Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T11:31:54.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Thriving World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Salvatore Di Martino  and
Michael P. Scarpa
Edited by
Isaac Prilleltensky ,
Salvatore Di Martino ,
Michael Scarpa  and
Ottar Ness
Isaac Prilleltensky
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Salvatore Di Martino
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Michael Scarpa
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Ottar Ness
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Get access

Summary

Humankind has entered the Anthropecene era. The world faces numerous threats to the survival of humanity and other species. While diverse disciplines have risen to meet global challenges, psychology has largely focused on individual aspects such as cognition, emotion, and behavior. This chapter aims to support psychology in adapting to global challenges by introducing a novel tool, the panological model. This model comprehensively accounts for the complex relationships between multiple levels of analysis. The first part of the chapter introduces the core characteristics and innovations of the panological model, which seeks to expand upon Uri Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological model. These advancements include: a paradigm shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism, a new systemic vision, and a redefiniton of the role of time. The second part of the chapter combines the model with the principles of global fairness, wellness, and worthiness. This integration shows how psychology can gain a deeper understanding of macro-level phenomena, enabling it to address pressing global challenges like international conflicts, pandemics, and environmental sustainability.

Keywords

planetary thrivingcommon goodglobal psychologyanthropocentrismecocentrismpanological model
Type
Chapter
Information
How People Thrive
Promoting the Synergy of Wellness, Fairness, and Worthiness
 , pp. 261 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akchurin, M. (2015). Constructing the rights of nature: Constitutional reform, mobilization, and environmental protection in Ecuador. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(4), 937–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antó, J. M., Martí, J. L., Casals, J., et al. (2021). The planetary wellbeing initiative: Pursuing the sustainable development goals in higher education. Sustainability, 13(6), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. E., & Bruch, C. E. (Eds.). (2000). The environmental consequences of war: Legal, economic, and scientific perspectives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. G., Wilson, N., & Anglemyer, A. (2020). Successful elimination of Covid-19 transmission in New Zealand. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(8), e56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barberia, L. G., & Gómez, E. J. (2020). Political and institutional perils of Brazil’s COVID-19 crisis. Lancet, 396(10248), 367–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2006). A health map for the local human habitat. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), 252–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, B. (2004). A theory of ecological justice. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, W. (1993). Personal identity, national identity and international relations. \No. 9). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boddice, R. (Ed.). (2011). Anthropocentrism: Humans, animals, environments. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, J. (2009). War and nature: The environmental consequences of war in a globalized world. Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 45, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). Reality and research in the ecology of human development. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,119, 439–469.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of development processes. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1027). Wiley.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). Wiley.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 103–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burge, T. (1986). Individualism and psychology. The Philosophical Review, 95(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: A new vision of reality. Futurist, 16(6), 19–24.Google Scholar
Cave, S. (1998). Applying psychology to the environment. Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Chan, K. M., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., et al. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462–1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, J. (2010). A profession in change: A development ecology perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Malmö University, Faculty of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. N. E. (2001). Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2010). The ABCs of human survival: A paradigm for global citizenship. University of British Columbia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cueva, F. C., & Vergara, F. (2008). Asamblea constituyente. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Decreto Legislativo s/n Registro Oficial. Const-Enmienda-2015.pdf (asambleanacional.gob.ec).Google Scholar
Dekker, H. (2017). The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Di Fabio, A., & Tsuda, A. (2018). The psychology of harmony and harmonization: Advancing the perspectives for the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(12), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, B. D. (2015). Beyond sustainability–biophilic and regenerative design in architecture. European Scientific Journal, 11(9), 147–158.Google Scholar
Dobson, A., & Bell, D. (Eds.). (2005). Environmental citizenship. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowdle, W. R. (1998). The principles of disease elimination and eradication. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 76(Suppl 2), 22–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Earth Charter (2000). The Earth Charter. https://earthcharter.org/read-the-earth-charter/.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. R. (2010). Thriving beyond sustainability: Pathways to a resilient society. New Society.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2008). Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, M., Ghazinour, M., & Hammarström, A. (2018). Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: What is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?. Social Theory & Health, 16, 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feygina, I. (2013). Social justice and the human–environment relationship: Common systemic, ideological, and psychological roots and processes. Social Justice Research, 26, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D., & Wilder-Smith, A. (2020). The global community needs to swiftly ramp up the response to contain COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10230), 1109–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flett, G. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2020). Aging and feeling valued versus expendable during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A review and commentary of why mattering is fundamental to the health and well-being of older adults. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 2443–2469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., & Navarro, O. (2017). Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, R. (2010). The great reset: How new ways of living and working drive post-crash prosperity. Random House.Google Scholar
