Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The early eighteenth century and the KJB
- 2 Mid-century
- 3 The critical rise of the KJB
- 4 Romantics and the Bible
- 5 Literary discussion to mid-Victorian times
- 6 The Revised Version
- 7 ‘The Bible as literature’
- 8 The later reputation of the KJB
- 9 Narrative and unity: modern preoccupations
- 10 This (spiritual) treasure in earthen/earthenware/clay vessels/pots/jars
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- General index
- Biblical index
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The early eighteenth century and the KJB
- 2 Mid-century
- 3 The critical rise of the KJB
- 4 Romantics and the Bible
- 5 Literary discussion to mid-Victorian times
- 6 The Revised Version
- 7 ‘The Bible as literature’
- 8 The later reputation of the KJB
- 9 Narrative and unity: modern preoccupations
- 10 This (spiritual) treasure in earthen/earthenware/clay vessels/pots/jars
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- General index
- Biblical index
Summary
Rules for the revision
By far the most important new English version of the Bible to appear in the 350 years between 1611 and 1961, when the New English Bible was published, was the Revised Version (NT 1881, OT 1885, Apocrypha 1895), yet its significance here lies not so much in its achievement as in the insight it gives into the business of translation, its effects on opinions of the KJB and, to a minor extent, its role in generating the multitude of twentieth-century versions. This is not to belittle its achievements or to gloss over its weaknesses, but to recognise that, even though a literary welcome was given to its work on some of the OT books, it has not become a significant work of English literature. In spite of—and even because of—the RV, the KJB's general reputation continued to grow, and it remained the paramount Bible for English writers: nowhere in English literature does the text of the RV become a significant factor.
As a revision, the RV has much in common with the KJB. Both were committee revisions undertaken at the behest of parliament. If the decision to make the RV was taken tardily as against the almost indecent haste of the decision to make the KJB, if political and sectarian motives had their role in generating the KJB while the RV was the result of scholarly agitation, nevertheless each revision proceeded with exemplary care and thoroughness.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of the Bible as Literature , pp. 218 - 261Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993