Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Principal events in the life of L. T. Hobhouse
- Further reading
- Biographical notes
- Liberalism
- Chapter I Before Liberalism
- Chapter II The Elements of Liberalism
- Chapter III The Movement of Theory
- Chapter IV ‘Laissez-faire’
- Chapter V Gladstone and Mill
- Chapter VI The Heart of Liberalism
- Chapter VII The State and the Individual
- Chapter VIII Economic Liberalism
- Chapter IX The Future of Liberalism
- Other Writings
- Index
- Title in the series
Chapter II - The Elements of Liberalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Principal events in the life of L. T. Hobhouse
- Further reading
- Biographical notes
- Liberalism
- Chapter I Before Liberalism
- Chapter II The Elements of Liberalism
- Chapter III The Movement of Theory
- Chapter IV ‘Laissez-faire’
- Chapter V Gladstone and Mill
- Chapter VI The Heart of Liberalism
- Chapter VII The State and the Individual
- Chapter VIII Economic Liberalism
- Chapter IX The Future of Liberalism
- Other Writings
- Index
- Title in the series
Summary
I cannot here attempt so much as a sketch of the historical progress of the Liberalizing movement. I would call attention only to the main points at which it assailed the old order, and to the fundamental ideas directing its advance.
Civil Liberty
Both logically and historically the first point of attack is arbitrary government, and the first liberty to be secured is the right to be dealt with in accordance with law. A man who has no legal rights against another, but stands entirely at his disposal, to be treated according to his caprice, is a slave to that other. He is ‘rightless’, devoid of rights. Now, in some barbaric monarchies the system of rightlessness has at times been consistently carried through in the relations of subjects to the king. Here men and women, though enjoying customary rights of person and property as against one another, have no rights at all as against the king's pleasure. No European monarch or seignior has ever admittedly enjoyed power of this kind, but European governments have at various times and in various directions exercised or claimed powers no less arbitrary in principle. Thus, by the side of the regular courts of law which prescribe specific penalties for defined offences proved against a man by a regular form of trial, arbitrary governments resort to various extrajudicial forms of arrest, detention, and punishment, depending on their own will and pleasure.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings , pp. 10 - 23Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 1
- Cited by