Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:46:53.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

Malcolm Schofield
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How Plato Writes
Perspectives and Problems
 , pp. 290 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, E., and Campbell, L. (1897). The Life and Letters of Benjamin Jowett. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Abbott, E., and Campbell, L. (1899). Letters of Benjamin Jowett. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Adam, J. (1963 [1902]). The Republic of Plato: Edited with Critical Notes, Commentary, and Appendices. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2011). The Cratylus of Plato: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adomenas, M. (2006). ‘Plato, Presocratics, and the question of genre’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), La costruzione del discorso nell’età dei Presocratici. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, pp. 329–53.Google Scholar
Allan, D. J. (1954). ‘The problem of Cratylus’, American Journal of Philology 75: 271–87.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. (1983). Plato’s Parmenides: Translation and Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1976). Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books M and N. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1978). ‘Plato and common morality’, Classical Quarterly 28: 437–51.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1981). An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1999). Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2010). ‘Virtue and law in Plato’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–91.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1968). ‘Truth and politics’, in her Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, pp. 223–59, with notes at pp. 290–2.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (2018). ‘Sorting out lies: the eight categories of St Augustine’s De Mendacio’, Augustinianum 58: 441–68.Google Scholar
Barker, E. (1918). Greek Political Theory: Plato and His Predecessors. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Barker, E. (trans.) (1995). Aristotle: The Politics, rev. R. F. Stalley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2001). Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2006) ‘The Sophistic movement’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
Bartels, M. (2017). Plato’s Pragmatic Project: A Reading of Plato’s Laws. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Barton, J. (2005). ‘Hippocratic explanations’, in van der Eijk, P. J. (ed.), Hippocrates in Context. Leiden: Brill, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. (2010). ‘The puppet and the sage: Images of the self in Marcus Aurelius’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 187–209.Google Scholar
Bestor, T. W. (1980). ‘Plato’s semantics and Plato’s Parmenides’, Phronesis 25: 38–75.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (2006). Plato’s Republic: A Biography. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1985). ‘Socratics versus Sophists on payment for teaching’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 1: 1–49.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. (1991). ‘Persuasion, compulsion and freedom in Plato’s Laws’, Classical Quarterly 41: 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobonich, C. (1996). “Reading the Laws’, in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 249–82.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. (2002). Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. (2010). ‘Images of irrationality’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–71.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Bollack, J., and Wismann, H. (1972). Héraclite ou la séparation. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
Bouchet, C., and Giovanelli, P. (eds.) (2015). Isocrate: entre jeu rhétorique et enjeux politiques. Lyons: Centre d’étude et de la recherche sur l’Occident romain.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2004). ‘Phaedo of Elis and Plato on the soul’, Phronesis 49: 1–23.Google Scholar
Brock, R. (2021). ‘In search of Socrates’ voiceprint’, in Dimauro, E. (ed.), μεταβολή: Studi di storia antica offerti a Umberto Bultrighini. Lanciano: Carabba, pp. 309–26.Google Scholar
Brown, E. (2000). ‘Justice and compulsion for Plato’s philosopher-rulers’, Ancient Philosophy 20: 1–17.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2003). ‘Revisiting Plato’s Cave’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 19: 145–77.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1997). ‘Plato’s Academy and politics’, in his Studies in Greek History and Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 282–342.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1987). ‘Platonism and mathematics: A prelude to discussion’, in Graeser, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Bern: Haupt, pp. 213–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1990). The Theaetetus of Plato, trans. M. J. Levett, rev. and introd. Myles Burnyeat. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997). ‘Plato’s first words’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1998). ‘The past in the present: Plato as educator of nineteenth-century Britain’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 353–73.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999a). ‘Utopia and fantasy: The practicability of Plato’s ideally just city’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999b). ‘Culture and society in Plato’s Republic’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 20: 215–324.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2000). ‘Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul’, in Smiley, T. (ed.), Mathematics and Necessity (Proceedings of the British Academy 103). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2001). ‘What was the “common arrangement”? An inquiry into John Stuart Mill’s boyhood reading of Plato’, Utilitas 13: 1–32.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2002). ‘Plato on how not to speak of what is not: Euthydemus 283a–288a’, in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le Style de la pensée: Receuil de textes en homage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris: Belles Lettres, pp. 40–66.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2003). ‘By the Dog’, review of Ruby Blondell, The Play of Characters in Plato’s Dialogues, London Review of Books (7 August 2003): 23–4.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2005). ‘Platonism in the Bible: Numenius of Apamea on Exodus and eternity’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2013). ‘Justice writ large and small in Republic 4’, in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–30.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (trans. and ed.) (1926). Plato: Laws. 2 vols. London: Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Caird, E. (1865). ‘Grote’s Plato’, North British Review 99: 351–84.Google Scholar
