Ethical Considerations for Human Biology Research

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511781193.011

9 - Ethical Considerations for Human Biology Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012

Trudy R. Turner

Edited by

Michael P. Muehlenbein

Show author details

Michael P. Muehlenbein: Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The past 25 years have seen an ever increasing emphasis on and discussion of ethics in professional life. The Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at the Illinois Institute of Technology currently has a library of over 850 Codes of Ethics for various professions. Professional societies often have ethics modules online. Courses on ethics or ethics training are recommended parts of graduate curricula. Medicine, law, engineering, and business all have ethical standards and codes. The scientific community as a whole also shares a set of guiding principles that have been codified into a code of ethics for research and practice. In addition, each academic discipline has its own set of standards and principles, since each discipline has its own history and its own ethical dilemmas. Here I will briefly review ethical principles common to the scientific community as well as some of the ethical dilemmas faced by human biologists. This is not a comprehensive account. I direct the reader to the volume Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity (Turner, 2005a) for a fuller discussion of the issues presented here.

Codes of ethics exist because every individual faces choices. These codes provide a framework for making informed choices in situations where there are conflicting obligations and responsibilities. The codes provide a framework of general principles for discussion and choice. No code can anticipate each unique situation. Discussion and reflection are vital to anticipate situations that may require quick decisions.

Type: Chapter
Information: Human Evolutionary Biology , pp. 144 - 149

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781193.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bamshad, M. (1999). Session one: issues relating to population identification, anthropology, genetic diversity and ethics. Symposium held at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/21st//projects/GeneticDiversity/session1.html (last accessed, November, 2007).

Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (1989). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Collins, K. J. and Weiner, J. S. (1977). Human Adaptability: a History and Compendium of Research in the International Biological Programme. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Friedlaender, J. S. (2005). Commentary: changing standards of informed consent: raising the bar. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 263–274.Google Scholar

Gert, B., Culver, C. M. and Clouser, K. D. (1997). Bioethics: a Return to Fundamentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jorde, L. (1999). Session four: successful research collaborations. Anthropology, genetic diversity and ethics. Symposium held at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/21st//projects/GeneticDiversity/jorde.html (last accessed, November, 2007).

Juengst, E. (1999). Session one: issues relating to identifying populations. Anthropology, genetic diversity and ethics. Symposium held at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/21st//projects/GeneticDiversity/juengst.html (last accessed, November, 2007).

Larsen, C. S. and Walker, P. L. (2005). The ethics of bioarchaeology. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 111–119.Google Scholar

Long, J. C. (2005). Commentary: an overview of human subjects research in biological anthropology. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 275–279.Google Scholar

Neel, J. V. (1964). Research in Human Population Genetics of Primitive Groups. WHO Technical Report Series No. 279. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Neel, J. V. (1968). Research on Human Population Genetics. WHO Technical Report Series No. 387. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

O'Rourke, D. H., Hayes, M. G. and Carlyle, S. W. (2005). The consent process and DNA research: contrasting approaches in North America In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 231–240.Google Scholar

Stinson, S. (2005). Ethical issues in human biology behavioral research and research with children. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 139–148.Google Scholar

Tierney, P. (2000). Darkness in El Dorado. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Turner, T. R. (2005a). Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Turner, T. R. (2005b). Introduction: ethical concerns in biological anthropology. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Turner, T. R. (2005c). Commentary: data sharing and access to information. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 281–287.Google Scholar

Turner, T. R. and Nelson, J. D. (2002). Turner Point by Point. El Dorado Task Force Papers. Final Report, vol. 1, part 6. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar

Turner, T. R. and Nelson, J. D. (2005). Darkness in El Dorado: claims, counter claims and the obligations of researchers. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 165–183.Google Scholar

Williams, S. R. (2005). A case study of ethical issues in genetic research: the Sally Hemings–Thomas Jefferson story. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar

Winston, C. E. and Kittles, R. A. (2005). Psychological and ethical issues related to identity and inferring ancestry of African Americans. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 209–229.Google Scholar

Wolfe, L. D. (2005). Field primatologists: duties, rights and obligations. In Biological Anthropology and Ethics: from Repatriation to Genetic Identity, Turner, T. R. (ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar