Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- I Study skills for mathematicians
- II How to think logically
- 6 Making a statement
- 7 Implications
- 8 Finer points concerning implications
- 9 Converse and equivalence
- 10 Quantifiers – For all and There exists
- 11 Complexity and negation of quantifiers
- 12 Examples and counterexamples
- 13 Summary of logic
- III Definitions, theorems and proofs
- IV Techniques of proof
- V Mathematics that all good mathematicians need
- VI Closing remarks
- Appendices
- Index
11 - Complexity and negation of quantifiers
from II - How to think logically
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- I Study skills for mathematicians
- II How to think logically
- 6 Making a statement
- 7 Implications
- 8 Finer points concerning implications
- 9 Converse and equivalence
- 10 Quantifiers – For all and There exists
- 11 Complexity and negation of quantifiers
- 12 Examples and counterexamples
- 13 Summary of logic
- III Definitions, theorems and proofs
- IV Techniques of proof
- V Mathematics that all good mathematicians need
- VI Closing remarks
- Appendices
- Index
Summary
Everything is simpler than you think and at the same time more complex than you imagine.
Johann Wolfgang von GoetheThe more quantifiers a statement has the more complicated it is and the harder it is to understand. In this chapter we will look at how complicated statements can be made with quantifiers and give a method for seeing through this complexity.
We also see how to negate statements involving quantifiers. Fortunately, even for the most complicated of statements this is actually quite easy.
Complexity of quantifiers
The number of quantifiers in a mathematical statement gives a rough measure of the statement's complexity. Statements involving three or more quantifiers can be difficult to understand. This is the main reason why it is hard to understand the rigorous definitions of limit, convergence, continuity and differentiability in analysis as they have many quantifiers.
In fact, it is the alternation of the ∀ and ∃ that causes the complexity. For example, ∀x∀y∃zP(x, y, z) will, in general, be simpler than ∀x∃z∀yP(x, y, z). However, since we can replace ∀x∀y by ∀x, y, just counting the number of quantifiers gives a good measure of complexity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How to Think Like a MathematicianA Companion to Undergraduate Mathematics, pp. 84 - 89Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009