Caird, E. (1897–8). ‘Professor Jowett’, International Journal of Ethics 8: 42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (1866). Review of Grote’s Plato, Quarterly Review 119: 108–53.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1867). The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. (2001). Éthiques grecques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Capra, A. (2003). ‘Dialoghi narrati e dialoghi drammatici in Platone’, in Bonazzi, M. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Milan: Cisalpino La Goliardica, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1944). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1945). The Riddle of the Early Academy: Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1957). ‘The relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s later dialogues’, American Journal of Philology 78: 225–66.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1962). George Grote: A Biography. London: The Athlone Press, University of London.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (1971). ‘The logic of the Third Man’, Philosophical Review 80: 448–75.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1999). ‘Socrates and Plato in Plato’s Gorgias’, in his Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 29–75.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1939). Plato and Parmenides. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (trans.) (1941). The Republic of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. (1986). The Fragments of Parmenides. Assen: van Gorcum. Revised and expanded edition Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar
Cross, R. C., and Woozley, A. D. (1964) Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Crossman, R. H. S. (1937). Plato Today. London: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Crystal, I. (1996). ‘Parmenidean allusion in Republic V’, Ancient Philosophy 16: 351–63.Google Scholar
Curd, P. K. (1998). The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, N. O. (1991). ‘Plato’s defence of justice’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51: 809–34.Google Scholar
Dancy, R. M. (1991). Two Studies in the Early Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1962). Rhythmische Elemente im Logos des Heraklit, in Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 9. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N. (1998). ‘George Grote and the Platonic revival in Victorian Britain’, Quaderni di storia 47: 17–59. Reprinted as Essay VI in Demetriou (2011).Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N. (1999) George Grote on Plato and Athenian Democracy: A Study in Classical Reception. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N. (2004). The Reception of Grote’s Philosophical Works. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N. (2011). Studies in the Reception of Plato and Greek Political Thought in Victorian Britain. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Détienne, M., and Vernant, J.-P. (1978). Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. London: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (2004). Theophrastus: Characters. Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2003). The Heirs of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dimas, P. (2015). ‘Wanting to do what is just in the Gorgias’, in Rabbas, Ø, Emilsson, E., Fossheim, H., and Tuominen, M. (eds.), The Quest for the Good Life. Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 66–87.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (ed.) (1959). Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (2011). ‘The students of Socrates’, in Morrison, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–47.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (2011). ‘The rise and fall of the Socratic problem’, in Morrison, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. (2006). ‘The fundamental conflict in Plato’s Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 87–100.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1979). Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, P. (2005). ‘On Ancient Medicine and its intellectual context’, in van der Eijk, P. J. (ed.), Hippocrates in Context. Leiden: Brill, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar
England, E. B. (1921). The Laws of Plato: The Text Edited with Introduction, Notes, etc. 2 vols. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. (1983). Isokrates: Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Faber, G. (1957). Jowett: A Portrait with Background. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989). ‘Plato on poetry’, in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–148.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.) and Griffith, T. (trans.) (2000). Plato: The Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, G. C. (1930). Plato and His Contemporaries. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1986). ‘Immanence’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 71–97.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1993). On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Folch, M. (2015). The City and the Stage: Performance, Genre, and Gender in Plato’s Laws. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2001). ‘Sophists without rhetoric: The arts of speech in fifth-century Athens’, in Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1975). Aristotle on Emotion. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2010). ‘Puppets on strings: moral psychology in Laws Books 1 and 2’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–26.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1989). Cosmic Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. (1996). Andokides and the Herms: A Study of Crisis in Fifth-Century Athenian Religion. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (1986). Early Greek Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2008). Writing Greek Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M., and Woodruff, P. (trans.) (1995). Early Greek Political Thought from Homer to the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gifford, M. (2001). ‘Dramatic dialectic in Republic Book 1’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20: 35–106.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1996). Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C., and McCabe, M. M. (eds.) (1996). Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L., and Ryan, P. (trans.) (1996). Plato: Parmenides. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1987). ‘Plato in England: the nineteenth century and after’, in Funke, H. (ed.), Utopie und Tradition: Platons Lehre vom Staat in der Moderne. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 149–210.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1996). ‘The two Platos of Victorian Britain’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 385–406.Google Scholar
