Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:35:42.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Human Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law: Lessons for the U.S. Human Rights Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mie Lewis
Affiliation:
Stanford Law School
Shareen Hertel
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Kathryn Libal
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

To capture many of the most widespread and egregious children's rights violations in the United States, one need only follow the early life of an African-American child born into urban poverty. The child picks up the thread of intergenerational disadvantage when she finds herself in a racially segregated neighborhood drained of resources by historical redlining and more recent racially discriminatory lending practices (Squires 1992). One or both of the child's parents may have been arrested, possibly because of racially targeted policing practices, and incarcerated for an excessive period, thereby leaving the child vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse in violation of the child's right to be protected from violence (Braman and Wood 2003; Convention on the Rights of the Child [CRC] 1989, Articles 19, 20). The parents' legal rights over the child may be terminated by the state with a minimum of due process protections and the child made a ward of the state, in violation of the child's right against arbitrary separation from her parents (Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 [ASFA]; CRC, Articles 7, 9, 21). Meanwhile, the child's chaotic and underfunded school may not be the life raft it otherwise could be, depriving the child of the meaningful exercise of her right to an education (Williams v. California 2000; CRC, Articles 28, 29).

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Rights in the United States
Beyond Exceptionalism
, pp. 255 - 273
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Adoption and Safe Families Act. 1997. 42 USCS § 675(5)(E).
,Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections. 2007. Procedure 4058.01 (“Use of Force Continuum”).
,Bell v. Wolfish. 441 U.S. 520 (1979).
Braman, Donald, and Wood, Jennifer. 2003. “From One Generation to the Next: How Criminal Sanctions Are Reshaping Family Life in Urban America.” In Prisoners Once Removed: The Impact of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families, and Communities, edited by Jeremy Travis and Michelle Waul, 157–88. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Fox. 1996. All God's Children. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Chesney-Lind, Meda. 1997. The Female Offender: Girls, Women and Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
,Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. Adopted November 20, 1989, G.A. Res. 44/25, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25, entered into force September 2, 1990, signed by the United States of America on February 16, 1995.
,D.G. v. Ireland. App. no. 39474/98, European Court of Human Rights (2002).
Dale, Michael J. 1998. “Lawsuits and Public Policy: The Role of Litigation in Correcting Conditions in Juvenile Detention Centers.” University of San Francisco Law Review, 32: 675.Google Scholar
,Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education. 829 F. Supp. 1016 (N.D. Ill. 1993).
Feldman, Cassi. 2007. “State Facilities' Use of Force Is Scrutinized After a Death.” New York Times, March 4.
Foucault, Michel. [1975] 1995. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
,Gary H. v. Hegstrom. 831 F.2d1430, 1432 (9th Cir. 1987).
,Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. 2008. Policy 19.3 (“Use of Force”).
Goodkind, Sarah. 2005. “Gender-Specific Services in the Juvenile Justice System: A Critical Examination.” Affilia 20(1): 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassian, Stuart. 2009. Declaration filed in K.C. v. Townsend, 6:09-CV-012-C, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas on August 21, 2009.
Gunn, T. Jeremy. 2006. “The Religious Right and the Opposition to U.S. Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.” Emory International Law Review 20(1): 111–28.Google Scholar
Hennis-Plasschaert, Jeanine. 2008. Written Question to the European Commission on Human Rights (E-2231/08).
,Hollingsworth v. Orange County. No. 51–08-65 (Superior Court Orange County, California 1990).
Holsinger, Kristi, and Holsinger, Alexander M.. 2005. “Differential Pathways to Violence and Self-Injurious Behavior: African American and White Girls in the Juvenile Justice System.” Journal of Research in Crime and Deliquency 42: 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huling, Tracy. 2002. “Building a Prison Economy in Rural America.” In Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, edited by Marc Mauer and Meda Chesney-Lind, 197–213. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch. 1995. Children in Confinement in Louisiana. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch. 1996. Modern Capital of Human Rights? Abuses in the State of Georgia. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch. 1997. High Country Lockup: Children in Confinement in Colorado. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch. 1999. No Minor Matter: Children in Maryland's Jails. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch. 2009. No Equal Justice: The Prison Litigation Reform Act in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union. 2006. Custody and Control: Conditions of Confinement in New York's Juvenile Prisons for Girls. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
,Jones v. Blanas. 393 F.3d 918, 931 (9th Circuit 2004).
