Book contents
- A History of the Harlem Renaissance
- A History of the Harlem Renaissance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Revising a Renaissance
- Part I Re-reading the New Negro
- Part II Experimenting with the New Negro
- Chapter 6 Gwendolyn Brooks: Riot after the New Negro Renaissance
- Chapter 7 Romans à Clef of the Harlem Renaissance
- Chapter 8 Modernist Biography and the Question of Manhood: Eslanda Goode Robeson’s Paul Robeson, Negro
- Chapter 9 Modernism and Women Poets of the Harlem Renaissance
- Chapter 10 Children’s Literature of the Harlem Renaissance
- Part III Re-mapping the New Negro
- Part IV Performing the New Negro
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 7 - Romans à Clef of the Harlem Renaissance
from Part II - Experimenting with the New Negro
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2021
- A History of the Harlem Renaissance
- A History of the Harlem Renaissance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Revising a Renaissance
- Part I Re-reading the New Negro
- Part II Experimenting with the New Negro
- Chapter 6 Gwendolyn Brooks: Riot after the New Negro Renaissance
- Chapter 7 Romans à Clef of the Harlem Renaissance
- Chapter 8 Modernist Biography and the Question of Manhood: Eslanda Goode Robeson’s Paul Robeson, Negro
- Chapter 9 Modernism and Women Poets of the Harlem Renaissance
- Chapter 10 Children’s Literature of the Harlem Renaissance
- Part III Re-mapping the New Negro
- Part IV Performing the New Negro
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter focuses on romans à clef of the Harlem Renaissance. It argues that Wallace Thurman’s Infants of the Spring (1932) and Richard Bruce Nugent’s Gentleman Jigger (2008), read together, foreground the tensions between originality and derivativeness, individual “genius” and collaboration that were being negotiated more broadly in the modernist art of the period. On the one hand, both Infants of the Spring and Jigger are invested in models of artistry that valorize “individuality” and “genius” over “standardization” and derivativeness. On the other hand, the texts themselves – which explicitly address the question of plagiarism through differently inflected scenes describing the same event – suggest that a model of authorship or artistry that does not accommodate collaboration, borrowing, and even outright theft is gravely deficient.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of the Harlem Renaissance , pp. 125 - 143Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021