Grant, A. (1857, 1858). The Ethics of Aristotle, Illustrated with Essays and Notes. London: John W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Grant, A. (1871). ‘Professor Jowett’s translation of Plato’, Edinburgh Review 134: 303–42.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2015). The Soul of the Marionette: A Short Enquiry into Human Freedom. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. (2007). Xenophon on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1977). The Authenticity of Prometheus Bound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grote, G. (1826). ‘Institutions of ancient Greece’, Westminster Review 5: 269–331.Google Scholar
Grote, G. (1850). A History of Greece, vol. 8. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Grote, G. (1865). Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Grote, H. (1873). The Personal Life of George Grote. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1969). A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 3, The Fifth-Century Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1975). A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues, Earlier Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1978). A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 5, The Later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1936). ‘Plato’s theism’, Classical Quarterly 30: 4–9.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1969). ‘Plato’s “Noble Lie” and political brotherhood’, Classica et Mediaevalia 30: 211–27.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. (1992). ‘Plato and the erotics of narrativity’, in J. C. Klagge and N. D. Smith (eds.), Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, pp. 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, V. (2007). ‘Language in the Cave’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–215.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2013). ‘Plato’s politics of ignorance’, in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–54.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. (1940). ‘The Pythagoreans and Greek mathematics’, American Journal of Philology 61: 1–33.Google Scholar
Herzog-Hanser, G. (1936). ‘Νευρόσπαστα, neurospasta, Marionetten’, in Wissowa, G. and Kroll, W. (eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 17.1. Stuttgart: J B Mettlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, cols. 161–3.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (2000). Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinchcliff, P. (1987). Benjamin Jowett and the Christian Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, S. (2005). ‘The imaginary Spartan politeia’, in Hansen, M. H. (ed.), The Imaginary Polis. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 222–81.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. (2013). Plato and Pythagoreanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2003). The Greek World 479–323 bc, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S., and Spawforth, A. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (1993). Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2005). Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2016). ‘Archytas’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/archytas/.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (2018). ‘Sparta in Plato and Xenophon’, in Danzig, G., Johnson, D., and Morrison, D. (eds.), Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies. Leiden: Brill, pp. 547–75.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1979). Plato Gorgias: Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1999). ‘The theory of Forms’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1982). Frammenti: Senocrate, Ermippo. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. (1882). ‘Plato’s later theory of Ideas, ii: the Parmenides’, Journal of Philology 11: 287–331.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. (1980). The Victorians and Ancient Greece. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (1959). ‘Isocrates’ methods of teaching’, American Journal of Philology 80: 25–36.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (1998). ‘Dramatic form and philosophic idea’, American Journal of Philology 119: 577–98.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1999). Hippocrates. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jouët-Pastré, E. (2006). Le jeu et le serieux dans les Lois de Platon. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. (1871). The Dialogues of Plato, 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. (1875).The Dialogues of Plato, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Jowett, B. (1892).The Dialogues of Plato, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Jowett, B. (1899). Sermons: Biographical and Miscellaneous, ed. Fremantle, W. H.. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. (1987). Dear Miss Nightingale. A Selection of Benjamin Jowett’s Letters to Florence Nightingale, ed. Quinn, V. and Prest, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, D. (2003). The Peloponnesian War: Athens and Sparta in Savage Conflict, 431–404 bc. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1963). ‘Plato’s funeral oration: the motive of the Menexenus’, Classical Philology 58: 220–34.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1983). ‘Drama and dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 75–121.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1988a). ‘Plato and Socrates in the Protagoras’, Methexis 1: 33–52.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1988b). ‘On the relative date of the Gorgias and the Protagoras’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 69–102.