Fortuna, P., Wróblewski, Z., & Gorbaniuk, O. (2021). The structure and correlates of anthropocentrism as a psychological construct. Current Psychology, 42, 3630–3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francescato, D. (2020). Why we need to build a planetary sense of community. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 6(2/2), 140–164.Google Scholar
Glotzbach, S., & Baumgartner, S. (2012). The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice. Environmental Values, 21(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, S. D., McLeroy, K. R., Green, L. W., Earp, J. A. L., & Lieberman, L. D. (2015). Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1_suppl), 8S–14S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grenville-Cleave, B., Guðmundsdóttir, D., Huppert, F., et al. (2021). Creating the world we want to live in: How positive psychology can build a brighter future. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press.Google Scholar
Hage, R., & Rauckienė-Michaelsson, A. (2004). Ecocentric worldview paradigm: The reconstruction of consciousness. Journal of Baltic Science Education, (2), 60–68.Google Scholar
Hancock, T., IUHPE’s Global Working Group on Waiora Planetary Health. (2021). Towards healthy One Planet cities and communities: planetary health promotion at the local level. Health Promotion International, 36(Supplement_1), i53–i63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harré, N. (2018). Psychology for a better world: Working with people to save the planet. Revised and updated edition. Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Hirvilammi, T., & Helne, T. (2014). Changing paradigms: A sketch for sustainable wellbeing and ecosocial policy. Sustainability, 6(4), 2160–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huynh, L. T. M., Gasparatos, A., Su, J., et al. (2022). Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services. Science Advances, 8(31), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inkeles, A. (2017). National character: A psycho-social perspective. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelashvili, M., & Romano, J. L. (Eds.). (2016). The Cambridge handbook of international prevention science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman-Walsh, J. (2019). Foundations of zero-waste lead to sustainable tourism success: The case of Kamikatsu. Journal of Yasuda Women’s University, 47, 249–260.Google Scholar
Jason, L. (2013). Principles of social change. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. (2006). Becoming ecological: An expedition into community psychology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. G. (1968). Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In Carter, J. W. Jr. (Ed.), Research contributions from psychology to community mental health (pp. 76–100). Behavioral.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. (2010). Citizen of the world: The cosmopolitan ideal for the twenty-first century. Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Khudaykulova, M., Yuanqiong, H., & Khudaykulov, A. (2022). Economic consequences and implications of the Ukraine-Russia war. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 8(4), 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuriansky, J., LeMay, M., & Kumar, A. (2015). Paradigm shifts in nature and well-being: Principles, programs, and policies about the environment and climate change with actions by the United Nations for a sustainable future. In Nemeth, D. G., Hamilton, R. B., & Kuriansky, J. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Advances from the intersection of psychology and environmental protection: Science and theory; Intervention and policy (pp. 307–358). Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Langhelle, O. (2000). Sustainable development and social justice: Expanding the Rawlsian framework of global justice. Environmental Values, 9(3), 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiner, B. (2009). The legacy of war: An intergenerational perspective. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 79(3–4), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J., Westra, L., & Goodland, R. (1997). Ecological sustainability and integrity: Concepts and approaches. Springer.Google Scholar
Liu, J. (2017). Integration across a metacoupled world. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 639–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., Viña, A., Yang, W., et al. (2018). China’s environment on a metacoupled planet. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, J. E., & Margulis, L. (1974). Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1–2), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malta, M., Murray, L., da Silva, C. M. F. P., & Strathdee, S. A. (2020). Coronavirus in Brazil: The heavy weight of inequality and unsound leadership. EClinicalMedicine, 25, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbah, R. E., & Wasum, D. F. (2022). Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A review of the economic impact of Russian-Ukraine crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(3), 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurry, J. (2020, March 20). “No-waste” Japanese village is a peek into carbon-neutral future. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/20/no-waste-japanese-village-is-a-peek-into-carbon-neutral-future.Google Scholar
Mohajan, H. (2019). The first industrial revolution: Creation of a new global human era. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 377–387.Google Scholar
Moisi, D. (2009). The geopolitics of emotion: How cultures of fear, humiliation and hope are reshaping the world. The Boldley Head.Google Scholar
