John M. Reilly ,
Tom Wilson  and
Charles Kolstad
Atul K. Jain
Affiliation:
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Illinois
Michael E. Schlesinger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Haroon S. Kheshgi
Affiliation:
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Joel Smith
Affiliation:
Stratus Consulting Ltd, Boulder
Francisco C. de la Chesnaye
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency
John M. Reilly
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tom Wilson
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto
Charles Kolstad
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Modeling and measurement studies indicate that ocean and land ecosystems are currently absorbing slightly more than 50% of the human CO2 fossil emissions (Prentice et al., 2001). However, a significant question remains regarding the sources and sinks of carbon over land governed by changes in land covers and physiological processes that determine the magnitude of the carbon exchanges between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems. Most of these processes are sensitive to climate factors, in particular temperature and available soil water (Post et al., 1997). It is also likely that these processes are sensitive to changes in atmospheric CO2. Moreover, the climate variation is not uniformly distributed throughout the Earth's surface or within ecosystem types. Therefore, simulations of terrestrial carbon storage must take into account the spatial variations in climate as well as non-climate factors that influence carbon storage, such as land-cover type and soil water holding capacity, that interact with climate. Estimates should also account for land-cover changes with time. Because the changes in land cover, mainly from forest to croplands or forest to pasturelands, shorten the turnover of carbon above and below ground, they act to reduce the sink capacity of the biosphere.

Historical changes in biospheric carbon storage and exchange with the atmosphere are commonly simulated with globally aggregated biospheric models (Jain et al., 1996; Kheshgi and Jain, 2003), mostly in response to changes in atmospheric CO2 and climate, or changes in land-cover types (Houghton and Hackler, 2001; Houghton, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Human-Induced Climate Change
An Interdisciplinary Assessment
 , pp. 62 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achard, F., Eva, H. D.Stibig, H. J.et al. (2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFries, R. S., Houghton, R. A., Hansen, M. C.et al. (2002). Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(22), 14 256–14 261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farquhar, G. D. and von Caemmerer, S. (1982). Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In Physiological Plant Ecology II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Vol. 12B of Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series, ed. Lange, O. L.Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 549–588.Google Scholar
Friedli, H., Lötscher, H., Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U. and Stauffer, B. (1986). Ice core record of 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries. Nature 324, 237–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C. (1996). BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R. A. (1999). The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land-use 1850–1990. Tellus 51B, 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R. A. (2000). A new estimate of global sources and sinks of carbon from land-use change. EOS 81, supplement281.Google Scholar
Houghton, R. A. (2003). Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land-use 1850–2000. Tellus 55B, 378–390.Google Scholar
Houghton, R. A. and Hackler, J. L. (2001) Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-Use Changes: 1850 to 1990. ORNL/CDIAC-131, NDP-050/R1 (http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ndps/ndp050.html), Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Houghton, R. A., Hobbie, J. E., Melillo, J. M.et al. (1983). Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980 – a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecological Monographs 53, 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J. L. and Lawrence, K. T. (1999). The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science 285, 547–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. I., Prentice, I. C.Ramankutty, N., Houghton, R. A.Heimann, M. (2003). Reconciling apparent inconsistencies in estimates of terrestrial CO2 sources and sinks. Tellus, 55B 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMAGE team (2001). The IMAGE 2.2 Implementation of the SRES Scenarios: Climate Change Scenarios Resulting from Runs with Several GCMs. RIVM CD-ROM Publication 481508019, Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands.
Jain, A. K. and Yang, X. (2005). Modeling the effects of two different land cover change data sets on the carbon stocks of plants and soils in concert with CO2 and climate change. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19 GB 2015; doi: 10.1029/2004GB002349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A. K., Kheshgi, H. S. and Wuebbles, D. J. (1996). A globally aggregated reconstruction of cycles of carbon and its isotopes. Tellus 48B, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. (1990). The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 329, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, C. D. and Whorf, T. P. (2000). Atmospheric CO2 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B. and Whorf, T. P. (1982). Measurements of the concentration of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. In Carbon Dioxide Review: 1982, ed. Clarke, W. C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kheshgi, H. S. and Jain, A. K. (2003). Projecting future climate change: implications of carbon cycle model intercomparison. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17(2), 1047; doi: 10.1029/2001GB001842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kheshgi, H. S., Jain, A. K. and Wuebbles, D. J. (1996). Accounting for the missing carbon sink with the CO2 fertilization effect. Climatic Change 33, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. W., Emanuel, W. R.Wullschleger, S. D. and Post, W. M. (1995). In search of the missing carbon sink: a model of terrestrial biospheric response to land-use change and atmospheric CO2. Tellus 47B, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Goldewijk, C. G. M. (2001). Estimating global land-use change over the past 300 years: the HYDE 2.0 database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, T. R. and Belward, A. S. (1997). The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set, DISCover: first results. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18, 3291–3295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, A. D., Sitch, S.Clein, J. S.et al. (2001). Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: analyses of CO2, climate and land-use effects with four process-based ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(1), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. D., Carter, T. R., Jones, P. D., Hulme, M. and New, M. (2004). A Comprehensive Set of High-resolution Grids of Monthly Climate for Europe and the Globe: the Observed Record (1901–2000) and 16 Scenarios (2001–2100). Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 55. Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, University of East Anglia.
Neftel, A., Moor, E., Oeschger, H. and Stauffer, B. (1985). Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries. Nature 315: 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J. and Post, W. M. (1985). Development of a Linked Forest Productivity-Soil Process Model. Technical Report ORNL/TM-9519, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Polglase, P. J. and Wang, Y. P. (1992). Potential CO2-enhanced carbon storage by the terrestrial biosphere. Australian Journal Botany 40, 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, W. M., King, A. W. and Wullschleger, S. D. (1997). Historical variations in terrestrial biospheric carbon storage. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 11, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, C., Farquhar, G. H Fasham, M. et al. (2001). The carbon cycle and atmospheric CO2. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J.et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N. and Foley, J. (1998). Characterizing patterns of global land-use: an analysis of global croplands data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12, 667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N. and Foley, J. A. (1999). Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13, 997–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L. and Saxton, K. E. (1982). Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE 25, 1316–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W. and Mather, J. R. (1957). Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publ. Climatol. 10, 183–311.Google Scholar
Webb, R. S., Rosenzweig, C. E., and Levine, E. R. (1991). A Global Data Set of Soil Particle Size Properties. NASA Technical Memorandum 4286. New York: NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Institute for Space Studies.Google Scholar
Zobler, L. (1986). A World Soil File for Global Climate Modelling. NASA Technical Memorandum 87802. New York: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.Google Scholar
Zobler, L. (1999) Global Soil Types, 1-Degree Grid (Zobler). Data Set. Available on-line from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center at www.daac.ornl.gov.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×