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1995). ‘The place of the Statesman in Plato’s later work’, in Rowe, C. J. (ed.), Reading the Statesman. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2001). Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (2005). ‘The profession of friendship: Callicles, democratic politics, and rhetorical education in Plato’s Gorgias’, Ancient Philosophy 25: 319–39.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1963). The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981). The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, S. E. (2019). Play and Aesthetics in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1951). ‘The problem of Cratylus’, American Journal of Philology 72: 225–53.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1954). Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. A. (1989). Augustine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1981). ‘On the early history of axiomatics: The interaction of mathematics and philosophy in Greek antiquity’, in Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., and Agazzi, A. (eds.), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics and Galileo’s Methodology. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 145–86.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1986). The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1999). ‘Ancient Greek board games and how to play them’, Classical Philology 94: 247–67.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2013). ‘Imagining chorality: Wonder, Plato’s puppets, and moving statues’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–70.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1990). ‘Legislation and demiurgy: On the relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws’, Classical Antiquity 9: 209–29.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1991). ‘L’utopie legislative de Platon’, Revue Philosophique 4: 417–28.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2000). ‘The Laws’, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–92.Google Scholar
Lane, M. (1995). ‘A new angle on utopia: The political theory of the Politicus’, in Rowe, C. J. (ed.), Reading the Statesman. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 276–91.Google Scholar
Lane, M. (1998). Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, M. (2013). ‘Platonizing the Spartan politeia in Plutarch’s Lycurgus’, in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Lee, E. N. (1966). ‘On the metaphysics of the image in Plato’s Timaeus’, The Monist 50: 341–68.Google Scholar
Lee, E. N. (1973). ‘The second “Third Man”: an interpretation’, in Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.), Patterns in Plato’s Thought. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
Livingstone, N. (2001). A Commentary on Isocrates’ Busiris. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979). Magic, Reason and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990). Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (ed.) (1978). Hippocratic Writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1993). The Children of Athena: Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division between the Sexes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2006). The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. (1986). ‘Putting the Cratylus in its place’, Classical Quarterly 36: 124–50.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2000). Plato and His Predecessors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2015). Platonic Conversations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1995). Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. (2012). ‘Pleasure, pain and “anticipation” in Laws, Book I’, in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V., and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, pp. 311–28.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. (2015). Plato: Laws 1 & 2: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1969). Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society: Collected Works, vol. 10, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1978). Essays on Philosophy and the Classics: Collected Works, vol. 11, ed. Robson, J. M., introd. Sparshott, F. E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1981). Autobiography and Literary Essays: Collected Works, vol. 1, ed. Robson, J. M. and Stillinger, J.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D., and Too, Y. L. (trans.) (2000), Isocrates I. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1994). ‘George Grote and the study of Greek history’, in his Studies on Modern Scholarship, ed. Bowersock, G. W. and Cornell., T. J. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
Monro, D. B. (1871). ‘Jowett’s Plato’, Quarterly Review 131: 492–522.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. (1960). Plato’s Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. and Dillon, J. M. (trans.) (1987). Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (2002). The People of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1993). ‘Writing/reading a sacred text: A literary interpretation of Plato’s Laws’, Classical Philology 88: 269–300.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1999). ‘Plato’s lawcode in context: Rule by written law in Athens and Magnesia’, Classical Quarterly 49: 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2004). Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norlin, G. (ed.) (1928 and 1929). Isocrates, vols. 1 and 2. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1976). ‘The text of Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 80: 111–59.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J. (1967). The Socratic Paradoxes and the Greek Mind. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1989) Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1998). Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. and Lynch, J. P. (1994). ‘The growth of schools and the advance of knowledge’, in Lewis, D. M., Boardman, J., Hornblower, S., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 6, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1953). ‘The place of the Timaeus in Plato’s dialogues’, Classical Quarterly 3: 79–95.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1960). ‘Eleatic questions’, Classical Quarterly 10: 84–102.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1986). ‘Notes on Ryle’s Plato’, in Owen, G. E. L. (ed.), Logic, Science and Dialectic. London: Duckworth, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