,Juvenile Reeducation Institute v. Paraguay. Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment of September 2, 2004.
King, Loretta. 2009. Letter from Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King to New York Governor David Patterson. “Investigation of the Lansing Residential Center, Louis Gossett, Jr. Residential Center, Tryon Residential Center, and Tryon Girls Center,” August 14, 2009.
Klein, Eric K. 1998. “Dennis the Menace or Billy the Kid: An Analysis of the Role of Transfer to Criminal Court in Juvenile Justice.” American Criminal Law Review 35: 371–410.Google Scholar
Krisberg, Barry. 1994. “Distorted by Fear: The Make Believe War on Crime.” Social Justice 21(3): 38–49.Google Scholar
,Lollis v. New York Department of Social Services. 322 F. Supp. 473 (S.D. N.Y. 1970), modified, 328 F. Supp. 1115 (S.D.N.Y. 1971).
,Martarella v. Kelley. 349 F. Supp. 575, 598 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).
,Matter of Children Deprived of Liberty in the “Complexo do Tatuapé” of FEBEM. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (November 25, 2008).
,Milonas v. Williams. 691 F.2d 931 (10th Circuit 1982).
,New York Office of Children and Family Services. 2007. Policy and Procedures Manual 3247.13 (“Use of Physical Restraint”).
,New York Times. 2009. “Editorial: New York's Disgrace,” August 25.
,Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 1998. Guiding Principles for Promising Female Programming. http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/pubs/principles/contents.html.
Pagnanelli, Enrico. 2007. “Children as Adults: The Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Courts and the Potential Impact of Roper v. Simmons.” American Criminal Law Review 44: 175–94.Google Scholar
,Prison Litigation Reform Act. 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a)(requirement of exhaustion of administrative grievance procedures); 18 U.S.C. sec. 3626(g)(3) and (5)(applicability to children); 42 U.S.C. sec. 1997e(h)(same); 42 U.S.C. sec. 1997e(d)(limiting attorneys fees award).
Rose, Joshua T. 2003. “Innocence Lost: The Detrimental Effect of Automatic Waiver Statutes on Juvenile Justice.” Brandeis Law Journal 41: 977–95.Google Scholar
Ryder, R. Scott, and Elrod, Preston. 2005. Juvenile Justice: A Social, Historical, and Legal Perspective. 2nd Edition. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
Schinas, Margaritis. 2008. Written Question to the European Commission on Human Rights (E-3686/08).
Squires, Gregory D. ed. 1992. From Redlining to Reinvestment: Community Responses to Urban Disinvestment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
,Sukhovoy v. Russia. App. no. 63955/00, European Court of Human Rights (2008).
,Testimony of Vincent Schiraldi. Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services, before the District of Columbia, Committee on Human Services, February 16, 2006 (on file with the author).
,Texas Family Code §51.01. 2009. (“Purpose and Interpretation”).
,Texas Youth Commission. 2009. General Administrative Policy Manual.
,Texas Youth Commission, Correctional Care Form. Search Log, Dec. 23, 2008 – March 19, 2009 (on file with the author).
,Turner v. Safley. 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
,United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (“Beijing Rules”). Adopted November 29, 1985, by General Assembly Resolution 40/33.
,U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section. 2009. Documents and Publications. http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/split/findsettle.php#CRIPAletters.
Zielbauer, Paul. 2005. “A Spotty Record of Health Care for Children in City Detention.” New York Times, March 1.
,Williams v. California. Sup. Ct. California, Docket No. 312236 (filed 2000).
Wisdom, Cathy S., and Maxfield, Michael G.. 2001. “An Update on the ‘Cycle of Violence.’” Research in Brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
,Youngberg v. Romeo. 457 U.S. 307 (1982).
Zaplin, Ruth T. 1998. Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×