Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Houses of God
- 2 Civic Hospitals in the City and Archdiocese of Mainz
- 3 Mainz’s Hospital Sisters and the Rights of Religious Women
- 4 Leprosaria and the Leprous: Legal Status and Social Ties
- 5 “For all miserable persons”: Small and Extra-Urban Hospitals
- 6 Hospitals and their Networks: Recreating Relationships
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Houses of God
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Houses of God
- 2 Civic Hospitals in the City and Archdiocese of Mainz
- 3 Mainz’s Hospital Sisters and the Rights of Religious Women
- 4 Leprosaria and the Leprous: Legal Status and Social Ties
- 5 “For all miserable persons”: Small and Extra-Urban Hospitals
- 6 Hospitals and their Networks: Recreating Relationships
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Abstract This chapter, focusing on the archdiocese of Mainz, examines how hospitals were affected by the development of canon law. Legal religious status became increasingly important for hospital communities over the course of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, but the methods for obtaining this status were only gradually defined. Though hospitals’ entitlement to the privileges of religious status could be tendentious, hospitals were not separated, legally or in the eyes of ecclesiastical authorities, from other kinds of religious institutions. Surviving documents indicate that the sick-poor and the staff who served them could be agents of legal processes. At ecumenical and provincial councils, the privileges of hospitals were repeatedly defined in terms of the service of the sick-poor.
Keywords: canon law, medieval hospitals, papal decretals, ecclesiastical councils
In 1343, Archbishop Heinrich of Mainz sent a letter in response to a request from the sizable Cistercian house of Eberbach. The suggestion that the monks would be freer to devote themselves to spiritual service at the feet of the Virgin if they were liberated from anxieties concerning temporal matters may have been taken from their petition, which no longer survives. The archbishop granted Eberbach rights over the revenues of two parish churches, specifically so that the brothers might expand the services of their hospital and encourage works of charity in the diocese. In doing so, he echoed the language of the late twelfth-century papal decretal “Inter opera caritatis,” and used formulae common to hospital documents. “Inter opera caritatis” is quoted and alluded to in documents created by and for hospitals and other religious houses throughout Europe. Within the archdiocese of Mainz, the civic hospital of Speyer, the hospital managed by the monks of Eberbach, and the hospital sisters of St. Agnes in Mainz all preserve records which draw on this influential text. All hospitals were, like the one under the oversight of Eberbach, sites for the performance of the biblical works of mercy, providing shelter and food, clothing and care, to the most vulnerable of society, the poor of Christ. Many hospitals, moreover, were independent houses. These, while not affiliated with any order, were acknowledged as religious institutions, and integrated in the canon law and religious networks of medieval Europe. From the late twelfth century onwards, works of charity were not only a cultural and spiritual imperative, but were increasingly given legal definition.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hospitals in Communities of the Late Medieval Rhineland , pp. 35 - 62Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2023