Page, C. (1991). ‘The truth about lies in Plato’s Republic’, Ancient Philosophy 11: 1–33.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. (1999). Plato’s Reception of Parmenides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L. (trans.) (2005). Isocrates II. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Perlman, P. (1992). ‘One hundred-citied Crete and the “Cretan πολιτεία”’, Classical Philology 87: 193–205.Google Scholar
Perlman, P. (2004). ‘Crete’, in Hansen, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H. (eds.), An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1144–95.Google Scholar
Perlman, P. (2005). ‘Imagining Crete’, in Hansen, M. H. (ed.), The Imaginary Polis. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 282–334.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. (ed. and trans.) (1914). Plutarch’s Lives, vol. 1. London: W. Heinemann and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 1: The Spell of Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. (2014). Performing Citizenship in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, S. (1999). Religions of the Ancient Greeks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, W. J. (1985). Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. (2003). The Locrian Maidens: Love and Death in Greek Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. (2006). A History of the Classical Greek World 478–323 bc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, M. (1956). ‘T.H. Green and his audience: Liberalism as a surrogate faith’, The Review of Politics 18: 444–72.Google Scholar
Riginos, A. (1976). Platonica: The Anecdotes Concerning the Life and Writings of Plato. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1987). ‘Plato on the causes of wrongdoing in the Laws’, Ancient Philosophy 7: 23–37.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1951). Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (ed. and trans.) (1995). Plato: Statesman. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (2007). ‘Plato and the Persian Wars’, in Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. (2016). ‘Why the philosopher kings will believe the Noble Lie’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50: 80–110.Google Scholar
Samaras, T. (2002). Plato on Democracy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sansone, D. (ed.) (2020). Plato: Menexenus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (1968). ‘The Socratic paradox in Plato’s Laws’, Hermes 96: 421–34.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (trans.) (1970). Plato: The Laws. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (1973). ‘Penology and eschatology in Plato’s Timaeus and Laws’, Classical Quarterly 23: 232–44.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (1986). ‘“The RAND Corporation in antiquity?” Plato’s Academy and Greek politics’, in Betts, J. H., Hooker, J. T., and Green, J. R. (eds.), Studies in Honour of T. B. L. Webster: Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, vol. 1, pp. 200–10.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (1991). Plato’s Penal Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (trans. and comm.) (1995). Aristotle: Books 1 and 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. (2005). Hippocrates On Ancient Medicine. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (1984). ‘Zum Strafrechtsexkurs in Platons Nomoi’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 127: 97–132.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (1994). Platon: Nomoi (Gesetze). Übersetzung und Kommentar, vol. 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (2003). Platon: Nomoi (Gesetze). Übersetzung und Kommentar, vol. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (2011). Platon: Nomoi (Gesetze). Übersetzung und Kommentar, vol. 3. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1971). ‘Who were oἱ Δυσχερεῖς in Plato, Philebus 44Aff?’, Museum Helveticum 28: 2–20, 181.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1973). ‘Eudoxus in the Parmenides’, Museum Helveticum 30: 1–19.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1998). ‘Antisthenes’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, vol. 1, pp. 314–17.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999a). The Stoic Idea of the City, rev. ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999b). ‘The disappearing philosopher-king’, in his Saving the City. London: Routledge, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2000). ‘Plato and practical politics’, in Rowe, C. J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–302.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2006). Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2009). ‘Fraternité, inégalité, la parole de Dieu: Plato’s authoritarian myth of political legitimation’, in Partenie, C. (ed.), Plato’s Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–15.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013a). ‘Friendship and justice in the Laws’, in Boys-Stones, G., El Murr, D., and Gill, C. (eds.), The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–97.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013b). Review of F. Ademollo, The Cratylus of Plato, Gnomon 85: 489–95.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2018). ‘Aristotle’s critique of Spartan imperialism’, in Cartledge, P. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Greek Superpower: Sparta in the Self-Definition of Athenians. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, pp. 215–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2019). ‘Plato in his time and place’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–67.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2021). ‘Plato, Xenophon, and the laws of Lycurgus’, Polis 38: 450–72.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.), and Griffith, T. (trans.) (2010). Plato: Gorgias, Menexenus, Protagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.), and Griffith, T. (trans.) (2016). Plato: Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, H. O. (1983). ‘Marionetten’, Rheinisches Museum 126: 1–24.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2015). Levels of Argument. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998). ‘Parmenides’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, vol. 7, pp. 229–35.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003). Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2004). The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007). ‘Philosophy, the Forms, and the art of ruling’, in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2009). ‘Myth, punishment, and politics in the Gorgias’, in Partenie, C. (ed.), Plato’s Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. (2021). ‘Moral motivation in Plato’s Republic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59: 79–131.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2014). ‘Plato’s divided soul’, in Corcilius, K. and Perler, D. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1903). The Unity of Plato’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1914). ‘Plato’s Laws and the unity of Plato’s thought’, Classical Philology 9: 345–69.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (ed. and trans.) (1930 and 1935). Plato: The Republic, 2 vols. London: W. Heinemann and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1938). Platonism Ancient and Modern. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Singpurwalla, R. (2011). ‘Soul division and mimesis in Republic X’, in Destree, P. and Herrmann, F.-G. (eds.), Plato and the Poets. Leiden: Brill, pp. 283–98.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (1997). ‘How the prisoners in Plato’s Cave are “like us”’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 187–204.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2004). ‘A L Peck’, in Todd, R. B. (ed.), The Dictionary of British Classicists. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum, pp. 756–7.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. K. (1984). ‘Plato and children’s games’, in Gerber, D. E. (ed.), Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, pp. 275–84.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. (1983). An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stopper, M. R. (1981). ‘Greek philosophy and the Victorians’, Phronesis 26: 267–85. [This article is attributed to J. Barnes in the catalogue of his publications in B. Morison and K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in honour of Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.]Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1975). The Argument and the Action of Plato’s Laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1981). Speusippus of Athens. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2013). ‘Narrative and dramatic presentation in Republic III: Theory and practice’, in Notomi, N. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Dialogues on Plato’s Politeia (Republic). Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 309–13.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (2019). ‘Plato’s epistemology’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 429–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. and Lee, Mi-Kyoung (2016). ‘The Sophists’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/sophists/.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (1995). ‘Written in stone? Liberty, equality, orality and the codification of law’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40: 59–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. H. (1868). The Phaedrus of Plato. London: Whittaker and London: George Bell.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (1995). The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, Power, Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, R. G. (1989). ‘The third man argument and the text of the Parmenides’, in Anton, J. and Preus, G. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. 3. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 203–26.Google Scholar
Turner, F. M. (1981). The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vaio, J. (1996). ‘George Grote and James Mill: How to write history’, in Calder, W. M. III and Trzaskoma, S. (eds.), George Grote Reconsidered. Hildesheim: Weidmann, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar
van Harten, A. (2003). ‘Creating happiness: The moral of the myth of Kronos in Plato’s Laws (Laws 4, 713b–714a)’, in Scolnicov, S. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Plato’s Laws: From Theory to Practice. Sankt Augustin: Academis Verlag, pp. 128–38.Google Scholar
van Hook, L. (1945). Isocrates, vol. 3. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1954). ‘The third man argument in the Parmenides’, Philosophical Review 63: 319–49.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1969). ‘Plato’s “Third Man” argument (Parm. 132A1–B2): text and logic’, Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289–301.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1973). ‘Socratic knowledge and Platonic “pessimism”’, in his Platonic Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 204–17.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996). The Birth of Rhetoric. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (2013). ‘The Platonic manufacture of ideology, or how to assemble awkward truth and wholesome falsehood’, in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–38.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2004). ‘Prisoners and puppeteers in the cave’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 117–39.Google Scholar
Wilburn, J. (2012). ‘Akrasia and self-rule in Plato’s Laws’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 25–53.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1982). ‘Cratylus’ theory of names and its refutation’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–93.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. S. (1976). ‘The contents of the cave’, in Shiner, R. A. and King-Farlow, J. (eds.), New Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics. Guelph, ON: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, pp. 117–27.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2002). Love among the Ruins: The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2000). ‘Callicles and Socrates: psychic (dis)harmony in the Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 1–40.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D. (2022). Ritual: How Seemingly Senseless Acts Make Life Worth Living. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. (ed.) (1997). Encyclopedia of Ancient Philosophy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1971). Persephone. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: How Plato Writes
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108672603.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: How Plato Writes
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108672603.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: How Plato Writes
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108672603.017
Available formats
×