Gender Inequality: A Key Global Challenge – Reducing Losses due to Gender Inequality

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139225793.008

Chapter 6 - Gender Inequality: A Key Global Challenge – Reducing Losses due to Gender Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Joyce P. Jacobsen

Edited by

Bjørn Lomborg

Show author details

Joyce P. Jacobsen: Affiliation:
Wesleyan University
Bjørn Lomborg: Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction to the Challenge

Gender inequality pervades the world. In considering the dimensions of economic gender inequality, women still make less than men in the formal work sector, are more likely to live in poverty, are less likely to participate in the formal work sector, and do a larger share of work in the household sector. The dimensions of political gender inequality include women’s lower representation in elected office and lower representation in political and corporate appointments. Social gender inequality has numerous dimensions, some of which are less favorable to men while others are less favorable to women: men are more prone to violence, imprisonment, and disability, while women are more likely to be the victims of domestic violence and sexual assault; in some countries men have lower educational attainment than women, while the pattern is reversed in other countries. Demographic gender inequality includes the fact that men live shorter lives on average than do women (65 years for men, 69 years for women) (CIA 2010), but there is also concern that many women are never given the chance to be born, and in the younger generations men now outnumber women, by large numbers in China and India in particular (with gender ratios respectively of 113 men and 117 men per 100 women in the under-15 age range) (CIA 2010).

While many of the costs of gender inequality are ultimately borne by particular individuals, they can also be calculated at a society or even worldwide level. If individuals of different genders are not given equal opportunity to develop their potential, then societies forgo the increased level of output and ultimately well-being that would derive from their higher productivity. If societies do not invest equally in educating and training men and women, do not give them equal opportunities to engage in more productive forms of work, and do not give them equal opportunities to advance to more productive positions over time, then the societies do not harness the full potential of their members.

Type: Chapter
Information: How Much Have Global Problems Cost the World?
A Scorecard from 1900 to 2050
, pp. 192 - 206

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225793.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anker, R. (1987) Preface. In: Goldschmidt-Clermont, L., Economic Evaluations of Unpaid Household Work: Africa, Asia, Latin America and Oceania. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar

Azmat, G., Manning, A., and Van Reenen, J. (2007) Privatization, Entry Regulation and the Decline of Labor’s Share of GDP. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Caijing.Com.Cn (2010) China’s labor share of GDP declined for 22 consecutive years. Available at: .

Central Intelligence Agency (2010) World Factbook. Washington, DC: CIA.Google Scholar

Costa, D. (2000) From mill town to board room: the rise of women’s paid labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 101–122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Economic Report of the President (2011) Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

Food and Agricultural Organization (2010) Gender Dimensions of Agricultural and Rural Employment: Differentiated Pathways out ofPoverty. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar

Goldin, C. (1990) Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1987) Economic Evaluations of Unpaid Household Work: Africa, Asia, Latin America and Oceania. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar

Hausmann, R., Tyson, L., and Zahidi, S. (2010) The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar

International Labor Organization (2009) Global Employment Trends for Women. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. (2007) The Economics of Gender, 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. and Zeller, A. (2007) Queer Economics: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

King, E, Klasen, S., and Porter, M. (2009) Women and development. In: Lomborg, B. (ed.), Global Crises, Global Solutions: Costs and Benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klasen, S. and Lamanna, F. (2009) The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics 15: 91–132.CrossRef Google Scholar

Landefeld, J., Fraumeni, B., and Vojtech, C. (2009) Accounting for household production: a prototype satellite account using the American Time Use Survey. Review of Income and Wealth 55: 205–225.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Laughlin, B. (2007) A bigger piece of a very small pie: intrahousehold resource allocation and poverty reduction in Africa. Development and Change 38: 21–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

National Center for Education Statistics (1991) Digest of Education Statistics. Alexandria, VA: NCES.Google Scholar

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2003) Costs of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in the United States. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar

Pakko, M. (2004) Labor’s Share. St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.Google Scholar

Peterman, A., Behrman, J., and Quisumbing, A. (2010) A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper No. 00975. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. (1998) A History of European Women’s Work: 1700 to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., and Azfar, O. (2001) Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics 64: 25–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tzannatos, Z. (2010) Decreasing the gender gap in employment and pay in the Arab world: measuring the gains for women, youth, and society. Paper presented at the International Conference on Women and Youth in Arab Development, Cairo, March 22–24, 2010.

Udry, C. (1996) Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104: 1010–1046.CrossRef Google Scholar

US Bureau of the Census (1976) Historical Statistics of the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Wagman, B. and Folbre, N. (1996) Household services and economic growth in the United States, 1870–1930. Feminist Economics 2: 43–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiss, T. (1986) Revised estimates of the United States Workforce, 1800–1860, In: Engerman, S. L. and Gallman, R. E. (eds.), Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

World Bank (2010) World Development Indicators. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copenhagen Consensus Center based on United Nation, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2009) World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision

Maddison, A. (2008) Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 1–2008 AD, available at