Moran, E. F. (2010). Environmental social science: Human-environment interactions and sustainability. John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskell, C., & Allred, S. B. (2013). Integrating human and natural systems in community psychology: An ecological model of stewardship behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2002). The economic consequences of a war in Iraq. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9361. www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w9361/w9361.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, M. (2015). Humanistic psychology’s transformative role in a threatened world. In Schneider, K., Pierson, J.F., & Bugental, J.F.T. (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research and practice (pp 569–585). Sage.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunovic, I., & Barcelo, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Environment, 837, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prilleltensky, I. (2005). Promoting well-being: Time for a paradigm shift in health and human services. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33(66_suppl), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prilleltensky, I., Di Martino, S., & Ness, O. (2022). Psychology for the common good: The interdependence of citizenship, justice, and well-being across the globe. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prilleltensky, I., Scarpa, M. P., Ness, O., & Di Martino, S. (2023). Mattering, wellness, and fairness: Psychosocial goods for the common good. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 93(3), 1989–1210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinowitz, P. M., Pappaioanou, M., Bardosh, K. L., & Conti, L. (2018). A planetary vision for one health. BMJ Global Health, 3(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinowitz, P., Scotch, M., & Conti, L. (2009). Human and animal sentinels for shared health risks. Veterinaria Italiana, 45(1), 23–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redvers, N. (2021). The determinants of planetary health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(3), 156–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeb, R. N., Snow-Hill, N. L., Folger, S. F., et al. (2017). Psycho-ecological systems model: A systems approach to planning and gauging the community impact of community-engaged scholarship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 24(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2018). The psychology of global citizenship: A review of theory and research. Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2012). On global justice. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. Open Book.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangalang, C. C., & Vang, C. (2017). Intergenerational trauma in refugee families: A systematic review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 19, 745–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, C. D. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 137–149.Google Scholar
Scarpa, M. P., & Trickett, E. J. (2022). Translating ecology: Similarities and differences in the ecological images of Bronfenbrenner and Kelly. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 8(2), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, N. (1983). Individualism and the objects of psychology. In Harding, S. & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 225–244). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmuck, P., & Schultz, W. P. (2012). Psychology of sustainable development. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Schneeweiß, N., & Gropengießer, H. (2019). Organising levels of organisation for biology education: A systematic review of literature. Education Sciences, 9(3), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, V., & Mies, M. (2014). Ecofeminism. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55(5), 523–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M. J., & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.). (2007). Toward a global psychology: Theory, research, intervention, and pedagogy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist, 47(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sze, J., & London, J. K. (2008). Environmental justice at the crossroads. Sociology Compass, 2(4), 1331–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1993). The sociology of social change. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tebes, J. K., & Thai, N. D. (2018). Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tromboni, F., Liu, J., Ziaco, E., et al. (2021). Macrosystems as metacoupled human and natural systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschakert, P., Barnett, J., Ellis, N., et al. (2017). Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: Values, places, and experiences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5), 1–19.Google Scholar
Turner, B., Clark, W. C., Kates, R. W., et al. (1990). The Earth as transformed by human action: Global change and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Der Leeuw, S., Costanza, R., Aulenbach, S., et al. (2011). Toward an integrated history to guide the future. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venter, H., & Venter, E. (2010). Globalization and the psychology of the new world citizen: How the new global citizen compares to Maslow’s level of self transcendence. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(7), 29–35.Google Scholar
Ventura, D. D. F. L., Giulio, G. M. D., & Rached, D. H. (2020). Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic: Sustainability is an indispensable condition of global health security. Ambiente & Sociedade, 23, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, W. (2022). Thriving: The breakthrough movement to regenerate nature, society, and the economy. Fast Company Press.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (Ed.). (2020). The social psychology of collective victimhood. University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhees, C. (2009). Measuring ecological validity: A theory-based assessment of ecological validity in community psychology research. Unpublished master’s thesis, Graduate School of Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Washington, H., Piccolo, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Kopnina, H., & Alberro, H. (2021). The trouble with anthropocentric hubris, with examples from conservation. Conservation, 1(4), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. (2013). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., et al. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1973–2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. The Geneva Charter for Well-being: 2021. World Health Organization. www.who.int/publications/m/item/the-genevacharter-for-well-being.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1933). Concerning the anthropocentrism of psychology. Psychological Review, 40(2), 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Smith, A., et al. (2008). Are we now living in the Anthropocene?. GSA Today, 18(2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×